logo
Bipartisan leaders come together to try to make Maine more resilient to extreme weather

Bipartisan leaders come together to try to make Maine more resilient to extreme weather

Yahoo28-02-2025

The fishing vessel Tara Lynn II crashed into the rocky coast of Cape Elizabeth amid powerful winds and record-breaking tides on the coast of southern Maine. The crew was rescued. Jan. 13, 2024. (Photo by Jim Neuger/Maine Morning Star)
The first bill of the legislative session, meant to be a symbol of the parties coming together, had a public hearing Thursday.
Senate President Mattie Daughtry (D-Cumberland) was joined by co-sponsor House Minority Leader Billy Bob Faulkingham (R-Winter Harbor) in presenting the governor's bill to the Legislature's Housing and Economic Development Committee. LD 1 is a three-part proposal to better prepare the state for extreme weather events. It seeks to improve emergency communications, create funding opportunities to make Maine homes more resilient and establish a new State Resilience Office to address flooding and other impacts.
'Moving forward, I and the other bill sponsors want to help empower our state to prepare, so we don't have to always repair,' Daughtry told the committee.
The proposed legislation follows the interim recommendations from the Maine Infrastructure Rebuilding and Resilience Commission, which Mills established by executive order last spring in response to the series of severe storms that caused an estimated $90 million in damage to public infrastructure across Maine last winter.
The proposal builds upon $60 million for storm relief that was included in the state's supplemental budget last year.
Though Maine's coastal communities saw extensive damage in the storms, Daughtry clarified that the bill would benefit the entire state because inland communities also need to prepare for flooding, wind damage and threats to water supplies.
'LD 1 won't stop storms, but it will help people be better prepared,' Faulkingham said.
The proposal's three new initiatives do not rely on the state's general fund or taxpayer money, but instead leverage federal dollars and an unintended surplus of fee-based revenue from the state Bureau of Insurance.
Environmental advocates including Maine Conservation Voters, Natural Resources Council of Maine and Maine Audubon praised the bill for its proactive approach to mitigating the effects of climate change. Though the Maine Insurance Agents Association agreed resilience is important, it opposed the measure because its funding mechanism relies in part on fees paid by agents and insurance carriers.
One initiative in the bill is the Home Resiliency Program, which would provide grants to help homeowners better equip their houses to withstand severe weather events. Insurance Bureau Superintendent Bob Carey testified in support of the program and explained its two main components: roof replacement and flood resistance.
Roughly three-quarters of instances where an insurer decides not to renew a homeowner's policy is due to substandard roofs, Carey said, noting that this has been an increasing problem. The program would help homeowners who need new roofs to better withstand strong wind and rain events.
Last winter's storms also demonstrated a need to fortify homes against flooding, Carey said. He said he envisions grants funded through the new program could be used for improvement projects such as elevating utility connections, sealing foundations and installing sump pumps to minimize the damage from water seepage.
'These programs will help Maine residents harden their homes to deal with more frequent and intense storms,' Carey said. 'We also believe they will foster a broader culture of preparedness.'
As drafted, the bill limits the program to homeowners whose permanent residence is in Maine. Carey suggested amending the program to provide tiered-grants based on income.
Between March 2022 and May 2024, Maine had nine natural disasters severe enough to warrant presidential disaster or emergency declaration, said Maine Emergency Management Agency Deputy Director Joe Legee.
'These events underscore the urgent need to enhance our capacity to respond to and recover from disasters, especially at a time when the future of federal support, federal assistance is uncertain,' Legee said, nodding to ongoing spending cuts and freezes made by the Trump administration.
Effective and accurate information before, during and after disasters is crucial, Legee said. The proposed legislation wants to enhance statewide disaster communications systems by adding new languages for more translation options and better targeting alerts to ensure they reach those who need to see them as well as minimizing alerts to people outside of disaster areas.
The bill also proposes $10 million to bolster the disaster recovery fund, which is used to meet the state's legal obligation to cover a portion of the costs associated with federally declared disasters, Legee said. Having sufficient money in that fund helps communities recover more effectively, especially small municipalities that have faced multiple severe weather events in recent years, Legee said.
The bill also invests in a new program that would better prepare Maine residents for flooding through improved data and risk reduction measures.
A new flood readiness program would update flood models and maps, especially in areas where they are the most outdated, said Hannah Pingree, director of the Governor's Office of Policy Innovation and the Future. With that, it would create an online data hub to improve community access to flood risk data.
The data work would be funded through a one-time $9 million investment, Pingree said, adding that there would be ongoing financial support for regional floodplain management and risk reduction. She also said this could increase participation in the National Flood Insurance Program.
A new State Resilience Office will coordinate the flood readiness program, as well as other related activities, using a $69 million federal grant the state was awarded last year, Pingree said.
'LD 1 is a vital down payment on a more resilient future for Maine,' Pingree said. 'It creates a foundation of information, capabilities and capital upon which the state can build a robust system that increases protection for Mainers and their property against storms, floods and other hazards.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The most important Democratic primary endorsements: poll
The most important Democratic primary endorsements: poll

