logo
California needs to stop tying itself in knots over trans athletes and admit — men shouldn't compete against women

California needs to stop tying itself in knots over trans athletes and admit — men shouldn't compete against women

New York Post2 days ago

Instead of simply following President Trump's executive order that bans biological men from participating in women's sports, California came up with a more reductive policy.
They said girls could share the podium with trans athlete AB Hernandez who, by the way, had a pretty successful Saturday at the state championships. Because Hernandez, a junior at Jurupa Valley High School, is a dude competing against chicks.
As controversy swirled around Hernandez's dominant performance in high school track and field and Trump's threats to withhold federal funding, the California Interscholastic Federation tweaked its rules on Tuesday to mandate that any biological females who lost to a trans-athlete would not lose their place.
Advertisement
Hernandez took first in two events and second in another. For the high jump, Hernandez cleared 5 feet 7 inches with no failed attempts while his two, I guess we can call them 'co-winners,' Jillene Wetteland and Lelani Laruelle cleared the same threshold with a fail each. The three shared the first-place podium.
4 Thanks to California Interscholastic Foundation's new rule AB Hernandez shares the first platform with two female track and field athletes.
AP
In the triple jump, the trans athlete won while Kira Gant Hatcher, who trailed by over a half-meter, stood atop the first-place platform, again alongside Hernandez.
Advertisement
And yet the fact that they had to change the rules of a simple straight forward competition —whoever jumps the highest or the longest wins — to accommodate Hernandez was an admission from officials that this all was inherently ridiculous.
And yes, utterly confusing. Hey, you technically lost to a biological male but here's your first-place trophy anyways because we feel bad that we are letting this dude in.
Girls, like their male counterparts, are cutthroat and competitive. They want and deserve a level playing field and the chance to win fair-and-square. They shouldn't have to be told to be a good girl and make room for the person who everyone has agreed — by making the rule change — does not belong there.
Why not simply comply with the ban? Instead, the governing body is twisting itself into a pretzel to accommodate trans athletes.
Advertisement
4 AB Hernandez, a transgender student at Jurupa Valley High School, competes in the long jump at the California high school track-and-field championships.
AP
It's 2025. After years of being told that we had to remake our society and erase the female side of the gender binary in sports, jails and yes, locker rooms, or be called a transphobe, we have returned to consensus of sanity. Or at least people are finally unafraid of being canceled to simply state the obvious: biological men have a physical advantage over them.
This is such a settled issue that the most recent polling shows close to 80 percent of Americans believe men do not belong in women's sports.
There's also been another change.
Advertisement
After what I can only call a chilling absence of male voices from the sports world, we're starting to see more high-profile athletes finally speak out. Maybe because it's no longer verboten. But better late than never.
Last month Aaron Rodgers told Joe Rogan that, 'the trans-woman movement is actually anti-woman…when it comes to sports.
4 Charles Barkley has spoken out against biological males in women's sports.
Getty Images
'You're not seeing trans men dominating anything. It's because there's a biological difference.'
Meanwhile, Sir Charles Barkley told Outkick's Dan Dakitch that he was 'gonna make this very simple for you, Dan. Men should not play sports against women.
'I don't even think that's controversial… I don't wanna hear you try to explain it to me. No, no, no, I don't wanna hear it. I'm not gonna argue with you. Men shouldn't play sports against women. I'm done,' he said.
Even cuckoo progressive California Gov. Gavin Newsom — who is trying to rebrand himself as a common sense Dem — admitted it was 'deeply unfair.'
Then he backed this sudden rule change.
Advertisement
4 Back in February, Donald Trump signed an executive order banning trans women athletes from women's sports.
AP
And yet, there are many pockets of the media who are still choosing their twisted version of compassion for boys over reality. During a Friday interview with Julie Hamill, President of the California Justice Center, CNN host Brianna Keilar repeatedly called Hernandez 'her' and used the cockamamie phase, 'assigned female at birth.'
A visibly annoyed Hamill corrected Keilar, noting that Hernandez is a he. Because when you strip all the pronoun charades and the fluffy terms of 'gender affirming care' we can see clearly what this issue is about: biological truth and fairness.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

