Iran already carrying out ‘wholly unacceptable' actions in UK, Reynolds warns
The threat from Iran in the UK could increase as Tehran seeks to retaliate against the US, Israel and their allies, a Cabinet minister has suggested.
Jonathan Reynolds said Iranian activity in the UK is already substantial and it would be 'naive' to think it will not escalate.
The Business Secretary said 'not a week goes by' without Iran targeting cyber attacks on the UK's critical national infrastructure.
Both MI5 and the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) have warned about Iran's activities.
The head of MI5, Ken McCallum, said in October that authorities had stopped 20 state-backed plots hatched by Iran in the UK since 2022.
He warned of an 'unprecedented pace and scale' of plots posing 'potentially lethal threats' to British citizens and UK residents.
The NCSC has warned Iran 'is developing its cyber capabilities and is willing to target the UK to fulfil its disruptive and destructive objectives'.
Mr Reynolds told Sky News the risk from Iran in the UK is 'not hypothetical'.
He said: 'There is not a week goes by without some sort of Iranian cyber attack on a key part of the UK's critical national infrastructure. There is Iranian activity on the streets of the UK, which is wholly unacceptable.
'It's already at a significant level. I think it would be naive to say that that wouldn't potentially increase.
'But again, there's a choice here for Iran: Do they want to continue being an agent of instability in the region and the wider world? Where has that got them? Where has it got the Iranian people?
'There's a better course of action for Iran to take here, and I think they should consider that.'
Iran was the first foreign power to be listed on the enhanced tier of the foreign influence registration scheme, aimed at protecting the UK from malign foreign influence.
It means anyone who is directed by Iran to carry out activities in the UK must declare it or face five years in prison.
The scheme is due to come into force in July.
The Home Office will also introduce new laws that will allow the UK to proscribe state-based groups such as Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
In the latest sign of Iran's actions against the UK, it emerged on Saturday that authorities in Cyprus have arrested a Briton alleged to have been carrying out surveillance of the RAF Akrotiri base on the island.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
25 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Omagh inquiry told pace of disclosure ‘must increase'
The speed of disclosure to the Omagh Bombing Inquiry 'must increase', counsel to the proceedings has said. The Omagh Bombing Inquiry, chaired by Lord Turnbull, is hearing opening statements from core participants including representatives of bereaved families, victims, the PSNI, and the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland. Advertisement The Real IRA bomb in the Co Tyrone town in August 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins, in the worst single atrocity in the Troubles in Northern Ireland. The public inquiry was set up by the previous government to examine whether the explosion could have been prevented by the UK authorities. The opening statement section of the inquiry will take place over Monday and Tuesday. Earlier this year the inquiry heard personal statements from those affected by the massacre. Advertisement Prior to the opening statements on Monday, Paul Greaney KC, counsel to the inquiry, told Lord Turnbull that the legal team had hoped that disclosure from relevant bodies would have been more advanced than it currently is. He further argued that there would be value in having at least one hearing to discuss progress of disclosure in September or October. 'The understandable consequence of the level of disclosure to core participants is that the opening statements of the bereaved families and survivors cannot be as detailed or evidence focused as they would have wished,' he said. Noting that the next stage of the inquiry will commence in March, he said: 'That gap of nine months between Chapter Two and Chapter Three is unfortunate, in our view.' Advertisement He added: 'The simple fact is that the speed of disclosure to the inquiry by material providers must increase, and that is why we repeat the need for the state core participants and indeed all material providers to work at pace to fulfil the requirements of the inquiry and to ensure that the necessary resources, both human and financial, are dedicated to that work.' Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn is one of the core participants. Photo: PA. Mr Greaney noted that many documents exist only in hard copy and – even when held digitally – may take time to review and be disclosed. He offered three further general observations on proceedings. Mr Greaney stressed that the inquiry was not constrained by any other previous proceeding, investigation or review in its eventual findings. Advertisement That comment came in advance of the written submission from Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn which Mr Greaney said contains a reference to a 'relatively low bar of plausible argument' on four out of 10 grounds of preventability of the bombing which had been considered by a previous judicial review. Addressing concerns raised by survivors and victims that relevant documentation will be declared 'missing', Mr Greaney said any such claim 'will be subject to the most intense scrutiny by the inquiry', including demands around information on the search efforts and expectations of material being recovered. Ireland Omagh families will be 'satisfied' by steps from I... Read More He added that the inquiry would use its powers to ensure the fullest possible levels of disclosure. On the subject of candour, Mr Greaney said the inquiry expects openness and transparency from state core participants Advertisement He said state core participants have not made any such concessions in their written opening statements and reminded them that they would be subject to scrutiny.
