logo
‘We are living in a war': Mexicans brace for violence ahead of judicial elections

‘We are living in a war': Mexicans brace for violence ahead of judicial elections

Mexico City
CNN —
Gadi Mokotov makes cars bulletproof. Living in Mexico City, he sees all sorts of demands for armored vehicles – from military trucks and secretive government vehicles to the Cadillacs of the capital's high rollers and even 10-year-old Hondas.
As criminal violence ticks up across the country, the lines for his services have grown longer – and more of his customized cars are coming back for repairs with bullet pocks and shattered windows.
'We are living in a war,' he told CNN. 'A war with the cartels.'
Despite the efforts of successive governments to combat Mexico's deeply entrenched cartels, tens of thousands of people are killed each year in crime-related deaths, according to government figures. Recently, Mokotov says one of his private clients in Guadalajara brought their Ford pick-up truck back to his shop with over 100 bullet marks, breaking down into tears, thankful to have survived an ambush.
In years past, Mexico City was seen as a relatively peaceful oasis in the country. But even here, violence is spiking, with murders up over 150 percent compared to the same period last year, according to reporting by El Pais.
Some attacks appear to be designed to send a message to Mexico's political class. Last week, two aides to the mayor of Mexico City were gunned down on their way to work, in what authorities concluded was a 'direct and highly planned attack.' A few days earlier, a mayoral candidate in the state of Veracruz had been shot and killed alongside three other people during a festive campaign march.
As controversial national judicial elections approach on Sunday, some Mexicans across the country are preparing for the worst.
According to Mexican think tank Laboratorio Electoral, last year's legislative elections were the most violent on record, with over 40 candidates assassinated and hundreds more violent incidents, including attacks and kidnappings, largely attributed to cartels aiming to sway the vote and intimidate candidates.
While the run-up to this year's judicial vote has not been quite as bloody, a climate of fear persists. Across the country, at least four candidates have already abandoned their campaigns after receiving threats, per the international conflict research organization Crisis Group, and several judges have refused to campaign at all in areas controlled by cartels. Since 2012, at least 17 judges and six clerks have been killed in connection to their work, the group notes.
Cars being reinforced with armor by Gadi Mokotov's company ETTS Blindajes in Mexico City.
Evelio Contreras/CNN
A controversial vote
One of the last acts of former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador in 2024 was to pass a constitutional reform mandating that all judges in the country be elected by direct vote – a radical shift from the system of internal appointments that had populated most of Mexico's judiciary until then.
The vote – seen by supporters as an effort to guarantee judges' autonomy and impartiality – has been embraced by Lopez Obrador's successor and protege, President Claudia Sheinbaum. On Sunday, June 1, thousands of candidates will be competing for the 881 seats up for grabs.
César Gutiérrez Priego, a criminal lawyer in Mexico City running for a seat on the country's Supreme Court, told CNN he's been campaigning this spring with a bulletproof vest under his suit.
César Gutiérrez Priego at home in Mexico City.
Evelio Contreras/CNN
Priego's protective vest, which he's worn everyday under his clothes as he campaigns for a seat on Mexico's Supreme Court.
Evelio Contreras/CNN
'It doesn't smell very good. But it's something that I needed to do because I have to protect myself. I have two kids and I don't want to just be another number,' he says of the vest, which he's been wearing for two months on the campaign trail.
Priego is no stranger to the potential for violence and corruption in Mexican politics – he decided to study law when he was in his 20s, after seeing his high-ranking military father, Mexico's then-drug czar, imprisoned on what he says were false charges.
Across the country, trust in the justice system has been broken over and over. Judges are widely perceived as among the most corrupt officials in the country, and many high-profile cases have never been concluded. In 2022, just 16 percent of criminal investigations overall were resolved, according to Human Rights Watch.
Critics argue that addressing these issues requires far more profound change – including repressing organized crime and addressing corruption at the prosecutorial level and in government – than this week's judicial vote can address.
Both the Biden and Trump administrations in the US have warned against the judicial vote, voicing concern that making judges run for election could further expose them to political interests and to potential corruption or intimidation by organized crime groups.
Still, Priego says he's willing to try the new system – and to face the personal risk to his own life – for a shot at a seat on the highest bench in the country.
'In Mexico, we have a big trouble here in our country. And what is that trouble? It's that criminals take control of some places, some institutions, and one of those institutions is the justice system. And I believe if we change that, we can make the change that really helps people, because if you make the criminals go to jail, you can end impunity,' Priego tells CNN.
Ending impunity, everyone agrees, is long overdue in the country – though not everyone agrees on how to get there.
In his Mexico City garage, Mokotov sees daily evidence of the crisis, including a fast-growing number of first-time clients asking for his services: women looking to add bulletproof armor to humble commuter cars.
It's a request that leaves even him a bit disturbed, he says. 'It's not nice to see moms coming here saying 'I need to protect my kids to go to school.' They're afraid for the lives of their kids.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's foreign policy frustrations are piling up
Trump's foreign policy frustrations are piling up

