logo
Zudio Opens at Entertainland Mall, Gurugram

Zudio Opens at Entertainland Mall, Gurugram

Entertainland Mall, one of Gurugram's fastest-growing lifestyle and entertainment destinations, has expanded its retail offerings with the grand opening of a new Zudio store in Sector 83. The store, occupying an impressive 22,000 sq. ft., further strengthens Zudio's footprint across the Delhi-NCR region.
Strategically positioned along NH-48, Entertainland Mall spans 1.5 lakh sq. ft. and is conveniently located just 15 minutes from Huda City Centre Metro Station. The mall is home to a vibrant mix of renowned fashion and lifestyle brands such as Pepe Jeans, Kazo, Van Heusen, Allen Solly, and United Colors of Benetton, making it a comprehensive retail hub for New Gurugram.
Ms. Mamta Gupta, spokesperson for Entertainland Mall, shared, 'With Zudio's entry, we move closer to our goal of creating a destination that blends top-tier retail, leisure, and entertainment. We're curating a space that offers a multi-dimensional experience for every kind of visitor.'
Zudio's launch not only diversifies the mall's fashion portfolio but also adds to the appeal of Entertainland's already robust entertainment lineup. The mall hosts:
Kartomania – India's longest go-karting track
Blaast – the country's largest VR arena
A sports bar with bowling alley
Trampoline park
Multiplex
A variety of dining options
The arrival of Zudio reinforces Entertainland Mall's position as a go-to lifestyle and retail destination for residents of Gurugram and the surrounding regions.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jim Cramer and Wall Street Are Bullish on Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF)
Jim Cramer and Wall Street Are Bullish on Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF)

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jim Cramer and Wall Street Are Bullish on Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF)

We recently published a list of . In this article, we are going to take a look at where Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF) stands against other stocks on Jim Cramer and Wall Street's radar. During April 24's episode of Squawk on the Street, Cramer made the following comment about Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF): 'We own Capital One. Now I don't know… people… in your world, this Capital One, it got approved, and, and, Fairbank is gonna stand there after this thing closes, and I think he's gonna buy back a ton of stock because his stock is really cheap and he's a reaallyy good banker […] Capital One, they're supposed to be missing the quarter, people are supposed to be defaulting. It is the oddest time, it's the strangest angst, David, I see people having angst and doing crazy things. They have angst, and they're paying off their credit. You know when you have angst, you default.' A smiling face of a customer as they make a deposit at this company's branch. Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE:COF) provides a broad range of financial services, including banking, lending, and credit products. The company offers checking and savings accounts, various types of loans, and digital banking services to individuals, small businesses, and commercial clients. On May 21, BofA analyst Mihir Bhatia increased the price target for Capital One (NYSE:COF) to $233 from $223 and maintained a Buy rating after the recent acquisition of Discover Financial. The analyst highlighted that the closed-loop Discover network provides significant strategic opportunities that could strengthen Capital One's deposit, banking, and card businesses. The firm noted that credit metrics are improving and expects expense synergies to be easily attainable. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Discrimination cases unravel as Trump scraps core civil rights tenet
Discrimination cases unravel as Trump scraps core civil rights tenet

Boston Globe

time7 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Discrimination cases unravel as Trump scraps core civil rights tenet

