Even Republicans aren't sure what to make of Tulsi Gabbard's weird new video
Four months into her tenure as the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard has proven her many critics right with one misjudgment after another. The DNI, for example, fired the National Intelligence Council's leadership for presenting facts that the White House didn't like. When pressed on the Signal chat scandal, she testified under oath about details that appeared to contradict reality.
In recent days, Gabbard has reportedly taken steps to politicize her agency's inspector general's office, while exploring ways to turn the president's daily briefing into Fox News-style segments.
But her latest move is arguably the strangest. Politico reported:
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard warned of a 'nuclear holocaust' and chastised 'warmongers' for bringing the world 'closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before' in a foreboding video posted to social media on Tuesday. In the three-minute video, Gabbard details a recent visit to Hiroshima, Japan to learn more about the aftermath of the U.S. nuclear attack on the city in 1945 during World War II. The video features footage of Gabbard's trip and archival footage showing victims, interspersed with Gabbard speaking directly to camera about the consequences of a nuclear attack.
Much of the three-minute video is unremarkable. Gabbard reflected on a recent visit to Hiroshima and talked about the significance of a nuclear threat in ways that are largely uncontroversial.
But one part of Gabbard's message stood out as ... odd.
'As we stand here, closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before, political elite and warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers,' she said toward the end of the video. 'And perhaps it's because they are confident that they will have access to nuclear shelters for themselves and for their families that regular people won't have access to.'
So, a few things.
First, the suggestion that we're currently 'closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before' is difficult to take seriously. I'd encourage Gabbard to read, for example, any good book about the Cold War.
Second, I noticed the DNI didn't name which 'warmongers' are trying to 'foment' tensions between nuclear powers — the specifics matter. Who are these nefarious figures allegedly putting the world at great risk?
Third, the idea that the unnamed elite 'warmongers' have secret nuclear bunkers seems quite bizarre, even by Gabbard standards.
In fact, the message was so strange that some of the Republican senators who voted to confirm her to her current position — despite her lack of qualifications and habit of echoing Russian propaganda — made no effort to defend her.
Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana, for example, told Jewish Insider that 'she obviously needs to change her meds.' Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, who has a flare for classic understatements, added that Gabbard's message was 'very strange.'
Before the Senate confirmation vote on the former Hawaii congresswoman, a variety of former national security officials urged senators not to vote for her. In hindsight, perhaps the chamber's GOP members should've heeded their warning.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
37 minutes ago
- Axios
Democrats challenge Trump on immigration enforcement
Democratic state leaders are pushing back against the Trump administration's policies and threats this week. The big picture: As protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids escalate nationwide, particularly in California, lawmakers are seizing the moment to challenge the administration's bluff about not cooperating with Trump's enforcement policies. Trump and members of his administration have threatened to arrest any government officials who stand in the way of the president's policies, especially when it comes to immigration. The president's border czar Tom Homan said he wouldn't rule out arresting Democratic officials who impede law enforcement or harbor undocumented immigrants. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) dared Homan to do so, and Trump suggested the governor indeed be arrested amid an escalating feud. Yes, but: Arrests aren't the only concern facing Democrats. In the latest flareup, Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was physically removed from a Los Angeles press conference held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Thursday as he said he tried to ask a question. Padilla's encounter follows another between three House Democrats from New Jersey and ICE agents last month, which ultimately resulted in the indictment of Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) McIver is charged with three counts of "forcibly impeding and interfering with federal law enforcement officers." The New Jersey Rep. said she plans to plead not guilty and called the charges a "brazen attempt at political intimidation." State of play: President Trump has doubled down on his sweeping immigration crackdown, deploying 4,000 National Guard soldiers and 700 Marines to California this week amid fiery demonstrations against federal immigration raids. Newsom, along with other Democratic city and state leaders, have fiercely opposed the military's deployment to quell protesters. Still, Trump has sent troops into the state. Meanwhile, Trump vowed that protests responding to his multimillion-dollar military parade in D.C. this weekend will be met with "very big force." Zoom in: Democratic lawmakers have for months been challenging the administration's policies — on everything from immigration to tariffs. A coalition of 20 Democratic attorneys general filed a lawsuit against the administration last month over threats to withhold billions of dollars in federal funding if they don't follow his immigration enforcement polices. This week, the focus has been on the administration's hardline immigration policies. During an hours-long congressional hearing Thursday, three governors cast the administration's immigration policies and response to protests as undemocratic while Republican lawmakers grilled them on state-level enforcement. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said Homan could "try" to arrest them over their disconnects on the issue. Zoom out: Congresspeople are not the only ones challenging the administration, with a battle at play between the executive and judiciary. Wisconsin judge Hannah Dugan, who was charged in April by the FBI with allegedly helping an undocumented immigrant avoid arrest, has painted her case as a broader defense of the judiciary's independence from the Trump administration. Meanwhile, LA Mayor Karen Bass and other Democratic regional leaders at a Wednesday briefing called for the ICE raids to end, as demonstrations continued across the country.
