Close races, Trump and 2-party support: Political scientists react to federal election results
Social Sharing
The close race in Miramichi-Grand Lake suggests why it still wasn't known Tuesday morning whether Mark Carney's Liberals will return to power in Ottawa as a minority or a majority government, a New Brunswick political scientist says.
Liberal Lisa Harris conceded to Conservative Mike Dawson after midnight Monday, after the lead flipped back and forth throughout vote-counting, but there is still one poll to be counted. Polls are still be counted elsewhere in Canada as well.
"On the weekend, I was in Saint John, and I told a number of people, I said, 'if Wayne Long wins, it's a Liberal minority, if Lisa Harris [also] wins, it's a Liberal majority,' and it might come down to that," political scientist Jamie Gillies of St. Thomas University said Tuesday morning.
"You take four or five ridings across the country and shift about 900 to 1,000 votes, and the Liberals probably have a majority," he said. "They may still pull out a majority, but they're that close to it. That riding, I think, probably just slipped away for the Liberals last night."
Long, in Saint John–Kennebecasis, was one of six Liberals who won in New Brunswick. The Conservatives took the other four seats.
Gillies, the head of the communications and public policy program at STU, said he got a total of two hours of sleep throughout the night, as he followed the results closely.
WATCH | A look across an unchanged map:
Here's what the federal election results look like in New Brunswick
10 hours ago
Duration 1:06
In New Brunswick, he said, the most surprising thing to him was the support for Long, who was the first Liberal MP to call for an increasingly unpopular Justin Trudeau to resign. Long won a fourth mandate, after changing his mind about not running again.
"This is his strongest election win of his four," said Gillies.
He thinks this could be partially attributed to the tariff issue.
"I think Saint John is probably very important to what Carney wants to do in terms of how the new Liberal government might deal with some of the economic challenges coming from the United States."
Another thing Gillies found interesting was the vote share in the Fredericton-Oromocto riding, which was originally expected to be close.
Liberal David Myles captured 61.3 per cent of the vote. Conservative Brian MacDonald got 32.1 per cent.
"David Myles actually had a higher vote share in Fredericton than Dominic LeBlanc had in Beauséjour, which is often considered the safest Liberal riding in the country."
There are still quite a few ridings in Canada to be called as of Tuesday morning, and Alex Marland, the Jarislowsky chair in trust and political leadership at Acadia University in Nova Scotia, said his understanding is that a number of the ballots still left to be counted are mail-ins.
N.B. election map stays the same after one nail-biter race
He said mail-in ballots would most likely skew Liberal, so it raises some questions about whether some really tight races could end up flipping and giving the Liberals a majority.
"Regardless of whether they end up with a majority or a minority, it's going to be very, very close, and this is going to be a very divisive parliament," said Marland.
Marland and some other political scientists said throughout the election campaign that one issue that would be top of mind for voters was going to be U.S. President Donald Trump and Canada's relationship with its neighbour.
Marland said this absolutely had an effect on how the results played out last night.
"It really galvanized progressives, people on the political left," he said.
"You can see the collapse of the NDP vote. A big reason for people who would have voted NDP ending up voting Liberal was really because of fear over Donald Trump."
For Gabriel Arsenault, a political science professor at the Université de Moncton, that shift even further toward a two-party system was what impressed him the most.
In December, he said, the Liberals and Conservatives were getting around 65 per cent of intention votes versus 85 per cent at this point.
It will be a tough way forward for the NDP, said Arsenault.
"What happened is structural," he said. "[Pierre] Poilievre sought votes among workers, and usually that would be the main group where the NDP got its votes, so I think it has to transform itself."
The Green Party secured one seat — for its co-leader Elizabeth May — down from two seats in 2021 and three seats in 2019.
