logo
Final hearing fails to close rift over ambulance rate charges legislation

Final hearing fails to close rift over ambulance rate charges legislation

Yahoo14-05-2025

A final public hearing this week failed to close the wide gap between Senate and House leaders over how much ambulance service companies should be paid for emergency and non-scheduled transfers of patients with commercial health insurance coverage.
State Sen. Sue Prentiss, D-Lebanon, a paramedic and executive director of the American Trauma Society, made a last pitch for her bill (SB 245) that would set that charge at 325% of the federal Medicare rate.
'This has become the nationally recognized rate; six states have it,' Prentiss told the House Commerce and Small Business Committee, adding that West Virginia recently adopted a 400%.
Congress outlawed balanced billing which is the practice of a health care provider going after an individual insured for extra payment on charges an insurance company declined to cover. These also were called 'surprise medical bills.'
'I don't think people should be nervous when an ambulance shows up at the door that they are going to be financially bankrupt by the experience,' said Rep. Jerry Stringham, D-Woodstock, and a medical strategy consultant who said he could defend a 365% rate.
The only medical service allowed by Congress to continue balanced billing was ambulance service because there was no national standard rate for the service.
Prentiss served on a 15-person committee that traveled across the country to see how states were dealing with it.
House Commerce Chairman John Hunt, R-Rindge, said Prentiss's bill wouldn't end the practice since balanced billing would still be allowed for non-emergency and scheduled transports by ambulance.
In March, the House voted, 250-85, to approve Hunt's competing bill (HB 316) that would set the ambulance rate at 202% of the federal Medicare rate.
The Senate endorsed Prentiss's bill with a higher rate by a voice vote.
Ambulance companies staged protest caravan
When Hunt's bill came before a Senate committee last month, ambulance service company owners staged a caravan outside the Legislative Office Building in protest. Several EMS executives and fire chiefs predicted some companies would go out of business if they had to survive on the rate allowed in Hunt's bill.
In response, Hunt said the Senate rate would make commercial insurance customers 'suckers' who were asked to pay excessive rates because 80% of all ambulance transports come under Medicare or Medicaid that pay much lower rates.
Studies confirm Medicare pays about 46% of the actual cost to transport by ambulance, Medicaid about 42%.
Paula Rogers, a lobbyist with the American Association of Health Insurance Plans, said it's difficult to come up with a 'new' solution to a problem that has plagued the industry for 15 years.
From 1999-2003, Rogers served as the state's insurance commissioner.
'We have heard this lament from the (ambulance) providers,' said Rogers, adding that her clients don't like leaving this to rate-setting.
'Where is it going to ever be sorted out?'
Sen. David Rochefort, R-Littleton, is chairman of Senate Health Care and authored a separate, Senate-passed bill (SB 130) to name a 12-person commission to study delivery models for EMS and report back to lawmakers with recommendations by Nov. 1.
But on Wednesday, Hunt's committee voted, 10-8, along party lines to recommend killing the bill, all Republicans wanting to kill it, all House Democrats wanting to pass it.
Whatever happens in the coming weeks, the issue will stay before House lawmakers.
Hunt convinced his committee to retain until next year a fourth bill (HB 725) from Stringham that would have set the same 325% rate as Prentiss has proposed.
What's Next: The House Commerce and Small Business Committee in the coming week or so is expected to recommend the House reject Prentiss' bill.
Prospects: Odds are heavily in favor that this issue will remain a stalemate. If that occurs, private talks between insurers and ambulance company supporters will continue this summer and fall with Stringham's bill as a placeholder should an agreement be reached.
klandrigan@unionleader.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ted Cruz was with president when Musk's barrage of attacks started: ‘Trump was pissed'
Ted Cruz was with president when Musk's barrage of attacks started: ‘Trump was pissed'

New York Post

time27 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Ted Cruz was with president when Musk's barrage of attacks started: ‘Trump was pissed'

Sen. Ted Cruz was with a fuming President Trump as Elon Musk viciously attacked his former ally online Thursday — with the Texas Republican saying the spat made him feel like he was a kid in the middle of a divorce. 'I was sitting in the Oval as this unfolded. Trump was pissed. He was venting,' the Republican senator revealed on his podcast 'Verdict with Ted Cruz' Friday. 'I was sitting there, and the tweets were coming…. Elon was saying some really harsh things.' The SpaceX and Tesla billionaire went on a multi-day social media offensive against Trump, panning the president's 'big, beautiful' reconciliation bill 'disgusting' and urging Congress to kill it. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk fumed after Trump spoke out about the simmering feud. Cruz, who's friends with both former bros, called their very public break-up this week 'incredibly painful.' 'These are two men whom I know very well, they're both good friends of mine,' he said. 3 President Trump and Tesla billionaire Elon Musk came to blows on social media this week, ending their bromance. AFP via Getty Images 'I feel like the kids of a bitter divorce where you're just saying, 'I really wish mommy and daddy would stop screaming.'' 3 Ted Cruz talked about the break-up this Friday on his podcast 'Verdict with Ted Cruz.' Verdict with Ted Cruz/Facebook Trump and Musk's tiff escalated later in the week — with Trump threatening to cancel billions of dollars in government contracts to Musk's companies and Musk claiming Trump was holding out on making the Jeffrey Epstein files public because he's in them. 3 Trump and Musk's tiff escalated later in the week. Getty Images 'It just went from zero to 11 instantaneously,' said Cruz. 'These are two alpha males who are pissed off. And unfortunately, they're unloading on each other … They're angry, it's not complicated.' Cruz and his co-host commented that they thought both men are right — Trump's big beautiful budget bill has to get passed but the government has to tackle the deficit more as Musk argued. 'Unfortunately, Elon is working under the assumption that Congress actually wants to do the job and save our country,' said podcast co-host Ben Ferguson. 'And I think Trump is working under the reality that there's a lot of people in Congress that actually aren't looking out for the American people.' Musk on Saturday deleted his post about the Epstein files in a sign he was ready to throw in the towel. But Trump made it clear he wasn't interested in kissing and making up anytime soon. 'I have no intention of speaking to him,' he told NBC News.