French Open: Coco Gauff will face a Frenchwoman ranked 361st in the semifinals
French Open: Coco Gauff will face a Frenchwoman ranked 361st in the semifinals

Washington Post

time31 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

French Open: Coco Gauff will face a Frenchwoman ranked 361st in the semifinals

PARIS — That No. 2 seed Coco Gauff reached Thursday's French Open semifinals should surprise no one. Her 361st-ranked opponent for a berth in the title match? That's a whole other story. Gauff made it to the final four at Roland-Garros for the third time, getting past No. 7 Madison Keys 6-7 (6), 6-4, 6-1 on Wednesday in a quarterfinal between two Americans who both have won a major title.

Donald Trump Finds His Approval Rating Sinking Once More
Donald Trump Finds His Approval Rating Sinking Once More

Newsweek

time33 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Finds His Approval Rating Sinking Once More

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's approval rating on the economy is sinking, according to new polling. Pollster G. Elliott Morris' tracker shows that on the issue of the economy, Trump's approval rating is underwater by 15.75 points. That is down from -14.94 points on Monday. When Morris' tracker first launched in January, Trump's approval rating on the economy was well above water, at +8.24 points. On the issue of inflation, Trump's approval rating stands at -22.24 points. That is down from +1.99 points in January. Why It Matters While this downturn hasn't returned to the all-time low of -16.28 percent net approval recorded on May 8, the trend comes despite Trump's recent move to scale back the tariffs that saw his approval ratings plummet in April amid economic anxiety. That the numbers are falling again suggests voters remain unconvinced by the administration's course correction—and that concerns over rising prices, trade instability, and mixed signals from the White House continue to overshadow any efforts to reset the economic narrative. What To Know While Morris' tracker shows that Trump's approval rating on the economy is trending downward, pollster Nate Silver's tracker tells a different story. Silver's tracker shows that in the past few days, Trump has been trending upward on the economy, with his approval currently standing at -10 points, up from -11.3 points on June 1. However, similar to Morris' tracker, Silver's tracker shows that Trump's net approval rating on the economy has trended downwards dramatically since January, when it stood at +6 points. The same trend occurs for Trump's net approval rating on inflation, which has trended upward in the past few days, from 19.7 on May 1 to 17.1 as of June 3, but has dropped from -6 points in January. Individual polls show that Americans remain sharply divided over Trump's handling of the economy during his second term. While some surveys indicate modest approval, others reveal significant dissatisfaction—highlighting the ongoing polarization of public opinion on one of the administration's most critical issues. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the rain after arriving on Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, on May 30, 2025. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the rain after arriving on Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, on May 30, 2025. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP According to polling conducted between May 21 and June 2, 2025, economic job approval ratings for Trump range from a low of 37 percent to a high of 47 percent, with disapproval rates consistently higher in most surveys. The latest poll by AtlasIntel (May 21-27) shows Trump with just 42 percent approval on the economy and 54 percent disapproval, resulting in a net -12 percent rating. Similarly, RMG Research (May 28-29) recorded 44 percent approval and 55 percent disapproval, also yielding a net -11 percent score. Other pollsters, like YouGov and John Zogby Strategies, reported a slightly narrower gap. Zogby's poll from May 28-29 showed a 46-50 percent split, or a net -4 percent, indicating a more divided sentiment among likely voters. Only Morning Consult recorded a relatively neutral economic approval rating for the president, with 47 percent approving and 47 percent disapproving in its most recent surveys conducted between May 30 and June 2. This suggests a degree of economic support stability, though not a clear advantage. At the bottom end, the American Research Group poll (May 17-20) gave Trump just 37 percent approval compared to 60 percent disapproval, marking a net -23 percent—the steepest negative margin in the group. Meanwhile, polls show that Trump continues to face strong headwinds on the issue of inflation, with net approval ratings on the topic deeply negative—despite attempts by his administration to scale back tariffs, having paused the majority of them. Across national surveys conducted between May 1 and June 2, 2025, Trump's approval rating on inflation remains persistently low, ranging from just 31 percent to 44 percent. Disapproval consistently outpaces approval by double digits, with net ratings ranging from -7 percent (Harris/Harvard CAPS) to -32 percent (Verasight and Marquette Law School). In the most recent YouGov poll (May 30-June 2), just 39 percent approved of Trump's handling of inflation, while 54 percent disapproved—netting a -15 percent margin. The latest data from Verasight and Marquette University underscore the depth of discontent: only 31 percent and 34 percent of respondents, respectively, approved of Trump's inflation policies, while roughly two-thirds disapproved. That puts Trump's net approval at -32 percent in both surveys, among the worst marks recorded in this cycle. It comes after the pace of inflation slowed in April, the month that Trump introduced his tariffs, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) said last month. The annual inflation rate was 2.3 percent in April, down from an annual rate of 2.4 percent March. Meanwhile, consumer confidence saw a surprising increase in May. The Conference Board reported a rise to 98, much higher than both the expected 87.1 and April's 86 reading. It was the biggest one-month jump in more than a year. Nonetheless, polls still show that voters don't trust Trump on the economy. In the latest Fox News poll from April, 72 percent said they were "very" or "extremely" worried about the economy entering a recession this year. What Happens Next Trump's approval rating could fluctuate in the coming weeks, depending on the evolving tariff situation and concerns about a recession.

