
The GOP's patience on Russia is wearing thin
Presented by
With help from Connor O'Brien
Subscribe here | Email Robbie | Email Eric
President DONALD TRUMP is holding out hope for direct talks with Russian President VLADIMIR PUTIN to find a way to end the war in Ukraine. But back in Washington, Republicans are losing patience with Moscow.
'Putin has shown, first of all, he's not trustworthy. Second of all, that he's not serious about this. He's slow rolling this,' Rep. ROB WITTMAN (R-Va.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee, said at the POLITICO Security Summit today. 'There has to be consequences for him not being serious about negotiating peace.'
'Putin has disrespected the US and the goodwill of our President,' Sen. JOHN CORNYN (R-Texas) wrote in a post on X.
It's clear Republican lawmakers are champing at the bit to unleash new sanctions on Russia. The big question is whether Trump will reach that point, too.
Trump told reporters today that he thinks only a direct meeting with Putin will get results — and that he's not giving up on peace talks yet. 'Look, nothing is gonna happen until Putin and I get together,' Trump told reporters on board Air Force One en route to the United Arab Emirates.
Ukrainian President VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY has said he would meet Putin face-to-face for talks in Turkey, and Trump, currently on a tour of the Middle East, previously mused about going if Putin would go. But Putin was a no-show, opting instead to send lower-level technocrats to lead the negotiations with Ukrainian counterparts.
Trump, from Air Force One, added: 'And he wasn't gonna go. … He wasn't going if I wasn't there. And I don't believe anything will happen, whether you like it or not, until he and I get together. But we are gonna have to get it solved because too many people are dying.'
Zelenskyy was quick to seize on Putin's absence, calling it the starkest sign yet the Russian president isn't genuine in efforts to end the three year-long war against Ukraine, which has taken more than 100,000 lives.
Trump's Republican allies on Capitol Hill have a massive new sanctions bill on Russia — with broad bipartisan support — locked and loaded. But so far it hasn't gone to the floor for a vote. The bill was introduced last month by Sens. LINDSEY GRAHAM (R-S.C.) and RICHARD BLUMENTHAL (D-Conn.) Rep. MICHAEL MCCAUL (R-Texas), told our own Phelim Kine at the Security Summit today that he is supporting a version of the sanctions bill in the House.
'Zelenskyy has agreed to a 30-day ceasefire. Putin's response is bombing Ukraine on Palm Sunday,' McCaul said. 'There's a pattern here. It doesn't take an expert to see the lack of sincerity in this negotiation.'
Sen. JEANNE SHAHEEN (D-N.H.), the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the bill has 70 supporters. 'It's veto proof. Let's get that done now,' she told reporters Tuesday. 'Let's let Russia know we're really serious, and if they don't move that, there are going to be consequences.'
Sen. Majority Leader JOHN THUNE's office said it doesn't have any scheduling announcements on the bill.
Some Republican lawmakers have said they want to give Trump room to negotiate even as they criticize Putin, meaning holding back on legislation that would punish Russia to help facilitate talks. But the fresh wave of criticism shows their patience is wearing thin. And that may in turn escalate pressure on the Trump administration to start playing bad cop with Moscow again.
ALSO: The Trump White House's top counterterrorism official, SEBASTIAN GORKA, had some fiery exchanges during an interview with our own Dasha Burns at the Security Summit on Trump's border and deportation policies, Iran talks, negotiations with Russia over Ukraine and criticism of POLITICO's own coverage of the administration. You can watch the full interview here.
The Inbox
FIRST IN NATSEC DAILY – BEHIND ROMANIA'S LOSS OF VISA WAIVER PROGRAM: The Department of Homeland Security announced in March that Romania had lost its visa waiver program in part to 'ensure border and immigration security.' But a previously unreported internal NSC memo obtained by our own Daniel Lippman showed that the Trump administration also considered another factor: Romania's failure to abide by what the White House saw as democratic norms after it annulled an election last year.
Romania has drawn Vice President JD VANCE's ire for prohibiting hard-right politician CĂLIN GEORGESCU from running in a redo this month of an election he won last year that was later annulled.
