‘Almost criminal' that patients cannot access medical records – former HSE digital chief
It is 'almost criminal' that Irish patients cannot easily access their own medical records, according to a leading digital health expert, who resigned in frustration from the HSE two years ago.
Maynooth University professor of innovation Martin Curley addressed the college's Digital Health summer school today, Monday.
He resigned as the HSE's head of digital transformation in 2023 after five years. At the time, he compared the challenge of the role to scaling Mount Everest.
In just one example of obstacles facing patients and staff, anyone who wants to see their personal medical records must make a Freedom of Information (FOI) request.
'This is nonsense, this is almost criminal,' he said, speaking after the event.
'One of the angles we talked about today is that we are in breach of GDPR. There's a fundamental right from GDPR that patients have access to their information.'
He acknowledged there could be sensitive information which doctors might be reluctant to share, or information which needs explanation.
Despite this, he said, a shift away from the FOI requirement would mean 'moving from paternalism to participation and partnership'.
His main focus at Monday's event was on practical examples of how digital technology could help this shift happen, and also benefit other areas of health.
Praise for HSE's Mission 10X
The conference heard about a digital health initiative already in use by the HSE Dublin and in the Midlands health region.
Prof Curley said the Mission 10X system is based on 10 recommendations. He described it as 'fully aligned' with the Sláintecare programme.
It runs on an individual e-health record called 'SPINE' — secure patient information network exchange. It is in use with over 15,000 patients.
He added that the conference heard of 'staggering changes' from the HSE's Maxine Radcliffe regarding swifter and more accurate triaging of patients. He said:
We're calling Mission 10X a moonshot, to bring Ireland from last in Europe to first in the world in digital health.
'We need to scale it [nationally] and, if this plan is supported, everybody in Ireland will have a personal health record on their phone and it will be completely integrated from a pharmacy, to the GP, to the hospital. We actually demonstrated that working today, so it's not pie in the sky.'
It has been estimated about €10m is needed to run what he called 'a large living lab' to test it further.
'Then we think we could give everybody a personal electronic health record for €100m, and have it working with SPINE,' he said.
Other speakers at the event included the Irish Patient Association's Stephen McMahon and Ibec chief executive Danny McCoy.
The HSE has said it is rolling out digitalisation across the system, with the HSE app for patients now up and running in its first phase.
Last October, HSE chief Bernard Gloster said the the health service is 'about seven years' away from delivering a digital health record system to replace paper records.
They are in use in some maternity hospitals already.
The programme for government also commits 'to continue to work towards the full digitisation of Irish healthcare records and information systems'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Children's health crisis will roll on until there is transparency about how public money is spent
The fallout concerning the use of funding from the National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF) in a Children's Health Ireland (CHI) hospital continues. The story that emerged in the media over a week ago painted a picture of a rolling crisis, after a confidential internal report raised concerns about abuse of waiting lists and a toxic work culture . That report will now be referred to gardaí by the HSE. The report in question focused on five special weekend outpatient clinics for 179 children carried out by a consultant at a public hospital. These clinics were funded by the NTPF and the consultant received €35,800 for seeing the patients. However, the report questions whether the young patients could have been seen during the consultant's HSE contracted hours or referred to his colleagues. There were also concerns about potential clinical failures regarding vulnerable children, who may have been left waiting longer than they should have been for important treatment. READ MORE And yet again, the report raises serious questions about professional ethics, conduct and clinical care in CHI, coming hot on the heels of the publication of two separate damning reports on children's orthopaedic surgery failures. We still know don't exactly what actions were taken to address the alleged potential misuse of NTPF funds and whether there may be further similar cases in CHI. The news that the report has been referred to gardaí – amid temporary pausing of NTPF funding, which is now due to be lifted 'imminently' – and promises of action and reviews, as well as the 'ongoing' roll-out of a new central referral management system for all services in CHI, suggests