logo
Gaza civilians struggle as aid fails to reach north

Gaza civilians struggle as aid fails to reach north

Time of India3 days ago

Starving civilians caught in the chaos of food distribution in Gaza (Image credit: AP)
Before the war, Hazem Lubbad was a university student, supporting his studies while working as a waiter at a restaurant in Gaza City. For the past 19 months, he has been hunkering down with his extended family in Sheikh Radwan, a neighbourhood in the northwest of Gaza City.
Many neighboring areas, such as Beit Lahiya and Jabalia, have been ordered by the Israeli military to 'evacuate' and move south. The area faces constant Israeli airstrikes and shelling, residents say, as well as a desperate struggle to find enough food. Moving around the area is dangerous, too.
"We eat whatever is available, one meal a day, from morning until late at night. Sometimes it is lentils; sometimes it is pasta," the 21-year-old Palestinian said in a video message from Gaza.
Food has been in short supply throughout the war, Lubbad said. Now, some food has begun to trickle into Gaza after an 11-week blockade imposed by the Israeli government, but residents say it is still not reaching the north.
Israel closed the crossings and halted all aid deliveries into Gaza on March 2. Israeli officials said that Hamas was stealing aid and using it to supply its own fighters, without providing evidence to support this claim.
Hamas, which is in charge of Gaza, is considered a terrorist group by Israel, Germany, the US and several other countries.
Civilians face daily struggle for food amid war:
"There has been no flour for a month and a half to two months. A kilo of flour on the black-market costs 80–100 shekels (roughly €20-24 or $22-28), and the situation we are living in does not allow us to buy it," explained Lubbad, adding that no one in the family has a regular income anymore due to the war.
Lubbad said that they had set up a basic solar-powered phone charging station where people could recharge their phones in exchange for money.
"Without this money, there's no income," he said. This means that he cannot afford to buy much in the markets, where prices have skyrocketed. According to residents, some of the aid that recently entered Gaza was looted by desperate and hungry people. Others are selling food at inflated prices.
Israel has not allowed foreign journalists into Gaza since it launched its war following the Hamas terror attacks in 2023, so DW often has to rely on talking to Gazans over the phone.
Residents in the north are also watching with horror at the news of almost daily killings of people trying to reach food distribution sites in southern Gaza. These sites are run by a private American-Israeli company called the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) and secured by the Israel Defence Forces (IDF).
The
United Nations
and other humanitarian organizations have rejected the new food distribution system, arguing that it would be unable to meet the needs of Gaza's 2.3 million inhabitants and would allow Israel to use food as a means of controlling the population. There are no distribution sites in northern Gaza and for people in the north it would be too far and dangerous to get to them.
The UN said it is permitted to bring in a limited number of trucks with flour, which is only allowed by Israel to be distributed to bakeries, as well as some other supplies, such as medical items and baby food.
UN-OCHA speaks of 'deprivation by design':
"
It is engineered scarcity," said Jonathan Whittall, head of UN-OCHA, in a briefing with journalists in Jerusalem last week, adding that aid should reach all civilians wherever they are — and should not be limited. "This new scheme is surveillance-based rationing that legitimizes a policy of deprivation by design. And it comes at a time when people in Gaza, half of whom are children, are facing a crisis of survival.
"
There is a widespread shortage of food as well as clean water and cooking gas. People resort to burning rubbish or pieces of wood salvaged from bombed-out buildings to cook.
On Tuesday, in another of such incident, news agencies, quoting local officials, reported there had been 27 deaths after Israeli forces opened fire near an aid center. People have to walk for many miles to reach these sites, which are located near Israeli militarized zones.
Earlier on Tuesday, the IDF put out a statement. "During the movement of the crowd along the designated routes toward the aid distribution site — approximately half a kilometer from the site — IDF troops identified several suspects moving toward them, deviating from the designated access routes," it said. "The troops carried out warning fire, and after the suspects failed to retreat, additional shots were directed near a few individual suspects who advanced toward the troops.
"
It added that the military is "aware of reports regarding casualties, and the details of the incident are being looked into."
The military also said that it "allows the American Civil Organization (GHF) to operate independently in order to enable the distribution of aid to the Gazan residents — and not to Hamas."
The International Red Cross (ICRC) said that its field hospital in Rafah had received "a mass casualty influx of 184 patients" on Tuesday morning.
Nineteen cases were declared dead upon arrival, the statement said, and eight died shortly after. The majority of cases had suffered gunshot wounds.
What is happening at the new distribution points for aid?
Last week, DW spoke to a young man who had been displaced in southern Gaza and who had managed to obtain two food boxes from a GHF distribution point.
"Anyone could carry as much as they could. There were no instructions about the number, no checks, or anything," Muhammad Qishta said by phone, adding that the boxes contained rice, sugar, flour, halva (sweet sesame paste), oil, biscuits, and pasta.
"Since there were no clear instructions about which streets to take to get in and out of the area, some people entered streets they didn't know were off-limits, and there was gunfire.
I ran quickly and didn't see anything, but I heard the sound of gunfire," 30-year-old Qishta said.
In Sheikh Radwan in northern Gaza, Hazem Lubbad and his relatives are staying put. They do not want to leave their area because "everywhere is the same bad situation.
Everywhere is dangerous."
For now, Lubbad said they have also resorted to grinding pasta and lentils to make bread. "We make 20 pieces of pita bread daily and divide them among 13 people. Each person gets one or two pieces of bread per day. This helps us until we find something else to eat."
Until recently, they were also able to buy dukkah, a spice mixture used as a dip for bread, but it is running low. The canned food they stocked up on when it was available has also run out, Lubbad said.
"For the children, it is extremely difficult," he said. "One meal a day is simply not enough, but there is no food for more than one meal."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump signs orders intended to jolt US drone manufacturing
Trump signs orders intended to jolt US drone manufacturing

