Civilian deaths in terrorist attacks surge in Feb
The month of February 2025 saw a marginal increase in terrorist attacks but a sharp surge in civilian casualties, along with a significant increase in the arrest of terrorists across the country, an Islamabad-based thinktank said in a report on Sunday.
According to the Pakistan Institute for Conflict and Security Studies (PICSS), the last month saw 79 terrorist attacks, resulting in the deaths of 55 civilians and 47 security personnel, while 81 security personnel and 45 civilians sustained injuries.
"February 2025 marked the first month since August 2024 in which civilian fatalities surpassed those of security forces," PICSS said. It added that civilian deaths rose by 175%, while deaths of security personnel declined 18% compared to January 2025.
In January 2025, 20 civilians were killed, while 57 security personnel were martyred. "The security forces intensified their counter-militancy operations, eliminating 156 militants, injuring 20, and arresting 66," PICSS said in a press release.
Terrorist fatalities dropped by 25%, – 156 in February compared to 208 in January. However, a significant increase in militant arrests was recorded in February, with 66 suspects detained, the highest monthly figure since 139 rounded up in December 2023.
According to the PICSS press release, 50 of the detainees were arrested from the erstwhile Federally-Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) region, while 16 others were arrested from Punjab.
Balochistan remained the most volatile province, recording 32 attacks that claimed 56 lives, including 35 civilians, 10 security personnel, and 11 terrorists. The attacks left 44 people injured, including 32 security forces personnel and 12 civilians.
Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) – excluding the tribal districts or erstwhile Fata – recorded 23 attacks, resulting in the deaths of 14 security forces personnel and 12 civilians, while 22 civilians and an equal number of security personnel were injured.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Trump ban on entry of international Harvard students blocked by US judge
BOSTON: A federal judge in Boston on Thursday temporarily blocked U.S. President Donald Trump from barring U.S. entry of foreign nationals seeking to study or participate in exchange programs at Harvard University. Under a two-page temporary restraining order granted to Harvard, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs enjoined Trump's proclamation from taking effect pending further litigation of the matter amid an escalating dispute between the Ivy League school and Republican president. The judge ruled that Trump's directive prohibiting foreign nationals from entering the United States to study at Harvard for the next six months would cause 'immediate and irreparable injury' before the courts have a chance to review the case. Burroughs last month had blocked Trump from implementing a separate order prohibiting Harvard from enrolling international students, who make up more than a quarter of its student body. Harvard on Thursday amended its lawsuit to challenge the new directive, claiming Trump is violating Burroughs' decision. 'The Proclamation denies thousands of Harvard's students the right to come to this country to pursue their education and follow their dreams, and it denies Harvard the right to teach them. Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,' the school said in the filing. Burroughs' order on Thursday also continued a separate temporary restraining order she issued on May 23 against the administration's restriction on international student enrollment at Harvard. Earlier on Thursday, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson called Harvard 'a hotbed of anti-American, anti-Semitic, pro-terrorist agitators,' claims that the school has previously denied. 'Harvard's behavior has jeopardized the integrity of the entire U.S. student and exchange visitor visa system and risks compromising national security. Now it must face the consequences of its actions,' Jackson said in a statement. Trump cited national security concerns as justification for barring international students from entering the U.S. to pursue studies at the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based university. Under Trump's proclamation, the suspension would initially be for six months but could be extended. Trump's order also directed the U.S. State Department to consider revoking academic or exchange visas of any current Harvard students who meet his proclamation's criteria. In Thursday's court filing, Harvard said Trump had violated federal law by failing to back up his claims about national security. 'The Proclamation does not deem the entry of an alien or class of aliens to be detrimental to the interests of the United States, because noncitizens who are impacted by the Proclamation can enter the United States — just so long as they go somewhere other than Harvard,' the school said. The Trump administration has launched a multifront attack on the nation's oldest and wealthiest university, freezing billions of dollars in grants and other funding and proposing to end its tax-exempt status, prompting a series of legal challenges. Trump administration ramps up attack on Harvard, Columbia Harvard argues the administration is retaliating against it for refusing to accede to demands to control the school's governance, curriculum and the ideology of its faculty and students. The university sued after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced on May 22 that her department was immediately revoking Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, which allows it to enroll foreign students. Noem's action was temporarily blocked almost immediately by Burroughs. On the eve of a hearing before her last week, the department changed course and said it would instead challenge Harvard's certification through a lengthier administrative process. Nonetheless, Burroughs said she planned to issue a longer-term preliminary injunction at Harvard's urging, saying one was necessary to give some protection to Harvard's international students. Wednesday's two-page directive from Trump said Harvard had 'demonstrated a history of concerning foreign ties and radicalism,' and had 'extensive entanglements with foreign adversaries,' including China. It said Harvard had seen a 'drastic rise in crime in recent years while failing to discipline at least some categories of conduct violations on campus,' and had failed to provide sufficient information to the Homeland Security Department about foreign students' 'known illegal or dangerous activities.' The school in Thursday's court filing said those claims were unsubstantiated.
