logo
US warns China threat, urges Asia to boost defense

US warns China threat, urges Asia to boost defense

Korea Herald4 days ago

SINGAPORE (Reuters) — US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth warned on Saturday that the threat from China was real and potentially imminent as he pushed allies in the Indo-Pacific to spend more on their own defense needs.
Hegseth, speaking for the first time at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Asia's premier forum for defense leaders, militaries and diplomats, underlined that the Indo-Pacific region was a priority for the Trump administration.
"There's no reason to sugar coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent," Hegseth said, in some of his strongest comments on the Communist nation since he took office in January. He added that any attempt by China to conquer Taiwan "would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world," and echoed Trump's comment that China will not invade Taiwan on the president's watch.
China views Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to "reunify" with the democratic and separately governed island, by force if necessary. It has stepped up military and political pressure to assert those claims, including increasing the intensity of war games around Taiwan.
Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims, saying only the island's people can decide their future.
"It has to be clear to all that Beijing is credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo Pacific," Hegseth said.
China said the comments "were steeped in provocations and instigation."
"Mr. Hegseth repeatedly smeared and attacked China and relentlessly played up the so-called 'China threat,'" the Chinese embassy in Singapore said on its Facebook page. "As a matter of fact, the US itself is the biggest 'troublemaker' for regional peace and stability." Hegseth's comments on allies needing to increase spending is likely to cause consternation amongst partners, even though experts said he faced a relatively friendly audience in Singapore. China's Defense Minister Dong Jun has decided to skip the major Asian security forum and Beijing has sent only an academic delegation.
Hegseth has previously taken aim at allies in Europe for not spending more on their own defense. In February, he warned Europe against treating America like a "sucker" while addressing a press conference at NATO headquarters in Brussels.
On Friday, while delivering the keynote address at the Shangri-La Dialogue, French President Emmanuel Macron said Hegseth was justified in asking Europe to increase its own defense spending.
"It's hard to believe, a little bit, after some trips to Europe that I'm saying this, but thanks to President Trump, Asian allies should look to countries in Europe as a new found example," Hegseth said.
"NATO members are pledging to spend 5 percent of their GDP on defense, even Germany. So it doesn't make sense for countries in Europe to do that while key allies in Asia spend less on defense in the face of an even more formidable threat, not to mention North Korea." Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans said it was important to have Hegseth acknowledge that European countries were stepping up.
"It was for me maybe the first time or one of the first times I heard the US administration acknowledge this explicitly," Brekelmans said, referring to Hegseth's comments.
US Democratic Senator Tammy Duckworth, who is co-leading a bi-partisan delegation to the Shangri-la Dialogue, said it was noteworthy that Hegseth emphasized that the United States was committed to the region, but his language on allies was not helpful.
"I thought it was patronizing of our friends in the Indo-Pacific in particular," Duckworth said.
Spending on weapons and research is spiking among some Asian countries as they respond to a darkening security outlook by broadening their outside industrial partnerships while trying to boost their own defense industries, according to a new study by the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies, the organization that runs the Shangri-La Dialogue.
The spike comes even as Asian nations spent an average of 1.5 percent of GDP on defense in 2024, a figure that has kept relatively constant over the last decade, it said.
Hegseth suggested that allies in Europe focus on security on the European continent, so that Washington could focus on the threat posed by China in the Indo-Pacific, alongside more participation by allies in Asia.
"We would much prefer that the overwhelming balance of European investment be on that continent, so that as we partner there, which we will continue to do, we're able to use our comparative advantage as an Indo-Pacific nation to support our partners here," he said in response to a question after his speech.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says deal with Xi 'extremely hard' as steel tariffs double
Trump says deal with Xi 'extremely hard' as steel tariffs double

Korea Herald

time5 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Trump says deal with Xi 'extremely hard' as steel tariffs double

