logo
Sorry, kids. We blew your climate budget - but we really love our SUVs

Sorry, kids. We blew your climate budget - but we really love our SUVs

Irish Times24-05-2025

With every breath you take today, some of the carbon dioxide you breathe in possibly was emitted to the atmosphere several centuries ago. True, an infinitesimally small contribution – but one that reminds us that some of the greenhouse gases we emit today will still be around, trapping the Earth's heat, cent far into the distant future.
Some have shorter lifetimes. Methane, for example, which constitutes 30 per cent of Irish greenhouse gas emissions, produces its intense warming effect 80 times greater than CO2 over 20 years. But it doesn't stop there, as much of it then converts to CO2, which joins the long term store of that gas for centuries. Those who would have you believe that the warming effect of methane emissions disappear after a decade or so are simply wrong. It matters not to the atmosphere whether that methane has come from a dairy cow or a leaking gas pipeline. It all ends up in the atmospheric reservoir of greenhouse gases for future generations to cope with.
So decisions made today regarding our emissions have very long-term consequences for those who come after us. It also confirms that there is no turning back the dial in terms of the warming effect of gases already emitted. No feasible removal technology exists at the scale and deployment level to get us out of our predicament over the next few decades. This means that there is only a certain amount of additional emissions that the world can add to the atmosphere before trigger points of warming and potential tipping points of climate dislocation are inevitable.
[
You'd be genuinely mad to buy an SUV unless you need it - just look at latest climate and safety figures
]
For a 50-50 chance of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels, the remaining global budget at the beginning of this year was estimated to be 235 billion tonnes of CO2. This will be used up in around six years at current rates of emission. The best we can do is buy time by radical cuts in emissions.
READ MORE
What is Ireland's fair share of this remaining budget? How should countries that have benefited from burning fossil fuels since the industrial revolution do in any allocation, compared with developing countries that have only recently started emitting significant amounts of greenhouse gases? Ireland has sought to address these issues in its climate legislation and its adherence to the Paris Agreement of 2015 by a system of legally binding five-yearly carbon budgets. The most recent update of these has been recommended to the Minister for the Environment by the Climate Change Advisory Council. These limit national emissions to 295, 200 and 160 million tonnes for each of the five year periods 2021-25, 2026-30 and 2031-35 respectively. Before taking these limits to the Oireachtas for approval, the Minister is seeking public submissions on them to be made before June 4th. It is an opportunity for citizens to express their views on this critical intergenerational issue.
These new carbon budgets were required to be formulated in compliance with the Climate Action and Low Carbon Development (Amendment) Act 2021, which was passed overwhelmingly, and enthusiastically supported by the two major parties in government today. This Act also requires consistency with Article 2.2 of the Paris Agreement, which requires governments to implement their climate actions to 'reflect equity and the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in the light of different national circumstances.' This convoluted phrase essentially brings us back to the issue of fairness. What is fair for a rich country like Ireland to claim in terms of the remaining global carbon budget? Has this principle been observed in formulating the new round of carbon budgets?
[
What do changing rainfall patterns mean for the world's nourishing grasslands?
Opens in new window
]
In its first report in 2021 advising the minister on the design of the original carbon budgets (2021-2030) the Climate Change Advisory Council produced a reasoned justification of how the budgets represented a fair and equitable contribution to meeting the needs of Paris 2.2. But in the latest iteration, this aspect is completely missing. Only a temperature criterion is offered regarding compliance with the Paris objective of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees, without any significant consideration of equity/fairness. This raises important legal issues as to the extent to which the required consistency with an international treaty is being observed.
For a nation with a proud record of supporting less well-off countries in the Global South, ignoring a basic tenet of climate justice is unethical and selfish. It's rather like saying we will grab an unfair share of the remaining carbon budget and expect poorer countries to accommodate us by picking up the slack – the same countries that will also suffer more adverse climate consequences.
The reality is that we in Ireland have already – or are close to having – exhausted our fair share of the dwindling global carbon budget. We are now entering carbon debt territory to the rest of the world. This is not an academic exercise – we are disproportionately contributing to the climate disasters of the present and future beyond our shores. This is not a comfortable situation to be in.
What will you say to your children and grandchildren?
'Sorry, kids, we opted to plunder your legacy to sustain our comfortable lifestyles in the 2020s. We wanted to keep our SUVs, further intensify our agriculture, and continue subsidising fossil fuels to the extent of €4.7 billion annually. Our political leaders facilitated us at every stage as they prioritised holding on to power. Yes, we did know that blowing your legacy condemns everyone here in Ireland to future catastrophic flooding, heatwaves, droughts and storms. It's tough, but do the best you can.'
John Sweeney is emeritus professor in the Irish Climate Analysis and Research Units (Icarus) at the department of geography at Maynooth University

