Jury in Satchwell trial told to approach case ‘with open mind, without emotion'
The jury in the trial of a man accused of murdering his wife have been told to approach the case 'with an open mind' and 'without emotion'.
The judge said to jurors that they should not think 'less' of the accused because he did not take the stand to give evidence.
Advertisement
Richard Satchwell, of Grattan Street in Youghal, is accused of murdering his wife between March 19th and 20th, 2017.
The 58-year-old, who is originally from Leicester, England, denies the charge at the Central Criminal Court in Dublin.
Tina Satchwell's remains were found under the stairs in the living room of their Co Cork home in October 2023, six years after Mr Satchwell reported her missing.
Tina Satchwell's remains were found six years after her husband reported her missing (Family Handout/PA)
At the Central Criminal Court on Monday, Mr Justice Paul McDermott told the seven women and five men of the jury that aspects of the trial have been 'unseemly, perhaps shocking'.
Advertisement
But he said if parts of the trial raised their indignation, 'you have to put those things outside the door' and approach it in a 'very careful clinical way'.
'You have to approach it with an open mind, with an independent mind, without emotion, without prejudice,' he said.
Mr Justice McDermott said that they were making their determination based on proof beyond reasonable doubt, which he described as higher than probable, but not 'a mathematical certainty'.
He described it as similar to making a major life decision where a lot of aspects are weighed up, and where something may cause them to hesitate in making the decision.
Advertisement
He described reasonable doubt as when something in the evidence presented in court causes them to pause, or if they feel there is 'something missing'.
'It's not a mathematical certainty, it's not an impossible standard, it's certainly a high standard.'
He said there was no burden on an accused to prove their innocence, and the presumption of innocence is maintained 'unless and until you determine he is guilty of an offence'.
'You know that Mr Satchwell has not given evidence in the case, there is no obligation' to do so, he told the jury.
Advertisement
'He is entitled not to give evidence and you shouldn't think any less of him because he exercised his right.'
Mr Justice McDermott said he would summarise some of the evidence in the case for the jury.
He said if the jury disagrees with the emphasis he places on certain evidence, or if they feel he left out something 'that you think is terribly important', 'that's fine'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Relief and a raised fist as Mahmoud Khalil goes free – but release ‘very long overdue'
Mahmoud Khalil squinted in the afternoon sun as he walked away from the fences topped with razor wire, through two tall gates and out into the thick humidity of central Louisiana. After more than three months detained in this remote and notorious immigration detention center in the small town of Jena, he described a bittersweet feeling of release, walking towards a handful of journalists with a raised fist, visibly relieved, but composed and softly spoken. 'Although justice prevailed, it's very long overdue and this shouldn't have taken three months,' he said, after a federal judge in New Jersey compelled the Trump administration to let him leave detention as his immigration case proceeds. 'I leave some incredible men behind me, over one thousand people behind me, in a place where they shouldn't have been,' he said. 'I hope the next time I will be in Jena is to actually visit.' Flanked by two lawyers, and speaking at a roadside framed by the detention center in the backdrop, he told the Guardian how his 104 days in detention had changed him and his politics. 'The moment you enter this facility, your rights leave you behind,' he said. He pointed to the sprawling facility now behind him. 'Once you enter there, you see a different reality,' he said. 'Just a different reality about this country that supposedly champions human rights and liberty and justice. Once you cross, literally that door, you see the opposite side of what happens on this country.' Khalil is the most high profile of the students arrested and detained by the Trump administration for their pro-Palestinian activism. He was the final one left in detention, following an arrest that saw him snatched from his Columbia apartment building in New York. The Trump administration has labelled Khalil a national security threat and invoked rarely used powers of the secretary of state under immigration law to seek his removal. The administration has fought vigorously to keep Khalil detained and continues to push for his removal from the US. Asked by the Guardian what his response to these allegations were, Khalil replied: 'Trump and his administration, they chose the wrong person for this. That doesn't mean there is a right person for this. There is no right person who should be detained for actually protesting a genocide.' He spoke briefly of his excitement of seeing his newborn son for the first time away from the supervision of the Department of Homeland security. The baby was born while Khalil was held in detention. He looked forward to their first hug in private. He looked forward to seeing his wife, who had been present at the time of his arrest. He smiled briefly. And then he turned back towards, ready to take him on the first leg of a journey back home.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Woman, 32, arrested over fatal hit-and-run of Netflix star Sara Burack in Hamptons