Egypt Independent

time18 hours ago

  • Egypt Independent

Trump's foreign policy frustrations are piling up

CNN — Every president thinks they can change the world – and Donald Trump has an even greater sense of personal omnipotence than his recent predecessors. But it's not working out too well for the 47th president. Trump might intimidate tech titans to toe the line and use government power to try to bend institutions like Harvard University and judges, but some world leaders are harder to bully. He keeps being ignored and humiliated by Russian President Vladimir Putin who is defying the US effort to end the war in Ukraine. Russian media is now portraying Trump as the tough talker who always blinks and never imposes consequences. The president also thought that he could shape China to his will by facing down leader Xi Jinping in a trade war. But he misunderstood Chinese politics. The one thing an authoritarian in Beijing can never do is bow down to a US president. US officials say now they're frustrated that China hasn't followed through on commitments meant to deescalate the trade conflict. As with China, Trump backed down in his tariff war with the European Union. Then Financial Times commentator Robert Armstrong enraged the president by coining the term TACO trade — 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' Everyone thought that Trump would be on the same page as Benjamin Netanyahu. After all, in his first term he offered the Israeli prime minister pretty much everything he wanted. But now that he's trying to broker peace in the Middle East, Trump is finding that prolonging the Gaza conflict is existential for Netanyahu's political career, much like Ukraine for Putin. And Trump's ambition for an Iranian nuclear deal is frustrating Israeli plans to use a moment of strategic weakness for the Islamic Republic to try to take out its reactors militarily. Powerful leaders are pursuing their own versions of the national interest that exist in a parallel reality and on different historical and actual timelines to shorter, more transactional, aspirations of American presidents. Most aren't susceptible to personal appeals with no payback. And after Trump's attempts to humiliate Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office, the lure of the White House is waning. Trump spent months on the campaign trail last year boasting that his 'very good relationship' with Putin or Xi would magically solve deep geopolitical and economic problems between global powers that might be unsolvable. He's far from the first US leader to suffer from such delusions. President George W. Bush famously looked into the Kremlin tyrant's eyes and 'got a sense of his soul.' President Barack Obama disdained Russia as a decaying regional power and once dismissed Putin as the 'bored kid in the back of the classroom.' That didn't work out so well when the bored kid annexed Crimea. More broadly, the 21st century presidents have all acted as though they're men of destiny. Bush came to office determined not to act as the global policeman. But the September 11 attacks in 2001 made him exactly that. He started wars in Afghanistan and Iraq — which the US won, then lost the peace. And his failed second term goal to democratize the Arab world never went anywhere. Obama tried to make amends for the global war on terror and travelled to Egypt to tell Muslims it was time for 'a new beginning.' His early presidency pulsated with a sense that his charisma and unique background would in itself be a global elixir. Joe Biden traveled the globe telling everyone that 'America is back' after ejecting Trump from the White House. But four years later, partly due to his own disastrous decision to run for a second term, America — or at least the internationalist post-World War II version – was gone again. And Trump was back. Trump's 'America First' populism relies on the premise that the US has been ripped off for decades, never mind that its alliances and shaping of global capitalism made it the most powerful nation in the planet's history. Now playing at being a strongman who everyone must obey, he is busily squandering this legacy and shattering US soft power — ie. the power to persuade — with his belligerence. The first four months of the Trump presidency, with its tariff threats, warnings of US territorial expansion in Canada and Greenland and evisceration of global humanitarian aid programs show that the rest of the world gets a say in what happens too. So far, leaders in China, Russia, Israel, Europe and Canada appear to have calculated that Trump is not as powerful as he thinks he is, that there's no price for defying him or that their own internal politics make resistance mandatory.

