
Welsh abuse gang inquiry should be considered, says Senedd
David Deans
Political reporter, BBC Wales News Cemlyn Davies
Political correspondent, BBC Wales News Getty Images
There has been a call for a Wales-wide inquiry into grooming gangs
The Senedd has unanimously called for a Wales inquiry into child sexual exploitation by gangs to be considered by the Welsh government.
But Plaid Cymru and Labour rejected demands from the Tories for such an exercise to definitely take place, instead arguing for police evidence to be reviewed first.
It follows calls from a survivor for an investigation into the extent of the problem in Wales.
"We all have got a moral duty to ensure those who commit these crimes face justice," Welsh Conservative Senedd leader Darren Millar said.
The Welsh government has previously said it has had assurances from all four police forces in Wales that there are currently no "widespread issues with grooming gangs".
Wednesday's debate followed angry scenes in the Senedd in January when Millar was told by Presiding Officer Elin Jones to "tone down" a question about grooming gangs.
He had been discussing the case of a victim known by the pseudonym Emily Vaughn.
Now in her 30s, Emily Vaughn said that she was first groomed at the age of 11 and then abused from the age of 14.
She told BBC Wales in January that she was trafficked to Telford, Blackpool and within Wales, and was raped "almost every single day". 'Silver lining'
Her case was raised again during Wednesday's debate which took place after the Conservatives laid a motion calling on the Welsh government to "commission an independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation"
Altaf Hussain, MS for South Wales West, said: "Her courage to call for an independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation by grooming gangs has inspired us to bring forward this motion today."
"Emily's story has somewhat of a silver lining," he said.
"If anything good can come from her horrendous ordeal, it is that she advocates for other victims, and is actually campaigning to ensure no-one else suffers the abuse that she endured."
He said a Wales-wide inquiry into the issue would help "get to grips with the problems here at home".
"I want my Wales safe, safe for our families, our children, and children's children," he added.
The leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats Jane Dodds, who previously worked in children's safeguarding, said: "We all know that this is an absolutely appalling issue, and it's an appalling issue that is going on right now in our towns, in our communities, in our villages, and it is right that we are talking about it." 'Must not be political'
Plaid Cymru MS Sioned Williams said: "We must absolutely not make this a political issue, and we must ensure that the best way of achieving action and accountability is taken for the sake of victims and survivors.
She also highlighted concerns raised recently by the Children's Commissioner for Wales about the lack of progress in implementing recommendations from a previous inquiry into child sexual exploitation.
Responding to the debate on behalf of the Welsh government, Social Justice Secretary Jane Hutt said ministers were implementing those recommendations.
She also outlined the recent steps announced by the UK government to address concerns around child sexual exploitation including a review of grooming gang evidence to be chaired by Dame Louise Casey, as well as five local inquires - in Oldham and four other areas yet to be announced.
Hutt told the Senedd that Dame Casey's audit "will make recommendations about further analysis, investigations and actions that are needed to address current and historical failures, including in Wales".
The Conservatives' motion was defeated by 34 votes to 13.
However, a Plaid Cymru amendment which called on the Welsh government to work with police forces on an "all-Wales audit", was backed unanimously.
The amended motion also said that ministers should "consider commissioning a full independent inquiry in light of the evidence gathered by the audit".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ITV News
31 minutes ago
- ITV News
Grooming gang report author Louise Casey appears before MPs after major review of failures
The author of a major review into grooming gangs which found authorities have 'shied away' from the ethnicity of sex offenders has appeared before MPs. Baroness Louise Casey appeared before the Commons Home Affairs Committee on Tuesday morning, after the Government set out plans to launch a new nationwide inquiry into grooming gangs following her rapid review of the scandal. During her appearance, she urged people to "keep calm" about drawing conclusions from data on the ethnicity of suspects and offers, warning that any statistical evidence in "incomplete and unreliable". She said: 'When we asked the good people of Greater Manchester Police to help us look at the data we also collected... if you look at the data on child sexual exploitation, suspects and offenders, it's disproportionately Asian heritage. "If you look at the data for child abuse, it is not disproportionate, and it is white men. 'So again, just note to everybody, really outside here rather than in here. Let's just keep calm here about how you interrogate data and what you draw from it.' Baroness Casey said that misusing unreliable data to come to any conclusion was "a different level of public irresponsibility". As Baroness Casey faced MPs, elsewhere in London Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch held a press conference alongside a number of victims of grooming gangs. When asked if she owes an apology to survivors of grooming gangs for the Conservatives' lack of action when in office, she said she had already said sorry. She said: 'We have done that. I have spoken this is not the first time that I'm meeting the survivors. I have spoken to them about this. 