logo
Convict accused of gunning down ex-prison guard for exposing his illegal affair with female jail officer, warned: 'I promise I'll get you', court hears

Convict accused of gunning down ex-prison guard for exposing his illegal affair with female jail officer, warned: 'I promise I'll get you', court hears

Daily Mail​5 hours ago

The mother of an ex-prison officer shot dead in 'retaliation' after he exposed an affair between a convict and a female officer has revealed her son was chillingly warned by the accused, 'I promise I'll get you', a court has heard.
Lenny Scott, 33, was fatally injured when he was shot six times by the gunman wearing a hi-vis jacket outside a gym on Peel Road in Skelmersdale, West Lancashire, on February 8 2024.
Alleged gunman Elias Morgan is accused of shooting the father-of-three after Mr Scott exposed an illicit relationship involving him and a female officer at HMP Altcourse, Preston Crown Court heard.
The alleged threat made four years before Mr Scott's death was 'the first thing that came to mind', his mother told police after the killing.
Alex Leach KC, prosecuting, told the jury that after Mr Scott refused a £1,500 offer to not report a phone containing evidence of the relationship, Morgan told him: 'I'll bide my time, but I promise I will get you' before making a gun gesture.
Co-defendant Anthony Cleary is alleged to have assisted Morgan in the 'revenge plot' by 'delivering the van and bike so they could be used by a gunman who intended to kill Lenny Scott'.
Both men deny murder, while Cleary also denies a second charge of manslaughter.
The court heard a pre-recorded police interview on Thursday from Mr Scott's mother, Paula.
She told the officer her son 'liked to do things right...liked to speak up'. But she said he had also complained about 'corrupt prison officers' during his time working in prisons in Birmingham and HMP Altcourse.
Mrs Scott told the detective that 2020 was 'a bad year' for her son, which included him being threatened in March.
She told the interviewer that Mr Scott's partner, Lucy Griffiths, had rung her and said there had been a problem at work.
She said: 'The police were involved and he had a threat and they knew their home address. I think Lenny played it down with me.
'He was definitely rattled by it...The fire service came and fitted alarms just in case there was anything thrown at the house.
'He was definitely upset by it and worried about the children. In the threat it said about his home address and they even named the children. It wasn't difficult as he had their names on his arm.
'I asked "is everything okay" and he said yes, the police were involved. He said he had to go into a cell and they found a phone.
'The lad threatened him and somebody else he was with. He said along the lines of "you're done for" but I couldn't swear by the words...He was second guessing things, he was making a joke about things but it wasn't. It changed things for him from then.
'He said "you don't know what it's like working there, you don't understand how little they value my life". He didn't feel supported by it.
'Before then he felt like nothing could get to him but after he started thinking he had children. It just rattled him.
'However, he still got on with work and went everyday and tried his best. He used to tell me there were corrupt prison officers. It sort of changed his opinion of the Prison Service after that threat.'
Mrs Scott told the court her son was suspended from his role as a prison officer after he punched an inmate during an unrelated incident.
She said he told her: 'The last year I have had to deal with corrupt prison officers and they have now turned on me'. He was later dismissed over the same incident.
Mrs Scott told the court that the corrupt officer in question was a 'female officer called Sarah'.
The court heard Mr Scott was asked twice to be a witness and his mum 'assumed it was in relation to the threat and the corrupt prison officer'.
However, the court heard Mr Scott didn't want to 'put his family in jeopardy by going and being a witness'.
Mrs Scott added: 'He would have been a witness and done anything if he was still at the prison,' but felt unsupported following his dismissal.
On the day of her son's killing, Mrs Scott said he had picked up one of his children from school because they were ill, before dropping him at Ms Griffiths' house.
He then went to the gym at Peel House in Skelmersdale where he trained in ju-jitsu.
Mrs Scott said: 'I sent him a text saying I was going to pick up some medicine. He said I've taken him to Lucy's and I'm going to the gym.
'He must have been going in when I texted him and said "have you fed the dog?" He rang and said he hadn't. That was the last time I spoke with him.'
