I know how Victoria Starmer feels. My family home became a target when my husband was an MP
At first, I thought it was a book. I was standing in the hallway of our Cornwall house in 2020 and opened the slim Royal Mail package, assuming it was a copy of Johnny's memoir. When I realised I was holding a nappy in my hand, it took me a moment to process what was going on. Then the side of it flapped open and I saw it was filled with adult human excrement.
'It's s---,' I screamed to Johnny, who had his back to me. It took him a beat to understand that I was being literal. Quickly, he grabbed it, ran outside and dumped it on the lawn, and then called the police. Johnny was at this point a minister in Boris Johnson's government and while all mail going to his Westminster and Plymouth offices was scanned, we were left to our own devices at home.
The police were with us half an hour later and were really helpful – eventually tracing it back to a woman in Croydon and doing everything they could to keep us safe. But I was shaken afterwards: this was our house, the place where we were raising our children away from prying eyes, and my husband's very public job had intruded inside it.
Hence my sympathy for Victoria Starmer. We don't know each other but I can guess how she must be feeling after the horrific arson incident at their north London house. Knowing these people can invade a place you see as a sanctuary – somewhere you deliberately keep separate from the business of politics – makes you feel powerless and very unsafe. For me, it was as if someone had reached their arm into my kitchen and handed me the nappy themselves.
Mrs Starmer is a clever woman and she will have understood that a job like her husband's doesn't come without consequences, but when Johnny first told me he wanted to be an MP, I was very naive. I didn't realise that abuse would be part of the territory.
Johnny and I met aged seven at our primary school in Sussex. We both sang in the choir, but after moving to different secondary schools we didn't see each other again until we were invited to the same party in London in 2009. I was 29 and recognised Johnny – who was in the Army and had already completed two tours of Afghanistan – immediately. We were engaged quickly but because we decided to start a family soon afterwards, we ended up not getting married for another five years.
However, our small wedding was arguably not the most life-changing moment of 2014. That is reserved for when Johnny told me he wanted to stand as an MP. He came home having read a statistic that said more soldiers died from suicide than on the field – and he found this so shocking he decided he wanted to do something about it.
Johnny and I have always been a team and even though Plymouth, the seat he wanted to contest in the 2015 election, was heavily Labour at that point, we decided to give it a go. I had given up my career in the airline industry to have my children and was earning money doing a cleaning job, so I was happy to help him in any way I could. Together, we drove around the city in a van emblazoned with Johnny's face and knocked on about 28,000 doors; our middle daughter, who was a baby then, was usually strapped to one of our backs.
We were given a 1 per cent chance of winning, so on the night of the election we went for a curry to celebrate having given it our best shot. Then we got a call from the constituency office: the count was close and we were needed there immediately.
When he won by 1,000 votes, I felt such a sense of achievement. Plymouth Labour could not believe it – and nor, to be honest, could we. Johnny was handed an envelope saying: 'Well done, you're an MP', and the whips still had no idea who he was. Our life changed quickly.
Unlike the party, the press were interested in us from the get-go. Johnny shared an office with four other new MPs but they had to kick him out because he had so many interviews and it was disturbing them. I think it was to do with him being a soldier and, maybe, our young family.
Soon we were an open story for everyone. I agreed to interviews if it meant Plymouth would get recognised and not just be the place people mistook for Portsmouth. I figured that if it meant talking about what shower gel we use, so be it.
As for our children: unlike Vic Starmer, I didn't mind occasional pictures of them in the paper, but I didn't want their lives to be too disturbed. We lived on the other side of the Tamar Bridge to Plymouth and we made sure they went to a school that wasn't in the constituency.
My life, meanwhile, was completely intertwined with Johnny's job. I ran his office; it was all casework, diary stuff and admin. While I was there, they made a rule that no family members could work for MPs, but because I was in situ I was allowed to stay. I worked so hard: I deserved my salary, no matter what people online said.