'I have apologised, but what I find extraordinary is that more people are interested in prosecuting a government that did some things... rather than looking at what needs to happen right now, what I'm really worried about is that we're spending a lot of time bringing the politics back into this when we want to take the politics out of it. 'I have spoken to survivors, and what they're talking about right now is a full national inquiry. 'No one here has asked me for more apologies. They have heard the apologies. Apologies are easy. 'What we need to see is action. We can sit here and say sorry all day long, but what I actually want to see is an inquiry that gets to the bottom of this.' On Monday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper claimed officials have dodged the issue of ethnicity among the groups of sex offenders for fear of being called racist, even though available data showed suspects were disproportionately likely to be Asian men. She said 'much more robust national data is needed' on the ethnicity of offenders, adding that the authorities 'cannot and must not shy away from these findings'. Doing so would allow 'the criminality and depravity of a minority of men to be used to marginalise whole communities." Ms Cooper also said the Government would take action 'immediately' on all of Lady Casey's recommendations, which include launching a national inquiry and making it mandatory to record the ethnicity and nationality of all suspects in child sexual abuse cases. At the committee meeting, Baroness Casey said: 'I listened to what the Home Secretary said in Parliament yesterday, I would like to see quite a significant uplift in the prosecutions, the action, the criminal investigations on child sexual exploitation, both historic and current.' In the Commons, Ms Cooper 'unequivocally' apologised for the failings which had led to grooming and child sexual abuse. The Home Secretary also pledged to exclude convicted sex offenders from the asylum system, while the report warned 'a significant proportion' of live investigations into grooming gangs 'appear to involve suspects who are non-UK nationals and/or who are claiming asylum in the UK'.


Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Britain's first transgender MP appears in court accused of harassing ex-wife
Britain's first transgender MP has appeared in court after being accused of harassment by an ex-wife who was allegedly sent unwanted voice notes and messages. Conservative politician Jamie Wallis, now known as Katie Wallis, pleaded not guilty to the charges brought forward by Rebecca Wallis. Wallis arrived at Cardiff Crown Court today dressed in a white blouse and black cardigan with coral-painted nails. The 40-year-old is accused of making unwanted phone calls, sending unwanted messages and voice notes and driving past Ms Wallis's home between February 14 and March 21. Wallis, the first MP to openly begin the process of gender transitioning, previously told the court: 'Legally I am known as Jamie, but I prefer to be known as Katie.' Simone Walsh, prosecuting, told the court the defendant and alleged victim were in a relationship for more than 15 years and separated in 2020, with their divorce finalised in 2024. 'Following the victim informing the defendant of a new relationship the defendant's behaviour became harassing in nature,' she said. Narita Bahra, defending, said there was 'no malice' on her client's part. Last month, district Judge Rhys Williams adjourned the hearing before Wallis gave evidence after the court ran out of time. He also ordered a new psychiatric report to be carried out on Wallis. During the hearing, prosecutor Simone Walsh explained the 'defendant and victim' were in a relationship for 15 years and share two children together. Ms Walsh said: 'They separated in 2020 and their divorce was finalised in 2024. 'Following the victim informing the defendant of a new relationship, the defendant's behaviour became harassing in nature. 'The frequency, nature and contents of the messages and voicemails amounted to harassment of the victim. 'Despite being arrested on February 28 and released on bail, the defendant has continued to send messages to his victim.' A screen was put up in court to avoid Rebecca Wallis coming face-to-face with her ex-husband, the Tory MP for Bridgend between 2019 and 2024. Narita Bahra KC, defending, said the evidence against Wallis did not amount to harassment and that the defendant's mental health had 'spiralled' at the time of the allegations. She said: 'The complainant has chosen what messages to provide to police and she hasn't provided the full exchange with Dr Wallis. 'Dr Wallis was going through a very important stage of her transition process which was to come out full-time. 'The complainant took issue with that. She did not want Dr Wallis to come out full-time as transgender. 'This involved announcing himself as a woman to the world and dressing as a woman full-time. 'She was so unwell and was not in a position where she had support from others - she was reaching out to her.' The prosecution offered no evidence on a charge of stalking. As Jamie Wallis, the former MP was elected to the Commons in 2019, becoming the first Tory to win the South Wales seat of Bridgend since the 1980s. Wallis became the first MP in the UK to come out as transgender three years later. The announcement came after Wallis crashed a Mercedes while wearing high heels and a black leather PVC mini-skirt before leaving the scene and being arrested in bed six hours later. In March 2022, Wallis revealed a diagnosis for gender dysphoria having 'felt this way since I was a very young child' and a desire to transition to be a woman. Wallis also reported being raped and blackmailed, and was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. In response, then Prime Minister Boris Johnson praised Wallis's bravery, and politicians from across the political spectrum publicly expressed their support.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Justice Secretary tells of opposition to ‘dangerous' abortion decriminalisation