Donald Trump said on Wednesday that it was "extremely hard" to reach a deal with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, but the EU touted progress in its own trade talks with Washington even though the US president doubled global metal tariffs. Trump's latest trade moves came as ministers from Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development countries gathered in Paris to discuss the outlook for the world economy in light of a US hardball approach that has rattled world markets. Trump's sweeping tariffs on allies and adversaries have strained ties with trading partners and sparked a flurry of negotiations to avoid the duties. The White House has suggested the president will speak to Xi this week, raising hopes they can soothe tensions and speed up a trade deal between the world's two biggest economies. However, early on Wednesday, Trump appeared to dampen hopes for a quick deal. "I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!" he posted on his Truth Social platform. Asked about the remarks during a regular press briefing, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian said: "The Chinese side's principles and stance on developing Sino-US relations are consistent." China was the main target of Trump's April tariff blitz, hit with levies of 145 percent on its goods and triggering tit-for-tat tariffs of 125 percent on US imports. Both sides agreed to temporarily de-escalate in May, after Trump delayed most sweeping measures on other countries until July 9. His latest remarks came hours after he increased his tariffs on aluminum and steel from 25 percent to 50 percent, raising temperatures with various partners while exempting Britain from the higher levy. EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic said after talks with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on the sidelines of the OECD meeting in Paris that raising the metal tariffs "doesn't help the negotiations". The two sides were nonetheless "making progress" in their negotiations, Sefcovic said at a news conference. Goods from the 27-nation bloc will be hit with 50-percent tariffs on July 9 unless it reaches a deal with Washington. The EU has vowed to retaliate. "We did very much focus on these negotiations, and I still believe in them," Sefcovic said, adding that he was optimistic that a "positive result" could be reached. The US-EU meeting took place a day after the OECD cut its forecast for global economic growth, blaming Trump's tariff blitz for the downgrade. "We need to come up with negotiated solutions as quickly as possible, because time is running out," German economy minister Katherina Reiche warned. French trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin said: "We have to keep our cool and always show that the introduction of these tariffs is in no one's interest." After talks between UK Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds and Greer on Tuesday, London said that imports from the UK would remain at 25 percent for now. Both sides needed to work out duties and quotas in line with the terms of a recently signed trade pact. "We're pleased that as a result of our agreement with the US, UK steel will not be subject to these additional tariffs," a British government spokesperson said. The Group of Seven advanced economies -- Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States -- was due to hold separate trade talks on Wednesday. Mexico will request an exemption from the higher tariff, Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard said, arguing that it was unfair because the United States exports more steel to its southern neighbour than it imports. "It makes no sense to put a tariff on a product in which you have a surplus," Ebrard said. Mexico is highly vulnerable to Trump's trade wars because 80 percent of its exports go to the United States, its main partner. While some of Trump's most sweeping levies face legal challenges, they have been allowed to remain in place for now as an appeals process takes place. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed on Tuesday that the Trump administration sent letters to governments pushing for offers by Wednesday as the July 9 deadline approached. (AFP)

Czech court cancels injunction banning nuclear power plant contract with Korea's KHNP: report
Czech court cancels injunction banning nuclear power plant contract with Korea's KHNP: report

Korea Herald

time7 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Czech court cancels injunction banning nuclear power plant contract with Korea's KHNP: report

A Czech court has canceled an injunction banning the signing of a multibillion-dollar nuclear power plant contract with South Korea, lifting a major hurdle in the final agreement between the two sides, the Korean company in charge of the project said Wednesday. The Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. (KHNP) confirmed media reports that the Czech Supreme Administrative Court overturned the injunction that has prevented the European nation's Elektrarna Dukovany II (EDU II), the entity in charge of the project, and the South Korean consortium, led by KHNP, from signing the final contract to build two new nuclear power units in Dukovany nuclear power plant. The move came following EDU II's appeal last month against a local court decision to issue an injunction temporarily suspending the finalization of the estimated 26 trillion-won ($18.6 billion) deal at the request of French energy company EDF, a losing bidder in the tender process. The KHNP had initially planned to sign the final agreement with EDU II on May 7 to build two 1,063-megawatt reactors at the Czech power plant, located about 170 kilometers southeast of Prague. If the deal is finalized, it will mark South Korea's first overseas nuclear power plant contract since 2009, when the country secured a deal to build the Barakah nuclear power plant in the United Arab Emirates. "The KHNP welcomes the Czech supreme court's decision to reverse the injunction and looks forward to swiftly signing a final contract with Prague," the Korean company said. (Yonhap)

Foreign policy and security tasks pile up: What awaits President Lee?
Foreign policy and security tasks pile up: What awaits President Lee?

Korea Herald

time11 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Foreign policy and security tasks pile up: What awaits President Lee?

