Regeneration of derelict Victorian mill in Manchester delayed again
The regeneration of a Victorian city centre mill has been delayed.Hotspur Press, also known as Medlock Mill, in Manchester has been derelict since shutting down as a printing press in 1996.Initial plans to convert it into a 171-home, 28-storey apartment block fell through in 2020, with a new developer, Manner, taking the historic structure on.The firm's plan to build a 36-storey student tower was given planning permission in May 2024, but it has changed the design twice since then and has had to resubmit its proposals to planners.
The new student tower was initially clad in redbrick panels, but this was changed earlier this year to be anodised metal, appearing to be grey-silver. Manner has now revised its plans for the building to include a bronze finish on the exterior. The firm has repeatedly denied the change was made to make more profit.The Local Democracy Reporting Service understands the new metal finish will cost more than the brick cladding, but it is not known if this is due to inflation from last year to 2025.Manner boss Richard James said: "Through the consultation process we wanted to listen and take on board feedback to ensure we bring forward a proposal for The Hotspur Press that local people and the city can enjoy for years to come."The redesigned proposals will now be submitted to Manchester City Council.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Why baby boomers are the backbone of middle-class Britain
Why do so many younger people feel they are disadvantaged relative to older generations? The narrative of intergenerational 'unfairness' – recently explored in a Telegraph piece on whether boomers are the 'victim generation' – pervades social discourse, and I find it really troubling. Pitting one section of society against another, on the basis of perceived 'fairness', damages the fabric of our country. In truth, there are vast differences in income and wealth throughout the population, both across and within age groups. Many young people are well-paid, and they certainly enjoy far more leisure time and holidays than previous generations, along with flexible working and much better employment protections than the baby-boomers could ever have imagined – which we have fought hard to achieve. Indeed, the post-war baby-boomers are the backbone of middle-class Britain, and have been the bastion of trying to safeguard British values while championing progress. Of course, there are vast differences among people in their 60s and early 70s, but in general, they tend to have a strong work ethic – want to support themselves and their families, avoid living on benefits – and will work even when feeling unwell, because they are loyal to their employer or their business. This is the generation that built the country we know and love today – they are disciplined, self-reliant and resourceful, unafraid of competition, and strive to improve themselves and help their families as much as they can. As Anthony New, a Telegraph reader, puts it: ''When we were growing up, many of us were very poor but we worked hard and balanced our budgets carefully.' The baby-boomers are also the heart of many of our charities and volunteering networks. They take responsibility for others, not just themselves, and want to 'give back' to society. They tend to be very community-minded and want to 'do the right thing' – which sometimes requires self-sacrifice, but baby-boomers have been brought up to believe this is how society works well. Their parents, who went through the war years, had real deprivations, while baby-boomers had very little when young but nevertheless worked hard to rebuild the country, taking advantage of post-war industrial and technological improvements. Despite all of this, too many commentators blame baby-boomers for selfishly gathering more than their 'fair share' of national resources, depriving them of their rightful dues. They accuse them of being 'lucky' to afford their own homes, enjoy free university education, and get big pensions. These accusations are much more perception than reality. Of course those at the end of their career will be better off than those just starting their working life. As Deborah Skinner, another Telegraph reader, puts it: 'We worked bloody hard throughout our life. Never had savings or a rich family to fall back on.' The baby-boomers scrimped and saved to afford sky-high mortgage interest. No holidays, spending cut to the bone, and working for years before they could buy a property. Less than ten per cent of baby-boomers went to university. The vast majority started work at 15, 16 or 18 – with many going into apprenticeships, bringing home an income straight from school. So by the time they reached their late twenties, they had already been earning money and saving for ten to fifteen years. Today's younger people, many of whom have higher education, do not reach this point until their early or mid-thirties. And as for pensions. Well, less than half of baby-boomers – and particularly women – were offered an employer pension. There was no auto-enrolment, no automatic right to a pension or any other workplace benefit. Women could be barred from pensions and generous maternity rights. Even basic employment protections against harassment and unfair dismissal were not the norm – we had to fight for women's working conditions to improve. So, it's time to stop this 'oldie bashing' and start to appreciate that each generation contributes to society, and the intergenerational envy that has crept into conventional thinking for too many younger people does not reflect reality. In fact it builds dangerous resentment. There are inequalities everywhere. Rather than trying to take money away from baby-boomers, who did so much to improve our country, let's work together as a society. It is the turn of younger generations now to carry us forward and build an even better future. Will they rise to the challenge?
BBC News
36 minutes ago
- BBC News
Bristol City Council could 'go bust' due to £63m debt 'time bomb'
Bristol City Council could "go bust" within 10 months if the government does not extend a deadline for it to plug a £63m hole in the school's budget, a councillor has deficit has mostly built up due to the authority having to spend more money than planned supporting young people with special educational needs and disabilities (Send).The council has permission from the government to carry over the debt next year, but there is no indication this deadline will be extended, and councillor Jonathan Hucker fears it has become a "ticking time bomb".The Department for Education has been contacted for comment. The schools deficit is subject to an accounting mechanism known as a "statutory override" until March 2026, which allows the council to exclude it from its main the government has not said this will be extended, or that it will provide the billions in funding required to Bristol and many other local authorities in similar situations to clear the debt, the Local Democracy Reporting Service a meeting of the audit committee on 29 May, Mr Hucker said the council is facing the prospect of having to declare bankruptcy."It is the most critical financial issue that the council faces," he said. "If the government does not act, it is likely that the council will go bust at the end of this financial year."Mr Hucker said he believed it was "very unlikely" the government would fund the deficit."It is a ticking time bomb. To withstand such a major financial shock would be difficult at the best of times."Bristol City Council finance director Andy Rothery acknowledged there was "nothing on record" from the government about extending the he added the Department for Education was conducting a major review of Send funding.
BBC News
36 minutes ago
- BBC News
Camel calf born at Whipsnade Zoo is squeaking at his mum
A chatty camel calf who was born at a UK zoo appears to be "strong and healthy", his keepers have Zoo in Bedfordshire said the baby boy, who is yet to be named, was born on 18 May to first-time-mum Orla and dad keeper Gracie Gee said Orla was "constantly reassuring him with murmurs and noises – and you can hear him 'talking' back with squeaks, which is very sweet".The fluffy new addition joins his half-sister Sally, who was born in April 2024, and will live with the zoo's herd of five adults. "Orla is very protective and attentive of her newborn," added Ms Gee."Despite being thought of as grumpy, camels are very nurturing and caring parents, and it's wonderful to see Orla proving to be a natural mum already."The calf seems strong and healthy – he was walking within hours of being born, and visitors will be able to see him getting used to his long, lanky legs as he races around the camels' vast paddock."Whipsnade Zoo's domestic Bactrian camels are an ambassador species for their critically endangered cousins, the wild camel in Mongolia and charity behind Whipsnade Zoo is supporting conservation efforts in Mongolia, including in the Gobi Gee said there were as few as 950 wild camels left in the deserts of Mongolia and China, with "hunting and water scarcity caused by human-activity largely to blame"."Natural predation from the grey wolf is also putting pressure on the remaining population," Ms Gee said. Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