The Justice Secretary has described measures proposing to decriminalise abortion as 'extreme' as she outlined her opposition ahead of a vote by MPs. Amendments likely to be debated on Tuesday are aimed at ensuring women cannot be prosecuted for terminating their own pregnancy at any stage. But Shabana Mahmood, who said she believes safe and legal abortions are part of female healthcare, branded the amendments 'unnecessary' and 'dangerous'. Abortion in England and Wales remains a criminal offence but is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. It is also possible to take prescribed medication at home if a woman is less than 10 weeks pregnant. Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi's amendment, which has wide support from MPs, would result in 'removing the threat of investigation, arrest, prosecution, or imprisonment' of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy. She said she had been moved to advocate for a change in the law having seen women investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions. The issue has come to the fore in recent times with prominent cases such as those of Nicola Packer and Carla Foster. Ms Packer was cleared by a jury last month after taking prescribed abortion medicine when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal limit of 10 weeks for taking such medication at home. She told jurors during her trial, which came after more than four years of police investigation, that she did not realise she had been pregnant for more than 10 weeks. The case of Ms Foster, jailed in 2023 for illegally obtaining abortion tablets to end her pregnancy when she was between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant, eventually saw her sentence reduced by the Court of Appeal and suspended, with senior judges saying that sending women to prison for abortion-related offences is 'unlikely' to be a 'just outcome'. Ms Antoniazzi said police had investigated more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortion in the past five years 'including women who've suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths'. She added: 'This is just wrong. It's a waste of taxpayers' money, it's a waste of the judiciary's time, and it's not in the public interest.' A separate amendment has also been put forward by Labour MP Stella Creasy and goes further by not only decriminalising abortion, but also seeks to 'lock in' the right of someone to have one and protect those who help them. Ms Mahmood, who will not be present for Tuesday's vote due to being away on Government business, wrote to constituents making clear her opposition to both amendments. She said: 'It is hard to see these measures as anything other than extreme. 'I can unequivocally state that I would have voted against both amendments were I able to be there, and I will vote against them if given the opportunity in the future. 'I oppose extending abortions up until the point of birth beyond the exemptions that currently exist, as doing so would not only be unnecessary but dangerous. 'I am deeply concerned to see these measures being progressed in the name of women's rights, when the potential physical and mental impacts on women would be so devastating.' She added she is 'troubled' by the amendments being considered as part of the wider Crime and Policing Bill 'meaning there will be less time for debate'. She described the proposed changes as something which would 'signal a generational shift in our approach and response to abortion and therefore warrants serious discussion'. The latest attempt to change the law follows repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th-century law, the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019. MPs had previously been due to debate similar amendments removing the threat of prosecution against women who act in relation to their own pregnancy at any stage, but these did not take place as Parliament was dissolved last summer for the general election. Earlier this month, a debate at Westminster Hall heard calls from pro-change campaigners that women must no longer be 'dragged from hospital bed to police cell' over abortion. But opponents of decriminalisation warned against such a 'radical step'. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) urged MPs to vote against both amendments, saying they would bring about 'the biggest expansion of abortion since 1967'. Alithea Williams, the organisation's public policy manager, said: 'Unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away, and women will be left at the mercy of abusers. 'Both amendments would allow abortion up to birth, for any reason. 'NC20 (Ms Creasy's amendment) is only more horrifying because it removes any way of bringing men who end the life of a baby by attacking a pregnant woman to justice.' Ms Creasy rejected Spuc's claim, and urged MPs not to be 'misled'. She highlighted coercive control legislation, which would remain in place if her amendment was voted through, and which she said explicitly identifies forcing someone to have an abortion as a crime punishable by five years in jail. A separate amendment, tabled by Conservative MP Caroline Johnson proposes mandatory in-person consultations for women seeking an abortion before being prescribed at-home medication to terminate a pregnancy. The changes being debated this week would not cover Scotland, where a group is currently undertaking work to review the law as it stands north of the border. On issues such as abortion, MPs usually have free votes, meaning they take their own view rather than deciding along party lines. The Government has previously said it is neutral on decriminalisation and that it is an issue for Parliament to decide upon.