Reform UK fulfils pledge to scrap LTNs in its council areas as none exist
Reform UK's pledge to remove all low-traffic neighbourhoods from the council areas it controls looks to be achieved in record time after the 10 local authorities said they do not actually have any in place.
Zia Yusuf, Reform UK's chair, said last week there would be a 'large-scale reversal' of existing LTNs in the 10 areas across England where the party won control of the councils in local elections on 1 May.
'We view these schemes with the same suspicion as mass immigration and net zero,' Yusuf told the Telegraph, adding: 'You can expect, if you live in a Reform council, for there to be a much higher bar for any proposals for LTNs and for the large-scale reversal of these existing LTNs.'
The Guardian contacted the councils now run by Reform – Derbyshire, Doncaster, Durham, Kent, Lancashire, Lincolnshire, North Northamptonshire, Nottinghamshire, Staffordshire and West Northamptonshire – and they all said they had no such schemes.
LTNs are traffic interventions that filter smaller, residential roads using either physical barriers like bollards and planters or numberplate-recognition cameras to prevent motor vehicles using them as through routes.
While the wider idea of using what are known as modal filters to make residential roads safer for walking and cycling has been used intermittently for decades, the branding as LTNs usually refers to schemes introduced from 2020, when the Conservative government encouraged councils to install them.
Some of these LTNs were put in quickly, bringing complaints about traffic displaced to boundary roads and some congestion. However, studies of LTNs, including one commissioned by Rishi Sunak's LTN-sceptical government, have generally found they work well and are popular.
Asked about the lack of LTNs in the areas they run, a Reform spokesperson pointed to mapping data showing the proportion of roads within the council areas not open to through-traffic. However, this would also count longer-established non-LTN roads without through traffic, such as cul-de-sacs and housing estates. It is not known whether Reform plans to open these up as through routes.
Reform has also pledged to sack council staff working on diversity issues or efforts connected to net zero, although it is unknown how many staff this would actually involve. Some councils, such as Lincolnshire, have said they have no diversity staff.
A Liberal Democrat source said: 'Reform are utterly clueless about how to run a council. From councillors who won't take up their seats to schemes that don't exist, it's clear that they don't understand the needs of their communities.
'Now they have some power, they need to learn how to Google things first. Liberal Democrats will be holding Reform's feet to the fire and standing up for our communities.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Farage winning over Gen Z women
Nigel Farage is winning over Gen Z women, a new poll has found. Figures show that the Reform UK leader's popularity has surged after the announcement of proposed policies that could benefit young women. Mr Farage's share of support from women aged 18 to 26 nearly doubled, from 12 per cent to 21 per cent in May. It followed his pledge to scrap the two-child benefit cap and introduce a tax break for married couples. Right-wing parties have traditionally struggled to attract young female voters – but the latest poll, shared with Politico by the More in Common think tank, suggested that Reform could buck that trend. Mr Farage's growing influence has also been credited to a social media presence that boasts more than one million followers and 21 million likes on TikTok. Some of Reform's newest female recruits are believed to have defected from the Conservatives, like several of the party's highest-profile members.
The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Momentum is building': Green industries praise clean energy rules for new homes
Green industries have praised proposals to require solar panels and heat pumps in new build homes but housebuilders warned that too much bureaucracy to install them could harm efforts to hit housing targets. The Energy Department (Desnz) said on Friday that the future homes standard (FHS), which will be published in autumn, is expected to require new residential properties to have solar panels and low-carbon heating by default. With a significant amount of the UK's carbon footprint coming from gas heating of homes, the FHS will require new housing in England to produce fewer carbon emissions than those built under current regulations. The renewable energy sector, alongside green campaigners, have welcomed the 'common sense' proposals. Trevor Hutchings, chief executive of the Renewable Energy Association (REA) said: 'The growth of solar power has been one of the UK's biggest renewable energy success stories, demonstrating without a doubt that we don't have to choose between lowering our emissions and lowering household energy bills. 'Today's announcement – which the REA has long campaigned for – takes this one step further – not only enabling thousands of future homeowners to experience the benefits of affordable and clean power, but supercharging growth in the British renewable energy industry and driving forward our energy transition.' Chris O'Shea, chief executive of Centrica, said: 'The age of solar is well and truly upon us, with millions of households up and down the country already benefiting from generating their own free electricity from the sun. 'With the Future Home Standard expected in the autumn, momentum is building behind Great Britain's rooftop revolution.' Mike Childs, head of policy, science and research at Friends of the Earth, called the move 'plain common sense' but warned that ministers must act to help decarbonise homes that are already built. 'The Spending Review next week must ensure that the forthcoming Warm Homes Plan is sufficiently funded so that that everyone can enjoy these benefits, and no one is left behind because they can't afford the changes,' he said. Greenpeace UK's head of politics Ami McCarthy said: 'It's extraordinary that such a common-sense solution has taken so long to be rolled out, and this Government deserves full credit for this breakthrough. 'Now ministers need to urgently reform the UK's energy system as a whole and stop gas from setting the price of electricity so that everyone, whether living in a new build or not, gets to enjoy the lower bills that cheap, clean renewable power can bring.' Under the proposed changes, developers must meet solar panel coverage equivalent to 40% of the building's flood area – and those that cannot must install a 'reasonable amount of solar coverage'. The changes will be subject to practical limits with flexibility in place for new homes surrounded by trees or with lots of shade overhead, the Government said. Liberal Democrat MP Max Wilkinson praised the move after ministers previously rejected his 'Sunshine Bill' – a similar law which would have seen new builds come with solar panels equivalent to at least 40% of their ground floor area as standard. The Cheltenham MP told the PA news agency: 'This news will help us fight the cost-of-living crisis by lowering people's energy bills while reducing carbon emissions too. 