The Justice Department now is reviewing its entire docket and has already dismissed or terminated 'many' cases that were 'legally unsupportable' and a product of 'weaponization' under the Biden administration, said Harmeet Dhillon, who heads the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'We will fully enforce civil rights laws in a way that satisfies the ends of justice, not politicization,' she said in a statement to The Washington Post. Advertisement The review includes cases and reform agreements forged after years-long investigations that the administration says lacked justification. Civil rights experts estimate that dozens of discrimination cases involving banks, landlords, private employers, and school districts could face similar action. 'What we're seeing is an attempt by the Trump administration to really dismantle a lot of the core tools that we use to ensure equality in the country,' said Amalea Smirniotopoulos, senior policy counsel and comanager of the Equal Protection Initiative at the Legal Defense Fund, a nonprofit that has long advocated for the civil rights of Black Americans and other minorities. Advertisement At the center of this effort is 'disparate impact analysis,' which holds that neutral policies can have discriminatory outcomes even if there was no intent to discriminate. The legal standard stems from Griggs v. Duke Power, the landmark 1971 Supreme Court decision that became a staple of civil rights litigation. In that case, attorneys relied on statistical evidence to show how standardized testing prevented Black employees in North Carolina from advancing at the energy company. The legal theory has been consistently recognized by the Supreme Court, written into federal regulations and enshrined into employment law by Congress. But President Trump declared it unconstitutional in April, issuing an executive order that kicked off an intense review of civil rights regulations, enforcement actions, and settled cases. Now, government agreements and orders that relied on disparate impact in pursuing sex, race, and disability discrimination cases are being undone. On May 23, for example, the Justice Department terminated an agreement with Patriot Bank, a Tennessee-based lender accused of failing to lend in predominantly Black and Latino neighborhoods in Memphis, from 2015 to 2020. Prosecutors used statistical evidence to show disparities in the bank's lending practices alongside evidence of intentional discrimination, such as targeting most of its advertising in majority-white neighborhoods. A three-year agreement to reform its lending practices had been in place for a little over a year before Trump's Justice Department moved to end it, noting the bank was in compliance with the reform agreement. Patriot declined to comment. Civil rights advocates worry about the future of similar enforcement. Advertisement Disparate impact has long been anathema to conservatives, who say it can result in quotas and deny equal opportunity to white people. But past Republican administrations opted not to take this issue on, partly because of Supreme Court precedent and partly because it might prove politically unpopular. 'What changed is just political will,' said Kenneth L. Marcus, who headed the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights during both George W. Bush's administration and Trump's first term. 'The second Trump administration is more willing to take on potentially contentious civil rights issues than any Republican administration this century.' Trump issued a slew of executive orders to eradicate diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, programs - calling them 'illegal and immoral' days after he returned to the White House in January - and ordered the government to close diversity offices and fire staff. His administration has since launched investigations into corporations, law firms and colleges over their diversity initiatives, while going to battle with Harvard University for its refusal to comply with a set of demands to alter its governance, admissions, and hiring practices. When Trump set his sights on disparate impact in April, he called it a 'pernicious movement' that ignores 'individual strengths, effort or achievement.' He ordered federal agencies to review any cases and reform agreements that rely on the theory - and terminate them as they see fit. The actions are long overdue, said Dan Morenoff, executive director at the American Civil Rights Project, a nonprofit law firm that opposes the use of disparate impact and diversity initiatives. He contends that the government's use of disparate impact has been, in many cases, legally dubious, adding that its assumptions are fundamentally flawed. Advertisement 'The people who most appreciate disparate impact appear, usually, to be deeply wed to the idea that any discrepancies are best explained by discrimination,' he said. The Supreme Court most recently upheld the use of disparate impact analysis in a 2015 housing case. But that decision was decided on a 5-4 vote in an opinion written by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, now retired. Some conservatives believe the court's current conservative supermajority might give them their wished-for outcome. 'It's clear what the Trump administration is aiming for is to get this question to the Supreme Court in hopes the Supreme Court will take that tool away,' said Smirniotopoulos of the Legal Defense Fund. The rollbacks are already underway. In 2023, the Justice Department alleged that Atlanta-based Ameris Bank avoided providing home loans to Black and Latino home buyers in Jacksonville, Florida, in a practice known as redlining. The bank almost exclusively advertised in majority-White neighborhoods and made little effort to do business in majority Black and Latino neighborhoods, according to its lawsuit. Only 2.7 percent of Ameris's mortgages went to borrowers in Black and Latino communities from 2016 to 2021, the complaint said, while its competitors issued more than three times as many loans during that window. Ameris knew about the disparities but failed to correct them, the government alleged. Though it admitted no wrongdoing, Ameris quickly settled the case, agreeing to a set of measures whose progress would be monitored by the court. Then, on May 19, the Justice Department moved to unwind the settlement, saying that the bank has 'demonstrated a commitment to remediation' while freeing it from its legal obligations to implement the reforms. The bank did not object to the move. Prosecutors did note that Ameris had disbursed the entirety of a $7.5 million loan subsidy fund for borrowers in Black and Latino neighborhoods. Advertisement A judge granted the request a day later. Ameris declined to comment. The government moved to terminate cases involving two banks in Alabama and Tennessee that had agreed to court-monitored reforms tied to allegations of discriminatory lending practices. It also moved to dismiss a case in Kinloch, Mo., against property managers accused of refusing to rent to prospective Black tenants at disproportionate rates. There are at least eight other housing and lending cases across seven states that are similarly candidates for dismissal, according to a review. While the administration blamed the Biden administration for mishandling these cases, it has also dismissed cases going back decades. It did not directly concern disparate impact, but the Justice Department in April dismissed a 1966 consent order with a Louisiana school district concerning its desegregation efforts.

