MIT bans class president who gave pro-Palestine speech from commencement
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology has barred the class of 2025 president from her graduation ceremony after taking the stage on Thursday to speak about the war in Gaza, her support for Palestine and condemnation of the institution in relation to it, according to the institution.
In reaction, on Friday, students chanted for her to walk as MIT Chancellor Melissa Nobles began her speech.
'Excuse me, I respect that you have a message to send but this is not the time or place,' Nobles said on Friday. 'Today is about our graduates and their families. Please respect them and allow me to continue.'
Class president Megha M. Vemuri's speech on Thursday was not the one provided to the institution in advance, according to an MIT spokesperson.
While the institution supports free expression, it stands by the decision to not allow the student at the Friday events because she 'deliberately and repeatedly' misled commencement organizers and led a 'protest from the stage, disrupting an important Institute ceremony.'
Read more: MIT announces plans to wind down DEI office, eliminate equity VP job
'You have faced the obstacle of fear before and you turned it into fuel to stand up for what is right,' Vemuri said during her Thursday speech.
" You showed the world that MIT wants a free Palestine," she said.
Vemuri was met with yells from the crowd, some students jumping out of their seats in support of her words and others shaking their heads seemingly not in support of her speech.
President Sally Kornbluth followed Vemuri's speech, stating that MIT values 'freedom of expression' but that today is 'about the graduates.'
'There is a time and a place to express yourselves and you will have many many years to do it. Let's talk today about our graduates,' she said.
Kornbluth's reaction was met with a round of applause.
Vemuri continued her speech by stating that the undergraduate and graduate union voted to cut ties with 'the genocidal Israeli military' last spring and for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza.
'You faced threats, intimidation, and suppression coming from all directions, especially your own university officials, but you prevailed because the MIT community that I know would never tolerate a genocide,' she said.
Last year, MIT was one of the campuses across the country that created a pro-Palestinian encampment. It later ended as the institution said it would suspend those students who didn't leave it and it was cleared out by police.
In her Thursday speech, Vemuri condemned MIT for what she described as its ties to Israel and said that as alumni they should continue asking MIT to cut ties.
'Right now, while we prepare to graduate and move forward with our lives, there are no universities left in Gaza. We are watching Israel try to wipe Palestine off the face of the earth. And it's a shame that MIT is a part of it. The Israeli occupation forces are the only foreign military that MIT has research ties with,' she said.
'This means that Israel's assault on the Palestinian people is not only aided and abed by our country, but our school,' she said.
Read more: Why the fight over foreign students at Harvard has some US students leaving, too
The controversy at commencement comes amid Kornbluths' announced plans to 'sunset' the university's Institute Community and Equity Office and remove its vice president for equity and inclusion position in a letter to the school community last week. The office's 'core programs' will continue but under the purview of other offices.
Why the fight over foreign students at Harvard has some US students leaving, too
Harvard affinity group graduations held off campus amid 'capitulation' to Trump
Harvard commencement speaker says it's fitting to 'hear from an immigrant like me'
Many foreign students already fleeing Harvard University due to Trump order
Protesters pack outside Harvard commencement as families focus on their graduates
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
State Department considers giving $500 million to the new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation
The State Department is discussing allocating $500 million for funding of the U.S. and Israel backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) that has been delivering food to Palestinians in Gaza in recent weeks, a U.S. official and a source with direct knowledge told Axios. Why it matters: If the U.S. goes ahead with this massive funding, it will become the biggest donor to the foundation and will de facto "own" the operation. While such a move will increase the U.S. credibility in asking other countries to donate money to the foundation, it would also draw the U.S. deeper into active involvement in the Gaza war and make it more responsible for the humanitarian situation in the enclave. Without funding from foreign governments, the GHF will have difficulty operating in the coming months. Israeli officials asses that the GHF needs around $100 million a month to continue delivering aid in Gaza. Driving the news: In recent weeks, the GHF launched a new mechanism aimed at delivering aid to Palestinian civilians without Hamas taking control of or getting credit for it. The GHF and Israeli officials say hundreds of thousands of Palestinians have already received food, medicine and other supplies at the aid sites. But over the last