
Lawmakers move to limit Trump's war powers as Israel-Iran war escalates
Washington — Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are looking to limit President Trump's ability to order U.S. strikes on Iran amid its ongoing war with Israel, emphasizing that only Congress has the power to declare war under the Constitution.
"This is not our war," GOP Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky said in a post on X Tuesday announcing that he had introduced a measure under the 1973 War Powers Resolution to block U.S. strikes. "Even if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution."
The Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war, and the extent of the president's authority to wade into conflict abroad without the approval of the legislative branch has been challenged in recent years. In 2020, Mr. Trump faced criticism for his decision to strike Iranian military leader Qassem Soleimani without notifying congressional leaders.
Massie's resolution aims to force the president to seek congressional approval before entering a war with Iran and would terminate the use of U.S. armed forces against Iran without Congress' expressed approval. It's co-sponsored by Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California, who urged "every member to go on record" in a post on X on Monday.
"Are you with the neocons who led us into Iraq or do you stand with the American people?" Khanna said.
The privileged resolution would force a vote on the matter within a number of days. The House is currently on recess, but leaders will be forced to engage with the push upon their return. The vote would put Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, in a difficult position, given his strong support of Israel and the president.
Sen. Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat, is leading an effort in the Senate and introduced a similar resolution on Monday that forces a vote on requiring Mr. Trump to get congressional approval or a formal declaration of war to attack Iran, unless the U.S. is defending itself against an imminent attack.
"This resolution will ensure that if we decide to place our nation's men and women in uniform into harm's way, we will have a debate and vote on it in Congress," Kaine said in a statement.
Kaine said Tuesday he didn't have any cosponsors to announce yet, but "I definitely have interest."
Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri said he isn't backing Kaine's resolution, telling reporters that "there's very little danger" of Mr. Trump leading the U.S. into war. But Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, urged Mr. Trump to "go all in" if diplomacy fails.
"If that means providing bombs, provide bombs," Graham said Sunday in an interview with "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." "If it means flying with Israel, fly with Israel."
Mr. Trump cut short his trip to Canada for the G7 summit on Monday, citing the Israel-Iran conflict. After returning to Washington, the president wrote that "we now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran" and warned "we know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding."
"He is an easy target, but is safe there — We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now," the president said.
At least one Democrat said he plans to vote against Kaine's resolution. Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, who supports preemptive strikes against Iran, said he doesn't want to take any action that would curtail Mr. Trump's ability to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities.
Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky said his position is "no president can bomb another country without the permission of Congress."
"It's always been my belief that you don't go to war without the approval of Congress and bombing other countries is obviously war. If you want to do that, you need to come to Congress and ask for permission," Paul told reporters Tuesday.
Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, is pushing another measure to prohibit the use of federal funds or any use of military force against Iran without consent from Congress, except in the case of self-defense. It had a handful of cosponsors on Monday.
, and contributed to this report.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Joe Biden Surprises ‘Reacher' Star Alan Ritchson on Set, Actor Says Meet-Up Was ‘A Privilege and Honor'
Former President Joe Biden and his son Hunter paid a surprise visit Monday morning to the 'Reacher' Season 4 set in Philadelphia. Jack Reacher himself, actor Alan Ritchson, posted Tuesday on Instagram about the Bidens' visit, calling it a 'a privilege and honor to meet the Biden family.' Accompanying videos and photos of him with the Biden men, the 'Reacher' star wrote, 'So our 'Reacher' set got in the way of these legends.' He went on to have nothing but good things to say about the former U.S. president and his son. 'They couldn't have been more lovely. Kind, joyful, gracious and present,' Ritchson captioned his Instagram post. 'We chatted briefly about simple stuff, like string theory and quantum entanglement. Then Joe beat me at arm wrestling. All in a day's work.' According to an eyewitness who spoke to CBS Philadelphia Monday, Biden just so happened to be in the same area in Philadelphia at the same time as the 'Reacher' cast and crew. The eyewitness said that the 'Reacher' team was filming a police chase when several black SUVs suddenly pulled up. 'Out walked these men, that I thought they were actors, but then the entire cast and crew started clapping and cheering,' the eyewitness said of Biden's 'Reacher' set entrance. Former President Biden's surprising, real-life 'Reacher' crossover moment came less than a month after it was announced that he had been diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer. In late May, CNN anchor Jake Tapper also published 'Original Sin,' his book detailing the behind-the-scenes efforts that were made to cover up Biden's cognitive decline while he was still in office. Ritchson's comments, meanwhile, do not mark the first time the 'Reacher' star has dipped his toes into political waters. In February, Ritchson also blasted Matt Gaetz, the former Florida congressman who has been accused of child sex trafficking and statutory rape and who withdrew his nomination to serve as U.S. attorney general during Donald Trump's second presidential term. Gaetz was once a classmate of Ritchson's, and the actor called him a 'motherf—ker' and told GQ of his former schoolmate, 'We are adversaries.' Amazon's Prime Video has not yet announced a premiere date for 'Reacher' Season 4. The series' third season concluded its eight-episode run in late March. The post Joe Biden Surprises 'Reacher' Star Alan Ritchson on Set, Actor Says Meet-Up Was 'A Privilege and Honor' appeared first on TheWrap.