What to know about seeing the northern lights in the US on Sunday
What to know about seeing the northern lights in the US on Sunday

Boston Globe

time7 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

What to know about seeing the northern lights in the US on Sunday

The auroras were caused by a 'severe' geomagnetic storm - ranked a level 4 out of 5, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Space Weather Prediction Center. The storm brought a strong punch of solar particles and plasma that temporarily disturbed Earth's protective magnetic bubble, providing one of the more impressive storms so far this year. Good aurora-viewing conditions could continue to nightfall in the eastern U.S., according to forecasts by the Space Weather Prediction Center. The center will continue to update the forecast as it monitors geomagnetic conditions on Earth. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up If the storm continues at a 'severe' level Sunday night, the aurora could be seen at low latitudes again, including as far south as Alabama. For the best chances to see the aurora, get away from city lights and check the skies for cloud and smoke. Advertisement Before heading out, here's what you need to know about seeing the aurora Sunday night. When will I know if the aurora will appear near me? The storm is expected to oscillate between low and severe levels of intensity for the rest of Sunday, according to the Space Weather Prediction Center. As of Sunday morning, the center's forecasts show a chance for similarly severe storming after night falls on the East Coast. But those conditions depend on the storm remaining in a favorable connection to Earth, and other scientists don't write off that the storm could fizzle out before night. Advertisement Forecasts will be updated as the storm evolves, so consult the latest forecast news here or on the center's website before heading out. (Sunset will occur around 8:30 p.m. in the Mid-Atlantic.) Where are the best places to see the northern lights tonight? The northern states - including Maine or even New York - have the best chance of seeing the aurora, even under weaker storm conditions. If severe storming occurs Sunday night, people could see the northern lights as far south as Alabama. Many already reported seeing the aurora in the western U.S., from Texas to Montana, on social media during severe conditions early Sunday. Forecasts as of Sunday morning show the light show could dip to these similar latitudes again. A slightly weaker storm could still bring auroras as far south as Illinois and Oregon. Some have also been able to capture the lights farther south than predicted on their cameras and cellphones, as lenses are more sensitive to the light than our eyes are. Many people experienced brilliant aurora in May 2024, which was the most intense solar storm in 20 years. This storm won't be at the same level, but it will be similar to the one in October that brought the light show to the National Mall in D.C. Will the aurora be blocked by clouds? Clouds and wildfire smoke could complicate some aurora viewing. The areas with the least amount of clouds Sunday night will probably be in the eastern half of the U.S. - from parts of North Dakota to West Virginia. Clouds may appear in the Mid-Atlantic as the sun sets, but they may clear up as the night progresses. Advertisement The cloudiest areas will be in the Mountain time zone as well as parts of New England. But wildfire smoke may also provide an additional challenge, as smoke from Canada is stretching across the Midwest to the East Coast. Although the aurora occurs much higher on Earth than the smoke, the smoke could affect the vibrancy of the colors. What will the aurora look like near me? Not all auroras appear the same. Some are dancing bright green and purple curtains, and others are a diffuse reddish-orange glow. The colors and shape of the aurora appear differently depending on the latitude and altitude. Dancing green and purple auroras are usually seen in higher-latitude places such as Canada or along the U.S.-Canada border. Lower latitudes usually see more red auroras because red occurs at higher altitudes and can be seen farther from the poles. If you're in the midlatitudes (in Virginia or Arizona, for example), your aurora may appear more red than those in Canada or Finland. If I missed this aurora, will there be more opportunities to see one near me? Auroras depend on activity from the sun, which can produce intense eruptions quickly that take a day or so to travel to Earth. After Sunday night, the chances of seeing an aurora in the lower U.S. will be low in the following days as activity decreases. However, the sun has been its most active in 20 years for the past year or so. The sun's magnetic activity naturally waxes and wanes in 11-year periods, known as the solar cycle. In October, NASA said the sun entered the maximum phase of its cycle - potentially continuing for the next year. Scientists can't predict exactly when, but statistics indicate that the sun probably will continue to produce some notable storms before it enters a less active phase of its solar cycle. Advertisement

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store