She added she phoned Merseyside Police at around 10pm to ask for some advice when she hadn't heard from him for some time.
Officers from Lancashire Constabulary arrived at her house shortly before 2am the next morning.
She told the detective: 'I don't know why but from the second they said he had been shot, we don't know people who live in that world, but straight away that prison came to light.
'I think a detective came out that night and I'm almost certain I told him about the prison straight away. It's the only thing you think. It's the only time he has mixed with people like that.'
She added: 'As part of prison life they get threats but they aren't substantial. There would definitely be comments like 'I know where you park your car' but he just brushed those off. It was just a way of life.
'The minute after I found out about this, the first thing that came to my mind was that threat. There was nothing else that came close.'
Mrs Scott said at the time of her son's death he was 'in his best job' working for Gousto and 'was in the best place really'.
She earlier told the court how her son had previously been a firefighter in the RAF, before working a number of jobs before joining the Prison Service.
She said the dad-of-three was a 'homebody' who had a 'passion for animals'.
Opening the case earlier this week, Mr Leach told the court that Mr Scott found the phone in Morgan's cell on March 26 2020.
The court heard not only was possession of the phone a criminal offence, but 'Morgan knew there was evidence on it which would lead to the discovery of a sexual relationship between him and a female prison officer'.
The prosecution alleged Morgan made a number of threats towards Mr Scott, including that a car was outside his family home.
Mr Scott's manager at the prison, John Davies, wrote in a statement that 'the way Lenny reacted is something I have never heard or seen before'.
When the iPhone was examined, it 'revealed Elias Morgan was engaged in a sexual relationship with another prison officer, Sarah Williams', the court heard.
Mr Leach added: 'It was clear that she had provided Elias Morgan with details about other prisoners. The court heard Mr Scott gave a witness statement and Morgan was arrested and interviewed under caution.
Morgan, who had been moved away from Mr Scott's wing 10 days after the 'threats', was remanded back into custody between July 2021 and October 2022 - and in April 2023 was charged with unauthorised possession of the mobile phone. Williams admitted three offences of misconduct in a public officer and a computer misuse offence.
Morgan pleaded not guilty - and his case was adjourned until February 19 - 11 days after Mr Scott was killed.
Mr Leach said: 'On the 8th February 2024, almost four years later, Lenny Scott was coming out of his gym at Peel House in Skelmersdale when he was approached by a man wearing a high-visibility jacket and carrying a handgun.
'The man shot him, six times, to the head and body. Lenny Scott died of his injuries. The man travelled to and escaped from the scene on an electric motorbike, which he loaded onto the back of a van, a short distance away, before driving back towards Liverpool. The murder was, the prosecution says, an act of retaliation.
'The prosecution says that once you've heard the evidence, you will be sure that, at the very least, Elias Morgan orchestrated Lenny Scott's murder, recruiting Anthony Cleary to assist him in doing so.
'That alone would make him guilty of murder on count one.
'Moreover, the prosecution say, when you've examined the fine detail of the evidence, you will be sure not only that Elias Morgan is guilty of murder by organising the killing of Lenny Scott, you will be sure that it was he who pulled the trigger himself.
'For his part, Anthony Cleary, the second defendant, played a supporting role. Acting on instructions, he delivered the van, containing the electric motorbike used by the gunman, to a housing estate close to the gym.
'Moreover, he knew that he was delivering the van and bike so that they could be used by a gunman who intended to kill Lenny Scott, or at least to cause him really serious harm.'
Mr Leach told the jury: 'The evidence you are about to hear, when examined in detail, reveals a powerful image, one in which Elias Morgan, driven by a desire for revenge and reliant on Anthony Cleary for his assistance, planned and executed the murder of Lenny Scott. Both men, the prosecution says, are guilty of his murder.'
The trial of Morgan, 35 and Cleary, 29, continues.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BREAKING NEWS Greg Josephson - co-founder of Universal Store is stabbed to death by a teenage boy at house party in Brisbane
BREAKING NEWS Greg Josephson - co-founder of Universal Store is stabbed to death by a teenage boy at house party in Brisbane

