
Taxpayers will foot bill for employment disputes under Rayner's workers' rights plan
Ms Rayner has already been accused of imposing additional costs of £5 billion a year on Britain's businesses with her expansive workers' rights plans, which will also make it easier for employees to strike.
The plans reduce the proportion of workers who must be a member of a trade union in order to run a strike, and the proportion of unionised workers who must vote in favour of industrial action.
The latest amendments were tabled by the Government on Wednesday, and had not previously been announced by ministers – effectively smuggling them into legislation under consideration by MPs.
One amendment will give workers the right to claim 'civil legal aid' to fight employment disputes. Currently, the government will only support some claims of discrimination and HMRC can take action over failure to pay the minimum wage.
The bill would also give the Government the power to take on employers directly, even if the workers affected by the dispute have decided not to take legal action.
Ministers would then claw back the cost of legal support, including representation at a tribunal, from compensation paid by bosses to their workers.
New rules 'really scary' for businesses
Craig Beaumont, executive director at the Federation of Small Businesses, said the new rules were 'really scary' for businesses and could lead to an increase in vexatious claims that can take two years to fight.
'This makes the funnel bigger for new cases, by allowing the government to take out or continue legal action against employers or give legal aid to claimants,' he said.
'It's really scary for small businesses. The idea is that a vexatious claim could come their way and they could wait two years from that point before it is cleared.'
Mr Beaumont said some business owners would feel under pressure to settle claims to avoid years of uncertainty and legal bills.
'If you don't, you might have spent £30,000 on legal fees, which is money that you can't spend employing someone,' he said.
Any action against employers would be brought by the government's new Fair Work Agency, and is designed to help employees who cannot afford lawyers or are concerned about recriminations from their bosses for suing the company.
The plans come after His Majesty's Courts and Tribunal Service revealed in October the number of outstanding tribunals stood at 44,000 in England and Wales.
The number of new cases increased by 18 per cent in the previous year, while the number of cleared cases was down four per cent.
Business leaders have spoken out against the workers' rights plans, which previously included employees' 'right to switch off' and avoid contact with bosses when not working.
The plans were dropped when the bill was presented to Parliament last year.
A Government spokesman said: 'Our Plan to Make Work Pay is a core part of our mission to grow the economy, raise living standards across the country and create opportunities for all.
'This pro-business, pro-worker Government continues to engage extensively with businesses and unions, including on the set up of the Fair Work Agency.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
36 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle indicated the UK would offer a 'fulsome response' to any concerns raised by allies amid suggestions that US opposition could undermine transatlantic trade negotiations. Mr Kyle sought to reassure the public that the Government deals with similar 'infrastructure issues' relating to embassies 'all the time'. 'These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process,' he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme. He added: 'These are the issues that we talk about as two countries all the time… we're in the Five Eyes agreement, America and Britain share intelligence… If people raise security issues even though it relates to planning, then I'm sure we will have a fulsome response for them. 'But look, the key thing is these are issues which are quite routinised in the way that we deal with the security of our country.' A senior US official had told the Sunday Times: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' The matter is believed to have been discussed during US-UK trade talks, with diplomats saying the Trump administration would have reservations about intelligence sharing with the UK if the building went ahead. More than a thousand demonstrators gathered earlier this year for a rally against the proposed Chinese 'super-embassy' because of concerns about its potential proximity to Canary Wharf and the City of London. The redevelopment plans at the former site of the Royal Mint were 'called in' last year, which means the Government will make the final decision following a report from the Planning Inspectorate. The plan was initially refused by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022.


Glasgow Times
37 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle indicated the UK would offer a 'fulsome response' to any concerns raised by allies amid suggestions that US opposition could undermine transatlantic trade negotiations. Mr Kyle sought to reassure the public that the Government deals with similar 'infrastructure issues' relating to embassies 'all the time'. 'These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process,' he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme. He added: 'These are the issues that we talk about as two countries all the time… we're in the Five Eyes agreement, America and Britain share intelligence… If people raise security issues even though it relates to planning, then I'm sure we will have a fulsome response for them. 'But look, the key thing is these are issues which are quite routinised in the way that we deal with the security of our country.' A senior US official had told the Sunday Times: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' The matter is believed to have been discussed during US-UK trade talks, with diplomats saying the Trump administration would have reservations about intelligence sharing with the UK if the building went ahead. More than a thousand demonstrators gathered earlier this year for a rally against the proposed Chinese 'super-embassy' because of concerns about its potential proximity to Canary Wharf and the City of London. The redevelopment plans at the former site of the Royal Mint were 'called in' last year, which means the Government will make the final decision following a report from the Planning Inspectorate. The plan was initially refused by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022.


Glasgow Times
37 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Molly Russell's father urges PM to act over online harms as ‘app cap' considered
Ian Russell, whose 14-year-old daughter took her own life after viewing harmful content on social media, urged the Prime Minister to 'act decisively' in toughening legislation to protect young people online. It comes after Cabinet minister Pete Kyle signalled he was looking at measures to restrict the amount of time children spend on their phones, including through a possible 10pm curfew. Molly Russell took her own life in November 2017 after she had been viewing material on social media linked to anxiety, depression, self-harm and suicide (Family handout/PA) Mr Russell, who is chairman of the Molly Rose Foundation set up in his daughter's memory, said: 'Every day the Government has delayed bringing in tougher online safety laws we've seen more young lives lost and damaged because of weak regulation and inaction by big tech. 'Parents up and down the country would be delighted to see the Prime Minister act decisively to quell the tsunami of harm children face online, but sticking plasters will not do the job. 'Only a stronger and more effective Online Safety Act will finally change the dial on fundamentally unsafe products and business models that prioritise engagement over safety.' The Online Safety Act has passed into law, and from this year will require tech platforms to follow new Ofcom-issued codes of practice to keep users safe online, particularly children. Hefty fines and site blockages are among the penalties for those caught breaking the rules, but many critics have argued the approach gives tech firms too much scope to regulate themselves. Peter Kyle said he was looking at measures to curb 'addictive' behaviour. Mr Kyle was asked on Sunday morning whether he would look at limiting the time children spend on social media to two hours per app after the Sunday People and Mirror reported the measure was being considered by ministers. 'I've not been able to talk publicly about what the Labour approach is because we have the legacy legislation that has to go through first,' he told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg show. 'This year we've had illegal content that needs to be taken down, but in July age-appropriate material must be supplied by platforms otherwise there'll be criminal sanctions against them. 'And in this time, I've been looking very carefully about what we do next.' Pressed on whether he was looking at an 'app cap', Mr Kyle said: 'I'm looking at things that prevent healthy activity, I'm looking at some of the addictive nature of some of the apps and smartphones. 'I'm trying to think how we can break some of the addictive behaviour and incentivise more of the healthy developmental… and also the good communicative side of online life.'