The 'summary of conclusions' memo from the NSC policy coordination committee meeting on March 14 shows there was some internal dissension about the move. The U.S. Embassy in Bucharest said that 'removal of Romania's designation could result in damage to U.S. image,' according to the document. But the committee, chaired by NSC senior director for Europe and Eurasia ANDREW PEEK, said it was important to ensure Romania 'upholds the democratic process and conducts free, fair, and transparent elections.' The meeting was put together to decide how to contribute to a 'broader Administration effort to prevent the deterioration of democratic norms and practices in Europe writ large,' according to the memo.
'Protecting the integrity of our immigration and visa system is critical to securing our national security,' a White House official said in a statement to NSD. 'There are strict requirements to qualify for the benefit of the Visa Waiver Program, which it wasn't clear Romania had in fact met when the Biden administration rushed the process in its waning days. We separately have concerns about anti-democratic actions in Europe, including lawfare against certain points of view.'
DHS spokesperson TRICIA MCLAUGHLIN said in a statement that it was 'grateful for Romania's close partnership over the years to enhance security cooperation' and that the country may be reconsidered for the program in the future.'
A spokesperson for the Romanian embassy said in a statement that such considerations about democratic norms were 'not part of our dialogue with U.S. officials' and that 'based on the assessment of U.S. agencies leading to the designation as a VWP country, Romania met the program's statutory requirements.'
'Romania reiterates its full willingness to engage in discussions with the United States, as close strategic partners, on ways to address this issue moving forward,' the spokesperson added. 'The decision to ban Mr. Călin Georgescu's candidacy was made within the existing constitutional framework by an independent authority — not by the Romanian government.'
ABOUT THOSE SANCTIONS: Trump's decision to abruptly lift all sanctions on Syria — which won him rare praise from Democrats — isn't as simple as flipping a switch, former officials and experts told our own Felicia Schwartz.
'That was a pretty sweeping announcement when you consider that we have sedimentary layers of sanctions going back to 1979 and, of course, U.S. law as the Caesar act,' said a former U.S. official who was granted anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomatic conversations. The Caesar act is a sweeping landmark sanctions bill, passed in 2019 and extended in 2024, that imposed secondary sanctions to restrict any investment in Syria under the former BASHAR AL-ASSAD regime.
Trump and the executive branch have very wide latitude to suspend the sanctions unilaterally without Congress, though what exactly he meant by lifting all sanctions and how fast that could happen remains unclear. MATT ZWEIG, a former U.S. sanctions official, noted that while Trump could swiftly roll back many trade sanctions, export controls and related restrictions if he chose to, 'the key question is whether the administration would benefit from a deliberative and strategic process.' Zweig is now with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies Action, an advocacy group connected to the think tank.
Rep. JOE WILSON (R-S.C.) said today that Trump's move should include lifting export controls. 'Lifting sanctions while keeping export controls means Chinese and not American companies will lead Syrian reconstruction contrary to President Trump's vision,' he wrote.
The Treasury Department said today that it is working with the State Department and NSC to implement 'the necessary authorizations that would be critical to bringing new investment into Syria.' Secretary of State MARCO RUBIO also told reporters in Turkey today that the administration will use waivers in the Caesar act to lift initial sanctions but will work on repealing the legislation.
Trump said his decision followed lobbying from the leaders of Saudi Arabia and Turkey, but other governments in the region like Israel, the UAE and Egypt are anxious about the move amid concerns about Syrian leader AHMED AL-SHARAA's past ties to al Qaeda.
'There are still deep reservations on the part of several governments,' the former U.S. official said. 'But clearly the most significant piece of this is the impact that it will have in clearing the way for a real regeneration of the Syrian economy.'
IT'S THURSDAY: Thanks for tuning in to NatSec Daily! This space is reserved for the top U.S. and foreign officials, the lawmakers, the lobbyists, the experts and the people like you who care about how the natsec sausage gets made. Aim your tips and comments at rgramer@politico.com and ebazail@politico.com, and follow Robbie and Eric on X @RobbieGramer and @ebazaileimil.
While you're at it, follow the rest of POLITICO's global security team: @dave_brown24, @HeidiVogt, @jessicameyers, @RosiePerper, @nahaltoosi, @PhelimKine, @ak_mack, @felschwartz, @connorobrienNH, @paulmcleary, @reporterjoe, @JackDetsch, @samuelskove, @magmill95, @johnnysaks130 and @delizanickel
The Complex
TRUMP'S PLANE-SIZED HEADACHE HITS ARMS SALES: Democratic lawmakers are trying to block billions of dollars in arms sales to two Middle Eastern countries to protest investments in Trump's personal business and a jet offered to him, as your lead NatSec Daily author and our own Joe Gould report today.
