
Trump's pardon of Chrisleys praised by Joe Giudice as 'the only way' after 'harsh' prison sentences
Joe Giudice has a lot of respect for Savannah Chrisley.
In an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital, Giudice, who was charged and sentenced to 41 month in prison after pleading guilty to financial fraud in 2014, applauded Savannah's persistence advocating for her parents.
Todd and Julie Chrisley were released from federal prison after they received a pardon from President Donald Trump.
"I give a lot of props to Savannah," said Giudice, who lives in the Bahamas after being deported from the United States in 2019. "I mean, she worked hard, and she did everything she had to do. I mean, it worked, right? I mean, she pardoned her parents, and you got to give her props for that. And look, I mean, they got a harsh sentence. I mean, they got a harsh sentence for exercising their rights."
"They went to trial, and they got nailed (for) 10 years. I mean, that's a lot of time for what they did. I mean, that's crazy. ... So, I mean, you can't win. You know what I mean? You don't win. You never win."
Todd and Julie, who became famous on the reality series "Chrisley Knows Best," were convicted of conspiring to defraud community banks out of more than $30 million in fraudulent loans and tax evasion and sentenced to 12 and seven years, respectively. Their sentences were later reduced.
WATCH: JOE GIUDICE PRAISES SAVANNAH CHRISLEY FOR 'PRESSING TRUMP' OVER PARENTS' PARDON
They were both pardoned and released from federal prison last week.
Savannah got emotional outside the federal prison in Pensacola, Florida, awaiting her father's release May 29.
When speaking to reporters, Savannah said, "Honestly, this process has been absolutely insane, and I am so grateful that I'm going to leave here with my dad."
"If I could get a pardon, I'd take it, for the sake of my kids."
"What Savannah did was the right thing," said Giudice, whose ex-wife, Teresa Giudice, was also found guilty of fraud charges and served 15 months in prison. "She kept pressing for Trump and for the pardon, and she got it. That was the only way to do it."
Joe and Teresa pleaded guilty in 2014 to financial fraud. Teresa served her sentence first and was released in December 2015. Joe then started his 41-month prison term in March 2016.
The father of four was held by immigration officials after he completed his sentence. A judge ruled in October 2018 that Joe, who is not an American citizen, would be deported to his native Italy upon completion of his prison term.
"When we pled, I took full responsibility," said Giudice. "My ex was supposed to stay home with the kids, and I was supposed to go to jail. I didn't know I was going to get deported, but I was supposed to go to jail.
"They said, 'Listen, just take the plea. Go through your time. By the time you get it out, you'll be fine.' So we took the plea, went to sentencing and then everything just went wrong. The judge decided to not abide by the plea and go against the plea and decided to sentence my ex to a year in prison."
"It wasn't fair," he added. "It's just a very complicated, crazy system."
Years after he was released, Giudice, who told Fox News Digital he and Teresa and the Chrisleys were made to be "examples," spoke more about the similarities between the two cases.
"I mean, these people did the same exact thing we did, that I did — not Teresa, me," Giudice said on an episode of Teresa and Melissa Pfeister's "Namaste B$tches" podcast in 2022. "It was probably, I say, 90% of the world does, the U.S. does — did — during the times, but they targeted us, and now these people here did the same exact thing, same exact charges.
"[The Chrisleys] would've probably got a slap on the wrist. They would've gone to prison. Maybe the wife would've gone to prison same [amount of] time as Teresa, if that. And the guy would've probably got the same amount I got, which he would've been out in, you know, 17 months 'cause he could've done the drug program, and he's a citizen and this and that. So, he would've been out 16 months, 17 months.
"But being that he went to trial, OK? They crucified him, all right?" he added. "They give you double time."
These days, Giudice says he hopes to one day return to the United States, and he remains positive.
"If I could get a pardon, I'd take it for the sake of my kids," said Giudice, who shares four daughters with Teresa.
As far as the Chrisley family?
"I'm very happy for the Chrisleys," said Giudice. "For anybody that gets out of prison, I'm happy. It's not a place for anybody. I'm glad that Savannah worked hard and got her parents out. That's a good thing. It's a big victory for Savannah and her family."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
20 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Supreme Court Leaves Intact Ban on High-Capacity Gun Magazines
The US Supreme Court turned away a fresh gun-rights appeal, refusing to question the District of Columbia's ban on large-capacity ammunition-feeding devices. The justices on Friday rejected arguments from four firearms owners who said the ban violates the gun-rights protections in the Constitution's Second Amendment.


Fox News
20 minutes ago
- Fox News
'The Five' touts need for 'transparency' following Biden's doctor being subpoenaed
All times eastern Special Report with Bret Baier Maria Bartiromo's Wall Street FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage MOMENTS AGO: Trump takes questions as Abrego-Garcia faces human trafficking charges


CNN
21 minutes ago
- CNN
Proud Boys members suing Justice Department for January 6 prosecutions
Members of the Proud Boys who were convicted by a jury on several counts related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack – each of whom were later pardoned or had their sentences commuted by President Donald Trump – are now suing the Justice Department for what they say was a 'political prosecution.' The individuals, including several former leaders of the group, say the prosecution in the case amounted to an 'egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system and the United States Constitution to punish and oppress political allies of President Trump, by any and all means necessary, legal, or illegal.' Four of the five men – Enrique Tarrio, the former leader of the group; Joseph Biggs; Ethan Nordean; Trump Zachary Rehl; and Dominic Pezzola – were convicted of seditious conspiracy and each received lengthy sentences prior to Trump's absolution. The group wants the government to pay $100 million in restitution for the criminal prosecution and has asked for a jury trial in the matter. In the wake of Trump's election for a second term, the administration granted full clemency to hundreds of people convicted of felony crimes like destroying property and assaulting police on January 6. Trump's reelection also brought with it a complete about-face on investigations into those who attacked the Capitol that day, effectively ending the largest ever investigation conducted by the FBI. Trump's Justice Department also recently announced it had reached a settlement in the lawsuit brought by the family of Ashli Babbitt, who was shot and killed by an officer on January 6 after attempting to breach the Speaker's Lobby near the House chamber. CNN has reached out to the Justice Department for comment. Republicans and Trump allies have long argued that the hundreds of cases brought against people who participated in the January 6 attack often amounted to political persecution from Joe Biden's Justice Department because they targeted Trump supporters. The lawsuit filed Friday could either force the administration to defend its prosecution of the Proud Boys or settle with the men. One of the men suing the Justice Department, Dominic Pezzola, was the first rioter to break open a window at the Capitol, allowing scores of protestors to enter the building, prosecutors said during the trial. Prosecutors argued that the other four men were leaders of the group and helped coordinate and helm elements of the attack. 'Now that the Plaintiffs are vindicated, free, and able to once again exercise their rights as American citizens, they bring this action against their tormentors for violations of their Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment Rights,' the lawsuit says. The lawsuit argues that prosecutors went after the five men despite knowing they never organized or coordinated the events of January 6. Prosecutors, the lawsuit alleges, invented 'a whole new legal theory,' stacked the jury and breached attorney-client communications.