Trump warns Musk will face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats
Trump warns Musk will face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump warns Musk will face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats

President Donald Trump vowed his former friend Elon Musk will face 'very serious consequences' should he choose to support the Democratic party following their very public feud. Trump delivered the warning in an interview with NBC News, during which he also said he had 'no intention of speaking to' the tech billionaire any time in the near future, citing the online threats and insults he hurled in recent days. 'I'm too busy doing other things,' Trump said Saturday. 'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful,' he added. 'You could not disrespect the office of the president.' Asked directly whether he believes their relationship to be permanently over, Trump replied: 'I would assume so, yeah.' The world's richest man backed Trump and Vice President JD Vance in the 2024 election, shelling out nearly $300 million in a bid to land them in the White House. In the months following their win, Musk cemented himself by Trump's side, appearing at press conferences, parties and public events, while professing his 'love' for the president. But relations ruptured between the pair on Tuesday, when Musk ripped into the Republicans' 'Big, Beautiful' budget bill aimed at enacting much of Trump's agenda. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on his X social media platform. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' He said the bill would undermine much of his efforts to trim federal spending during his brief period with Trump's Department of Government Efficiency. On Thursday, he then blasted the president and accused him of being an ingrate, saying, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Mere hours later, the SpaceX founder dropped the 'really big bomb' when he alleged Trump appeared in the 'Epstein files,' referring to a trove of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sex trafficking crimes, including those who were involved. That post was deleted Friday night. 'That's called 'old news,' that's been old news, that has been talked about for years,' Trump said Saturday when asked about his reaction to Musk's allegation. 'Even Epstein's lawyer said I had nothing to do with it. It's old news.' The president also fired back in a series of press appearances and social media posts. He threatened to not only terminate Musk's government contracts, but to get rid of his Tesla as well. Sources told NBC News the electronic vehicle is still parked outside of the White House. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on Truth Social, referring to federal contracts with SpaceX. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' As for his budget bill, Trump believes his feud with Musk has actually been positive, telling NBC the Tesla CEO helped bring it to the public's attention. 'I think, actually, Elon brought out the strengths of the bill because people that weren't as focused started focusing on it, and they see how good it is,' Trump said. 'So in that sense, there was a big favor. But I think Elon, really, I think it's a shame that he's so depressed and so heartbroken.'

Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers
Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers

Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers The threat culminated a week of clashes between Trump and Musk over federal policy. Show Caption Hide Caption Six takeaways from the President Donald Trump, Elon Musk feud From disappointment to threats, here are six takeaways from the public spat between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Trump told NBC News there would be 'very serious consequences' if Musk financed challenges to Republicans who support his legislative priorities. Musk, who contributed nearly $300 million to help Republicans including Trump win the 2024 election, has harshly criticized the legislative package. President Donald Trump said his former adviser, billionaire Elon Musk, would face 'very serious consequences' if he financed candidates to challenge Republicans who support the president's legislative package for tax cuts and border security. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News on June 7. He declined to share what those would be. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that.' The rupture between the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man reaches far beyond their own relationship. Musk contributed nearly $300 million to help Republicans, including Trump, win the 2024 elections. He was a special White House adviser recommending ways to dismantle federal agencies and lay off workers. Trump thanked him repeatedly for his service and presented him with a gold key in the Oval Office on May 30. But in the week after, Musk harshly called the House-passed legislative package of Trump's top priorities a "disgusting abomination" and urged lawmakers to kill it, as the Senate debates the measure. In response, Trump has already threatened to cancel Musk's government subsidies for electric carmaker Tesla and contracts for rocket company SpaceX. Trump said he thought Musk turned on him because the legislation would end subsidies for electric vehicles and because Trump discarded Musk's choice to lead NASA. Musk replied by threatening to shut down the Dragon spacecraft program that helps the U.S. transport astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station. Trump has seemingly tried to temper his public comments about Musk, wishing his companies well. But he told reporters on Air Force One on June 6 that retaliation was possible. 'He's got a lot of money. He gets a lot of subsidy, so we'll take a look at that,' Trump said. 'Only if it's fair for him and for the country, I would certainly think about it. But it has to be fair.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store