Sen. CHRIS MURPHY (D-Conn.) plans to force a vote on five major arms sales to the United Arab Emirates and Qatar valued at $3.5 billion following Qatar's offer to gift a luxury Boeing aircraft for Trump to use as Air Force One. He and Sen. CHRIS VAN HOLLEN (D-Md.) also plan to co-lead measures to block U.S. arms sales to the UAE over its decision to invest $2 billion in Trump's cryptocurrency venture. Murphy has characterized these moves as 'illegal bribes' to enrich the president personally — a charge that the Trump administration and his Republican allies dismiss.
But regardless of whether these arms sales are blocked, Republican lawmakers are voicing their own unease at the prospect of Trump receiving the Qatari 747 as a gift (and potentially a temporary Air Force One).
Senior House Armed Services member ROB WITTMAN (R-Va.) told our own Jonathan Martin at the Security Summit: 'I have some concerns about an aircraft coming to the United States from the Qataris, both from a security aspect ... [and] all the questions too of accepting gifts from foreign governments.' He added: 'Congress needs to play a role' in any potential deal.
Sen. DEB FISCHER (R-Neb.), a senior Senate Armed Services Committee member, said she wants to examine the plane from more of a policy and a budget' perspective.
'I want to look at the cost of that and how that compares to just getting a new plane, but also the idea that it would be carried over after President Trump's presidency for his library,' Fischer told our own Joe Gould on stage at POLITICO's summit. 'How does that affect the taxpayer? Because obviously the next president is going to need a plane.'
On the Hill
DON'T FORGET ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS: Senate Democrats are keeping busy hammering the Trump administration on other foreign policy aspects, too. Sens. Van Hollen and Shaheen led a letter to Rubio criticizing the Trump administration's move to scale down the bureau in the State Department that manages human rights issues and steeply cut funding to programs that support human rights programs abroad. Thirteen other Democratic lawmakers signed onto the letter.
'When the United States conveniently wields human rights principles as a political cudgel against our adversaries, but does not apply those same standards to our allies, countries like China and Russia are quick to point out such hypocrisy, and American influence on the world stage drops precipitously,' they wrote.
Broadsides
OVERWORKED: Two former U.S. national security advisers say that Rubio has too many jobs for one guy.
'It's simply impossible' for Rubio to simultaneously serve as secretary of State and national security adviser, said JOHN BOLTON, who held the job in the first Trump administration.
'One thing I never thought about in four years as national security adviser was, 'Hey I have spare time, let me also take the secretary of State job,'' said JAKE SULLIVAN, who served in the role for President JOE BIDEN. 'I actually think it's ludicrous to think that you could do both jobs.'
Both made the comments at POLITICO's Security Summit today.
Still, Bolton said Rubio 'has integrity' and while he could reach a point where he wouldn't be able to serve any longer, 'we haven't reached that point yet.' Rubio has made light of juggling multiple administration jobs at once as part of Trump's drive to boost government efficiency. 'Can you take what today are four jobs and just give them all to one person?' he said last week during a speech to the Congressional Hispanic Leadership Institute. 'And I said that sounds like a great idea, let's do it all across the government. Little did I know they just meant me!'
National Security Council spokesperson JAMES HEWITT said in response: 'Secretary Rubio has done an extortionary job implementing the President's America First agenda and is capable of fulfilling the duties of both positions. I'm not sure how John Bolton can claim it's 'impossible' when it's been done before.'
Bolton was much less charitable in his assessment of Trump's special envoy for the Middle East STEVE WITKOFF — who is also leading talks with Putin over Ukraine.
'He knows nothing about Russia, he knows nothing about Ukraine, he knows nothing about Iran, he knows nothing about nuclear weapons, he knows nothing about international arms control and nuclear proliferation, knows nothing about verification and compliance with international agreements. What could go wrong?' Bolton said.
Hewitt did not respond to a request for comment on Witkoff's role. However, Republican lawmakers and administration officials have repeatedly defended Trump's decision to pick who he wants for top jobs — and many have gone to bat defending Witkoff.
Transitions
— DAVE LUBER, the head of the National Security Agency's cybersecurity directorate will retire at the end of the month, as The Record reports.
