logo
Edmonton police release video of motorcycle crash to warn about dangers of street racing

Edmonton police release video of motorcycle crash to warn about dangers of street racing

Global Newsa day ago

With summer fast approaching, the Edmonton Police Service issued a warning about the risks of of dangerous driving on Friday as they say illegal street racing sees an uptick in the season.
'With our 2025 fatal collisions already sitting at an unacceptable high of 15 in only the first half of the year, we are reminding Edmonton drivers that police are out enforcing traffic laws and charging those who choose to put everyone's safety at risk,' Sgt. Kerry Bates with the EPS' traffic safety unit, said in a news release.
'Fines for Traffic Safety Act violations such as stunting start at $567, not to mention a possible driver's licence suspension and, in the case of a Criminal Code violation like a dangerous driving charge, a criminal record.'
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
To illustrate how dangerous stunting and street racing can be, police released a video on Friday of an incident that occurred last month in which a man in his 20s was seriously injured while riding a motorcycle.
Story continues below advertisement
The video shows an SUV appearing to try to do doughnuts on Roper Road near 42 Street when a sports motorcycle, that police allege was travelling at 'a very high rate of speed,' slams into the SUV. The motorcycle rider was thrown from the bike. Police said they expect to lay charges in the case.
According to the EPS, between 2020 and 2024, police have laid anywhere between 276 and 397 dangerous operation of a motor vehicle charges each year, and issued anywhere between 91 and 130 stunt tickets per year during the same time frame.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Calgary Party proposes ‘no rough sleeping' zone around Stephen Avenue
The Calgary Party proposes ‘no rough sleeping' zone around Stephen Avenue

Global News

time6 hours ago

  • Global News

The Calgary Party proposes ‘no rough sleeping' zone around Stephen Avenue

One of Calgary's main political parties running a slate of candidates in the upcoming municipal election is proposing rules prohibiting overnight camping or rough sleeping near Stephen Avenue. The policy is part of an overall safety platform unveiled this week by The Calgary Party, led by mayoral candidate Brian Thiessen. The platform suggests the party would create 'no overnight sleeping zones,' and 'enforce rules prohibiting overnight camping or rough sleeping within a two to three block radius of Stephen Avenue.' 'These are human beings who feel unsafe, and so they sleep in public places so that they will feel safe from an overdose, from theft,' Thissen said Friday. 'That's overlapping with business owners and the public who want to enjoy these public spaces.' The rules around rough sleeping are limited in Calgary, with a section of the city's Parks and Pathways Bylaw that deals with camping/erecting camping tents in a park. Story continues below advertisement According to a city spokesperson, their Vulnerable Persons Team works with partner agencies to help people experiencing homelessness in finding a safe space to transition and out of the elements. In an interview with Global News, Thiessen said the party's platform focuses on providing housing first to address homelessness. 'You've housed people, you're treating them for mental health and addiction issues, and then you can get to the part which a lot of people start with, which is we want to get people off the streets,' he said. The party's downtown policy also includes measures to increase police presence downtown, crackdown on open drug use, panhandling near roadways, loitering in transit areas, and an expansion of mental health and addictions support. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'It's always tricky because you don't want to layer on tickets and fines to the unhoused and make it impossible for them to dig their way out,' Thiessen said. 'That discussion about bylaws has to happen in conjunction with community courts.' Wendy Irvine, who runs the Unicorn Pub on Stephen Avenue, told Global News her staff experiences social disorder issues daily. When asked about The Calgary Party's proposal, Irvine said she is supportive of cleaning up Stephen Avenue, but wonders about the impact. Story continues below advertisement 'Totally enforce it, but where are they moving into? For us at the Unicorn, we have the back alley, and that's where they all go,' she said. Global News reached out to several local homelessness advocates but did not hear back. The proposal echoes a letter, obtained by Global News, from 18 downtown business and property owners sent to the mayor, premier, city council, the province as well as municipal election candidates. View full screen View full screen View full screen View full screen Previous Image Next Image Close Modal Gallery 'When will we take action to address what those who live here already know — that Calgary is no longer the clean, safe and welcoming city of which we have always been so proud,' the letter said. Story continues below advertisement The letter recommends several proposals to expand permanent day and night shelter for the unhoused, improve safety in the downtown core and along Stephen Avenue, and reform of municipal bylaws to make it easier to enforce expectations of behaviour in public spaces. A 'no rough sleeping' zone around Stephen Avenue is also amongst the proposals. 'The amount of damages and things that we have been seeing and witnessing comes on the burden of obviously the building owners, but that gets transferred down to the tenants,' said Mark Garner with the Calgary Downtown Association. 'We can't just replace windows in one of the businesses down here and two weeks later it's broken. We've got to do something different.' According to the most recent citizen satisfaction survey, 94 per cent of respondents agree that the city should be doing more to address safety issues in Calgary's downtown. In its latest State of the Downtown report, the city noted calls for downtown safety response by peace officers, security guards and community partners are down 12 per cent since last April. Calgarians head to the polls in the next municipal election on Oct. 20.