Daily Mail​

time26 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

BREAKING NEWS Greg Josephson - co-founder of Universal Store is stabbed to death by a teenage boy at house party in Brisbane

The co-founder of the Universal Store clothing chain has been killed after being allegedly stabbed by a teenage boy in Brisbane during a house party. Greg Josephson, 58, who co-founded the business with his brother Michael in 1999, was found dead at his Clayfield house on Oriel Road shortly after 8pm on Thursday night. A 15-year-old boy, who was known to the entrepreneur, was arrested and has been charged with one count of murder from a domestic violence offence. Police found the former Universal Store chief executive dead upstairs at the house, registered to his wife Tamra Josephson, during a teenage house party. The boy was refused police bail and is due to appear in Brisbane Children's Court on Friday morning. Acting Assistant Commissioner Rhys Wildman said an altercation took place between the 15-year-old and the 58-year-old man, who are believed to be known to each other. The charge levelled against the teenager was for domestic violence murder. It is alleged a household implement was used. A 15-year-old boy was found near the property and has been charged with murder 'There was some sort of altercation that's resulted in this 58-year-old male tragically, losing his life,' the acting assistant commissioner told The Courier Mail. 'It's not a case of carrying knives, it's unfortunately allotted in a home. 'Police are not looking for any other party, so it was an individual, the 15-year-old is the sole offender that we believe was involved in this incident. 'The guests at the party were not involved in the incident as it unfolded.' Officers found the 15-year-old boy near the property, on Barlow Street, and took him into custody. He was refused police bail and has been scheduled to appear in Brisbane Childrens Court on Friday. Inspector Jane Healy told Channel 7's Sunrise that police attending the house came across a 'confusing and confronting scene'. 'We are still establishing a timeline of what has happened.' The Child Protection Investigation Unit is investigating the incident. Police have appealed to anyone who may have information that could assist, or who may have CCTV or dashcam footage from the area, to come forward. A neighbour has described the shock she felt when the incident occurred. 'I did hear the police go down the street,' she said on Friday. 'I didn't think something like this was going to happen so close. [It's a] bit of a shock.' The six-bedroom property has been currently listed as for sale on for 43 days. The upmarket home features a swimming pool, six bathrooms and two parking spaces. It was sold in 2016 for $1,910,000 and the median property prices in Clayfield over the last year range from $1,880,000 for houses.

‘I don't know if I'm going to feel normal again' Child Q says over strip search
‘I don't know if I'm going to feel normal again' Child Q says over strip search