Express Tribune
20 hours ago
- Express Tribune
India vs Pakistan conflict: Indian media under-fire globally for reporting misinformation during Pakistan-India conflict
As tensions between Pakistan and India escalated in May 2025, misinformation spread rapidly through Indian newsrooms, exacerbating an already volatile situation. The misinformation wasn't limited to social media or unverified posts; mainstream news networks were among the chief culprits, disseminating false reports that heightened public confusion. Manisha Pande, media critic and managing editor at Newslaundry, described the situation as a "Frankenstein's monster" of unchecked misinformation. Speaking to the Washington Post, Pande stated that these TV channels have gone out of control in their pursuit of ratings, largely influenced by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the increasing pressure to align with the government. A particularly striking example occurred on May 9 when Prasar Bharati, India's state-owned broadcaster, claimed on live television that Pakistan's army chief had been arrested and a coup was underway. '1st India News' even arrested Asim Munir and themselves appointed a new army chief for Pakistan! 😭 — Jawaharlal Nehru (Satire) (@The_Nehru) May 9, 2025 The news was rapidly spread across social media and major Indian news outlets, including Times Now and Zee News, only to later be debunked. Gen. Asim Munir, a subject of many false reports, was not imprisoned, but instead promoted to the rank of field marshal. This was not an isolated topic. The Indian media has earned the nickname "Godi Media" for its consistent tendency to align with and amplify government narratives. Throughout the conflict, Indian channels were frequently criticised for broadcasting unverifiable reports, some of which were based on social media posts or sources with little credibility. In one such case, a major Hindi-language network falsely claimed that the Indian navy had attacked Pakistan's Karachi port. The story spread quickly, despite there being no evidence to support the claim, and was published on the front pages of some Hindi newspapers. INDIAN NAVY - 'Why should AIR FORCE & ARMY have all the fun' INS VIKRANT strikes KARACHI PORT . PAK NAVY burnt down to ashes .. 🇮🇳 HAR HAR MAHADEV 🙏🏻🚩 — KAFIR ON STEROIDS (@TammaraoPatil) May 8, 2025 In the absence of verified information, national TV channels ran rampant with sensationalist, hypernationalistic narratives. Reports surfaced that Indian forces had entered Pakistan, Pakistan's Prime Minister had surrendered, and major Pakistani cities had been destroyed. However, these claims were often accompanied by unrelated images of conflict elsewhere, such as Gaza or Sudan, or even scenes from video games, misleading viewers further. Images from Gaza shared as strike on Sialkot in Pakistan. Images are 4 years old. — Pratik Sinha (@free_thinker) May 7, 2025 The role of social media in amplifying misinformation was also key. Uzair Rizvi, a Delhi-based fact-checker, noted that misinformation spread rapidly on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) in the initial hours of the conflict, with over 70 unique posts of false information examined by 7 May. Users often turned to AI chatbots like OpenAI's ChatGPT or Grok for verification. Unfortunately, these chatbots are themselves known to be unreliable, offering answers that further muddied the facts. In response to growing concerns over misinformation, Indian officials, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, refrained from making public statements during the crisis, leaving the media to fill the void. In addition to the media's role in spreading misinformation, the Indian government also took steps to restrict the flow of information. Authorities blocked access to Pakistani news outlets on YouTube and ordered the suspension of X accounts linked to individuals reporting on the conflict. Journalists, including freelance reporter Hilal Mir, faced arrests for their online activities, further limiting independent reporting.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan's lithium battery imports soar, projected to hit 8.75 GWh by 2030: report
Driven by high electricity costs and falling solar prices, the imports of battery storage systems (BESS) have accelerated at breakneck speeds in Pakistan and are projected to rise to 8.75 gigawatt-hours (GWh) by 2030, according to US-based Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA). 'Pakistan imported an estimated 1.25 GWh of lithium-ion battery packs in 2024 and another 400 megawatt-hours (MWh) in the first two months of 2025, a trend that is likely to continue,' IEEFA stated in its latest report titled 'Battery storage and the future of Pakistan's electricity grid'. This could increase to 8.75 GWh, or 26% of the projected peak demand in 2030, 'if business as usual persists,' it said. 'Such a shift could lead to stranded peak generation assets and higher financial losses for the grid,' IEFFA warned. The report found Pakistan's growing adoption of battery storage is supported by lithium-ion battery imports from China. China exports more solar panels to Pakistan than to many G20 nations in 5 years: report 'While solar PV module prices in Pakistan have consistently declined, emulating improving economics in China, the same is not true for BESS because of high taxes and customs duties. The average price of lithium-ion battery packs in Pakistan ranges between $230/kWh and $360/kWh.' However, despite high taxes, solar-battery combinations seem attractive for consumers, with installations continuously increasing, IEEFA said. 'Solar with BESS has a payback period of 3-5 years in Pakistan's residential sector despite a 48% cost increase from surcharges and duties on lithium-ion batteries. The payback period ranges between 4-6 years for the commercial and industrial sectors, depending on battery size or usage requirements,' it found. The report noted that Pakistan's high penetration of rooftop solar generation can provide a strong foundation for large-scale battery storage adoption in a distributed manner. 'If sustained through further fiscal support and regulatory incentives, this could mean minimal investment requirements for new generation assets for the government at a central level,' it added From crisis to clean energy: Pakistan emerges as top solar market in 2024 However, a lack of grid modernisation and strong regulatory support remain key barriers that should be addressed to ensure an efficient energy transition in Pakistan, the report noted. 'Unmanaged BESS growth could destabilise Pakistan's national grid by reducing demand and raising capacity payments. 'Timely investments in grid modernisation, smart metering, and regulatory updates can enable decentralised solar plus BESS configurations, avoiding expensive generation expansion and supporting strategic power planning.'