Atlantic
41 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Why Won't the Pentagon Own Up to Trump's Latest Move?
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Donald Trump is focused this week on cracking down on the people he calls 'insurrectionists' —but not so much on the ones who fought an actual armed rebellion against the U.S. government in the 1860s. On Tuesday, Trump traveled to Fort Bragg, in North Carolina. When the base was established in 1918, it was named for Braxton Bragg, sometimes described as the worst Confederate general to serve in the Civil War. In 2023, the Defense Department renamed several facilities that had honored Confederates, giving Fort Bragg the admittedly uncreative name of Fort Liberty. In February, the Trump administration reverted to the old name—but with a twist. The base would instead honor Private First Class Roland L. Bragg, a World War II veteran awarded a Silver Star and a Purple Heart. Georgia's Fort Benning had a similar rechristening. At Fort Bragg, Trump announced that he was changing back the names of another new round of bases. 'We are also going to be restoring the names to Fort Pickett, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Rucker, Fort Polk, Fort A. P. Hill, and Fort Robert E. Lee,' the president said. 'We won a lot of battles out of those forts.' (The government began naming southern facilities for Confederate commanders during World War I, when the government wanted to encourage southern enlistment.) Yet when the Pentagon released an official announcement, it said something subtly but significantly different: that actually the forts would, like Bragg and Benning, be named for other veterans with the same surnames. Instead of Robert E. Lee, the top Confederate commander, Fort Lee will honor Private Fitz Lee, a Black soldier who served in the Spanish-American War. The discrepancy between Trump's claim that the names of generals including Lee and A. P. Hill were returning and the official announcement reveals the puerile wink-and-a-nod trolling behind the re-renaming. The original names were replaced after a careful process had identified military figures who deserved recognition. The Pete Hegseth–led Pentagon, by contrast, appears to have found its new honorees by poring over lists of veterans in a superficial search to find any decorated veteran with the right surname. (This has apparently been a higher priority than finding a chief of staff for Hegseth's tumultuous office or briefing the secretary on the legal justification for deploying Marines to Los Angeles.) Reverting is an insult to the families of those people whose names were added and then removed. But refusing to own up to the goal here is a laughable equivocation from guys who like to talk about how strong they are. Trump clearly wants to bring back the Confederate names. Why won't the Pentagon go along with it, or why can't officials admit it? Isn't this the 'wokeness and weakness' that Hegseth has promised to eliminate? Even under this same-last-name strategy, everyone can see that these names are intended as a nod to the Confederates. It's not a dog whistle if everyone can hear it. The president doesn't know much about history, according to a top former aide, or care that much for heritage. (I'd be curious to hear how many of the original Confederate honorees he could identify, beyond Lee and perhaps Pickett, whose charge made him infamous.) But Trump knows that much of his political support is in what we might call the cultural American South: the swaths of the United States not necessarily in the old Confederacy where Confederate symbols are popular. One January 6 rioter carried a Confederate flag into the U.S. Capitol. Trump also previously resisted the idea of dropping the Confederate names in 2020, when Congress passed a bipartisan law to do so after the murder of George Floyd. He even vetoed the bill, but Congress overrode him. Reverting to the old names now is an emblem of Trump's broad campaign against anything that can be construed as woke. He is capitalizing on public dissatisfaction over some manifestations of DEI to attack any governmental gestures toward racial equity and reconciliation—whether symbolic and bipartisan, such as the fort names, or bedrock elements of the nation's civil-rights enforcement. The clumsy approach has led to some embarrassments, such as flagging for deletion a photo of the Enola Gay, the airplane that dropped the first atomic bomb, apparently because gay was in the name. Lionizing Lee ought to be nearly as embarrassing. After the surrender at Appomattox, Confederate apologists worked to cultivate a dignified impression of Lee as a tormented patriot reluctantly defending his home state and a brilliant general fighting a lost cause. But as my colleague Adam Serwer wrote in 2017, Lee, despite his reputation as a military tactician, botched the rebel strategy in the Civil War. More important, he was—despite the successful efforts of revisionists who have depicted him as a kindly, conciliatory man—a committed white supremacist and a cruel slaveholder, even by the standards of the time. Where Trump distanced himself from Lee in 2018, his administration is more willing to embrace Confederate ideas today. Citing the writer Michael Lind, future Vice President J. D. Vance said on a podcast in 2021 that 'American history is a constant war between Northern Yankees and Southern Bourbons, where whichever side the hillbillies are on wins,' positioning himself on the side of the southerners: 'And that's kind of how I think about American politics today, is like, the Northern Yankees are now the hyper-woke, coastal elites.' This weekend, he appeared on the podcast of Theo Von, the comedian who memorably told Trump what it's like to use cocaine. Von