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
MPs should get veto on any Iran conflict, Plaid Cymru says
MPs should have the opportunity to veto any plans for UK military involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict, Plaid Cymru has said. The US bombed three nuclear sites in Iran at the weekend after escalation between Israel and Iran entered its third Minister Sir Keir Starmer called for de-escalation as Iran and Israel still launch missiles at each other's Secretary David Lammy is due to make a statement to MPs in the Commons later on the conflict. US President Donald Trump said the US military had carried out "massive, precision strikes" on three key nuclear facilities in Iran following concerns about reports Tehran was working on a nuclear missile officials confirmed sites were struck but denied they suffered any major damage and have vowed there would be "everlasting consequences" following the US Keir stressed the UK was not involved in the US strikes. He also warned of the risk of escalation, and said he wanted to reassure people "we're doing everything we can to stabilise the situation". Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap Iorwerth said the US attack was "a mistake" which could lead to "potentially catastrophic consequences".Speaking on BBC Radio Wales Breakfast, ap Iorwerth said: "Yes, we agree with Sir Keir Starmer that de-escalation has to be the goal now but we need assurances here for example and we are asking for assurances that there will be a vote in the UK Parliament before there was a possibility of the UK being sucked into this action – which we think should not happen".
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump insists ‘monumental damage' done by US strikes in Iran but others are more cautious
Donald Trump has doubled down on claims 'monumental damage' had been done to Iran's nuclear sites, as the head of the UN's nuclear agency said that while he anticipated 'very significant damage' at the underground Fordow site, the agency had not been able to assess it. Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, confirmed that Iran had told the agency it had planned to take 'special measures' to protect equipment and nuclear materials on 13 June. Trump, who has a reputation for hyperbole, again stated that the sites had been 'obliterated' by this weekend's US bombings, in contrast with the more cautious language from the Pentagon and Israeli officials. 'Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images,' he said in a social media post. 'Obliteration is an accurate term!' Pentagon officials have characterised the damage to the sites – at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan – as 'severe'. Assessing the extent of the damage has been complicated by the fact that the US, Israel and the IAEA only have access to surface satellite imagery of the sites and reporting from Iran's nuclear agency on any contamination. Satellite imagery of Fordow taken in the days before the US attack showed an unusual volume of truck traffic. The images appeared to confirm that Iranian authorities had preemptively removed some material from the site, possibly including its uranium stockpile – or parts of it. On Monday, Israeli jets struck Fordow in order to obstruct its access routes, the IDF said. According to briefings from unnamed US and Israeli officials to American and Israeli media, Fordow had been heavily damaged but not destroyed. A senior US official told the New York Times the site had been taken 'off the table' but that even 12 bunker-busting bombs could not destroy it. Speaking in Vienna, Grossi said that given the 'explosive payload utilised and the extreme vibration sensitive nature of centrifuges, very significant damage is expected to have occurred.' He added, however, that 'at this time, no one, including the IAEA, is in a position to have fully assessed the underground damage.' Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, had earlier said Tehran was still 'calculating the damage'. Grossi also called for agency inspectors to be allowed to return to Iran's nuclear sites in a bid to 'account for' Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpiles and a 'return to the negotiating table'. Whether or not Iran had managed to remove technology and uranium from the attacked sites is likely to be a key question in the coming days and weeks. 'We are going to work in the coming weeks to ensure that we do something with that fuel and that's one of the things that we're going to have conversations with the Iranians about,' the US vice-president, JD Vance, told ABC's This Week on Sunday, referring to the stockpile of uranium theoretically sufficient to make nine or 10 atomic weapons. Satellite images released by several imaging companies in the immediate aftermath of the US strikes suggested changes to the above ground topography of the Fordow site, which is buried beneath layers of sedimentary rock in the Zagros mountains. Other images showed what appeared to be two distinct clusters of holes in a ridge at the site, caused by the entry of the dozen bunker-busting Massive Ordinance Penetrators dropped by US B2 Spirit stealth bombers. According to Joseph Rodgers, deputy director and fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies' Project on Nuclear Issues, the US bunker busters appeared to have targeted ventilation shafts at the Fordow facility. 'The reason that you'd want to target a ventilation shaft is that it's a more direct route to the core components of the underground facility,' Rodgers told Wired magazine. Among those so far sceptical about the impact of the US strikes was Jeffrey Lewis, a professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, who tracks Iran's nuclear facilities. 'At the end of the day there are some really important things that haven't been hit. If this ends here, it's a really incomplete strike,' Lewis told NPR, echoing other experts who pointed to Iran's continued retention of enriched uranium as the key issue. In a lengthy thread on social media, Lewis expanded his point: 'This means Iran has retained 400kg [of 60% highly enriched uranium], the ability to manufacture centrifuges, and one, possibly two underground enrichment sites. 'That is enough, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA's calculation, although Iran insists it does not seek nuclear weapons.' 'That is also to say nothing of possible secret sites, which opponents of the JCPOA [the Iran nuclear deal Trump pulled out of] used to invoke all the freaking time,' Lewis said. 'If the strike leaves the current regime, or something very much like it, in power with a nuclear option then it will have been a strategic failure. What does it say when two of the most amazing military operations in modern memory are still unable to fully eliminate Iran's nuclear program? I think that's proof that this is tactical brilliance […] may be in service of a foolhardy strategy.'