Washington Post
23 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Florida lawmakers pass charter school expansion on last day of session
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — On the 105th day of what was supposed to be a 60-day legislative session, Florida lawmakers passed a bill to allow charter schools to 'co-locate' inside traditional public schools. It's the latest move by the Republican-controlled Legislature to expand school choice in a state that has long been a national model for conservative education policy .


The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
US shifts Middle East posture as Trump mulls Iran involvement
The U.S. military is positioning itself to potentially join Israel's assault on Iran, as President Trump weighs direct action against Tehran to deal a permanent blow to its nuclear program. Trump on Tuesday urged residents of Tehran to flee and suggested he was weighing action against Iran, less than 12 hours after he had publicly pressed the country to accept his terms for a nuclear deal. Perhaps the biggest question facing Trump is whether the U.S. will drop bunker buster bombs, known as GBU-57, on Iran's Fordow nuclear site, a move Iran hawks say is necessary to eliminate Tehran's nuclear threat. Israel does not possess such a bomb, believed to be the only armament capable of destroying the highly protected nuclear plant buried deep in an Iranian mountain, nor the U.S. B-2 stealth bomber to drop it from. That has former and current Israeli officials pressing the U.S. to enter the conflict. 'The United States is much stronger than us. It has capabilities that we don't possess,' former Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz told CNN's Anderson Cooper on Monday. 'I am sure that the United States, if it decides to act, will do it for its own interests and not our interests only.' Another former Israeli defense minister, Yoav Gallant, also told CNN that Trump has 'an obligation to make sure that the region is going to a positive way and that the world is free from Iran that possesses [a] nuclear weapon.' Trump — who on Monday cut short his visit to the Group of Seven summit in Canada to return to Washington to huddle with his national security team — has already authorized several military capabilities to the Middle East for defensive purposes. Those include more than 30 refueling tanker aircraft sent to Europe, the USS Nimitz carrier strike group ordered to the Middle East and two destroyers sent to the eastern Mediterranean Sea to help Israel defend against guided missile strikes. The refueling tankers could be used to help replenish Israeli jets, offering Trump a less intense option for military involvement. A U.S. official told NewsNation that the planes were moved to the European theater to give Trump 'options' should things escalate further and the U.S. decide to become more involved. The extra equipment and personnel add to the large U.S. force posture in the Middle East, with nearly 40,000 troops, air defense systems, fighter aircraft and warships. The deployments of air and sea assets, taken together, suggest Washington is preparing for a potential offensive operation as Israel and Iran take part in tit-for-tat attacks, open warfare that Israeli officials have said could last 'weeks, not days' and threatens to spark a wider war in the Middle East. Trump on Tuesday afternoon met with his national security team for more than an hour in the Situation Room, according to the White House. But even amid the military buildup and high-level meetings, Trump as of Tuesday afternoon has not publicly committed himself to any course of action. He continues to urge Iran to make a deal to end its nuclear program 'before it is too late,' but has deflected questions as to what would cause a direct U.S. intervention in the war, telling reporters on Monday: 'I don't want to talk about that.' Still, he has hinted the U.S. could step into the fray. He said Tuesday on Truth Social that, 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' which an administration official told NewsNation indicated both the U.S. and its ally Israel, adding the U.S. has no presence in the skies over Iran. 'Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, and plenty of it, but it doesn't compare to American made, conceived, and manufactured 'stuff,'' Trump posted. And Sunday, he said 'it's possible' the U.S. could get involved in the conflict. Israel, now in its fifth day of missile strikes, has already damaged Iranian energy installations, missile sites, nuclear infrastructure, command centers and its state television station, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu showing no interest in negotiating after last week launching its largest military operation ever against the regional rival. Israeli attacks, which also killed several of Iran's top military leaders, began after its officials accused Iran of being on the verge of building a nuclear bomb. Since then, the two sides have traded large scale missile attacks in what has become the deadliest confrontation between the countries, with at least 24 people killed in Israel and more than 220 killed in Iran. The U.S. so far has only stepped in to help Israel shoot down incoming missiles via its provided Terminal High Altitude Area Defense missile defense systems. Trump earlier Tuesday also said he was seeking 'a real end' to the conflict, stressing that he's 'not looking for a ceasefire.' But he also warned that Iran knows 'not to touch our troops' and that the U.S. would be 'gloves off' in its response to such a scenario.