It's just another result that proved to Arsenault that the party system in Canada is changing.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
an hour ago
- National Observer
Reining in oil and gas is good for the economy
In biophysical terms, the oil and gas sector has expanded to the point of dominating the Canadian economy. The raw material extracted from nature by the oil and gas industry now outweighs all other domestic extraction of natural resources. This includes trees felled, ores mined, fish caught, gravel quarried, livestock slaughtered, coal mined and crops harvested. When burned, Canadian oil and gas emit well over a billion tonnes per year of climate-wrecking carbon dioxide. In sharp contrast to its biophysical dominance, oil and gas extraction provides only 0.4 per cent of Canadian jobs, and indeed only 16 per cent of jobs among extractive sectors. Moreover, most Canadian fossil fuel energy gets exported rather than consumed domestically. Even if domestic production of oil fell by nearly two thirds, and gas by more than a third, it would still be enough for current levels of domestic consumption. When Canada finally starts keeping, rather than breaking, its commitments to reduce fossil fuel use and thus greenhouse gas emissions, still less oil and gas will suffice for domestic consumption. Over the past 10 years, the governing Liberals promoted the biophysical takeover of the economy by oil and gas, largely through aggressive support of pipelines. They spent $50 billion buying, enlarging, and otherwise bolstering, the unmarketable Trans Mountain Pipeline. They sicced the RCMP on people defending Indigenous land against the Coastal Gas Link. And they launched a treaty dispute with the US to stifle tribal and state governments acting to shut down Enbridge Line 5. These actions have done tremendous harm to Canadian ecosystems and the global atmosphere. Liberal support for oil and gas has also hurt the Canadian economy. On average, other economic sectors sustain more than eight times more jobs per million dollars of GDP than oil and gas extraction does. Public and private investment in oil and gas crowds out investment in these other sectors, thus killing off jobs. By locking in fossil fuel, oil and gas investments lock out what we need more of, for both ecological and economic reasons. This includes solar energy, green buildings, mass transit and ecosystem restoration, all of which would create more jobs. At this week's meeting with premiers, Prime Minister Carney showed disturbing signs of caving in further to oil and gas. Instead, he must stop the industry's all-out assault on the biosphere. This means ending fossil fuel subsidies, rather than augmenting them, as the Liberals have in the past. And it means rejecting new pipelines and phasing out old ones, rather than proliferating them, as the Liberals have in the past. Humanity and nature urgently need our new government to finally set the Canadian economy on a more ethical and prosperous course away from oil and gas. Gregory M. Mikkelson, co-founder, Cross Border Organizing Working Group, As a tenured professor of environmental studies, Greg Mikkelson lectured and published in ecology, philosophy, and economics, with a focus on the nature, causes, and value of biological diversity. He also helped divest McGill University from fossil fuels. Having left academia, he now volunteers as a researcher and organizer for a growing international movement to shut down tar sands pipelines in the Great Lakes/St. Lawrence watershed.
National Observer
an hour ago
- National Observer
Mark Carney's grand climate bargain comes into view
In a political fight that seems destined to go many rounds, the first one went to the Prime Minister. He emerged from the high-stakes first ministers' meeting with many of Canada's premiers — including Conservative ones like Doug Ford — singing his praises. Even Smith had to concede that Carney's performance had won over the room, describing him as a 'dramatic improvement' over his predecessor. That's because Carney didn't take the bait that Smith so obviously laid out around pipelines. Instead, he smartly called the bluff she's been getting away with for years now. Smith has talked up and down about her government's commitment to decarbonizing oil production in Alberta, one that involves reaching net-zero province-wide by 2050. As you read the official communiqué from the meeting it becomes clear that this is where Carney is going to dig in for the real fight — and where Smith is least prepared to defend herself. 'First Ministers agreed that Canada must work urgently to get Canadian natural resources and commodities to domestic and international markets,' it reads, 'such as critical minerals and decarbonized Canadian oil and gas by pipelines, supported by the private sector, that provide access to diversified global markets, including Asia and Europe. First Ministers also agreed to build cleaner and more affordable electricity systems to reduce emissions and increase reliability toward achieving net zero by 2050.' No new pipelines without decarbonization, in other words. This immediately shifts the onus to the oil industry, which has been slow-playing its promised investment in carbon capture and storage technology for years now. If it doesn't finally move ahead there, the conversation around new pipelines is effectively over — and the blame will fall squarely on them. This also makes it more difficult for Smith and Conservative Party of Canada leader Pierre Poilievre to continue their recent campaign against industrial carbon pricing, given its obvious role in decarbonizing upstream oil and gas production. Not everyone is buying what Carney is selling here, mind you. Catherine Abreu, the director of the International Climate Politics Hub, described the idea of decarbonized oil and gas as 'a complete contradiction in terms, and a dangerous lie that Canadian government after Canadian government has tried to spin under the spell of industry lobbying.' This tracks with the broader environmental movement's longstanding skepticism of carbon capture and storage, which is informed by the underwhelming performance of early stage projects. It's worth noting, I think, that the performance of early-stage wind and solar were equally dispiriting. Technologies can and often do improve with time and scale. More to the point, if Canada is willing to sink billions in tax credits