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Climate scientists gather in Dublin to discuss agriculture
Climate scientists gather in Dublin to discuss agriculture

Agriland

time4 hours ago

  • Agriland

Climate scientists gather in Dublin to discuss agriculture

Climate scientists are attending the meeting of the Council of the Global Research Alliance for Agricultural Greenhouse Gases (GRA) which opened today, Tuesday June 3, 2025, at Dublin Castle. The GRA brings together climate scientists from across the world to enhance collaboration and progress climate research in agriculture. Ireland, through the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM), officially assumed the chair of the GRA from January 1, 2025, for a period of 18 months. This is the first time that Ireland has chaired the GRA since joining in 2009. Climate scientists Established in 2009, the GRA aims to provide a framework for voluntary action to increase international cooperation and investment in research activities for mitigating agricultural GHG and improving carbon sequestration, as well as improving the measurement of emissions in different agricultural systems. The GRA also helps scientists to gain expertise in mitigation through developing new partnerships and exchanges. A total of 68 countries and 29 partners are now members. The council meeting in Dublin sees delegates from a large number of these countries and partners in attendance. Over the course of the two-day meeting, they will consider among other things, a new Strategic Plan to 2030, as well as hearing updates from the activities of the four research groups. These groups are: livestock; croplands; paddy rice; and integrative cross cutting areas. They will also consider proposals for new flagship projects in areas such as the biological nitrification inhibition of pasture swards to reduce nitrous oxide emissions. They will additionally consider the outcomes of completed flagship projects such as the 'Feed Additives' project that has developed practical tools, protocols and guidelines for the testing and implementation of feed additives. The council meeting will be chaired by officials from DAFM. Many of the delegates will attend the 'Agriculture and Climate Change: Science into Action' conference also taking place in Dublin Castle on Thursday (June 5). They will also visit Teagasc Grange Research Centre and a farm on Friday (June 6), to see first-hand the research taking place on agricultural GHGs in Ireland and how the outputs of this research are being implemented on an Irish farm. Along with Ireland as the chair, the GRA special representative, who is the ambassador for the GRA, is Dr. Harry Clark, chief scientist of the New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre. Prof. Tommy Boland, University College Dublin (UCD) School of Agriculture and Food Science, is a co-chair of the livestock research group (one of four research groups) of the GRA.

Exercise may reduce risk of cancer returning, study shows
Exercise may reduce risk of cancer returning, study shows

RTÉ News​

time14 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Exercise may reduce risk of cancer returning, study shows

