Killers could be released from prison early under Labour jail review
Criminals serving long sentences for serious offences such as manslaughter, GBH and drug dealing could be released early from prison under a Labour review to combat prison overcrowding.
David Gauke, the former Tory justice secretary heading the review, said such controversial measures were needed if his proposed reforms of sentencing were to have any impact on prison overcrowding.
He warned that scrapping short prison sentences for lower-level offenders would not be enough on its own to prevent the Government from running out of prison cells.
'Those who are serving relatively long sentences will have to be released sooner if we are serious about not exceeding capacity,' he told the podcast, The Lord Chancellors, hosted by The University of Law.
'If we are going to keep control of our prison population, this isn't just going to be done on short sentences.
'The only way you can address that is the very large number of people we've got in prison who are in there for a reasonable length of time, and whether they need to spend all of that time behind bars in the way that they currently do.'
'Difficult' but 'necessary' decisions
He admitted his proposals, due to be unveiled in May, would face 'opposition'. 'They will be controversial. They will be difficult. But nonetheless they will be necessary…We have run out of space,' he said.
Offenders serving the longest jail terms include those guilty of crimes such as murder and manslaughter, grievous bodily harm, armed robbery, serious sexual and violent assaults including rape, drug-related offences and trafficking.
Murder is excluded from the terms of the sentencing review, however, and it is unlikely that the proposals would include rapists. It is expected offenders would have to earn early release from jail and would still face tough restrictions while completing the remainder of their sentences in the community.
Mr Gauke and Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, who ordered his review, have signalled their interest in Texas-style incentive schemes where prisoners can earn their freedom earlier by completing work, training or education assignments and demonstrating good behaviour in jail.
Prisoners given chance to 'earn' release
It is likely this would only apply to offenders on long fixed-term sentences who are currently released half or two-thirds of the way through them. It is unlikely to extend to those on 'indeterminate' sentences who have to 'earn' their release by demonstrating to the parole board they are no longer a risk to the public.
Mr Gauke blamed governments and Parliament for 'haphazard sentence inflation' which had seen jail terms for serious crimes nearly double in 20 years as they sought to win over the public with tougher approaches to criminals.
He also indicated the review would consider alternatives to short jail terms for lower level offenders including 'house arrest' where judges used tags, curfews and geographical restrictions to create virtual 'prisons outside prisons'.
'There are three ways in which you can control the prison population. One is about not sending people to prison at all who might otherwise be dealt with in the community,' said Mr Gauke.
'The second is if people are sent to prison for them to be imprisoned for less long. And the third is about rehabilitation and about reducing the level of crime.
'Now we will look at measures that assist all three of those objectives. Whether that is people who have maybe committed relatively minor offences and currently go to a prison for a short period of time. Is there something else that we can do there? We're clearly going to look at that.'
Mr Gauke said he would also be 'pressing the case' for 'problem solving courts' where judges take an active role in overseeing offenders' progress on drug, alcohol and other rehabilitation programmes in the community rather than sending them to jail.
'We will certainly want to be looking at the use of problem solving courts,' he said. 'I've seen it in Texas, recently. The returns are really considerable. So I'm pressing the case for that.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edinburgh Reporter
26 minutes ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Demands for UK Government to do more for housing in Scotland
First Minister John Swinney has urged the UK Government to do more to support Scotland's housing sector in the upcoming Spending Review. The First Minister will set out his vision for the future of Scotland's housing sector in a speech at the Scottish Federation of Housing Associations in Glasgow later. Ahead of his speech the First Minister said: 'Scotland faces a housing crisis which is why we are investing £768 million in affordable housing in 2025-26, the majority of which will be for social rent. This includes up to £40 million for acquisitions, to help reduce the number of homeless households, especially with children, in temporary accommodation. 'We are keenly aware of the benefits of providing multi-year spending plans to our partners and want to prove this stability across the public sector. We continue to call on the UK Government to provide multi-year funding for housing to give developers and third sector organisations long-term certainty. 'The UK Government must also commit to unfreezing Local Housing Allowance rates. These rates set the amount that private renters receive to help with rent. Increasing these rates can be a key lever that can help protect tenants. Repegging these rates to the 30th percentile of local rents would mean greater security for many households across Scotland.' Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer met with First Minister of Scotland, John Swinney in July 2024 at Bute House. Photo courtesy of The Scottish Government Like this: Like Related
Rhyl Journal
30 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Reeves signs off on £14bn to build new nuclear plant Sizewell C