Time of India

time43 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump signs orders intended to jolt US drone manufacturing

Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads President Donald Trump signed executive orders on Friday aimed at bolstering the US drone industry, cracking down on unauthorized flights and countering threats to national security and public orders sought to expand opportunities for commercial and recreational drone use, and tighten restrictions to address security threats. American officials have been concerned about foreign adversaries using drones to spy on sensitive areas, including military installations, and about China's dominance of the drone market, which they see as a national security threat."Building a strong and secure domestic drone sector is vital to reducing reliance on foreign sources, strengthening critical supply chains and ensuring that the benefits of this technology are delivered to the American people," one of the orders drone orders were part of a broader federal push into airborne technology. A third order he signed Friday sought to revive high-speed commercial air travel, by repealing regulations prohibiting cross-country supersonic flights, which for decades have precluded nonmilitary air travel over land at faster-than-sound and Republican administrations, as well as Congress, have grappled in recent years with the risks posed by China's role in drone manufacturing. The United States has struggled to develop alternatives at a scale necessary to wean drone operators, including the US military, completely off Chinese the same time, the growing popularity of commercial and recreational drones, and an increase in incidents of drones flying over sensitive sites, have heightened demand for Trump administration warned that drones have been used to smuggle drugs across borders, and that they could pose threats to large public gatherings, such as the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Summer Olympics, both of which are being held in the United of Trump's executive orders directed the Federal Aviation Administration to allow commercial users and public safety officials to fly drones beyond their range of sight. Under current rules, a user must be able to see the drone they are also backed a program to test aircraft that make vertical takeoffs and landings, which have the potential to improve cargo transport, medical responses and access to rural order also directed the commerce secretary to promote exports of US-made drones, and instructed federal agencies to prioritize purchases of executive order directed the FAA to develop processes to restrict the airspace over critical infrastructure, military installations, large airports, federal facilities and national also called on the attorney general and the FAA to more robustly enforce civil and criminal penalties for drone operators who violate laws or airspace restrictions. And it promoted grants for state and local law enforcement agencies to access drone-detection and tracking representatives said that the orders were an important investment in the US drone Ellman, CEO of the Commercial Drone Alliance, said in a statement that they were "long-overdue steps."The orders were Trump's most comprehensive attempt yet to boost the US drone his first term, he signed directives that sought to increase the use of drones. Days before he departed the White House, he instructed federal agencies to determine whether they could reduce the procurement of drones manufactured by foreign has taken steps to single out drone manufacturers for scrutiny and potential restrictions in the United States. In last year's defense bill, an annual measure that authorizes policies and funding for the Pentagon and military, lawmakers directed national security agencies to determine whether equipment produced by DJI or Autel, both Chinese companies that manufacture drones, posed a risk to the United States.A provision of the legislation said that if no determination was made within a year, the equipment would be added to the Federal Communications Commission's list of devices that cannot be sold in the United is not clear how many Chinese-manufactured drones exist in the United States, though they are estimated to be a majority of those in use. In the spring, there were over 1 million registered drones in the United States, according to the FAA, over 400,000 of which were commercial drones and over 350,000 of which were for recreational FAA requires the registration of all drones weighing more than 0.55 pounds. The FAA also restricts how high drones can be flown without authorization, to less than 400 feet, unless they are within a certain radius of tall structures. In restricted airspace, drone use is limited even Rocheleau, the acting FAA administrator, told House lawmakers this week that it was not possible for the FAA to know exactly how many drones were in the sky, given the limits of registration requirements."We do in fact work with legal operators, and we would be able to collect that," he told the Appropriations Committee, adding: "A child with a drone would be more challenging."