that there is much more to come. Whatever happens, it is unacceptable if the Department of Health , the Minister, the NTPF and the HSE were left in the dark about the whole affair until it was reported in the media, as has been suggested. We are expected to accept promises that it won't happen again, that action is being taken, and – well, you know the drill. But what about the bigger picture – oversight and transparency on how we are spending our healthcare budget, and, crucially, if it is being best used to provide care for patients? This year the HSE has a record €26.9 billion in funding , and staffing levels have increased by 23 per cent in the last five years. There are many new services, and bed numbers are continuing to grow to meet escalating demand. Our population is now 5.3 million. The Irish health system seems inexplicably reluctant to carry out routine audits and set standardised targets, as the continued large variations in productivity between services, gaps in basic performance data, and resistance to many oversight initiatives shows The question is whether we are getting the best value for money and access to services commensurate with these increases in resources. And where does the NTPF fit into all this? It was set up over 20 years ago to help relieve waiting list pressure in the public system, and was regarded by some as a sort of pressure safety valve to get public patients seen, diagnosed and treated faster; and by others as a sticking plaster for inadequate public capacity. Its budget for this year is an increased €230 million. Last year it facilitated outpatient appointments, diagnostic scans and procedures for approximately 251,000 public patients. It initially purchased appointments in the private sector for patients waiting too long on public waiting lists – known as outsourcing – but in recent years it has moved towards increased use of 'insourcing'. This is essentially overtime: using spare capacity in public hospitals over and above core activity. All governance for insourcing remains with the treating hospital, the NTPF took pains to point out last week. So it, and by extension the HSE itself, claims no responsibility for how its – or rather public – money is spent, once the forms are filled in. The NTPF does publish data on how many procedures and appointments it has paid for, which is more information than many of our health services publicly provide. And now it has written to all public hospitals with whom it funds insourcing work to obtain further confirmation that all work is carried out in line with agreed terms. There has always been the potential for abuse of NTPF funding as consultants can refer their own public patients to their private clinics, or public overtime. There is supposed to be data collection on how often this occurs, with the appropriate governance applied. And in cases where there are only one or two consultants in a highly specialised disease or geographic area, it makes sense to allow them to see these patients in a private/public overtime capacity if they are on a very long waiting list, to ensure timely access where needed and longer-term continuity of care. But surely audit and inspections of the use of NTPF funding in individual institutions should be routine? Each hospital should always be able to fully account for the need for insourcing funds, proving that its own resources, and staffing time, have been maximised under allocated HSE funding. Newer contracts for various healthcare staff allow for longer core weekday working hours and weekend work as normal, but implementation has been piecemeal in some specialities and services, despite the increased cost and staffing numbers. [ 'Fear and distrust': why children's healthcare is in crisis Opens in new window ] In this case, was the CHI hospital paying attention to how many patients were on individual consultant lists? How many they were seeing, and how long were individuals waiting before signing off the NTPF funding applications? The Irish health system seems inexplicably reluctant to carry out routine audits and set standardised targets, as the continued large variations in productivity between services, gaps in basic performance data, and resistance to many oversight initiatives shows. Last year, then-Minister for Health Stephen Donnelly presented data to the HSE board showing a significant drop in the average number of patients seen per consultant, with obvious ramifications for our long waiting lists. And in correspondence on the 2025 HSE budget, he asked the HSE to apply a standardised approach to maximising productivity through agreeing outpatient clinic targets for individual consultants, departments and specialities, and sharing data on outpatient numbers between consultants. A health minister should not have to specifically request what should be done as a matter of course. Our complicated public healthcare system, comprising public, voluntary and private overlapping services – and a combination of old and new working contracts – continues to muddy the waters of accountability and transparency. A key underpinning element of Sláintecare is the unpicking of the various conflicts and competing interests within our health service, increased governance and standardisation. Until its full implementation, whenever that is, far more oversight of all publicly funded services must be applied.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Two HSE staff suspended with pay or on administrative leave for 11 years