As for the rest of it, I just adapted. We were often invited to events in Plymouth and in London – and quite a few where I was asked to speak too. I really enjoyed it. Mostly, people were supportive of how much Johnny and I worked together, but every now and then someone from the 'old guard' would make a comment: usually something about me wearing trousers rather than a skirt. I just ignored it.
I opened a Twitter (now X) account so I could say the things Johnny wasn't able to – I'm outspoken, but he never asked me to tone it down (and apparently the bigwigs at Conservative HQ loved reading it). I once called Liz Truss an imbecile and that caused a bit of a hoo-ha, but let's be honest – history has proved me right.
I came off Twitter the day someone threatened the children: this person said that if I took them out that weekend, they wouldn't be safe. I told the police and they acted immediately, but that was it for me. I would be happy killing Twitter trolls forever but not if it puts the girls at risk.
I don't miss that aspect of political life at all. When we joined in 2015, Parliament had a security detail for the higher echelons but much less support for everyone else. Over Brexit, when tensions were running incredibly high and Jo Cox was murdered, there was a general feeling of unease and, thankfully, security was ramped up. From then on, I went everywhere with a panic button in my pocket, and when I did Johnny's surgery on a Thursday I had a bodyguard with me.
As Johnny's job got busier – and particularly once he became a minister in 2019 – I had to pick up more and more of the domestic work. He was usually away Monday to Thursday, which is a long time when you have three small children. It was hard for him too: he was desperate not to miss too much of the girls' childhoods, but he had no choice. Luckily, we have very easy-going daughters – and our third child, Audrey, was born in lockdown, so Johnny was home a lot during her first year.
Still, being an MP is all-consuming. It's a massive honour and privilege to be chosen by your peers; what we didn't realise was how awful it would be navigating the system and trying to get policies through. British politics, essentially, doesn't work. To pitch one side against the other means the whole thing is built on hatred, division and bullying. And even if one side comes up with a good idea, the other has to criticise it, which means you are set up to fail.
Still, for 10 years, it was our normal life. The 2024 election was brutal: Plymouth Labour are a special breed and when it was announced that we had lost, the security detail walked us to the stage, we shook the hand of the winner, and were back in the car five minutes later.
Afterwards, there was an adjustment period and I felt sad for Johnny, who had put his heart and soul into it – but there was also a feeling of peace. It's wonderful having him home. Last December, he went to every Christmas concert and nativity play that the children were in for the first time in nearly a decade. I also finally had the space to think about what I wanted to do. I started The Dress Barn – a space to buy clothes for events and weddings in Cornwall, where we live. I love doing it.
As for politics: if Johnny ever went back, he wouldn't be messing about – he would go with a big role in mind and, of course, I'd support him. But for now, we're happy being out of the spotlight.
As told to Melissa Twigg
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Fox News Politics Newsletter: 'Totally lost it'
Welcome to the Fox News Politics newsletter, with the latest updates on the Trump administration, Capitol Hill and more Fox News politics content. Here's what's happening… -Trump's border wall expansion moves forward in several critical areas: 'Crisis is not yet over' -Trump admin asks Supreme Court to life injunction blocking dismantling of Education Dept -Elon Musk may speak to Trump aides in push to calm feud President Donald Trump told Fox News on Friday that he isn't interested in talking to SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, adding that "Elon's totally lost it." Trump also said to Fox News' Bret Baier that he isn't worried about Musk's suggestion to form a new political party, citing favorable polls and strong support from Republicans on Capitol Hill. The comments come as Musk and Trump have been arguing over social media in recent days…Read more FEUD AFTER VICTORY: Who deserves the most credit for president's resounding 2024 White House win TAX BATTLE ROYALE: Trump's tariff strategy could pay for his tax bill, but only if they stick, experts warn 'VENDETTA': Judge temporarily blocks Trump admin's entry ban for international Harvard students NOT HAPPY: Biden book author reveals how White House staff truly felt about Karine Jean-Pierre as press secretary BORDER BLITZ: Trump administration drops hammer on 'narco sub' cocaine ring as cartels threaten US borders 'BEGAN TO FEEL ILL': South Sudan deportations have placed migrants, and ICE officials, in danger: new court filing DEFENDING THE CUTS: House Budget chairman explains why there's no 'pork' in Trump tax bill after Elon Musk attacks POLITICS IN ORBIT: Claim Trump nixed top Musk ally from NASA post over Dem donations belied by ex-Dems on team UNITY ON IMMIGRATION: Handful of House Democrats join Republicans in sanctuary city crackdown 'IT'S ABSURD': Dems who want ICE agents unmasked 'mandated mask wearing for years' during COVID 'WORLD STANDARD': Risch urges 'top to bottom' USAID spending review after waste, fraud exposed MICHIGAN GOES GUARD: After 'agro-terror' fungus caught in Detroit, MI House says it has best national plan to blunt CCP influence Get the latest updates on the Trump administration and Congress, exclusive interviews and more on


