
75,000 cases of eye care products just got recalled: Here's to know, plus what to buy instead
If you suffer from dry or itchy eyes, listen up: more than 75,000 cases of eye drop solution were voluntarily recalled nationwide by BRS Analytical Service, a pharmaceutical testing lab, according to an enforcement report from the Food and Drug Administration. AvKare, a manufacturer of medical, surgical and pharmaceutical items, originally reported the recall.
Why are certain eye care products being recalled?
The recall follows an FDA audit at BRS Analytical Service, which found a number of Current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) deviations. The cGMP is a set of regulations enforced by the FDA to ensure that manufacturers use safe practices to produce pharmaceutical products. 'cGMP deviations may lead to products of unacceptable quality, and it is not possible to rule out patient risks resulting from use of these products,' according to the statement from AvKare.
Additionally, the enforcement report says the reason for the recall is 'due to a lack of assurance to sterility.' The recalled products, also described as 'eye lubricants,' help relieve dry and irritated eyes.
What products are part of the recall?
The recall encompasses ophthalmic solutions shipped over a two year period from: May 26, 2023 until April 21, 2025, according to AvKare. If you have any of the below items, you should stop using them immediately:
NDC# 50268-043-15 Artificial Tears Ophthalmic Solution
NDC# 50268-066-15 Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium Ophthalmic Gel 1%
NDC# 50268-068-15 Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium Ophthalmic Solution
NDC# 50268-126-15 Lubricant Eye Drops Solution
NDC# 50268-678-15 Polyvinyl Alcohol Ophthalmic Solution
What should you do?
In addition to pausing any use of the above compromised products, you can follow the steps below and swap in one of our expert-approved alternatives.
If you have any of the recalled products, or think you may have any of them, AvKare is encouraging consumers to fill out a Recall Form and email it to them. After sending in the form, the organization will then send you a Return Authorization Form, which you can use to send the products into the following address with the package marked: Ophthalmic RECALL. They will also issue full credit including shipping costs for returns.
R&S Northeast LLC
8407 Austin Tracy Rd
Fountain Run, KY 42133
Expert-recommended alternatives to use instead
If you suffer from dry, itchy or irritated eyes, experts recommend using the following methods to help alleviate symptoms. To treat aqueous dry eye, also known as blepharitis, it's best to use a warm compress over the eyes for about 30 seconds daily, according to Dr. Yuna Rapaport, a board-certified ophthalmologist at Manhattan Eye. Additionally, 'humidity in the bedroom is also helpful for evaporative dry eye,' says Rapaport. Consider using a humidifier in your room to help alleviate symptoms.
Ocusoft
These cleansing eyelid pads also come recommended by Rapoport to help with dry eyes. The set includes 35 fragrance- and alcohol-free pads that help remove makeup, pollen and oils that can irritate the eyes, according to the brand.
Eye Revive by Daily Practice
Rapaport recommends this foaming cleanser to help hydrate and soothe eyelids. It has glycerin, a humectant that hydrates skin by pulling moisture from the air, and fruit extracts with antioxidants, like lycopene, that can help prevent skin damage from free radicals, according to the brand. Rapaport says to use the cleanser by gently scrubbing over and around the eyelids. She also recommends applying the solution to a cotton pad and washing the inner and outer corners of the eyes.
A warm compress can also be a great alternative for soothing irritated eyes, according to Rapaport. This compress, which has a 4.5-star average rating from 1,745 reviews on Amazon, has 30 self-heating eye compresses to relieve dry eyes, reduce eyelid inflammation and unblock glands in the eyes, according to the brand. Since they're self-heating you don't need to put them in the microwave and risk them getting too hot. You can also use your FSA funds to purchase these.
Levoit Humidifier
A humidifier also helps relieve dry eyes by adding moisture to an environment, like your bedroom. This 2.5-liter option has an auto shut-off feature and is BPA free. Humidifiers are great to have around especially if you have allergies and regularly get irritated eyes or experience dryness or allergies.
Meet our expert
At NBC Select, we work with experts who have specialized knowledge and authority based on relevant training and/or experience. We also take steps to ensure all expert advice and recommendations are made independently and without undisclosed financial conflicts of interest.