Two employees in the health service have been suspended with pay or have been on administrative leave for 11 years. Another HSE staff member has been suspended with pay or on administrative leave since 2017 and another since 2018. HSE figures suggested that in 2014-2024 a total of 42 staff were suspended with pay or placed on paid administrative leave. The figures were set out by the HSE in reply to a parliamentary question tabled by Sinn Féin health spokesman David Cullinane. READ MORE Mr Cullinane told The Irish Times he did not know why the HSE personnel had been suspended or on paid administrative leave for so long. He said he would be interested in seeing an explanation from the HSE. The HSE told Mr Cullinane in its reply that 'the cases identified are under active investigation or have some other action pending'. There are more than 130,000 staff working across the public health system in Ireland. The two cases dating to 2014 relate to personnel working in the acute hospital sector and the mental health service. A person suspended or on administrative leave since 2017 also worked in the mental health area, the table provided by the HSE indicates. A staff member suspended or placed on administrative leave since 2018 was based in the acute hospital part of the health service. Asked by The Irish Times for more details on the cases that have been under investigation in some instances since 2014 and why the processes involved have proved to be so lengthy, the HSE said it endeavoured to carry out all investigations as expediently as possible. It said this was in line with the terms of the relevant HR procedures and policies. 'Factors such as legal matters, safety, or other issues can arise which can impact the timelines. 'To maintain the privacy of the individuals involved, the HSE cannot comment on any individual case.'
Irish Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Mum's warning to never to kiss babies on lips after bug leaves son brain damaged
An Irish mum has warned people never to kiss babies after her son contracted herpes simplex from a cold sore. Jed Scanlon was rushed to hospital by parents Amanda, 39, and David, 40, after he came down with a high temperature. Medics diagnosed the three-year-old with herpes simplex and encephalitis. Jed has been left with severe learning difficulties after the virus attacked his brain. Amanda, from Derry, said he was thriving and ahead of his milestones until he was six months old. She added: 'When he was diagnosed, I didn't realise the complications he was going to be left with. 'The virus attacked his brain instead of the immune system and left him with an acquired brain injury. 'He has significant brain damage to his temple lobes and a rare form of epilepsy caused by the damage. 'They didn't know if he'd be able to walk or talk. We were absolutely devastated. We couldn't believe it. We were in shock. 'I knew cold sores were dangerous but I didn't know the extent to leave someone with brain damage.' The tot has seizures every night and is non verbal. Doctors are trying to control Jed's seizures but they can't determine what his future will look like. Jed has occupational therapy, physical therapy and speech therapy. Hospital housekeeper Amanda said: 'Before this, he was thriving. 'He was rolling over, he was meeting all his milestones and he was so smart. Jed could give me a high five at five-months-old which is amazing. 'When he was diagnosed, it wasn't a great prognosis. They hadn't met any cases like Jed and they didn't have a great outlook on his life. 'He has development delays and he's non verbal. We don't know what his future looks like. 'He can walk and finger feed himself. Jed is full of life and he's constantly up to mischief. 'You need eyes on the back of your head to watch him.' Amanda documents Jed's story on her TikTok page Jedsjourney to raise awareness of the dangers of kissing newborns. She added: 'I want to raise awareness of how dangerous cold sores can actually be. 'Don't kiss anyone's baby even if you don't have a cold sore, especially not on the lips. 'It never crossed my mind not to let people kiss him, I just made people wash their hands but cold sores never came into my head. 'We don't remember Jed being around anyone with a cold sore but you don't need to be able to see the coldsore to have the virus. 'Once you get the virus it lives dormant and can flare up any time. 'Me and David don't get cold sores and never have. 'We try not to dwell on where he picked it up from because it won't achieve much. 'Babies could also get the virus from someone sneezing or coughing around him. You have to be really careful.'
