
Aussie tennis star cops monster ban after accidentally breaking doping rules - as he reveals shocking health effects of battle to clear his name
Australian tennis star Max Purcell has accepted an 18-month ban after he breached Tennis' Anti-Doping Programme (TADP) rules.
He has also been ordered to repay over $200,000 in prize money won between the period of December 2023 and February 2024.
The two-time Grand Slam winner explained to his followers that the seven-month ordeal has taken a huge toll on his wellbeing, with the 27-year-old tennis star claiming he has 'struggled to sleep and eat properly' while also developing 'nervous and anxious tics' which he battles on a daily basis.
In December 2024, the ITIA announced that the Wimbledon and US Open doubles champion had breached Article 2.2 of the TADP, relating to the use of a 'prohibited method'.
A 'devastated' Purcell said at the time he had 'unknowingly' received a transfusion of vitamins that were above the 'allowable limit of 100ml' as he voluntarily accepted a provisional suspension.
The ITIA had launched an investigation into the matter and found text messages between himself and another player in December 2023 where he admitted to a 'hydration session' at a medical clinic and confirmed he had received an infusion.
They recovered data on the mobile phone of the player he had been messaging which revealed that the players had 'exchanged a number of further messages that day concerning the infusion.'
'These messages indicate that: (i) the Player requested the Clinic staff not to keep receipts relating to his infusion; (ii) the Player discussed ways in which he could justify receiving infusions, including feigning illness; and (iii) the Player subsequently researched whether or not the infusion was prohibited under the WADA Code (specifically, whether it was the ingredient itself or the water that was relevant to the limit of 100 mL within 12 hours),' the ITIA wrote, outlining their investigation.
After being made aware of the messages, the ITIA issued a demand to access Purcell's mobile device and download the relevant information. And after requesting an interview with the 27-year-old to discuss the matter in person in December 2024, Purcell issued a statement to the ITIA where he accepted the Anti-Doping Rule violation.
Tennis players can only consume 100ml intravenously over a 12-hour period as part of the TADP regulations.
He is understood to have undergone the infusions in Bali in 2023 and in his statement, he said he had been left 'shocked' after medical records indicated that the infusions, which he received on December 16 and 20 in 2023, had been more than '500ml and over the allowable limit'. Purcell had also told the ITIA that he had 'directed the clinic both times to provide me with a legal IV amount. I told them less than 100ml and both times they seemed to understand me.'
Purcell was subsequently given a notice of a potential doping rule violation, which the Aussie subsequently accepted on December 12 2024.
He would appear for an interview with the ITIA later that month, where the ITIA said he 'confirmed the contents of the player statement' and also said that 'while he believed that he had asked the clinic to provide him with IV infusions of no more than 100ml, he had not checked the volume of the IV infusion before it was administered to him.'
In their investigations, the ITIA stated that they had also contacted the clinic, who told them: '(i) it is possible that there was a misunderstanding if Purcell requested a 100ml infusion.'
The ITIA added that the clinic said they were 'aware of the players status as a professional athlete and his adherence to anit-doping regulations.'
Because of Purcell's cooperation with the governing body, the ITIA have allowed for a 25 per cent reduction in his sanction, with the time that the tennis star has served under the voluntary provisional suspension now being also included in his 18-month ban, which will end on June 11, 2026. He is banned from playing, coaching or attending any tennis events governed by the ITIA's members, including the ATP and WTA Tours, the ITF or Tennis Australia.
ITIA CEO Karen Moorhouse stated that the situation should help to bring back confidence and trust in the anti-doping system.
It comes after the system has been scrutinised in recent years following high-profile cases including Iga Swiatek and Jannik Sinner.
'It also shows that the ITIA considers intelligence from a range of sources with the overriding aim to protect everyone covered by the tennis anti-doping rules, and ensure a level playing field for all,' Moorehouse said.
'We have had some really high profile cases … naturally that has led to lots of questions.
'I really hope this decision does show players we are there to protect all those clean players and we have that capability.
'We have great people who really challenge ourselves to make sure we are looking at every bit of intelligence and taking the steps we can to achieve our aim.'
On Tuesday, following the announcement, Purcell took to Instagram issue a statement on the matter, where he opened up on the toll that the ordeal has taken on him.
Purcell addressed his followers on Instagram revealing the toll that the last few months had taken on his health before adding that he had fully cooperated with the ITIA
'As announced by the ITIA, I've accepted a settlement for a period of ineligibility of 18 months with a loss of earnings from December 16 2023 – February 3 2024 (as February 3 was my first doping test since December and returned a negative result, as all my tests have),' Purcell wrote.