The Independent

time37 minutes ago

  • The Independent

‘I don't know if I'm going to feel normal again' Child Q says over strip search

A black woman who was strip-searched by two Metropolitan Police officers after being wrongly suspected of carrying cannabis when she was a schoolgirl said she does not know if she is 'going to feel normal again'. The woman, known as Child Q, was 15 years old and on her period when she was searched at school by officers in Hackney, east London on in December 3 2020 On Thursday, a disciplinary panel found Pc Kristina Linge and Pc Rafal Szmydynski had committed gross misconduct during the 'disproportionate' and 'humiliating' incident, and the officers were dismissed from the force without notice. The 'traumatic' search involved the removal of Child Q's clothing, including her underwear, her bending over and having to expose intimate parts of her body, the police disciplinary panel heard. In a family statement released by Bhatt Murphy Solicitors after the hearing, Child Q said: 'Someone walked into the school, where I was supposed to feel safe, took me away from the people who were supposed to protect me and stripped me naked, while on my period. 'I can't go a single day without wanting to scream, shout, cry or just give up. 'I don't know if I'm going to feel normal again. But I do know this can't happen to anyone, ever again.' Child Q's mother said the Metropolitan Police has a 'huge amount' of work to do if they are to win back the confidence of black Londoners. In the statement, she said: 'Professionals wrongly treated my daughter as an adult and as a criminal, and she is a changed person as a result. 'Was it because of her skin? Her hair? Why her? 'After waiting more than four years I have come every day to the gross misconduct hearing for answers, and although I am relieved that two of the officers have been fired, I believe that the Metropolitan Police still has a huge amount of work to do if they are to win back the confidence of black Londoners.' The tribunal heard authorisation was not sought for the intimate search, which left Child Q feeling 'demeaned' and 'physically violated'. An appropriate adult was not present, a key safeguard of a child's rights, and the girl's mother was not told of the situation. A third officer – Pc Victoria Wray – was given a final written warning after her involvement on the day was found to amount to misconduct. She was a 24-year-old probationary officer at the time and arrived at the scene after the key decisions had been made. Panel chairman Commander Jason Prins said: 'There has been enormous harm to Child Q and significant harm to the community in trusting the police.' Earlier he had described the incident as 'a disastrous and negative interaction' between police and a black teenager, but said race had not been the reason why Child Q was treated so badly. The search was 'disproportionate, inappropriate and unnecessary', and it was 'humiliating' for the child and made her feel 'degraded'. Commander Prins said 'this is a case where officers adopted a simplistic approach' to a sensitive matter and they did not follow the training they were given. Authorisation was not sought and the situation 'cried out for advice and input', he added. Child Q did not give evidence at the four-week hearing 'because of the psychological effects that this strip search has had on her', the panel heard. Outrage over Child Q's treatment led to protests outside Stoke Newington police station in north London, after a safeguarding review found she had arrived at school for a mock exam and was taken to the medical room to be strip-searched while teachers remained outside. After the misconduct panel finding, Amanda Rowe, director of the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), which brought the case, said of the officers: 'Their decision to strip-search a 15-year-old at school on suspicion of a small amount of cannabis was completely disproportionate. 'They failed to follow the policies that exist to ensure that children in these situations have appropriate protective measures in place.' Teachers had already searched Child Q's blazer, shoes and school bag, and no drugs were found. The school's safeguarding deputy had called police, amid fears Child Q could have been carrying drugs for someone, being exploited or groomed in the community, which meant it was a safeguarding issue for her and other school pupils. Pc Szmydynski took a 'leading role' in the actions that day, including calling for a second female officer to attend, in line with a more intimate search taking place. Pc Linge told Child Q she would be arrested if she did not consent to being searched. Pc Szmydynski was 39 and had more than 13 years policing experience at the time of the search, after becoming a police community support officer in 2007 and a constable in November 2014. Pc Linge was 41 and had joined the force in August 2018. Child Q told Pcs Linge and Wray, who searched her, that she was menstruating, but the search continued, during which her sanitary pad was exposed. When no drugs were found after the strip search, Child Q's hair was also scoured. With no adult present, the teenager was alone and had no help during her conversations with police, or when the decision was made to perform a strip search. No consideration was given as to whether the search could have been moved to Child Q's home, a police station or if it needed to happen at all, according to Commander Prins. It was suggested the police felt the safeguarding deputy, who had accepted in her evidence to feeling 'Child Q was stoned', was acting as the appropriate adult. But Commander Prins added: 'Child Q's mother was a strong choice to be an appropriate adult and, equally, a member of staff who had not been involved in the incident.' The hearing was also told that Metropolitan Police officers get no further updates on stop and search after initial training, and the training on conducting searches in schools was described as 'insufficient'. After the hearing, Metropolitan Police Commander Kevin Southworth told the PA news agency: 'I think we should start by offering our sincerest and deepest apologies again to Child Q for what happened that day and also to her family, her friends, the community, and everyone affected by this terrible incident. 'We understand the distress it must've caused within the community and on Child Q herself and hopefully we can reassure people that we've transformed our approach to stop and search since this time in order to make sure that something like this never happens again.' He had also said: 'While the officers involved did not act correctly, we acknowledge there were organisational failings. 'Training to our officers around strip-search and the type of search carried out on Child Q was inadequate, and our oversight of the power was also severely lacking. 'This left officers, often young in service or junior in rank, making difficult decisions in complex situations with little information, support, or clear resources to help their decision-making.'

DAVID DAVIS: Which side is Labour on - the troops who defended this nation in Northern Ireland, or those who tried to destroy it?
DAVID DAVIS: Which side is Labour on - the troops who defended this nation in Northern Ireland, or those who tried to destroy it?

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

DAVID DAVIS: Which side is Labour on - the troops who defended this nation in Northern Ireland, or those who tried to destroy it?