A 32-year-old Virginia woman has been arrested in connection with a fatal hit-and-run incident that claimed the life of a popular Netflix actress, authorities said. Amanda Kempton was charged with leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident in connection to the hit-and-run death of Million Dollar Beach House star Sara Burack, according to the Southampton Town Police Department. Burack, 40, a real estate agent and former reality television personality was struck by a vehicle shortly before 3:00 am on Montauk Highway near Villa Paul Restaurant in Hampton Bays, New York. Emergency responders found her critically injured at the scene, and she later died at Stony Brook University Hospital due to severe trauma, including head injuries and multiple fractures. The vehicle involved fled the scene, prompting a large-scale search by local and state authorities. Following an extensive manhunt led by the Southampton Town Police Department and the New York State Police Accident Reconstruction Unit, Kempton was taken into custody. She has been charged with leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident resulting in death, a Class D felony under New York State law. If convicted, she faces up to four years in prison. Law enforcement officials have not yet disclosed details about how Kempton was identified as a suspect. Kempton is scheduled to be arraigned on Saturday as the investigation remains active, according to the New York Post. Public officials have urged anyone with additional information about the incident to contact Southampton Town Police, as the full circumstances surrounding the event are still under investigation, local outlet, Dan's Papers reported. Sara Burack was a licensed real estate broker with experience in the luxury real estate market. In addition to her professional accomplishments, she gained national visibility as a cast member on the Netflix series Million Dollar Beach House. Burack was also active in charitable work, including fundraising for leukemia research and animal rescue initiatives. Her sudden death has elicited an outpouring of grief from friends, former colleagues, and members of the entertainment and real estate communities. 'I want people to remember she was an amazing person who really cared for people,' close family friend and fellow realtor Paulette Corsair told Newsday. 'She was a hardworking real estate agent who was there for others. She was loved greatly by her friends and a close family.'
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Accidental foraging, reasonable doubt and ‘lies upon lies': Erin Patterson jury hears week of closing submissions in triple-murder trial
Colin Mandy SC, Erin Patterson's barrister in her triple-murder trial, was into the final minute of a closing submission that spanned three days when he started repeating one phrase, almost like a mantra, over and over. It was the last time the jury would hear from anyone in the case other than Justice Christopher Beale, a coda after the prosecution's closing argument and evidence from more than 50 witnesses. Twelve times Mandy said it in the last 60 seconds or so, the only answer, the one thing he wanted the jury to know: 'not guilty'. Patterson, 50, is facing three charges of murder and one of attempted murder in the Victorian supreme court. The charges relate to allegedly using death cap mushrooms in beef wellingtons served to lunch guests at her house in Leongatha on 29 July 2023. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to murdering the relatives of her estranged husband, Simon Patterson – his parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and aunt, Heather Wilkinson – and attempting to murder his uncle, Ian Wilkinson, Heather's husband. 'If you think that it's possible that Erin deliberately poisoned the meal, you must find her not guilty,' Mandy said. 'If you think that maybe Erin deliberately poisoned the meal, you must find her not guilty. 'If you think that she probably deliberately poisoned the meal, you must find her not guilty.' 'Possible', 'maybe' and 'probably' were emphasised, a nod to what Mandy says is a prosecution case that has not cleared the high bar of reasonable doubt. The jury should not consider the trial like a boxing match, prosecution and defence slugging it out, but the high jump, Mandy told the court. Only the prosecution, however, had to clear that bar; Patterson didn't even need to jump. 'If you think at the end of your deliberations, taking into account the arguments that we've made that it is a [reasonable] possibility that this was an accident … you must find her not guilty,' Mandy said. 'And if you think it is a reasonable possibility that her evidence was true, you must find her not guilty. 'Our submission to you is the prosecution can't get over that high bar of beyond reasonable doubt. And when you consider the actual evidence … and consider it properly, methodically, analytically, your verdicts on these charges should be not guilty.' Of the evidence given by Patterson, Mandy told the jury she came through unscathed, her account of what really happened the day of the lunch intact. 