Why trust NBC Select?
I'm a commerce editor at NBC Select, where I write about deals and sale events, product reviews and roundups and articles on product recalls. I reviewed a statement issued by AvKare and researched documents from the FDA as well as spoke with a board-certified ophthalmologist for this story.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Trump administration scrambling to rehire workers cut by DOGE to fill critical government roles
Departments and agencies across the federal government are scrambling to fill crucial roles left vacant over the Department of Government Efficiency's mass firings and deferred resignation offers. For months, DOGE has demanded departments and agencies dramatically downsize as part of efforts to cut government spending. Some employees have been incentivized to leave with early retirement offers or buyouts. Others, such as probationary employees, have been dismissed. But now, those same departments and agencies have been left understaffed and are struggling to get workers back. Between experienced employees who took early retirement offers, those who found jobs in the private sector, and those uninterested in returning to a chaotic environment, the government is having trouble filling roles. The Food and Drug Administration, which has let go of at least 3,500 employees since April, rescinded the reduction-in-force notification three weeks after initially sending it. One FDA employee told the Washington Post they only agreed to return because they hadn't found a new job yet. 'Being back feels like a funeral,' the employee said. 'Morale is terrible. Everyone is stressed and feels the absence of our colleagues.' The employee said they plan to find a new job. The FDA also appears to be hiring at least 17 new permanent roles, according to USAJobs. Postings show multiple openings for investigators, physicians, and regulatory specialists. Within the FDA, the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research has sent desperate emails asking for 'timekeeper' volunteers – people who handle necessary administrative tasks such as pay, leave, and travel. The chaotic firings and rehiring are occurring in agencies across the government. IRS probationary workers who were fired for 'performance' related reasons were told to show up to the office in May, according to The Washington Post. In February, the National Nuclear Safety Administration had to recall termination emails sent to at least 50 employees overseeing the nation's nuclear stockpile. The swath of USAID employees who were among the first to be targeted by President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's workforce cuts have recently been offered roles within the State Department. At the Community Planning and Development agency, within the Department of Housing and Urban Development, at least 370 employees, or 40 percent of staff, have left since the start of Trump's term, a staffer told the Washington Post. Some field offices have been left so understaffed, HUD offered reassignment offers to remaining employees. Despite some lawmakers' warning, the administration made cuts to the National Weather Service that left a field office in Kentucky short-staffed amid severe weather that included deadly tornadoes. While the office managed to keep up with scheduling changes, the NWS was recently permitted a workaround to the federal hiring freeze and can now hire more staff.


Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Four Democratic-led US states urge FDA to remove abortion pill restrictions
NEW YORK, June 5 (Reuters) - The attorneys general of New York, California, Massachusetts and New Jersey asked the Food and Drug Administration to expand access to the abortion pill mifepristone, and remove what they view as outdated and medically unnecessary restrictions. Thursday's petition by the Democratic-led states seeks to force the FDA to acknowledge what the states view as "extensive" evidence that mifepristone is safe, notwithstanding the Trump administration's general opposition to abortion. It came after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr told Congress last month he ordered FDA Commissioner Marty Makary to review the pill, and unspecified "alarming" new data suggested the government should at least change the label. Mifepristone is the first pill, followed by the drug misoprostol, for medication abortion in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy, and won FDA approval in 2000. Medication abortions account for more than half of U.S. abortions, though 28 states restrict access, according to the nonprofit Guttmacher Institute, which focuses on reproductive health. The petition challenges FDA requirements that mifepristone prescribers be included in national and local abortion provider lists, patients attest in writing that they intend to end their pregnancies, and pharmacies perform a variety of recordkeeping. Citing the drug's safety record, it said those rules, part of the FDA's Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program, are "no longer justified by science or law," especially in states where abortion is legal and comprehensively regulated. New York Attorney General Letitia James said the rules keep mifepristone out of reach of most primary care settings. She called that problem particularly acute in rural and other areas where getting abortions often requires