The Chancellor is set to confirm the funding at the GMB Congress on Tuesday. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said new nuclear power capacity was needed to deliver a 'golden age of clean energy abundance'. Trade unions welcomed the move, which the Treasury said would go towards creating 10,000 jobs, including 1,500 apprenticeships. But the head of a campaign group opposing the plant criticised the decision to commit the funding, saying it is still not clear what the total cost will be. Nuclear plants are seen as increasingly important electricity sources as the Government tries to decarbonise Britain's grid by 2030, replacing fossil fuels with green power. The last time Britain completed one was in 1987, which was the Sizewell B plant. Hinkley Point C, in Somerset, is under construction and is expected to produce enough power for about six million homes when it opens, but that may not be until 2031. The Energy Secretary said: 'We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis. 'This is the Government's clean energy mission in action – investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security.' It will get the UK off the 'fossil fuel rollercoaster', he separately told The Guardian. 'We know that we're going to have to see electricity demand at least double by 2050. All the expert advice says nuclear has a really important role to play in the energy system. 'In any sensible reckoning, this is essential to get to our clean power and net zero ambitions.' The joint managing directors of Sizewell C, Julia Pyke and Nigel Cann, said: 'Today marks the start of an exciting new chapter for Sizewell C, the UK's first British-owned nuclear power plant in over 30 years.' At the peak of construction, Sizewell C is expected to provide 10,000 jobs and the company behind the project has already signed £330 million worth of contracts with local businesses. The plant, which will power the equivalent of six million homes, is planned to be operational in the 2030s. The Government is also due to confirm one of Europe's first small modular reactor programmes and will invest £2.5 billion over five years in fusion energy research as part of plans to boost the UK's nuclear industry. The GMB union said giving Sizewell C the go-ahead was 'momentous'. Regional Secretary Warren Kenny said: 'Nuclear power is essential for clean, affordable, and reliable energy – without new nuclear, there can be no net zero. 'Sizewell C will provide thousands of good, skilled, unionised jobs and we look forward to working closely with the Government and Sizewell C to help secure a greener future for this country's energy sector.' Mike Clancy, general secretary of Prospect, said: 'Delivering this funding for Sizewell C is a vital step forward, this project is critical to securing the future of the nuclear industry in the UK. 'New nuclear is essential to achieving net zero, providing a baseload of clean and secure energy, as well as supporting good, unionised jobs. 'Further investment in SMRs and fusion research shows we are finally serious about developing a 21st-century nuclear industry. All funding must be backed up by a whole-industry plan to ensure we have the workforce and skills we need for these plans to succeed.' Alison Downes of Stop Sizewell C said ministers had not 'come clean' about the full cost of the project, which the group have previously estimated could be some £40 billion. 'There still appears to be no final investment decision for Sizewell C, but £14.2 billion in taxpayers' funding, a decision we condemn and firmly believe the government will come to regret. 'Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C? 'Ministers have still not come clean about Sizewell C's cost and, given negotiations with private investors are incomplete, they have signed away all leverage and will be forced to offer generous deals that undermine value for money. Starmer and Reeves have just signed up to HS2 mark 2.'
Glasgow Times
33 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
UK has one of ‘worst statutory leave offers for fathers in developed world'
In a new report, the House of Commons committee said a maximum of two weeks' paternity leave is 'completely out of step with how most couples want to share their parenting responsibilities' and 'entrenches outdated gender stereotypes about caring'. The committee has urged the Government to either amend the Employment Rights Bill to legislate for a day one right to paid leave or commit to 'considering this vital change within its review' in consultation with employers. It has also called on the Government to consider raising paternity pay to the level of maternity pay in the first six weeks – 90% of average earnings. The paternity and shared parental leave report by the committee said working parents 'will be let down by a review that leads only to tinkering around the edges of the system'. Chairwoman of the Women and Equalities Committee Sarah Owen said the UK's parental leave system was in 'urgent need of an overhaul to fit with the reality of working parents' lives'. The Labour MP for Luton North said reform 'must start with longer and better paid paternity leave'. Ms Owen said: 'It's essential the Government's proposed review addresses the system's fundamental failings, including low statutory pay, inadequate leave periods for fathers and others, exclusion of many working parents and guardians, plus design flaws and unnecessary complexity in the Shared Parental Leave scheme. 'The UK's parental leave system has fallen far behind most comparable countries, and we now have one of the worst statutory leave offers for fathers and other parents in the developed world.' The Labour MP added: 'Ministers must commit to meaningful reforms in the medium-term, with a view to going further towards a more gender equal parental leave system. 'Tinkering around the edges of a broken system will let down working parents. While much-needed substantial change to our paid parental leave system will require considerable financial investment, this would be outweighed by wider societal and economic benefits.' Chairwoman of the Women and Equalities Committee Sarah Owen (Roger Harris/UK Parliament) The report states that the UK's rate of statutory parental pay is 'completely out of kilter with the cost of living, has not kept pace with inflation and is far below rates in most comparable countries'. It recommends phased introduction of increases to statutory pay across the system to bring rates for all working parents up to 80% or more of average earnings or the real Living Wage. The lack of provision for self-employed fathers is 'deeply unfair', the report adds. The committee recommends that the Government consider options for providing statutory paid leave for all self-employed working fathers as part of its review of the parental leave system, including introducing a paternity allowance for self-employed fathers and other parents, similar to maternity allowance. The report states that the shared parental leave system is 'extremely difficult for most parents and their employers to understand'. It said a forthcoming review must examine the function and necessity of eligibility rules, with a view to 'simplifying or removing the employment status, time in service and earnings criteria'. The committee said the review should examine approaches taken in overseas systems, including the German 'partnership bonus' and Portugal's 'sharing bonus', which provide additional paid leave to couples in which both parents take a substantial portion of leave while the other returns to paid work.