What to Read
— Eric Schmitt and Helene Cooper, New York Times: Trump's Military Buildup at the Border Expands
— GLOBSEC US Foundation: Bridging the supply-demand gap for critical minerals by 2030
— Anagha Subhash Nair, Foreign Policy Magazine: The Long Shadow of Syria's Chemical Weapons
Tomorrow Today
— Atlantic Council, 9:00 a.m.: Critical minerals and the pathways to prosperity, peace, and security in the DRC
— Center for Strategic and International Studies, 9:30 a.m.: Securing the Future of U.S. Quantum Leadership with Rep. RAJA KRISHNAMOORTHI
— Atlantic Council, 10:00 a.m.: Lucian Kim on 'Putin's Revenge' and Russia's war on Ukraine
Thanks to our editors, Heidi Vogt and Emily Lussier, who are the main roadblocks to our peace plans.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
28 minutes ago
- CNN
What are stablecoins? Everything to know about the crypto being debated in Congress
Stablecoins are on the verge of going mainstream, analysts say, as a landmark regulatory bill makes its way through Congress. The Senate is deliberating the GENIUS Act, which would provide a framework for regulating stablecoins. The bill last week passed a major procedural hurdle in the Senate after initial resistance from some Democrats. Stablecoins are a type of crypto asset that is tied to the value of another currency, such as the US dollar or gold. They were initially created as a way for crypto investors to store their money but have grown in popularity in recent years for their use in digital payments. The landmark bill would provide a boost of legitimacy to the crypto industry and is another example of how cryptocurrencies have had a major revival under President Donald Trump's second term. Proponents of crypto have welcomed the focus on advancing stablecoin regulations. Yet critics have pointed to the Trump family's ties to the crypto industry: For example, World Liberty Financial, a company tied to the Trump family, has issued its own stablecoin. 'Stablecoins seem (to be) here to stay,' analysts at JPMorgan Chase said in an April note. 'A few years ago, we probably would have debated the accuracy of that sentence. Not today.' While cryptocurrencies are known for being volatile and fluctuating in value, stablecoins are supposed to be, as their name suggests, stable. This is because stablecoins are pegged one-to-one to another asset. They are most often linked to the US dollar, making one stablecoin worth $1. Companies that issue stablecoins hold other assets to back their coins and assure buyers about their value. For example, a company issuing stablecoins pegged to the US dollar could buy and hold high-quality assets like US government bonds. Two of the major stablecoin issuers are Tether, which issues USDT, and Circle, which issues USDC — and both of these stablecoins are pegged one-to-one to the dollar. Tether accounts for 62% of the total stablecoin market, according to analysts at Deutsche Bank. The total market value of stablecoins surged from $20 billion in 2020 to $246 billion in May 2025, according to analysts at Deutsche Bank. Stablecoins emerged in 2014 as way for crypto investors to park their money while buying and selling other more volatile cryptocurrencies like bitcoin. Since then, Stablecoins have ballooned in popularity particularly for their potential use in digital payments, said Darrell Duffie, a professor of finance at Stanford University. Stablecoins, given their stable value, can serve as a medium of exchange and function as a digital currency. The crypto coins have emerged as useful in helping speed up payments. 'Cross-border payments are providing the most exciting new use cases,' Duffie said. 'Making a payment, such as a remittance or a vendor payment to or from an emerging-market country, can now be made faster and at lower cost than a conventional correspondent banking payment.' While stablecoins are significantly less volatile than other crypto coins, they are not without risks. If the assets backing the coin drop in value and the one-to-one peg falls apart, it could cause the equivalent of a bank run, said Duffie. Stablecoins gained notoriety in 2022 when TerraUSD, an obscure type of coin called an algorithmic stablecoin, crashed in value and caused a panic among investors. There are also security risks like people forgetting the pass-code to their crypto wallet. The GENIUS act stands for 'Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins of 2025.' Circle would likely benefit from increased regulation more than Tether as Circle is a US-based company while Tether is based in El Salvador, Del Wright, a professor at Louisiana State University Law School who specializes in crypto, told CNN. If the legislation passes, it could usher in mainstream adoption of stablecoins for digital payments and spur growth in the stablecoin industry, said Christian Catalini, founder of the cryptoeconomics lab at MIT. He added that traditional Wall Street firms and startups would also compete to offer stablecoins. Visa (V) in May announced a partnership with Bridge, a stablecoin company owned by fintech startup Stripe, to enable payments using stablecoin in countries across Latin America. 'Stablecoins are on the cusp of mainstream adoption in 2025 as the US pushes forward with landmark legislation,' analysts at Deutsche Bank said in a May note. Despite the resistance in the Senate, 'we still expect progress this year.'