Xi will restart rare earth supply, trade talks set for June 9: Donald Trump
Xi will restart rare earth supply, trade talks set for June 9: Donald Trump

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

Xi will restart rare earth supply, trade talks set for June 9: Donald Trump

Trump and Xi held a 90-minute call on Thursday that saw the two agree to defuse growing tensions spurred by concerns over the flow of critical minerals needed by American firms Bloomberg President Donald Trump said his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping had agreed to restart the flow of rare-earth materials, as negotiators from the two nations prepare to resume trade talks on June 9 in London. The developments come as the world's two largest economies look to resolve a simmering dispute over tariffs and technology that has unnerved markets. Trump and Xi held a 90-minute call on Thursday that saw the two agree to defuse growing tensions spurred by concerns over the flow of critical minerals needed by American firms. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer are set to meet Monday 'with Representatives of China, with reference to the Trade Deal,' Trump said Friday on social media. 'The meeting should go very well.' Earlier talks between the two countries in Switzerland in May resulted in a tariff truce between Beijing and Washington that set the stage for further discussions on trade. But negotiations between the rivals stalled after the Geneva meeting, with both sides accusing the other of violating the agreement that brought down duties from massive highs. The US expressed concerns over the lack of rare-earth magnets essential for American electric vehicles and defense systems, while China bristled at fresh US restrictions on artificial intelligence chips from Huawei Technologies Co., as well as other advanced technologies and crackdowns on foreign students in the US. Asked Friday if Xi had agreed to restart the flow of rare-earth minerals and magnets, Trump told reporters on Air Force One: 'Yes he did.' China also approved temporary export licenses to critical mineral suppliers to major US automakers, Reuters reported earlier. But questions remain about what Trump conceded to Xi in their call, which the US president had eagerly sought. The Chinese Foreign Ministry in a statement said that Trump told Xi Chinese students are welcome to study in the US, and Trump later said it would be his 'honor' to welcome them. The call between Trump and Xi generated some hope on Wall Street for lower duties between the US and China, although investor optimism was limited, citing the lack of details on key matters and the thorny issues that await negotiators. The inclusion of Lutnick in the new round of talks may signal that Trump is willing to reconsider some of the technology curbs that threaten to hobble China's long-term growth ambitions.

Court rules Trump can exclude journalists from Oval Office, Air Force One
Court rules Trump can exclude journalists from Oval Office, Air Force One

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

Court rules Trump can exclude journalists from Oval Office, Air Force One

In a 2-1 ruling, the DC Circuit Court paused a judge's order that let AP rejoin the rotating press pool covering Trump's daily movements, siding with the administration's access limits Bloomberg A federal appeals court has ruled that President Donald Trump can exclude journalists from the Oval Office, Air Force One and other 'restricted' spaces based on their editorial decisions, handing the administration a win in its fight with the Associated Press over access. In a 2-1 order on Friday, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit halted a lower-court judge's order that had restored the wire service's ability to participate in a rotating pool of reporters who cover the president's daily movements. The news agency sued the Trump administration in February when the White House press office started limiting the access of AP reporters and photographers after the wire service refused to update its style guide to rename the 'Gulf of Mexico' the 'Gulf of America' following a Trump executive order. A Washington federal judge's order forcing the White House to reinstate the AP's access took effect April 14 after the appeals court didn't immediately intervene. The AP next could ask the full bench of active judges of the DC Circuit to reconsider the panel's order or ask the US Supreme Court to immediately intervene. 'We are disappointed in the court's decision and are reviewing our options,' AP spokesperson Patrick Maks said. Trump called the ruling a 'Big WIN over AP today' on his Truth Social platform. 'They refused to state the facts or the Truth on the GULF OF AMERICA. FAKE NEWS!!! Judge Neomi Rao wrote in the majority opinion that the lower court's decision 'impinges on the president's independence and control over his private workspaces.' The panel did leave in place part of the original order that required the AP to still have access to the East Room in the White House, which was usually open to a broader group of reporters. 'Throughout our nation's history, presidents have held crucial meetings and made historic decisions in the Oval Office and on Air Force One,' wrote Rao, joined by Judge Greg Katsas. 'On occasion, they have welcomed the press to observe. But these restricted presidential spaces are not First Amendment fora, and the President retains discretion over who has access.' Rao and Katsas were nominated by Trump in his first term. Judge Nina Pillard, appointed under former president Barack Obama, dissented. Historically, the AP has been part of a small, rotating pool of media outlets that cover the president's day-to-day activities as well as events open to larger groups of credentialed media outlets. In an April 8 order, US District Judge Trevor McFadden ruled that the AP was likely to succeed in arguing that the Trump administration violated the First Amendment of the US Constitution by singling out one media outlet based on its editorial choices. He said that officials remained free to exclude journalists from one-on-one access to Trump, but that they couldn't kick out the AP if it allowed in its peers. The case is Associated Press v. Budowich, 25-5109, DC Circuit Court of Appeals (Washington)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store