Zelenskyy calls Russia's peace proposal an ‘ultimatum' and he wants face-to-face talks with Putin
Zelenskyy calls Russia's peace proposal an ‘ultimatum' and he wants face-to-face talks with Putin

The Hill

time36 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Zelenskyy calls Russia's peace proposal an ‘ultimatum' and he wants face-to-face talks with Putin

KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Wednesday dismissed Russia's ceasefire proposal as 'an ultimatum' and renewed his call for direct talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin to break the deadlock over the war, which has dragged on for nearly 3½ years. Both sides exchanged memorandums setting out their conditions for a ceasefire for discussion at Monday's direct peace talks between delegations in Istanbul, their second meeting in just over two weeks. Both sides have established red lines that make any quick deal unlikely. Zelenskyy said that the second round of talks in Istanbul was no different from the first meeting on May 16. Zelenskyy described the latest negotiations in Istanbul as 'a political performance' and 'artificial diplomacy' designed to stall for time, delay sanctions and convince the United States that Russia is engaged in dialogue. 'The same ultimatums they voiced back then — now they just put them on paper … Honestly, this document looks like spam. It's spam meant to flood us and create the impression that they're doing something,' Zelenskyy said in his first reaction to the Russian document. He added that the 2025 talks in Istanbul carry 'the same content and spirit' as the fruitless negotiations held in the Turkish city in the early days of the war. The Ukrainian leader said that he sees little value in continuing talks at the current level of delegations. Defense Minister Rustem Umerov led the Ukrainian delegation in Istanbul, while Vladimir Medinsky, an aide to Putin, headed the Russian team. Zelenskyy said he wants a ceasefire with Russia before a possible summit meeting with Putin, possibly also including U.S. President Donald Trump, in an effort to remove obstacles to a peace settlement. The U.S. has led a recent diplomatic push to stop the full-scale invasion, which began on Feb. 24, 2022. 'We are proposing … a ceasefire before a leaders' summit,' with the U.S. acting as a mediator, Zelenskyy told a media briefing in Kyiv. 'Why a ceasefire before the leaders' meeting? Because if we meet and there is no mutual understanding, no willingness or vision on how to end this, then the ceasefire would end that same day. But if we see readiness to continue the dialogue and take real steps toward de-escalation, then the ceasefire would be extended with U.S. mediation guarantees,' he said. Ukraine is ready to meet at any time from next Monday at a venue such as Istanbul, the Vatican or Switzerland, Zelenskyy said. A second round of peace talks on Monday between Russian and Ukrainian delegations in Istanbul lasted just over an hour and made no progress on ending the war. They agreed only to swap thousands of their dead and seriously wounded troops. Also, a new prisoner exchange with Russia could take place over the weekend, Zelenskyy said. ___ Follow AP's coverage of the war in Ukraine at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store