The Hill
33 minutes ago
- The Hill
Morning Report — Trump agenda takes on water in sea of red ink
Editor's note: The Hill's Morning Report is our daily newsletter that dives deep into Washington's agenda. To subscribe, click here or fill out the box below. Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here In today's issue: The nation's rising debt, barely more than a talking point in the Capitol in recent years, suddenly poses an ominous risk to President Trump's sprawling legislative agenda. Republican debate in Washington about deficits, debt and lower taxes took a new turn on Wednesday after the Congressional Budget Office released its finding that the mammoth House bill backed by Trump and now pending in the Senate would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over a decade. Some Senate Republicans insist they cannot support a bill that explodes the debt, which currently totals nearly $37 trillion. Others balk at spending reductions that impact Medicaid and food assistance for the poor to pay for GOP-favored tax cuts. Such legislation, if enacted, would raise annual deficits and pile up levels of debt that, on paper, at least, swallow America's economic output and drag down the economy, according to fiscal hawks and Wall Street investors. Nonpartisan budget experts, examining the House-passed version of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' have yet to gauge what the Senate has in mind for its own version of legislation this summer. Some Republicans are trying to discredit economists and budget experts who warn that Trump's agenda would inflate the debt by trillions of dollars over nine or 10 years, while others are rattled by the potential election risks of failure to deliver a measure Trump can sign. Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) told reporters as he departed a White House meeting among Trump and GOP leaders on Wednesday that assertions the bill would increase deficits are 'absolutely wrong.' The self-imposed Senate legislative deadline is a month away, on July 4, and the clamor to cut federal spending more deeply to trim the long-term budgetary costs of tax cuts shifted lawmakers' conversation on Wednesday to Medicare, a program Trump promised voters he would not touch. 'I won't do it,' he told NBC's 'Meet the Press' in December. Some Senate Republicans make a distinction between cutting benefit payments and what they call Medicare 'waste, fraud and abuse.' Complicating the endeavor is a GOP plan to use a budget reconciliation procedure that relies solely on Republican votes to simultaneously allow up to $4 trillion in borrowing to cover existing U.S. obligations. The Treasury Department wants Congress to raise the debt limit before August or September, but Trump on Wednesday called for the statutory limit to be abolished altogether, throwing in with progressive Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who also wants to revoke it. The president's newest debt ceiling argument: 'It is too devastating to be put in the hands of political people that may want to use it despite the horrendous effect.' SMART TAKE with NewsNation's BLAKE BURMAN: With the focus on the White House's tariff talks with China, you might have missed an issue between the two countries that's playing out in our backyards — U.S. land owned by citizens of our adversaries. The Texas Legislature just passed a bill that would prevent Texas land sales to people from certain countries. Texas Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham told me the state took up the issue when a Chinese official purchased property too close to a U.S. military site. 'We realized that that was really a mechanism for destabilizing our grid, causing problems for our bases,' Buckingham told me. Think this concern is bipartisan? Not necessarily. A couple states away in Arizona, Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs just rejected a similar bill. While we watch President Trump deal with Chinese President Xi Jinping, this is a reminder that issues involving China rest in the states, as well. Burman hosts 'The Hill' weeknights, 6p/5c on NewsNation. 3 THINGS TO KNOW TODAY: ▪ Individuals from a dozen targeted countries in the Middle East and Africa are banned from traveling into the U.S. beginning Monday, Trump announced, citing national security concerns amid his immigration crackdown. Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen were listed in Wednesday's order. Travelers from seven other nations face restrictions. The Supreme Court in 2018 upheld an amended Trump travel ban. ▪ The administration is considering a premium service fee of $1,000 to fast-track tourist and nonimmigrant visas to jump to the head of the line. The hitch? Supreme Court precedent. ▪ The Trump administration returned a Guatemalan migrant to the U.S. who was wrongly flown to Mexico. And separately, deported Venezuelan migrants held in a Salvadoran megaprison must be allowed to contest U.S. assertions they are gang members, a U.S. federal judge ruled on Wednesday. LEADING THE DAY © Associated Press | J. Scott Applewhite MEDICAID CUTS: Senate Republicans on Wednesday discussed the need to cut out 'waste, fraud and abuse' in Medicare to achieve more deficit reduction in Trump's landmark bill to extend the 2017 tax cuts, provide new tax relief, secure the border and boost defense spending. The House-passed bill would cut more than $800 billion from Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program, but some GOP lawmakers argue that other mandatory spending programs, such as Medicare, should also be reviewed for 'waste' to further reduce the cost of the bill. 