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

The most important Democratic primary endorsements: poll

Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), two progressive powerhouses, hold the most influential endorsements in Democratic primaries, according to new polling shared with Axios. Why it matters: Democratic figures have already started firing off endorsements for the 2026 midterms. But new data reveals only a fraction of those endorsements motivate primary voters. 60% of likely Democratic primary voters are more likely to support a politician endorsed by Sanders, according to recent polling by Data for Progress. That figure is 56% for Warren. The endorsements of top Democratic leaders like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries aren't as powerful as the endorsements of other prominent Democrats, according to the poll. The big picture: There are several high-stakes primaries for Democrats next year. Progressives and moderates will try to put their thumbs on the scales of those contests. Senate Democrats are preparing for open primaries in Michigan, Illinois, Texas, Florida and North Carolina. Zoom in: These are how political figures polled among Democratic primary voters. Sen. Bernie Sanders — Net +48 (More likely: 60%, Less likely: 12%) Sen. Elizabeth Warren — Net +46 (More likely: 56%, Less likely: 10%) Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg — Net +44 (More likely: 53%, Less likely: 9%) Gov. Tim Walz — Net +44 (More likely: 54%, Less likely: 10%) Sen. Cory Booker — Net +38 (More likely: 51%, Less likely: 13%) House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries — Net +37 (More likely: 47%, Less likely: 10%) Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — Net +31 (More likely: 44%, Less likely: 13%) Gov. Gretchen Whitmer — Net +31 (More likely: 39%, Less likely: 8%) Gov. Josh Shapiro — Net +29 (More likely: 40%, Less likely: 11%) Sen. Amy Klobuchar — Net +29 (More likely: 40%, Less likely: 11%) Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer — Net +27 (More likely: 43%, Less likely: 16%) Rep. Jasmine Crockett — Net +26 (More likely: 33%, Less likely: 7%) Gov. Gavin Newsom — Net +25 (More likely: 38%, Less likely: 13%) Gov. Andy Beshear — Net +23 (More likely: 32%, Less likely: 9%) Businessman Mark Cuban — Net +23 (More likely: 35%, Less likely: 12%) Gov. J.B. Pritzker — Net +21 (More likely: 29%, Less likely: 8%) Sen. Chris Murphy — Net +19 (More likely: 26%, Less likely: 7%) Gov. Wes Moore — Net +17 (More likely: 25%, Less likely: 8%) Sen. Tim Kaine — Net +17 (More likely: 28%, Less likely: 11%) Former Ambassador Rahm Emanuel — Net +14 (More likely: 25%, Less likely: 11%)

The intra-GOP fight over Israel's strikes on Iran
The intra-GOP fight over Israel's strikes on Iran

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

The intra-GOP fight over Israel's strikes on Iran

Some Hill Republicans view the past 24 hours as a battle lost for MAGA's isolationist camp. Why it matters: GOP Hill leaders united in support of Israel's targeted attack on Iran — in spite of MAGA media's monthslong warnings against such strikes. Major MAGA figures from Tucker Carlson to Charlie Kirk to Jack Posobiec tried for months to rally the Trump base against the U.S. backing direct attacks on Iran. Non-interventionism is a core pillar of the "America First" movement — arguably as important to the MAGA base as immigration and trade. But elected Republicans' public support of Israel's action indicates the more traditional national security hawks still have some ground to stand on, for now. What they're saying: "Two months ago I gave Iran a 60 day ultimatum to "make a deal." They should have done it," Trump posted on Truth Social on Friday. Israeli officials told Axios that despite the administration's official distancing from the strikes, the U.S. had given Israel the green light. "The United States Senate stands ready to work with President Trump and with our allies in Israel to restore peace in the region and, first and foremost, to defend the American people from Iranian aggression," Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said in a statement. "Israel decided it needed to take action to defend itself. They were clearly within their right to do so," Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said. What we're hearing: Top GOP congressional staffers told Axios the limits of the MAGA isolationists' influence — particularly with lawmakers — is clear. One chief of staff described the online personalities as "in a bubble," arguing they have almost no real influence on Capitol Hill. Another said they felt that when it comes to Israel, most Republicans are not all that in line with voices like Carlson. One aide argued that Trump is not all that different than in his first term, when he took out Qasem Soleiman i or ordered strikes on Syria in response to a chemical weapons attack — despite new voices in his inner circle. Standing with allies is foreign policy 101, said another, calling it "remarkable" how some in the administration's isolationist wing pretends otherwise. What to watch: Some Republicans are taking it a step further than approval of Israeli actions, encouraging more direct U.S. involvement while not yet advocating for troops on the ground. "Again, I applaud President Trump for urging Iran back to the negotiating table," Sen Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) posted on X on Friday. "However, if Iran refuses this offer, I strongly believe it is in America's national security interest to go all-in to help Israel finish the job." "President Donald J. Trump does not bluff. If the Iranians attack Americans— there will be hell to pay," Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.), a close Trump ally, posted. Between the lines: The MAGAverse's influence could have been diluted by its own division over the issue of Israel and Iran. Some in MAGA, led by older voters and evangelicals, want to continue Washington's historic Israel bearhug even while avoiding other foreign entanglements. Others don't have such an Israel-sized carveout in their non-interventionist instincts. A slice of MAGA promoting antisemitism is openly hostile to the country. The bottom line: Those divisions were on full display Friday. "How is it not AMERICA FIRST to congratulate those who just made sure Islamists who chant "DEATH TO AMERICA" and who openly plotted to assassinate President @realDonaldTrump never have an opportunity to have a nuke?" right-wing provocateur Laura Loomer posted on X. "They should be Israel first. But we have to be America first," Steve Bannon said on his "War Room" podcast Friday. "The bottom line is, we cannot be inexorably dragged into a war on the Eurasian land mass or in the Middle East or in Eastern Europe."