'This case has been going on for months, seriously affecting my quality of life.
'From being unable to sleep and eat properly, and refusing to be by myself, to developing nervous and anxious tics which I still currently battle day to day.
'I couldn't sit and enjoy anything without the thought of the case and the endless possibilities of what sanction I would receive.
'I was nothing but cooperative with the ITIA. I'm so glad this is finally over for me and I can move on with my life.'
Purcell revealed he had received the infusion at a medical facility after he had been feeling unwell and all substances had been WADA approved.
'The ITIA accepted that the infusion over the 100ml limit was not intentional,' Purcell said.
'It's a case completely on exceeding the allowable limit of volume for an infusion. All substances in the infusion were WADA-approved and beyond that, it provided me with zero performance-enhancing benefit.
'It was 11 days prior to my first match of the season and was also administered at a 24/7 facility, in a third-world location after feeling unwell and fatigued from training.
'I have accepted the mistake I made and will make sure I'm even more diligent with everything regarding the integrity of the sport.'
Purcell had also included a screenshot of his phone's lock screen which had been a white background, with the words 'WADA Whereabouts' written in bold writing. He explained in his dedication to being a clean athlete, he had placed the words on his lock screen to ensure he remembered to check in with WADA testers to provide his whereabouts.
In December, Purcell made a statement on Instagram in which he revealed that he had 'unknowingly' received a transfusion of vitamins above the 'allowable limit'
'I pride myself on being a clean athlete and have never been anything but that. Those who know me, know that I take my anti-doping duties very seriously. So seriously, that since December 2023, when I was added tothe testing pool and asked to provide my whereabouts every single day, I even changed the background lock screen on my phone so I would never forget.
'I'll be able to compete from June 12th 2026. I am excited for the challenge and hope you all get around me for my comeback when it's time.'
It comes as Aussie tennis great Nick Kyrgios has also spoken out on Purcell's ban.
Kyrgios has been outspoken on the matter of doping in tennis over the past 12 months and was vocally critical of Sinner.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Nine key questions could decide fate of beef Wellington mushroom 'poisoner'
Erin Patterson has been accused of intentionally poisoning several family members and her eight-day cross-examination in the murder trial has come to an end The world has been gripped by the murder trial of an Australian woman that came after several people died after eating a homemade beef Wellington that is said to have contained poisonous death cap mushrooms. Erin Patterson denies intentionally poisoning three relatives and attempting to kill a fourth by serving them a meal containing toxic death cap mushrooms at her home in Victoria on July 29, 2023. Prosecutors have alleged she deliberately included the poisonous mushrooms in the meal, but her defence insists it was a tragic accident - saying Patterson may have accidentally included mushrooms she had foraged herself. Within a week of the meal, three of the guests had died and the fourth was in hospital. Patterson, 50, was questioned by police shortly after the deaths and she was arrested around a month later. Her alleged victims were her in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, both aged 70, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66. Ian Wilkinson, the uncle of Patterson's estranged husband, also fell seriously ill but survived after weeks of treatment. These are the nine key questions that could determine how the jury vote. Where were the toxic mushrooms from? Both the prosecution and defence have accepted the potentially deadly death cap mushrooms were in the beef wellington. During the initial police investigation, Patterson denied being a forager and her children told cops they had never seen her pick mushrooms. This completely shifted in the witness box as Patterson claimed that was untrue and said she had picked wild mushrooms since the 2020 Covid lockdown. Her lawyer, Colin Mandy SC, asked if she accepted that the beef Wellington pastries she had served to her lunch guests in 2023 contained death caps. "Now I think there was a possibility there were foraged ones in there," she replied. How did the mushrooms get into the dish? Prosecutor Nanette Rogers told the court how Patterson had posted in Facebook groups about using a food dehydrator to reduce the size of mushrooms to use in cooking. Patterson posted that she had been "hiding powdered mushrooms in everything". The jury was also shown a CCTV photo showing Erin Patterson at her local tip on August 2 - days after the fatal meal. Among the things she was seen disposing of was a large black box. When inspected a couple of days later, a staff member found a black Sunbeam dehydrator, Nanette Rogers says. Fingerprints were found on the dehydrator and compared to Ms Patterson's, Dr Rogers says - and they matched. It also tested positive for death cap mushrooms, the jury was told. Did she secretly hate her in-laws? Prosecutors have not identified a "particular" motive in this case but the court heard about issues Patterson faced with her ex-husband Simon's family. The couple were married in 2007 and separated in 2015 but