lengthy travel. "There is simply no scientific or medical reason to subject it to such extraordinary restrictions," James said, referring to mifepristone. "The FDA must follow the science." A spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Human Services said FDA Commissioner Makary "will ensure gold standard science is used while incorporating practical, common-sense considerations to its regulatory processes." Many states, primarily Republican-led or leaning, have restricted or substantially eliminated abortions in the three years since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that legalized the procedure nationwide. Last June, the Supreme Court preserved broad access to mifepristone, unanimously ruling that a group of anti-abortion organizations and doctors lacked legal standing to challenge the FDA's approval of the pill. Despite largely siding with abortion opponents, Republican President Donald Trump said during his 2024 campaign he did not plan to limit access to mifepristone. Last month, the administration asked a federal judge to dismiss, on procedural grounds, a lawsuit by three generally Republican states seeking to narrow such access. That lawsuit began during the administration of Democratic President Joe Biden, who generally supported abortion access. Seventeen other Democratic-led or -leaning states plus Washington, D.C., are separately suing the FDA in Spokane, Washington, to loosen restrictions on mifepristone. They said doctors and pharmacies should be able to dispense the pill, as with most drugs, without special certifications. On May 30, the Trump administration urged a dismissal, saying the states didn't show the FDA's policy was flawed or the agency ignored important evidence. The states filed Thursday's petition after a short delay, with the filing having been expected earlier in the morning.


Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Shocking reason your protein powder could be TOXIC
Protein powders have become a wellness staple - the go-to answer for everything from building muscle to 'getting enough protein.' But despite their popularity, these powdered supplements may not be as healthy or safe as we think. In fact, one medical expert says they could be doing more harm than good - and in some cases, manufacturers don't even know what's in them. 'I can tell you for a fact that advertised vs. actual amounts varied wildly,' Dr. Khameinei Ali, an MD who also happens to be an MBA (Cambridge), MPH (Harvard), President of the Westchester County Medical Society, and a board certified clinical informaticist, told Before medical school, he even worked as an analytical chemist for the Department of Defense, analyzing over-the-counter supplements for accuracy. His biggest concern? That protein powder labels aren't telling the full story - and the regulations in place aren't strong enough to protect consumers. 'The main issue with protein powders is that we don't know what's in them or if they contain the advertised amounts,' Dr. Ali said. 'Most importantly, the manufacturers may not know what's in them.' Unlike prescription medications or even standard food products, protein powders fall into a legal gray zone. Dr. Ali explained that these protein powders are regulated mostly by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and only partly by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA). Plus, they get inspected under much less stringent standards than food and drugs. 'This opens them up to all sorts of misleading labeling and extremely poor industry standards,' Dr. Ali said. Translation: That expensive, vanilla-flavored powder you picked up because it said 'clean' or 'lab-tested'? There's a good chance it was neither. 'There is very little to any independent laboratory verification of contents and authenticity of claims,' he added. 'Unfortunately, that means they could contain all sorts of toxic chemicals and byproducts.' Beyond the risk of inaccurate protein counts, powders derived from whey, soy, or hemp often include extra ingredients you probably didn't sign up for. 'These powders… frequently contain hidden additives, added sugars, and even toxins like heavy metals and BPA - up to 25 times the safe limit according to independent tests,' he said. This raises concerns about long-term safety. If that sounds terrifying, it's because it is - and the lax oversight doesn't help. 'Again, the FDA doesn't regulate them closely, leaving consumers in the dark about what's really in each scoop,' he emphasized. In most cases, it's probably a good idea to ditch the protein powder - especially if you're generally healthy and using protein powder to meet vague fitness goals. The expert advises against using them unless a medical professional tells you to. 'Unless medically supervised - such as for post-surgical healing, cancer recovery, or advanced frailty - I advise sticking to whole food sources like eggs, dairy, legumes, and lean meats in most cases,' Dr. Ali said. And if you have underlying conditions, like kidney disease, the stakes are even higher. 'Toxins aside, people with kidney disease have to monitor their protein intake to prevent further damage,' he said. Until tighter regulations are in place and independent testing becomes standard, your safest bet is to stick with real food. Whole eggs and chicken breast may not come in chocolate flavor, but at least you know what's in them.