into EV factories in Ontario and Quebec, the same sort of opportunity should probably be afforded to Alberta's largest industry — especially if we're trying to prevent the Alberta separatist movement from escaping political containment. Yes, these large carbon capture and storage projects might fail, just as some of the battery plants in central Canada already seem to have. But carbon capture technology also might succeed — and if it does, that's an unalloyed boon to both our economy and environment. Either way, Carney isn't biting on Smith's demands for new pipelines 'in every direction.' Instead, he's moving the conversation onto political ground that's far more favourable to his government, both in terms of the raw politics and its enduring (if evolving) commitment to fighting climate change. He will, as Smith demanded, create the conditions for a more rapid assessment of infrastructure projects. But it's clear that one of those conditions will be the net-zero targets that Smith and Alberta's oil and gas industry have repeatedly committed themselves to. If they can't or won't reach them, they'll finally have to come out and say as much. Mark Carney's first meeting with Canada's premiers resulted in an agreement to pursue projects that export "decarbonized oil and gas". How that helped avoid a confrontation with Danielle Smith — and why it puts the pressure squarely on her. If I had to guess, the only new oil export project we'll end up seeing is another expansion of TMX, one that can be accomplished with upgrades to the existing line and some dredging of Vancouver's Burrard Inlet, an idea that has been mooted by Carney and supported by BC's Minister of Energy and Climate Solutions Adrian Dix. That's in part because the combination of the increasingly imminent arrival of peak demand for oil will make new infrastructure projects like a revived Northern Gateway (which have to operate for decades to deliver an adequate economic return) a non-starter for the private sector. It's also because OPEC's declining interest in artificially supporting prices raises the prospect of another price war like the one in 2014 that devastated the Canadian oil patch. Carney knows all of this, and understands it better than any elected official in the country. His real interest, I suspect, is building the sorts of projects that will best position Canada in the low-carbon economy that so clearly lies ahead. But he also understands that getting into a pitched battle with Alberta by explicitly crushing its pipeline dreams gets in the way of that objective — and helps advance Smith's political agenda in the process. Sometimes, the best way to win a fight is by not fighting it at all.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Canadians divided on whether U.S. is an ‘ally' or ‘enemy' country: Poll
OTTAWA – Faced with a trade war they didn't start, Canadians are divided on whether they see the United States as an 'enemy' or an 'ally,' a new poll suggests. The Leger poll, which was conducted online and can't be assigned a margin of error, surveyed more than 1,500 people between May 30 and June 1. Almost a third of respondents said they view the U.S. as a 'neutral country,' while 27 per cent said they consider it an 'ally' and 26 per cent see it as an 'enemy country.' Just over a third of men said they consider the U.S. an ally, compared with one in five women. Almost 30 per cent of women said they view the U.S. as an enemy, compared with 22 per cent of men. Older Canadians, those at least 55 years of age, were more likely to consider the U.S. an enemy than younger Canadians. Regionally Albertans were most likely to consider the U.S. an ally while Ontarians and British Columbians were most likely to see it as an enemy. The difference is starkest between political party supporters, with 44 per cent of Conservative supporters saying they view the U.S. as an ally, compared with 17 per cent of Liberal supporters and 12 per cent of NDP supporters said the same. Comparatively 16 per cent of Conservative supporters said they view the U.S. as an enemy country, while 36 per cent of Liberal supporters and 41 per cent of NDP supporters said the same. U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order Tuesday to double his levies on steel and aluminum to 50 per cent. He claimed the measure will protect the country's national security and domestic industries. Prime Minister Mark Carney has said his government will need to take 'some time' to craft a response to the increased U.S. tariffs. The number of Canadians that report seeing the U.S. as an enemy country has dropped by six points since mid-March. At that time, 32 per cent of survey respondents told Leger they viewed the country as an enemy. The number of Canadians that view the U.S. as an ally also decreased by two percentage points since March, from 29 to 27 per cent, while the number that view it as a neutral country increased by six percentage points, from 24 to 30 per cent. Andrew Enns, Leger's executive vice-president for Central Canada, said that, broadly speaking, the patterns haven't changed much since the organization asked the question in February — when 27 per cent of respondents said they viewed the U.S. as an enemy and 30 per cent said they viewed it as an ally. Enns said the decline in the number of people saying the U.S. is an enemy likely reflects the overall sentiment on tariffs. 'It's still obviously there and, you know, clearly now we're dealing with higher steel tariffs, but the commentary coming from the White House and the Trump administration seems to have dissipated a bit and that's probably helping just tone things down,' he said. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Enns said Canada also has a new prime minister with a mandate that might 'take the edge off things.' 'I think that just keeps things more at a moderate level, and I think that reflects in people maybe feeling a little less threatened by the U.S.,' Enns said. Enns said political and business leaders have also sent a consistent message that the U.S. remains an important trading partner. He said that may encourage Canadians to believe there's a way to 'work things out.' The polling industry's professional body, the Canadian Research Insights Council, says online surveys cannot be assigned a margin of error because they do not randomly sample the population. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 5, 2025.