South Korea's newly elected president, Lee Jae-myung, takes office facing a mountain of foreign and security challenges — most notably, an unprecedented squeeze from Washington, where President Donald Trump's protectionist 'America First' agenda is leading to tariffs and testing the resilience of US alliances. Lee confronts not only the persistent and existential threat from North Korea — with inter-Korean relations at rock bottom — but also the imperative to recalibrate the country's diplomatic trajectory amid an intensifying US-China rivalry and an increasingly fluid global order. But these are far from the only challenges on Lee's plate. Tariff battles Front and center for the Lee administration are high-stakes tariff negotiations with the Trump administration, as sweeping US tariffs are already reshaping South Korea's exports and raising further uncertainty about the future of South Korea's economy. 'The number one priority, of course, is to have an initial meeting with the (US) President," Victor Cha, Korea chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said Wednesday, underscoring the importance of leader-to-leader diplomacy in tariff negotiations. "We've been in a period for six months where the Trump administration has been moving at 100 miles an hour, while South Korea has basically been stuck in neutral because it hasn't had a government. So making that first contact is very important.' Lee also said that tariff negotiations 'would become the most pressing issue we face right now,' alongside restoring people's livelihoods and reviving the economy amid slowing growth, in an interview with local radio broadcaster CBS on Monday — the final day of campaigning. Sectoral tariffs on cars and auto parts have taken effect, with new levies on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals looming. Aluminum and steel tariffs will double to 50 percent this week. All of these sectors are among South Korea's key export industries, accounting for a significant share of exports to the US. Meanwhile, 25 percent country-specific reciprocal tariffs on Korean goods remain under a moratorium until July 9. Korea pressed for bigger security share Ramon Pacheco Pardo, professor of international relations at King's College London, forecast that 'a big bundle of issues' would be part of tariff negotiations and that 'security will be part of the discussion as well.' 'South Korea will try to have other issues thrown into the mix that go far beyond tariffs and economic matters." This broader agenda comes amid growing concerns over defense commitments. On the security front, the Trump administration has called for allies to shoulder more of the defense burden — both financially and militarily. Anxiety flared anew over a possible reduction of the 28,500 US troops stationed in South Korea after a Wall Street Journal report in May suggested the Pentagon was considering relocating about 4,500 troops elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific, a claim the Pentagon has denied. Both the internally classified 'Interim National Defense Guidance,' reported by The Washington Post in March, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's remarks in May on the development of the 2025 National Defense Strategy underscore that US forces will prioritize deterring China. At the same time, allies are expected to take on greater responsibility for other regional threats — meaning North Korea, in South Korea's case. Retired Adm. Harry Harris, former commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command and former ambassador to South Korea, previously told The Korea Herald that he cannot rule out the possibility of a repositioning of US Forces Korea as part of the Pentagon's broader strategic realignment in the Indo-Pacific region to handle regional challenges holistically. In Seoul, concerns are also mounting that the operational scope of US Forces Korea could extend beyond the Korean Peninsula and expand to regional defense, including being repurposed for a potential Taiwan emergency. 'In 2003, some units from US Forces Korea were redeployed to Iraq. Now, if they are redeployed — not to Iraq, but to areas near Taiwan — that could present a whole new set of challenges, and it's something we need to think about very carefully," former Foreign Minister Yun Byung-se said during last week's Jeju Forum. Whether to attend NATO summit Another daunting task is resetting the diplomatic compass with China amid intensifying US-China competition — and with Russia, as US-Russia relations remain volatile and the Ukraine war enters a new phase. 'Lee has been pretty clear and vocal in the debates and in his statements that he wants to 'balance out' — I think that was the term he used — the relationship between the United States and China,' Cha said. "Lee is going to have to finesse this. There really is a hard line in the sand that the (US) administration has drawn." Cha also warned of 'negative externalities' if the Lee administration walks back too far from the previous Yoon Suk Yeol administration's firm policy on China. Another key and imminent decision for the new administration is whether to attend the upcoming NATO summit in The Hague on June 24–25, to which South Korea has been invited as one of four Indo-Pacific partners — Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand. Former President Yoon Suk Yeol attended three consecutive NATO summits from 2022 to 2024, where participating countries issued strong statements condemning Russia and China for their roles in the Ukraine war and voiced concern over their growing strategic alignment. When asked whether he would consider attending the NATO summit, Lee took a noncommittal stance. 'With the domestic situation being so chaotic and complicated, unless there is a concrete agenda item, I'm not sure there is a real need to attend, so I have a lot of reservations about it,' Lee said during a news conference on May 25. China's West Sea markers raise alarm Besides the intensifying rivalry between the US and China, another major challenge for bilateral ties with China is Beijing's unilateral installation of buoys and structures in the jointly administered West Sea zone. Seoul has raised concerns about China's installation of three structures within the Provisional Measures Zone — a jointly managed area established due to overlapping exclusive economic zones — between 2018 and 2024. South Korea's Navy has also found 13 large Chinese lighthouse-style buoys, measuring 5 to 13 meters tall, installed in and around the PMZ between 2018 and 2023. Seoul's anxiety stems from China's past behavior both in the South China Sea and the East China Sea, including the building of artificial islands and military bases in disputed waters — often within other countries' exclusive economic zones — causing tensions with neighboring countries such as the Philippines and Vietnam. Unresolved JDZ between Seoul, Tokyo On Japan ties: Despite the 60th anniversary of diplomatic normalization, the long-standing dispute over the Korea-Japan Joint Development Zone for untapped natural resources beneath the East China Sea remains a key obstacle in bilateral relations. The agreement, enacted in 1978 for a 50-year period, can be terminated with three years' notice, with the earliest opportunity coming in June this year. Seoul has warned that even if the JDZ agreement is dissolved, overlapping claims —especially over Block 7 — will persist, and the issue has the potential to become a major source of tension between the two countries, particularly at this critical diplomatic juncture.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store