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
This Pride Month, ‘I identify as scared'
This Pride Month, 'I identify as scared' In the background of the parades, festivals and protests going off for Pride Month, there are executive orders targeting trans Americans and diminished support of certain rights for members of the LGBTQ+ community. Many corporate sponsors, happy to wave rainbow flags and sell Pride-themed merch in years past, are pulling back funds, too. Writer John Paul Brammer joins Drew Goins and Molly Roberts to discuss how the political atmosphere is affecting Pride this year.


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
US and Chinese officials will meet in London on Monday, Trump says
President Donald Trump announced Friday that US and Chinese officials will meet in London on Monday to discuss trade between the two nations. 'I am pleased to announce that Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, and United States Trade Representative, Ambassador Jamieson Greer, will be meeting in London on Monday, June 9, 2025, with Representatives of China, with reference to the Trade Deal,' the president wrote in a post on Truth Social. The announcement comes after Trump and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping spoke for 90 minutes on Thursday. After the phone call, the US president said he was encouraged that ongoing trade tensions could soon be resolved. The last talks between the Trump administration and their Chinese counterparts, held on May 12 in Geneva, represented a major turning point for the global trade war. Delegates from China and the United States announced they would significantly roll back their historically high tariffs on one another. Markets rallied, Wall Street banks curtailed their recession forecasts, and moribund USconsumer confidence rebounded significantly. That marked a significant change from April, when tensions ran so high that trade between the United States and China came to an effective halt. The 145% tariffs on most Chinese imported goods made the math impossible for American businesses to buy virtually anything from China, America's second-largest trading partner. But since then, tensions had re-escalated. Trump on Wednesday said in a Truth Social post that Chinese leader Xi Jinping was 'extremely hard to make a deal with.' Trade talks have stalled, Bessent said, apparently frustrating Trump. Last week, Trump posted on social media that China 'TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US.' Trump said that he made a 'fast deal' with China to 'save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation.' He added: 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' The Trump administration had expected China to lift restrictions on rare earth materials that are critical components for a wide range of electronics, but China has largely refused, causing intense displeasure inside the Trump administration and prompting a recent series of measures to be imposed on the country three administration officials told CNN last week. For example, the White House warned US companies against using AI chips made by China's national tech champion Huawei. It stopped US companies from selling to China software that is used to design semiconductors. And the US State Department announced it would 'aggressively revoke visas' for some Chinese students in in turn, has accused the United States of 'provoking new economic and trade frictions.' 'The United States has been unilaterally provoking new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' the Chinese Commerce Ministry said Sunday. In the meantime, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, America's chief negotiator in the détente with China, said talks with China had stalled. But Trump and and Chinese leader Xi Jinping held a long-awaited phone call Thursday, which appears to have lowered the temperature a bit. The New York Times on Friday reported China has issued some licenses for rare earths, although the market is hardly back open. The talks in the UK are significant, and much is riding on their success – US economic growth remains steady but there are signs of cracking. And no one wants to return to April's standoff, which threatened to plunge the global economy into a stocks, which had rallied earlier in the day on a strong jobs report, rose a bit higher after Trump's Truth Social message about the resumed talks. The Dow was up 450 points, or 1.1%. The S&P 500 rose 1.2%, and the Nasdaq was 1.3% higher.