Minnesota state lawmaker, husband killed in targeted shooting: officials
Minnesota state lawmaker, husband killed in targeted shooting: officials

Global News

time9 hours ago

  • Global News

Minnesota state lawmaker, husband killed in targeted shooting: officials

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz says former state House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband were killed in a politically motivated assassination. A second lawmaker and his wife were shot and wounded. 'We must all, in Minnesota and across the country, stand against all forms of political violence,' Walz said at a press conference Saturday. 'Those responsible for this will be held accountable.' The wounded lawmaker was identified as state Sen. John Hoffman, a Democrat, was first elected in 2012. He runs Hoffman Strategic Advisors, a consulting firm. He previously served as vice chair of the Anoka Hennepin School Board, which manages the largest school district in Minnesota. Hoffman is married and has one daughter. Hortman was the top House Democratic leader in the state Legislature and a former House speaker. She was first elected in 2004. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Both Hoffman and Hortman represented districts located north of Minneapolis. Story continues below advertisement Drew Evans, superintendent of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, said that authorities were actively searching for a suspect. Officials said the suspect was dressed as a law enforcement officer. Autopsies will be done to determine extent of injuries, but Hortman and her spouse died from gunshot wounds, Evans said. Public Safety Commissioner Bob Johnson said the suspect was posing as a law enforcement officer. 'Suspect exploited the trust of our uniforms, what our uniforms are meant to represent. That betrayal is deeply disturbing to those of us who wear the badge with honor and responsibility,' he shootings happened at a time when political leaders nationwide have been attacked, harassed and intimidated during a time of deep political divisions. GIFFORDS, the national gun violence prevention organization led by former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, released the following statement. 'I am horrified and heartbroken by last night's attack on two patriotic public servants,' Giffords said. 'My family and I know the horror of a targeted shooting all too well. An attack against lawmakers is an attack on American democracy itself. Leaders must speak out and condemn the fomenting violent extremism that threatens everything this country stands for.' Giffords was shot in the head in 2011 by a gunman who killed six people and injured 12 others. She stepped down from Congress in January 2012 to focus on her recovery.

Supreme Court of Canada quashes B.C. sex conviction, extends 'rape shield' law
Supreme Court of Canada quashes B.C. sex conviction, extends 'rape shield' law

Vancouver Sun

time9 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Supreme Court of Canada quashes B.C. sex conviction, extends 'rape shield' law