'Her account remained coherent and consistent, day after day after day, even when challenged, rapid fire, from multiple angles, repeatedly.' Even if the jury were not convinced of that account, it did not mean Patterson was guilty, he said. 'If you reject her evidence, then what you have to do is take that evidence, put it to one side, and still consider whether the prosecution has proved the case beyond reasonable doubt on the evidence that they bring,' Mandy said. In the prosecution's telling, it wasn't just that Patterson's evidence was not convincing: it was a 'calculated deception' played on the jury. The contrast in message between the defence and prosecution was also delivered with a contrast in style. Nanette Rogers SC delivered the prosecution's closing address carefully and evenly, with the occasional pause for effect, her adherence to the pages in front of her so regimented that she would repeat sentences if she started them differently to how they had been written. Mandy was far more animated, almost theatrical, with flourishes that bordered on the comical. He mocked the prosecution case that Patterson planned the murders as far back as 28 April 2023, when it is alleged she picked death cap mushrooms after finding a post on iNaturalist, a citizen science website where the location of the mushrooms was shared. 'On the Crown case, you might think remarkably, extraordinarily, Erin Patterson observed and acted on the only two sightings of death cap mushrooms ever in South Gippsland … like she was sitting there waiting for them,' Mandy said. 'Never seen them before in South Gippsland. iNaturalist says they don't grow here. Refresh. Nup, still not there. Refresh. Still not there. Refresh, still not there.' Mandy then exclaimed 'ah', his hands wide, pretending to be Patterson discovering the post about death cap mushrooms. 'How likely is that?' he asked. Mandy lent all the way forward on to the lectern at this stage and immediately shifted tone. 'There's not one scrap of evidence that she actually saw those posts,' he said, shaking his right pointer finger towards the jury. The closing addresses are not evidence, but new matters emerged, or were drawn into sharper focus. Mandy said it was possible Patterson became unwell earlier than her lunch guests because she tasted the duxelles as she prepared the beef wellingtons. Patterson said the duxelles tasted bland when she cooked down button mushrooms bought from the supermarket, so she added dried mushrooms from a Tupperware container in her pantry. At the time, she thought these were from an Asian grocer, but now believed the container also held death cap mushrooms she accidentally foraged. Mandy made clear, however, that Patterson gave no such evidence that she re-tasted the duxelles after adding the dried mushrooms. He also wanted to make clear Patterson was 'not on trial for lying'. Moreover, Mandy told the jury, if she had been lying about some of the points the prosecution alleged she had, she would have told better lies: why say she didn't know what was in her vomit, if saying it contained beef wellington would help her? Why not say she had vomited after overeating sooner, given that the greater proximity of vomiting to eating the beef wellington, the greater the likelihood it would reduce the extent of illness? This came after Rogers had catalogued these lies – lies she said Patterson told to other witnesses in the case, and to the jury. Lies told not in the heat of the moment, lies Patterson has admitted, lies she has not. Perhaps the starkest of these, Rogers said, was Patterson's lie about weight loss surgery. 'In the lead up to the lunch and in the periods after the lunch, Erin Patterson told so many lies it's hard to keep track of them. She has told lies upon lies because she knew the truth would implicate her,' the prosecutor said. 'When she knew her lies had been uncovered, she came up with a carefully constructed narrative to fit with the evidence – almost. There are some inconsistencies that she just cannot account for so she ignores them, says she can't remember those conversations, or says other people are just wrong, even her own children. 'You will therefore have no difficulty in rejecting … that this was all a horrible foraging accident.' Rogers said there was no other 'reasonable alternative explanation for what happened to the lunch guests, other than the accused deliberately sourced death cap mushrooms and deliberately included them in the meal she served them, with an intention to kill them'. Justice Christopher Beale has told the jury that his closing charge to them, when he will discuss the legal principles that apply to them considering their verdict and direct them on how the evidence can be used, will take at least two days. 'First of all, maintain an open mind. You have heard the evidence. You have heard the closing speeches of the prosecution and the defence, but you have not heard my charge,' Beale said. 'The second point, and the last point, is it is more important than ever that you have a good weekend. I really want you to come back refreshed.' The trial at the Latrobe Valley law courts in Morwell was originally expected to last five to six weeks, but is set to stretch into a ninth. Court will resume on Tuesday, meaning the jury will not retire to consider its verdict until Wednesday at the earliest.
