AI still needs to up its March Madness game
The AI chatbots we invited into our long-running Axios AI+ women's bracket challenge this year were no match for most of the competitors among Axios readers and staff.
State of play: Not only did the AI chatbots have trouble filling out their March Madness brackets, they ended up finishing below most of the human pickers, at least for the women's tournament, which wrapped up Sunday.
Why it matters: AI bots are likely to become key helpers in every realm of human activity — fantasy sports included — but all that computing power doesn't guarantee better results, this year's experience shows.
Zoom in: Human entries led throughout the tournament, but ChatGPT had a chance to rise toward the higher end if South Carolina prevailed against UConn.
With UConn's 23-point win Sunday, however, ChatGPT fell to 30th place of the 46 completed brackets.
Anthropic's entry, which had UCLA winning it all (they lost in the Final Four round), nonetheless beat out OpenAI, finishing in 24th place.
Another AI entrant from 4C Predictions (entered directly by the company) also had South Carolina winning it all.
However, with better predictions in the early round it finished tops among the bots, landing in 18th place overall.
Yes, but: My bracket was even worse! I finished in 32nd place, below both ChatGPT and Anthropic.
And some AI systems, including the ones from 4C Predictions, did quite well on the men's side.
What they're saying: 4C Predictions CEO Alan Levy noted earlier this week that, while its engine didn't get the women's Final Four exactly right, it did correctly predict the teams in the men's Final Four.
"This year's results highlight a growing trend: machine learning is consistently outperforming human intuition," Levy said in a statement to Axios. "While it's true that the Final Four teams were among the favorites, the true proof of AI's superiority lies in the overall bracket accuracy, which hit 80%."
Levy says that AI's success in the early rounds "shows that AI isn't just guessing favorites — it's identifying patterns and probabilities that human intuition tends to overlook."
Between the lines: Perhaps most important, Levy says, AI makes its choices without getting emotional.
For example, Levy said, his firm's AI picked long-shot Houston over heavily favored Duke in the men's tournament — and Houston beat Duke in an epic comeback Sunday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Accenture Upskills 500,000 Employees to Meet Growing Demand for AI Consulting
Accenture plc (NYSE:ACN) is one of the best stocks for a . The company recently announced that it has equipped 500,000 of its employees with skills in generative artificial intelligence, responding to rising demand for services in this space. A team of data experts gathered around a computer monitor analyzing customer data. According to CEO Julie Sweet, the company's generative AI-related revenue has jumped to $2.6 billion over the past six months, a sharp rise from $300 million in the initial half-year after ChatGPT's 2022 launch. Sweet made the following comment: 'When you think about the scale of that transformation in the last 2.5 years - you can see that we've really focused on rotating all of our offerings, rotating how we deliver for our clients and, of course, using it to operate ourselves.' Globally, consulting and professional services firms have been adopting generative AI to cut down on repetitive and time-consuming tasks traditionally handled by junior staff. At Accenture, consultants are now using the technology to automate routine duties such as creating presentations, Sweet noted. She further stated: 'By being able to use some of the work that is pretty rote in terms of the presentation - we're able to mentor our young leaders about the underlying content more. They're actually able to focus and do more shadowing of senior leaders.' Accenture plc (NYSE:ACN) is a global professional services firm that offers consulting, technology, and outsourcing solutions to both businesses and government entities. The company supports clients in areas such as system integration, strategic planning, and enhancing operational efficiency, all with the goal of helping them achieve greater success. While we acknowledge the potential of ACN as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure. None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Fast Company
22 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Who will build the next generation of digital products?
AI is significantly impacting software development. Programmers write code. Their job is to translate product specifications into text a computer can understand, compile, and execute. There is some room for programming creativity to architect an application to simplify future maintenance or improve performance. However the most creative aspects of digital product development (e.g., mobile, wearable, web, and desktop apps) involve humans, from identifying their challenges when contemplating a product to gathering feedback when refining it. Successful digital products require a team of creative, critical thinkers. A typical team includes product owners, designers, developers, project managers, quality assurance specialists, and marketers. In recent years, low-code and no-code tools have become more capable, making it possible for non-developers to create prototypes and proofs of concept. AI is taking that to another level with its ease of building and the capabilities of the resulting product. Quantity versus quality in this new era Firebase Studio and tools like it generate code, not a black box. Suppose the product fails to meet requirements for any reason. It can then either be regenerated from an altered prompt or maintained like a traditional software project by engineers skilled in the project's programming language. That kind of troubleshooting and maintenance will benefit from a trained developer's knowledge and experience. I'm in favor of tools that help people get ideas out of their heads and onto a device where others can interact with it and provide feedback. Cocktail napkins may be relegated to their more limited wicking roles. But these new capabilities have the potential to rapidly expand the number of available digital products (web products, apps in the App Store, etc.). We could face a quantity over quality challenge with significantly more rough products obscuring the diamonds. Marketing teams will face a greater challenge boosting their product above the noise to be noticed. Technology and the role of human creativity The promise for non-developers is compelling, but what about professionals? Digital product professionals with extensive digital product development experience will benefit from advanced AI tools for design exploration, code generation, and test authoring. Drawing on experience, those professionals can direct AI tools to produce higher-quality results than someone with less experience directing the same tools. Lessons learned from prior experience should result in better prompts and, ultimately, better products. A powerful tool in the hands of someone who knows how to wield it can produce excellent results. A cautionary tale Decades ago, I was involved in the third rewrite of a struggling software product in the education market. The business owners were convinced their product's problems were tied to their programming language choice. It was early in my career, and the migration was to a language I enjoyed, so I didn't think to ask questions. As with previous rewrites, the feature set remained essentially the same. The basic architecture remained the same. And the team driving the requirements remained the same. Not surprisingly, the rewrite results were also the same. The product was not noticeably faster or easier to use, and customers didn't like it any more than the previous version. I learned an important lesson from the project. Technology by itself (in that case, a programming language) rarely moves the product success needle. Solving the right problem with the right basic approach, driven by user feedback and the marketing skills and budget to spread the word, has a far greater impact on the results. The same is true for AI. It is a fantastic tool that bestows the superpower on unskilled people to make really awful software products faster than they ever could before. Beyond programming: Solve the right problem with empathy While greater accessibility for non-developers and more powerful tools for skilled professionals are positive, the outlook isn't all rosy. Currently, AI is best at building products when specific instructions are given. The more detail we provide, the better the results. That is very similar to the programmer's role. Businesses that currently thrive by turning detailed specifications into functioning software products have the most to lose when AI tools most closely match their skillset. There is much more to digital product development than programming. Our clients value creative thinking, critical thinking, empathy, and a passion for creating compelling user experiences. Those characteristics are vital in ensuring we're solving the correct problems for our clients. Less programming effort will be required to build digital products. However, for the foreseeable future, there will still be a significant need for the distinctly human creativity and skills that make products great.
Bloomberg
38 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Apple Sets Plans for Delayed Siri Launch in 2026
Apple is targeting spring 2026 for the release of its delayed Siri upgrade, as the iPhone maker works to turn around its AI efforts. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman joins Caroline Hyde on 'Bloomberg Tech.' (Source: Bloomberg)