'There's a legitimate debate about, 'Can we do more with Medicaid? Are we doing too much with Medicaid? How much waste, fraud and abuse is there in Medicare? Why don't we go after that?' I think we should,' Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) said after meeting with colleagues to discuss changes to the House-passed bill. 'Some people are afraid of the topics. I'm not. In my view, this is our moment as Republicans in control of all three branches and we ought to be going after more fiscal responsibility.' Talk of cuts comes after Trump campaigned that he would not 'cut one penny' from Medicare, which currently benefits 68.2 million people 65 and older, but the White House has tried to argue that going after 'waste, fraud and abuse' is not the same as cutting benefits. Members of the Senate Finance Committee — including Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) — met with Trump at the White House on Wednesday to discuss the budget bill. Thune said his colleagues are moving 'in the same direction' and agree 'failure is not an option.' Meanwhile, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), a harsh critic of the bill, said Wednesday that the legislation needs to be overhauled and won't get through the Senate by Trump's July 4 deadline. 'It won't happen,' Johnson said of Trump's goal. SALT: Senate Republicans held a special conference meeting this afternoon to hash out their disagreements over Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' Senate conservatives, led by Johnson, will use the session as an opportunity to demand deeper spending cuts. The big problem, however, is that they have yet to agree on what deficit reduction measures need to be added. An obvious target is the deal the Speaker struck with blue state Republicans to raise the state and local tax deduction, or SALT, cap. The Hill's Alexander Bolton reports there's growing momentum in the Senate GOP conference to roll Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) and other members of the SALT Caucus. The Hill: House Republicans warn Senate not to touch the SALT deal. MUSK'S DIGS: Republicans perceive a threat as they push Trump's megabill: Musk — who contributed hundreds of millions of dollars in 2024 to bolster GOP political fortunes — is now a prominent critic of the president's centerpiece second-term legislation. The tensions press Republican lawmakers to toggle between Trump's instructions and debt-focused critiques of the endeavor by the world's richest man, who claims his own public following. Musk, who recently departed the administration with Trump's good wishes, rubbed a number of senior administration officials the wrong way with his criticism of the bill, which he dubbed an 'abomination.' Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said Wednesday that Trump is 'not delighted' with Musk's shift to oppose the megabill. 'He's not delighted that Elon did a 180 on that,' Johnson said. The Wall Street Journal: Musk's attacks on Trump's tax bill are fraying his relationship with the president. WHERE AND WHEN ZOOM IN © Associated Press | Carolyn Kaster TRANSGENDER TROOPS: Transgender active-duty service members must decide whether to leave the military on their own or be forced out by June 6 under a Pentagon policy announced last month by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a life-altering decision that trans troops interviewed by The Hill's Brooke Migdon said felt nearly impossible to make. 'It's crushing,' said Cmdr. Emily Shilling, who has served in the Navy for almost two decades. 'It's heartbreaking.' CBS News: This Army document outlines plans for expelling transgender troops from the military. MALE VOTERS: Democrats are increasingly frustrated by their party's approach to luring back men who supported Trump in November's election. In more than a dozen interviews with The Hill's Amie Parnes, Democrats griped that while it's still early, they have been underwhelmed by the initial efforts of their party to understand what went wrong and how they can rebuild. 'We have to refocus the party on what it once was and the reason I joined it 30 years ago which was because it was the party of the working class and working families,' said Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha, who served as a senior adviser to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) during his 2020 presidential campaign. 'When you're not talking about the working family, you're never going to get these men back.' 🚨HIGHER ED: The Education Department on Wednesday said Columbia University in New York appears to have failed to meet an accreditation standard by violating federal antidiscrimination law, which puts it at risk of losing federal student loans and Pell Grants. The Education Department's Office for Civil Rights and the Department of Health and Human Services's (HHS) Office for Civil Rights 'determined that Columbia University acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students, thereby violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,' according to a department statement. The university in April conceded to a $400 million deal with the administration to try to dodge additional discord focused on last year's student protests on campus about the war in Gaza, described by the administration as antisemitic. 