Hamas says it hasn't rejected ceasefire deal as Witkoff slams response as ‘unacceptable'
Hamas says it hasn't rejected ceasefire deal as Witkoff slams response as ‘unacceptable'

Egypt Independent

timea day ago

  • Egypt Independent

Hamas says it hasn't rejected ceasefire deal as Witkoff slams response as ‘unacceptable'

CNN — Hamas on Saturday said that it has responded to a Gaza ceasefire plan Hamas on Saturday said that it has responded to a Gaza ceasefire plan put forward by the US, repeating its call for an end to the war, in a move the US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff called 'totally unacceptable.' In a statement, Hamas said that its 'proposal' to the mediators – Qatar and Egypt — 'aims to achieve a permanent ceasefire, a comprehensive withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, and ensure the flow of aid to our people and our families in the Gaza Strip.' 'As part of this agreement, 10 living Israeli prisoners held by the resistance will be released, in addition to the return of 18 bodies, in exchange for an agreed-upon number of Palestinian prisoners,' the statement said. A source familiar with the negotiations told CNN that the militant group's response was 'positive,' but added that it will require further negotiations and clarifications. Hamas' response to the US proposal demanded changes to three key areas, the source said: extending the ceasefire past 60 days, humanitarian assistance, and the positions to which Israeli troops will withdraw. The latest response comes after a senior Hamas official told CNN earlier this week that the group had sent back a three-pronged counterproposal requesting US assurances that the negotiations over a permanent ceasefire will continue and the fighting will not resume after the pause; that humanitarian assistance be carried out through the United Nations; and that the Israeli military pull back to the positions that it held on March 2. Witkoff said in a post on X Saturday that he received Hamas' response, calling it 'totally unacceptable' and writing that it 'only takes us backward.' 'Hamas should accept the framework proposal we put forward as the basis for proximity talks, which we can begin immediately this coming week,' Witkoff continued. Slamming the US envoy's comments as having 'complete bias,' Basem Naim, a member of Hamas' political bureau, told CNN that the US had previously agreed upon a ceasefire proposal with Hamas which was then amended by Israel. Hamas then submitted an updated counterproposal over the weekend, Naim said. 'We did not reject Mr. Witkoff's proposal,' Naim said. 'Last week we came to an agreement and understanding with him on a proposal, which he deemed acceptable for negotiation,' he continued. 'We were then presented with the Israeli response, which disagreed with all the provisions we had agreed upon.' 'Why, each time, is the Israeli response considered the only response for negotiation? This violates the integrity and fairness of mediation and constitutes a complete bias towards the other side,' Naim said. An Israeli official told CNN on Saturday that they saw the militant group's latest response as having 'effectively rejected the latest Witkoff proposal and put forward a new offer with its own conditions.' Later the same day, the Israeli Prime Minister's Office reiterated Witkoff's reaction to Hamas' response, saying in a statement: 'While Israel has agreed to the updated Witkoff outline for the release of our hostages, Hamas continues to adhere to its refusal.' 'Israel will continue its action for the return of our hostages and the defeat of Hamas,' the statement said. What's in the US proposal The US-backed and Israel-approved proposal seen by CNN on Friday includes Hamas releasing 10 Israeli hostages and 18 deceased hostages in exchange for 125 Palestinian prisoners serving life sentences and 1,111 Gazans detained since the war began. Negotiations toward a permanent ceasefire would begin immediately on the first day of the 60-day truce, according to the US proposal. The terms of the agreement would also allow humanitarian aid to enter Gaza 'immediately' and be distributed 'through agreed upon channels,' including the United Nations and the Red Crescent, according to the proposal. But the draft agreement contained no intrinsic guarantee of a permanent end to the war, a key Hamas demand, nor assurances that the ceasefire will be extended as long as negotiations continue. Instead, it said that US President Donald Trump is 'committed to working to ensure that good faith negotiations continue until a final agreement is reached.' Hamas had initially signaled reluctance to accept the terms of the deal. Bassem Naim, a member of the Hamas political bureau, said on Facebook Thursday that the framework did 'not respond to any of our people's demands' but that discussions were underway, nonetheless. The back-and-forth between Israel and Hamas comes as famine conditions worsen in the Gaza Strip. Israel's 11-week blockade of humanitarian aid has left the enclave's population facing starvation. Though it was lifted last week, much of the little aid that has entered the strip since has been looted, and several people have been killed after chaos broke out near aid distribution sites, according to the Palestinian health ministry. Nearly 80 aid trucks traveling through southern and central Gaza were looted by desperate civilians on Saturday, the UN World Food Programme (WFP) said. In a statement issued on X, the WFP said 77 trucks had crossed into Gaza loaded with flour. All of them 'were stopped along the way, with food taken mainly by hungry people trying to feed their families.' It added that 'after 80 days of a total blockade, communities are starving – and they are no longer willing to let food pass them by.' This story has been updated with developments.