An international cancer study has found that exercise can have huge benefits for cancer patients and can even reduce the risk of the disease returning. The results were presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual conference in Chicago at the weekend, and published in the New England Journal of Medicine. Among those attending the expert gathering was Professor Janice Walshe, medical oncologist at St Vincent's University Hospital in Dublin. She called the study an "incredibly strong finding", saying "it adds to the literatures that suggests that exercise is really important in keeping ourselves well." The study examined nearly 890 patients who had high risk colon cancers (stage 2 or stage 3) and was completed in 55 locations, including in countries such as the US, France and Australia. All patients had completed chemotherapy treatments and were put into one of two groups. One group was given structured, supervised exercise sessions with a personal trainer and the other was just given a booklet outlining the benefits of a healthy lifestyle. The first group did 45 to 60 minute walks three or four times a week and could do more if they chose. Twice a month they worked with a personal trainer and then later once a month for a total of three years. After eight years, the patients in the first group had a 37% lower risk of dying than those in the second group. Prof Walshe said it was important to note that all these patients had already received chemotherapy. "So, this intervention is not a substitute for drugs that we know already reduce the risk of people dying from different various cancers," Prof Walsh said. Speaking to RTÉ's Morning Ireland, Prof Walshe said she felt that some newspaper headlines about the study were "misleading." "I think what they're trying to say is that the magnitude of benefit we have seen with this intervention, of an exercise programme, is the type of reductions we've seen with many of our new drugs. "But this is not a drug substitute," Prof Walshe said. "This is on top of you receiving the best drugs in the market to reduce the risk of disease recurrence." Prof Walshe said there is a "huge amount of Irish research" at this year's American Society of Clinical Oncology conference. "The consultants who travel here are all networking with various research groups to bring these trials home to Ireland and obviously the best approaches in terms of managing our cancer in our Irish patients," she said. "We already have exercise programmes ongoing in various parts of the country that are free of charge, because we believe exercise is really important in terms of, one, reducing risk of disease recurrence and, two, increasing people's confidence," she added.

Public innovation investment ‘has not kept pace' with private sector, Ibec says
Public innovation investment ‘has not kept pace' with private sector, Ibec says

Irish Times

timea day ago

  • Irish Times

Public innovation investment ‘has not kept pace' with private sector, Ibec says

Ireland's largest business lobby group, Ibec has called on the Government to increase the amount of public investment into research and development as Ireland drops below the European average for public spend per capita. Ibec has described Ireland's national research and innovation (R&I) infrastructure as becoming 'obsolete and out of date', claiming it is limiting research and innovation capacity in the State. As part of a series of policy position papers on Ireland's competitiveness and productivity, the group called on the Government to increase public investment in R&I to 1 per cent of modified gross national income by 2035 to 'fuel the long-standing ambition of becoming a European innovation leader'. Ireland's national research and innovation strategy, Impact 2030, sets out the target for Ireland to be classified as an Innovation Leader under the European Innovation Scoreboard by 2030 by achieving a score in excess of 125 per cent of the EU average. In last year's scoreboard, Ireland's performance stood at 113.2 per cent of the EU average, against its 2021 baseline of 108 per cent. READ MORE As it stands, Ireland's public investment accounts for just 13 per cent of the €8 billion national spend on research and innovation. Ibec said, 'Simply put, public investment has not kept pace with the surge of financing provided by industry.' The Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science estimated that public investment in innovation surpassed the €1 billion mark for the first time in 2023. Despite this increase in spending, according to Ibec, the Irish State spends €199 per person on directly funding R&I compared to the EU average of €274. The group called on the Government to simplify access to innovation supports, which it said are 'underutilised by industry due to the administrative burden and challenges in navigating the system'. It said Ireland's research and development tax credit is 'too complex and time consuming to access for a lot of companies'. In addition to improving access to the credit, Ibec also suggested the credit's expansion to cover offshore related-party research. [ EU warns it could accelerate retaliatory tariffs over US duties Opens in new window ] It said this measure would 'reflect the realities of how [intellectual property] is developed across global operations' and would 'incentivise the retention of [intellectual property] in the Irish tax base'. To improve national research capability, Ibec has appealed for the creation of a new funding mechanism for higher education facilities in succession to the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions which was launched in 1998. The group has also called for the use of the National Training Fund to attract skilled research talent, as well as investing in developing the domestic workforce by 'expanding and subsidising pathways for skills development'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store