The Supreme Court of Canada quashed a sexual-assault conviction against a B.C. man in a precedent-setting decision that strengthened the 'rape shield' law, ruling that even a complainant's lack of a sexual past can't be brought up in court. In a 9-0 unanimous decision released Friday, the court overturned a decision by B.C.'s Appeal Court in which Dustin Kinamore was found guilty of one count of sexual assault. The top court ordered a new trial. The B.C. Prosecution Service is reviewing the decision before deciding if it will be retried, said spokeswoman Damienne Darby in an email. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'The decision brings needed guidance,' including that such evidence needs to be approved by a judge before it is introduced at a trial, she said, adding such evidence can, if it meets certain criteria, still be included at trial. The decision would affect any current trials but she wasn't aware of any in jeopardy because of the ruling, she said. The B.C. Supreme Court and the Appeal Court had both allowed prosecutors to introduce the complainant's texts, which were sexual in nature but also told Kinamore that she did not want to have sex with him. Section 276 of Canada's Criminal Code, known as the rape shield law, limits the defence's use of evidence about a complainant's sexual history in court. The trial and appeal court judges had ruled that the prosecution's use of the complainant's sexts, which included that she was a virgin, weren't subject to Section 276 because they weren't about sexual activity but about sexual inactivity. The Supreme Court of Canada disagreed, concluding prosecution 'applications are subject to the same substantive admissibility and procedural requirements that apply to defence-led evidence,' law, wrote Chief Justice Richard Wagner. It said a complainant's sexual inactivity can 'evoke distinct myths and stereotypes that these rules seek to eliminate.' Kinamore's lawyer, Matt Nathanson, said in a text that he was pleased with the ruling and that its significance goes far beyond his case and has 'broken new ground' on sexual assault law that promotes 'consistency and fairness' for both parties because the prosecution has to apply to introduce that evidence in the same way that the defence does. He said Section 276 has long recognized that myths and stereotypes about complainants shouldn't be used to attack their credibility and now, 'for the first time,' the court says 'inverse' myths and stereotypes shouldn't be used to 'unfairly enhance their credibility either.' It is wrong to suggest complainants are more likely to have consented because of sexual history, and 'it is now wrong to suggest that a lack of previous sexual activity means they are less likely to have consented,' he said. Kinamore, then 22, met the complainant, then 16, in May 2020 and texted each other for months, up to Aug. 3, 2020, when they met at his apartment, according to the decision. She said he sexually assaulted her, and he said the sexual activity was consensual and didn't go as far she said it did because he stopped when she said to stop, it said. At trial, the prosecution introduced text exchanges, some explicitly sexual, without having a hearing known as a voir dire to test their admissibility. In many of them, she made it clear she wasn't interested in a sexual relationship with the accused and some referred to her virginity, and both the prosecution and the defence relied on the evidence, Wagner's judgment said. The Appeal Court ruled the texts were admissible because the complainant's messages expressing she wasn't interested in sex 'fell outside the exclusionary rule governing a complainant's sexual history,' according to Wagner's decision. In dismissing that, Wagner wrote that inadmissible evidence was used by the trial judge in her reasons to assess the credibility of the accused and the complainant and she 'relied heavily on this evidence in her reasons for finding Mr. Kinamore guilty.' A new trial was needed because 'her error was not harmless,' Wagner wrote. Relying on a complainant's past sexual inactivity 'remains grounded in false assumptions' that 'undermine the fairness of a trial by distorting its truth-seeking function,' he said. Screening evidence protects the complainant's dignity and privacy, he said. He also said the 'increasing complexity of sexual offence trials' add to the overburdened system and his ruling would will 'assist in minimizing unnecessary cost and delay.' Hilla Kerner of the Vancouver Rape Relief and Women's Shelter said it's unfortunate in this case because the conviction was overturned, but she welcomed the guidance from the higher court to speed up long trials. Consent is at the core of any sexual assault case, Dalya Israel of the Salal Sexual Violence Support Group, formerly Women against Violence Against Women, said in a text. 'When courts focus on context over consent, even well-meaning approaches, including those led by the Crown, can unintentionally reinforce the very myths the legal system is meant to reject,' she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store