week, two mass casualty events took place near the aid centers. In one of the incidents, the IDF confirmed that it fired at Palestinians who were on their way to the aid distribution center. Zoom out: In several other incident, the distribution centers were overwhelmed by the number of people who came to receive aid. The shooting and the chaos led the GHF to suspend operations for 24 hours on Wednesday and ask the Israeli military to take steps to avoid similar incidents. The UN and other aid organizations who refuse to cooperate with the GHF have warned for weeks that exactly these kind of incidents would result from civilians needing to pass through IDF lines to reach the newly established aid centers. Behind the scenes: A U.S. official said that State Department officials who oppose the U.S. funding of the GHF are concerned about the U.S. becoming responsible for future mass casualty incidents around the aid distribution centers. Those who support the idea on the other hand claim that U.S. funding means more U.S. ability to improve the humanitarian situation on the ground. A U.S. official said the idea of funding the GHF has been discussed in working levels within the State Department and Secretary of State Marco Rubio and president Trump, who will have to make this decision, hasn't been briefed about it yet. "It will probably happen next week and until then we will see if the situation stabilizes and there are no more incidents and then we will decide," the U.S. official said. Reuters first reported the discussions in the State Department on possible U.S. funding for GHF. The State Department did not respond to requests for comment. Between the lines: The funding on the GHF has been kept under a veil of secrecy by its senior leaders and by the Israeli government. A senior Israeli official said the GHF secured $100 million to launch its operation. The money came from foreign governments and from private sector donors who all asked for anonymity, the Israeli official said. Israel's public broadcaster Kan reported earlier this week that the Israeli government has given more than $200 million to the GHF in a secret appropriation to the ministry of defense without revealing where the money will go to. The Israeli prime minister's office denied Israeli tax payer money was given to GHF. Udi Levy, the former head of the Mossad's economic intelligence unit, told Israel's channel 12 last week that Qatar and Turkey are funding GHF. The Qatari and Turkish governments denied that. But the Israeli military censor ordered channel 12 to delete the interview from its website.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Detained Columbia graduate describes ‘visceral' harm of missing son's birth
Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University graduate detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) over his campus activism, said he has suffered 'visceral' harm after missing the birth of his son while in federal custody. 'The most immediate and visceral harms I have experienced directly relate to the birth of my son, Deen. Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone,' Khalil, a green-card holder, wrote in court documents filed Thursday. 'I listened to her pain, trying to comfort her while 70 other men slept around me,' he added. The Trump administration said it plans to revoke Khalil's legal status and urged him to deport himself voluntarily, according to reports from The Associated Press. Khalil was denied permission to go to the birth of his first child last month. Secretary of State Marco Rubio initiated removal efforts for Khalil in March, citing a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act over the government's allegation that he participated in pro-Hamas rhetoric at campus protests amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas war. 'To not be able to see them, hold them, speak with them freely, enjoy everything I imagined our first days as a family would be like, is devastating. Worst still is knowing that they must face all the fear and notoriety of this case without me,' Khalil wrote in this week's court documents. 'The Rubio Determination is casting a shadow of suspicion across our entire family. I could never have imagined this would happen, and it is horrifying to experience this as a husband and father,' he added. Khalil, in the court filings, denied accusations that he supports Hamas but questioned the Israeli government's strikes on 'innocent Palestinians.' Democrats and advocacy organizations have urged officials to immediately release Khalil, alleging that his constitutional right to free speech has been ignored. 'This arrest is unprecedented, illegal, and un-American. The federal government is claiming the authority to deport people with deep ties to the U.S. and revoke their green cards for advocating positions that the government opposes. To be clear: The First Amendment protects everyone in the U.S. The government's actions are obviously intended to intimidate and chill speech on one side of a public debate,' Ben Wizner, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, said in a statement. The State Department did not immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bodies of an Israeli-American couple held by Hamas recovered by Israeli military
Bodies of dual citizen Israeli-U.S. husband and wife killed in Hamas' October 7th attack have been recovered by the Israeli military.