South Korea is voting for a new president after six months of political chaos. Here's what to know
South Korea is voting for a new president after six months of political chaos. Here's what to know

Egypt Independent

timea day ago

  • Egypt Independent

South Korea is voting for a new president after six months of political chaos. Here's what to know

Seoul, South Korea CNN — After half a year of political turmoil, uncertainty and division, South Korea will vote for a new president to succeed Yoon Suk Yeol, the disgraced former leader who plunged the democratic nation into chaos by declaring martial law in December. This election feels particularly significant; the country, a US ally and Asian economic and cultural powerhouse, has floundered for months with a revolving door of interim leaders while navigating Yoon's impeachment trial and a multipronged investigation into the fateful night of his short-lived power grab. All the while, South Korea's economy has suffered, with US President Donald Trump's trade war and a potential global recession looming in the background. Two men are each promising to help the country recover if elected – a lawyer turned politician dogged by legal cases who survived an assassination attempt, and a former anti-establishment activist turned conservative minister. Polls open on Tuesday morning and a winner could be declared by Wednesday. Here's what you need to know. Lee Jae-myung, presidential candidate of the Democratic Party, speaks while campaigning in Seoul, South Korea, Monday, May 12, 2025. (AP Photo/Lee Jin-man) Lee Jin-man/AP The frontrunner is Lee Jae-myung, 60, of the liberal opposition Democratic Party. A former underage factory worker from a poor family, Lee became a human rights lawyer before entering politics. He is a former mayor and governor, and most recently served as a lawmaker after narrowly losing to Yoon in the 2022 presidential election. He survived an assassination attempt in January 2024 when a man stabbed him in the neck during a public event. He again made headlines on December 3, 2024 – the night Yoon declared martial law and sent troops to parliament. Lee was among the lawmakers who rushed to the legislature and pushed past soldiers to hold an emergency vote to lift martial law. He live streamed himself jumping over a fence to enter the building, in a viral video viewed tens of millions of times. On the campaign trail, Lee promised political and economic reforms, including more controls on a president's ability to declare martial law, and revising the constitution to allow two four-year presidential terms instead of the current single five-year term. South Korea's former President Yoon Suk Yeol delivers a speech to declare martial law in Seoul on December 3, 2024. The Presidential Office/Reuters Soldiers try to enter the legislature in Seoul after the martial law decree on December 4, 2024. Jung Yeon-je/AFP/Getty Images He has emphasized easing tensions on the Korean Peninsula while holding on to the longtime goal of denuclearizing North Korea; he also supports boosting small businesses and growing the AI industry. But Lee has also been dogged by legal cases, including several ongoing trials for alleged bribery and charges related to a property development scandal. Separately, he was convicted of violating election law in another ongoing case that has been sent to an appeals court. Lee denies all the charges against him. Speaking to CNN in December, he claimed he had been indicted on various charges 'without any evidence or basis,' and that the allegations are politically motivated. Lee's main rival is Kim Moon-soo of the conservative People Power Party (PPP). The People Power Party's presidential candidate Kim Moon-soo at an election campaign event in Goyang, South Korea, on May 21, 2025. Lee Jin-man/AP When Yoon left the party in May, he urged supporters to back Kim – a 73-year-old former labor minister, who had been a prominent labor activist at university, even being expelled and imprisoned for his protests. He eventually joined a conservative party, and stepped into the nomination after several rounds of party