📚 HARVARD: Trump wants to prevent Harvard University's international students from entering the country, he said in a Wednesday proclamation. Trump urged Secretary of State Marco Rubio to consider revoking current visas for Harvard's international students, who make up nearly a quarter of enrollment. Stay or go? Trump has aggressively sought to punish Harvard after it publicly refused several of his administration's demands, with the White House targeting the school's federal funding and launching a slew of investigations, writes The Hill's Lexi Lonas Cochran. Two students interviewed by The Hill say Harvard should do more to make international scholars feel safe on campus, pointing out that some of those involved have gotten crucial information from the media or court filings instead of from administration communication. 💉 HHS TURNSTILE: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) lost the co-leader of a working group on Tuesday when pediatric infectious disease expert Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos resigned as co-leader that advises outside experts on COVID-19 vaccines. Her departure from the agency came a week after HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a long-time vaccine skeptic, said the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women had been removed from the CDC's recommended immunization schedule. 🔬Health research grants cancellation tracker: The New York Times compiled a list of the thousands of research grants ended or delayed by the Trump administration to date, actions that erased $1.6 billion in support for research on Alzheimer's disease, cancer, substance abuse and many other diseases and conditions. The changes impact public institutions across the country, including in red states that backed Trump in the 2024 election. ELSEWHERE © Associated Press | Gavriil Grigorov, Sputnik UKRAINE: Trump said Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin plans to retaliate against Kyiv for drone strikes that targeted Moscow's strategic bomber fleet. Following a call with Putin, Trump said on social media that the two leaders had a good conversation, 'but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace. President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.' The call comes as Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky traded accusations just days after heavy strikes by both sides — as well as a second round of peace talks on Monday, during which a truce remained far out of reach. Ukraine's audacious drone attack on Russian warplanes has shown Kyiv has a few cards up its sleeve to combat Moscow's aggression, even as Trump pressures hard concessions to achieve a ceasefire. But it's not yet clear whether Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb achieved new leverage with Trump, who views the country as on the brink of defeat. ▪ The Wall Street Journal: The U.S. is redirecting critical antidrone technology from Ukraine to U.S. forces. ▪ NBC News: Satellite images of destroyed and damaged military aircraft on Russian bases have provided fresh detail into Ukraine's unprecedented drone attack. ▪ The Washington Post: A drone strike devastated Russia's air force. The U.S. is vulnerable to unconventional, asymmetric warfare, too. GAZA: The Israeli military announced roads leading to Gaza's aid distribution centers were considered 'combat zones' Wednesday, shortly after the controversial organization tasked with running the sites announced they would close for the day. Meanwhile, the Israeli military launched strikes on weapons belonging to the Syrian government in southern Syria, hours after two projectiles were fired from Syria into the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. ▪ NBC News: Israeli forces have recovered the bodies of two hostages with dual Israeli-U.S. citizenship, Judith Weinstein-Haggai and Gad Haggai. ▪ CNN: The U.S. on Wednesday vetoed a United Nations Security Council resolution demanding an immediate and permanent Gaza ceasefire because it was not linked to the release of hostages or disarming Hamas. ▪ Reuters: What could happen if Israel's parliament votes on dissolution next week? OPINION ■ A $4.5 trillion tax increase, or not? by The Wall Street Journal editorial board. ■ The GOP budget courts disaster, and for what? by Mark Mellman, opinion contributor, The Hill. THE CLOSER © Associated Press | Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Maxwell Orlosky, U.S. Navy Take Our Morning Report Quiz And finally … It's Thursday, which means it's time for this week's Morning Report Quiz! Alert to the Pentagon's proposal to change the names of some Navy ships, we're eager for some smart guesses about White House renaming policies. Be sure to email your responses to asimendinger@ and kkarisch@ — please add 'Quiz' to your subject line. Winners who submit correct answers will enjoy some richly deserved newsletter fame on Friday. Hegseth ordered one Navy ship to be renamed, and the Pentagon is 'considering renaming multiple naval ships named after civil rights leaders and prominent American voices.' Which ships are on the lists? Trump made waves in the first few days of his second term when he renamed which body of water the Gulf of America? Trump wants North America's tallest peak, Denali, to revert to its prior name, which honored what president? Trump proposed — and then the White House said the suggestion was abandoned — renaming Veterans Day, observed on Nov. 11, as what? Stay Engaged We want to hear from you! Email: Alexis Simendinger (asimendinger@ and Kristina Karisch (kkarisch@ Follow us on social platform X: (@asimendinger and @kristinakarisch) and suggest this newsletter to friends.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump asks Congress to make (some of) DOGE's illegal cuts legal