asked Vance, a Marine veteran, which side he'd have fought on during the Civil War, and the good news is that Vance said the Union. But he added: 'I feel like something … happened like 10 years ago,' where 'you have to think that every single person who fought for the Confederate side was an evil person, and I just think that's so stupid.' I've heard versions of this argument when I have written critically about Confederate commemorations in the past, but it's a straw man. With Vance, the question is always whether he really believes this or if he's just saying it cynically. But I don't know who is arguing that every Confederate soldier was an evil person. I know of relatives of mine who fought on both sides of the war, though, I'm proud to say, more who fought for the Union. The point is not that all Confederate soldiers were bad people or personally committed to slavery, nor that anyone necessarily needs to be ashamed of each individual. It is that the Confederacy seceded to defend slavery and fought a treasonous war over it. The U.S. government has no reason to celebrate the rebels or their leaders for their part in the war. To paraphrase a certain president: I prefer the war heroes who fought for the United States. Today's News An Air India plane crashed into a college hostel in Ahmedabad, India, killing at least 241 people on board. Senator Alex Padilla of California was pushed to the ground and handcuffed after he attempted to ask Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem questions at a press conference. The Democratic governors of Illinois, Minnesota, and New York were questioned about their states' sanctuary policies for migrants during a contentious Republican-led House hearing. Dispatches Work in Progress: A big change in New York is warping the calculus of the city's mayoral campaign, Annie Lowrey writes. 'If this is democracy, it's a funny form of it.' Time-Travel Thursdays: The best wellness advice has always been free—just take a 19th-century writer's word for it, Valerie Trapp writes. Evening Read Dare to Act Differently and Be Happier By Arthur C. Brooks In financial circles, the investment strategy many people pursue during chaotic times is known as the 'flight to safety.' That means dumping risky assets such as stocks and buying safer ones such as government bonds. This is not just a financial strategy, but a human one. When things get chaotic, eliminate your exposure to risk and hunker down. That's the safe bet. Or is it? Read the full article. More From The Atlantic Spend time with a loved one. 'In my household, Saturday is 'Dad-urday,'' Jordan Michelman writes. It's a father-daughter routine that has transformed his family life. Celebrate. Music wouldn't be the same without Brian Wilson. That's not an overstatement, Spencer Kornhaber writes.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales draws GOP primary challenge from Cotulla rancher Susan Storey Rubio
One year after U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales survived his Republican primary by fewer than 400 votes, another GOP challenger has emerged to target him in next year's midterms. Susan Storey Rubio, a rancher from Cotulla, will launch her campaign for Gonzales' 23rd Congressional District Thursday evening, attacking the Republican incumbent for not taking a hard enough line on border security and accusing him of making 'empty promises.' She'll put $350,000 of her own money into the race, according to a source close to the campaign. 'Tony Gonzales is a spineless moderate who didn't do a thing to stand up to Joe Biden and the Democrats and hasn't lifted a finger to help President Trump,' Storey Rubio said in a news release shared with The Texas Tribune ahead of her campaign rollout. In a 2-minute launch video, Storey Rubio tags Gonzales, who was first elected in 2020, as a bureaucrat and a career politician. 'It's time to round up the career politicians and deport them out of Washington, D.C.,' she says in the ad as it shows a bus labeled 'ICE' — referring to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — parked in front of the nation's Capitol. Gonzales, a centrist from San Antonio and U.S. Navy veteran, ran his tightest race yet in 2024, when he won with just 50.6% of the vote in a primary runoff against YouTuber and pro-gun activist Brandon Herrera. It was Gonzales' first primary cycle after the Texas GOP censured him for splitting with House Republicans on key votes, including his support for a bipartisan gun law in the wake of the Uvalde school shooting in his district. The race drew national attention, with feuding between Gonzales and the right flank of the Republican Party spilling into public. Then-U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Florida, and leaders of the hardline House Freedom Caucus endorsed Herrera. Gov. Greg Abbott, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson endorsed Gonzales, with Johnson traveling to Texas to fundraise for him. Gonzales outspent Herrera more than 2-to-1 — but won their head-to-head runoff by only 354 votes. Gonzales reported $1.9 million cash on hand at the end of the most recent campaign filing period, which ended in March. Texas' 23rd Congressional District stretches from San Antonio to the outskirts of El Paso, covering the largest stretch of the U.S.-Mexico border of any district in the nation. Republican Zeke Enriquez has already filed to run against Gonzales in the March primary. Democrat Santos Limon, who lost to Gonzales with 38% of the vote last November, will vie again for the Democratic nomination. Another Democrat, Peter White, has also filed. The primary election is scheduled for March 3. Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer. Get tickets. TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