Exposed: How Texans' Tax Dollars Fund Political Agendas
Exposed: How Texans' Tax Dollars Fund Political Agendas

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Exposed: How Texans' Tax Dollars Fund Political Agendas

When state Sen. Mayes Middleton sponsored a bill to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, he hoped it would end the use of peoples' money against their own interests. 'For too long, taxpayers' and parents' own tax dollars have been used to lobby against them in Austin,' Middleton said in a statement to The Dallas Express. Middleton, a Republican, introduced SB 19 in the state Senate in February, aiming to ban public bodies from hiring lobbyists. 'These taxpayer-funded lobbyists have squandered millions of dollars of your hard-earned dollars to lobby against border security, election integrity, parental choice in education, teacher pay raises, and even fought against property tax relief and reform,' Middleton said in the statement. Tarrant County Judge Tim O'Hare endorsed Middleton's proposed ban on taxpayer-funded lobbying in February. 'It's time for Texas to put a stop to using our tax dollars for special interest lobbying,' he posted at the time. Close to $100 million in public funds is spent each year on taxpayer-funded lobbying, according to Middleton. Public bodies across Texas spent up to $98.6 million in 2023 – up from $75 million in 2021 – to hire 'contract lobbyists,' according to a report by the Texas Public Policy Foundation. James Quintero, policy director of the group's Taxpayer Protection Project, wrote that these numbers fail to 'capture the full weight of taxpayer-funded lobbying.' He added that local governments also use tax dollars to hire 'in-house lobbyists' and pay membership dues to 'politically active groups that represent political subdivisions to the legislature.' Quintero wrote that it is 'more difficult to quantify' these kinds of lobbying due to the large volume of information. 'The practice of T[axpayer] F[unded] L[obbying] is being utilized by local governments to lobby state government for more government – and in a decidedly leftwing direction,' Quintero wrote. 'It is tantamount to the weaponization of public money against the public interest, for the benefit of a select few.' Groups like the Texas Association of School Boards used 'school tax dollars' to protect men going into girls' restrooms and locker rooms, and invited 'transgender advocates' to train school board members on pronouns, Middleton said. In the past, the TASB reportedly helped block school choice. The TASB uses 'taxpayer-funded' lobbying, and it spent up to $1.89 million as of the '2024 election season,' according to Transparency USA. Since 2015, the group has spent up to $6.8 million. Its 'advocacy agenda' is off-limits to the public. The TASB denounced efforts to ban lobbying with public money: 'Prohibiting Local Governments from Lobbying is Community Censorship.' Dallas directed more than $1 million to its 'internal lobbyists,' which support legislation it says 'protect[s] the rights of all vulnerable communities, including LGBTQIA+ individuals, youth, seniors, and refugees.' Fort Worth supports legislation that would 'prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.' Other large cities across Texas also fund lobbyists with public money. Austin uses its 'public-private team of lobbyists' to 'actively support legislation' backed by the city council, like 'pay-equity, education-equity, housing-equity, and health-equity.' Houston supports measures 'strengthening local governments' regulatory authority over energy industry participants.' San Antonio's Government Affairs Department pushes legislation supporting 'health equity and social justice.' Middleton's ban on taxpayer-funded lobbying – backed by Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick – passed the state Senate in March but ultimately died in the state House. Before it passed the first chamber, Republican state Sen. Robert Nichols introduced an amendment that gutted the bill. This removed the ban on public dollars for nonprofits that hire lobbyists and created carve-outs for nonprofits. TASB is a nonprofit, so this would have exempted the group from the public lobbying ban. 'Time and time again, we have seen taxpayer-funded lobbyists advocate against Texans and against common sense,' Middleton said in a statement. 'We don't need an Austin lobbyist middleman between state and local elected officials. We are elected to represent our constituents directly.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store