President Donald Trump sent Congress a memo Tuesday night asking lawmakers to sign off on his administration's demand for roughly $9.4 billion in immediate spending cuts. If Congress passes that rescissions package, funding to NPR, PBS and a slew of foreign aid programs would be officially slashed. If this idea sounds familiar, it's because Trump is asking Congress to take back money for programs that he and Elon Musk have illegally refused to spend. The request is a nod to the way things are supposed to work under the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act, a law that makes it clear that the president has no authority to unilaterally withhold, or 'impound,' money the legislature has appropriated. Thus, the request itself is a tacit admission from the Trump administration that its refusal to spend money Congress has appropriated is against the law. If an administration doesn't want to spend money that has been budgeted, a 1974 law requires the White House to submit what boils down to a request for Congress to take its money back. Only after both chambers approve would the budget authority granted to specific departments and agencies be rescinded. Congress now has 45 days to pass the package before it expires and the administration is once again legally required to spend that money. In the memo passed on to Congress, Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought laid out 22 specific cuts to be made. The largest single item in Vought's request would fully eliminate $1.07 billion allocated over the next two fiscal years to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. The CPB, as those of us who grew up watching 'Sesame Street' know, is the biggest source of funding for many PBS stations. Trump signed an executive order to slash the CPB's funding last month, but NPR and PBS have called the order unconstitutional and sued to have it overturned. But the bulk of the requested cuts are focused on drawing down funding to various international projects the Trump administration has decided 'do not align with an America First foreign policy agenda.' They apparently include such controversial concepts as promoting democracy ($83 million rescinded from the Democracy Fund), helping children ($437 million in contributions to UNICEF and other United Nations programs terminated), fighting HIV/AIDS ($400 million cut from programs like the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR), and saving lives after natural disasters ($496 million withdrawn from the International Disaster Assistance account). Among the smaller but pettier cuts requested is $125 million of the U.S. Agency of International Development's operating budget. It has been months since the Department of Government Oversight de facto shuttered USAID, which Musk famously boasted had been fed 'into the woodchipper,' with most of its contracts illegally cut and its employees fired. Many of those laid-off employees are also suing the administration for circumventing Congress in trying to shut down an agency Congress established by law. As with many things budget-related, several things are true at once here. On the one hand, the money that would be clawed back would undoubtedly have major, catastrophic impacts on the work it's funding. On the other, the $9 billion package is a drop in the bucket compared to the $2 trillion in savings that Musk originally promised to find with DOGE and a drop in the ocean compared to the annual $6.8 trillion federal budget. Getting the package through Congress would require only Republican votes, but that doesn't mean it will succeed. There has historically been little appetite from Congress for rescission requests; many lawmakers are aware of the political risk that comes with publicly voting to cut specific programs, especially popular ones. As Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins, R-Maine, recently noted to reporters, 'there hasn't been a successful rescission package in many, many years.' But Musk has been unhappy with the lack of enthusiasm from Congress for codifying DOGE's cuts. The Tesla CEO, who just left his quasi-official government role, slammed the House's megabill as a 'pork-filled ... abomination.' Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said he called Musk to talk to him about the bill but got no answer. Even if congressional Republicans balk at the relatively small package, Vought has a backup plan: keep breaking the law. The OMB director recently appeared on CNN not only to say this was 'the first of many rescission bills,' but also to insist that impoundment remains on the table. He also echoed a truly absurd claim from his former think tank that as long as you illegally withhold money within the 45-day window before a fiscal year ends, you can do an end-run around Congress. To repeat, in presenting congressional Republicans with the chance to place a veneer of legality on DOGE's actions, the White House is tacitly admitting that the power of the purse still lies in Congress' hands. But Vought's attitude makes it clear this is a 'heads I win, tails you lose' proposition. If Congress doesn't go along with its rescission package, the Trump administration will simply continue to do as it has done and usurp the power of appropriation for itself. The sad thing is there are surely plenty of GOP lawmakers who, to avoid risking difficult votes, are willing to surrender their awesome power. This article was originally published on