'I've been campaigning on this since long before I was an MP and was determined to build on its success after I was elected. 'I welcome today's news from the Government and I'm pleased we can all look forward to a brighter future – but there will be more work to do to ensure solar for new builds begins without delay.' Housebuilders largely welcomed the announcement but warned against introducing burdensome paperwork which may harm the Government's efforts to reach its target to build 1.5 million new homes by 2029. Neil Jefferson, chief executive at the Home Builders Federations, said: 'Moving forward, as we look to meet the more challenging carbon reductions set by Government, we will see solar PV panels on the overwhelming majority of new homes. 'We welcome recognition from Government that there needs to be flexibility around the number of panels on roofs in some locations, to reflect orientation and house design. 'We need to ensure the process to agree the number of panels in such locations is workable and not overly bureaucratic such that it does not delay attempts to increase housing supply.' Mark Wakeford, national chairman of the National Federation of Builders, said: 'Solar panels on new homes make sense because they lower bills and progress the clean energy revolution we so desperately need. 'Credit must also be given for recent announcements on grid investment and connection reforms, as these were important challenges to recognise and solve for a rooftop revolution to happen in practice.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Prison governors blast new Labour scheme forcing them to send serious offenders to open prison after just TWO WEEKS
Jail chiefs have slammed a new Labour scheme which will allow serious criminals to be transferred to open prison after serving just two weeks behind bars. The Prison Governors' Association (PGA) warned the move would 'potentially place the public at greater risk'. It is the first time the association has expressed concern over a series of soft-justice measures introduced since the general election by Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood. In a bid to free up space in overcrowded jails Ms Mahmood brought in a scheme last autumn which allows most criminals to be freed after serving just 40 per cent of their sentence. And last month Ms Mahmood indicated she would go ahead with a wholesale reform of court punishments which will see tens of thousands of criminals a year dodge jail, or be freed after serving just a third of their sentence. The new measures allow prisoners to be transferred to open jails three years before their normal release date. Crucially, governors will have 'only limited discretion in exceptional circumstances' to reject the transfers, the PGA said. The rules come into force on Monday. It means, for example, that criminals sentenced to seven and a half years' imprisonment on Tuesday last week, just after the bank holiday, will become eligible for open prison during the course of next week. Under the scheme, governors will be able to delay the moves if they assess a move to open jail would pose a 'wholly unacceptable risk'. But they will not have enough time to make proper assessments during the two-week run-up, the PGA warned. Its president Tom Wheatley said: 'Without the ability to properly consider a prisoner's behaviour during those two weeks we have concerns our members will be required to take decisions that potentially place the public at greater risk. 'There has not been sufficient clarity from the Government that this does come with increased risk.' He added: 'Open prisons are not a suitable place to house men that have been very recently sentenced for serious offences without any risk assessment. 'To ask the governor to decide that such risk is 'wholly unacceptable', given eligibility after just 14 days, is too short a time to make any such assessment and therefore to protect the public. 'It is also not what victims of crime expect, nor what the courts intend. 'This is simply a scheme to manage the lack of suitable prison capacity and having already released many low-risk offenders, it is becoming difficult to use the capacity in open prisons.' He said that without the new policy 'many of these men would remain in the closed prison estate safely behind walls and fences'. Terrorists, some sex offenders and those jailed for more than four years for violent crimes will not be eligible. But among those who could be transferred immediately include those handed long jail terms for crimes including possession of a firearm, rioting or violent disorder, drug trafficking and dealing, causing serious injury by dangerous driving, and human trafficking. On a seven and a half year sentence they will eligible for release after serving 40 per cent, or 36 months, which is the point at which transfer to open conditions can now kick in. A PGA spokesman said: 'This would still mean that after just two weeks in prison a man serving a seven and a half year prison sentence could be moved to an open prison, where there are no physical barriers like high walls, fences, secure gates and minimal staff supervision that could prevent prisoners from simply walking out.' There are also fears the scheme could damage rehabilitation schemes in open jails. Mr Wheatley said: 'Governors of open prisons are concerned that that valuable work those jails do – including with some life sentenced prisoners who have already served decades – could be undermined by a large number of new inmates turning up who have done nothing to earn the right to be in open prison.' There are 14 open jails in England and Wales, with the best known including HMP Ford in West Sussex and HMP North Sea Camp in Lincs. They are designed for criminals deemed to be very low risk or who are coming to the end of very long sentences. Prisoners will be eligible for much earlier transfer to jails such as HMP Ford in West Sussex, pictured Ms Mahmood's early prison release scheme saw 16,231 prisoners let out between its launch in September and the end of last year. Updated figures have not been published but the total is now thought to be between 30,000 and 40,000. A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: 'Only certain thoroughly risk-assessed offenders are eligible for moves to open prison and anyone found breaching the rules can be immediately returned to a closed prison. 'We are building new prisons and are on track for 14,000 places by 2031 – the largest expansion since the Victorians. 'Our sentencing reforms will also force prisoners to earn their way to release or face longer in jail for bad behaviour, while ensuring the most dangerous offenders can be kept off the streets.'