infighting. The PPP initially selected Kim as its candidate; then dropped him, eyeing former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo instead. The party finally chose Kim after he filed legal challenges. But the PPP remains deeply divided and its candidate trailed Lee in pre-election polling. In a statement after his nomination, Kim vowed to seek unity and build a 'big tent' coalition to take on Lee, according to Reuters. Kim has also promised to reform the country's politics, judiciary and election management systems to rebuild public trust. His campaign emphasized making South Korea business-friendly through tax cuts and eased restrictions, and by promoting new technologies and nuclear energy. Several third-party and independent candidates are also running for the presidency. They include Lee Jun-seok, a former PPP leader who founded his own conservative New Reform Party last year. What are the issues on the table? At the forefront of voters' minds is the country's flailing economy and rising cost of living. Youth unemployment has surged and consumption has declined, with the economy unexpectedly contracting in the first quarter of this year. Part of that is due to Trump's trade war – which has hit South Korea's export-reliant economy hard. South Korea's exports to the US fell sharply in the first few weeks of April after US tariffs kicked in, and the nation's largest airline has warned the downturn could cost it up to $100 million a year. Though officials from both nations have met for tariff talks, the political turmoil at home is likely slowing progress and hampering a possible trade deal until a new South Korean president is elected. Vehicles produced by South Korean automaker Kia Motors are waiting to be shipped at the Port of Pyeongtaek on April 3, 2025. Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images That's why both main candidates have focused on the economy, promising to stabilize the cost of goods and improve opportunities in housing, education and jobs. But there's a host of other problems the next president will have to tackle, too – such as the country's rapidly aging society and plummeting birth rates, which represent an urgent demographic crisis also seen in other countries in the region like Japan and China. Among the common complaints of young couples and singles are the high cost of childcare, gender inequality and discrimination against working parents. Then there are regional tensions. There's the ever-present threat from North Korea, which has rapidly modernized its armed forces, developing new weapons and testing intercontinental ballistic missiles that can reach almost anywhere in the United States. Experts have warned in recent years that the country may also be preparing to resume nuclear tests, which it paused in 2018. Across the Yellow Sea lies China, which South Korea has a strong trade relationship with – but historically fraught diplomatic relations. South Korea also maintains a close security alliance with the US, and hosts nearly 30,000 American troops in the country. In recent years, South Korea, Japan and the US have drawn closer together, working to counter Chinese influence in the strategically important Asia-Pacific region. What happened to Yoon? Former President Yoon Suk Yeol (center) arrives at the Seoul Central District Court for a criminal hearing in Seoul, South Korea, on May 19, 2025. Chris Jung/NurPhoto/Shutterstock Yoon was removed from office in April following months of legal wrangling, after parliament voted to impeach him late last year. It was a remarkable fall from grace for the former prosecutor turned politician, who rose to prominence for his role in the impeachment of another president – only to eventually meet the same fate. Soon after, Yoon moved out from the presidential residency and into an apartment in the capital Seoul. But his legal battles are ongoing; he faces charges including insurrection, an offense punishable by life imprisonment or death (though South Korea has not executed anyone in decades). Yoon denies all charges against him.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store