British troops went to Northern Ireland to save lives. Today, prosecutors pursue them for doing just that. To understand how we reached this appalling state of affairs, we must return to the beginning. In 1969 the British Army deployed to Northern Ireland not as an occupying force but as a peacekeeping one. Their mission was to shield the Catholic community from loyalist mobs amid spiralling sectarian violence. The IRA and their supporters are now trying to cynically rewrite that basic truth. The early years of the Troubles did not feature unrest, but murder. It was Paramilitary killings, as opposed to arrests, which defined the conflict: take the Warrenpoint ambush in 1979, where 18 British soldiers were killed and over 20 more were wounded by IRA bombs. But the IRA's campaign was not just against soldiers: its terrorists slaughtered innocent civilians, too. In Omagh in 1998, a bomb planted by the so-called Real IRA killed 29 and injured 200. These were not military operations. They were cowardly attacks on the defenceless. And yet, astonishingly, those who perpetrated such atrocities now recast themselves as victims. The IRA peddles a grotesque inversion of the truth, downplaying the scale of its crimes, while promoting a narrative of 'state abuses' designed to paint terrorists as martyrs and soldiers as villains. The Troubles killed more than 3,500 people, and injured more than 50,000. Republican and Loyalist paramilitaries caused roughly 90 per cent of the deaths. In stark contrast, British soldiers operated under the strict constraints of Operation Banner, bound by the 'yellow card' rules of engagement, which required restraint, warnings and proportionality. Time and time again, we see examples of the British military displaying courageous restraint in their confrontations with the IRA. One such case is that of Captain Herbert Westmacott, an SAS officer who was killed in an IRA ambush. Having witnessed their commanding officer brutally gunned down, his patrol entered the house from which the terrorist had fired the shots that killed him – not to exact revenge, but to detain the gunman. These troops chose justice over vengeance. Meanwhile, 1,400 soldiers and police officers died, while the Army killed only 300 IRA terrorists: a stark indicator of the lethal, asymmetric war they faced. Our troops served with discipline and honour in near-impossible conditions. And the facts bear this out: more Catholics were killed by the IRA than by any other group during the Troubles. So much for their claims to be liberators. Which brings me to the Clonoe incident, now the subject of a politically loaded inquest. Readers may already be aware of some of the facts. In February 1992, Special Branch learnt that an IRA team, armed with a Soviet DShK ('Dushka') heavy machine gun, would attack the Coalisland police station. The intelligence indicated that the attack would be mounted from the Clonoe chapel car park, so the SAS commander's plan was to close in on the IRA operatives and arrest them there as they mounted the heavy machine gun on to their stolen lorry. At 7.40pm on that dark February night, 12 members of the SAS were in position on the boundary of the car park, behind the hedgerow. However, the intelligence briefing was wrong. Instead, at around 10.40pm, the DShK was used to attack the Coalisland police station. Sixty rounds were fired at close range from the DShK. The attackers' intent was clear: to kill police officers. The gunfire could clearly be heard, and the tracer bullets were observed by the SAS patrol. After a minute or two, the soldiers heard another burst of gunfire. They did not know that this was in fact IRA terrorists firing their guns in the air as a tribute to Tony Doris, another IRA man who had been killed in a firefight the previous year. For all they and their commander knew, hiding behind their hedge, the murder gang were engaging other soldiers or other policemen. Within a minute, the lorry appeared out of the darkness, driven at breakneck speed, lurching around corners and with its engine screaming in too low a gear. As it drove into the car park, headlights illuminated the SAS position behind the hedgerow. At that point, the soldiers did not know whether they had been spotted. Fearing they were about to be attacked, the soldiers stood up, advanced on the occupants of the lorry and the three other vehicles in the car park, and opened fire. Four IRA members were shot dead, one was wounded, arrested at the scene and, notably, given first aid by the soldiers, while others fled in the three cars. Like all counter-terrorism actions at the time, the operation was reviewed by the Director of Public Prosecutions and all soldiers involved were found to have behaved entirely properly. Now we fast forward to February 2025, when Mr Justice Michael Humphreys ruled that the use of lethal force by the SAS in this incident was unlawful. The ruling is demonstrably wrong and ignores the facts. I find it hard to imagine a more clear-cut situation that would allow firing without challenge. Clonoe is just one incident in which elderly veterans are being persecuted, there will be many more. Terrorists killed 722 British soldiers during the Troubles. Not one of those murders has led to a retrospective inquest, let alone a prosecution. But today, we witness a legal crusade against the men who risked everything in the service of peace. This is not justice. While the killers walk free, authorities hound the men who stopped them, like criminals. The Legacy Act, which created a new body known as the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery (ICRIR) to take over all Troubles-era cases, was designed to put an end to this travesty. But the Government's dithering response has handed the initiative back to those who spent decades glorifying violence. Labour must decide whose side it is on: the defenders of this nation, or those who tried to destroy it? Our veterans, many now in their seventies, deserve peace in retirement, not a knock on the door and questions about a firefight in a chapel car park three decades ago, in which they were operating well within the law. Brave soldiers who served their country with honour, heroism and skill during the Troubles now have the Sword of Damocles hanging over them. I have repeatedly asked the Government to end this shameful campaign of retrospective justice. I have received no meaningful answer. That is why I support the petition calling for an end to these prosecutions – and the Mail's important new campaign, Stop the SAS Betrayal, to seek new legal safeguards for our troops. The petition has now passed 100,000 signatures, triggering a debate in Parliament. But that is just the start. This is not just massively important to our veterans. If this rewriting of history succeeds, this weapon of lawfare can be used against soldiers in any future conflict, destroying the efficacy of our troops when we need them most. The Rt Hon Sir David Davis is MP for Goole and Pocklington.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store