initially had a close relationship even after they split. This changed in 2022 when Simon described himself as "single" on a tax return and affected her ability to claim tax breaks. Patterson asked her in-laws to get involved and they were reluctant to, which led to arguments between them. She posted a series of raging posts on Facebook around that time including: "I'm sick of this s**t. I want nothing to do with them. I thought his parents would want him to do the right thing, but it seems their concern about… not wanting to get involved in their son's personal matters, are overriding that. So f**k them." How was the meal served? The court was told the four guests were handed their meal on a grey plates while Patterson had hers on an orange plate. The suspect has denied these claims and told the court she did not own any grey dishes. She told the court the meal was served up on a mixture of black and white plates. Despite this, footage from a police search of her home appeared to show two grey plates next to the dishwasher. Did she vomit after the meal? Patterson told the court she had bulimia and ate several slices of an orange cake her 70-year-old in-law brought for dessert. She told the court: "I kept cleaning up the kitchen and putting everything away and, um, I had a piece of cake and then I had another piece of cake. And then another." She told the court she ate all of the cake and "felt sick. I felt over-full. So I went to the toilets and brought it up again". Was she genuinely sick? Patterson said she was hit with diarrhoea after the meal and suffered with it for a week. She went to a local hospital and complained of "gastro". Despite this, medical professionals did not believed her symptoms were as bad as what her four guests experienced. The court heard from nurse Cindy Munro who said Patterson "didn't look unwell" when compared to the guests. Doctor Varuna Ruggoo said tests for her liver function came back with normal results. Why did she throw the dehydrator away? The day after Patterson left hospital she went to a rubbish tip and was seen on CCTV throwing the Sunbeam dehydrator out. When asked about the device she claimed she tried to get rid of the dehydrator because she "panicked" after a conversation with her ex-husband a few days earlier. She claimed he asked her: "Is that what you used to poison my parents?" She said: "I was scared of the conversation that might flow about the meal and the dehydrator and I was scared that they [child protection] would blame me for it." Despite this, the ex-husband claimed he did not remember saying that to her. Why did she lie about having cancer? Patterson invited her in-laws for the meal on a false pretence of receiving a cancer diagnosis, as prosecutors said it was highly unusual for Patterson to hold social gatherings. She had told Gail a few weeks earlier that she found a lump on her elbow. At the dinner she suggested she had been diagnosed with ovarian cancer. The mother of two later admitted she never had cancer, but had been worried enough by symptoms to seek tests. She then said she had been dealing with "self-esteem" issues and was embarrassed to tell her family that. How will the jury decide this case? Patterson has held that the other parties in this case, like her ex-husband, medical professionals and Facebook friends, have been wrong in their accounts. Her eight-day cross-examination has come to an end and she still pleads not guilty. Now the case is in the hands of the jury who will return their verdict.


North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Strong show in final practice gives Lando Norris reasons to be cheerful again
The British driver bemoaned McLaren's worst day of the season so far here at the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve on Friday after he trailed George Russell. But Norris soared to the top of the time sheets in the concluding running prior to qualifying, finishing 0.078 seconds ahead of Ferrari's Charles Leclerc with Russell third. Our top three in FP3 Norris 🥇Leclerc 🥈Russell 🥉#F1 #CanadianGP — Formula 1 (@F1) June 14, 2025 Norris trails McLaren team-mate Oscar Piastri in the championship standings by 10 points. However, Piastri has struggled for speed this weekend and he sustained damage to his McLaren when he hit the barrier at the so-called Wall of Champions. Piastri was left with a right-rear puncture before he stopped for repairs. The Australian's mistake cost him just eight minutes of track time but he finished in eighth place, seven tenths off Norris' pace. Lewis Hamilton was fourth, 0.251 sec behind Norris with Max Verstappen fifth and Fernando Alonso sixth in his Aston Martin. Qualifying takes place at 1700 local time (2200BST).


North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Qualifier Tatjana Maria shocks Madison Keys to reach final at Queen's
The 37-year-old mother of two arrived in London on a nine-match losing run but, after coming through qualifying, she is now unbeaten in six contests and will take on American Amanda Anisimova for the trophy on Sunday. Maria's latest victim was American second seed Keys, who was unable to cope with the German's unusual, slice-heavy game, falling to a 6-3 7-6 (3) defeat. From qualifying to the final. Three straight Top 20 wins. The Oldest ever @WTA 500 finalist!!! Take a bow, Tatjana Maria 👏#HSBCChampionships — HSBC Championships (@QueensTennis) June 14, 2025 After sealing the victory, Maria celebrated with her husband and coach Charles-Edouard and elder daughter Charlotte courtside, while younger daughter Cecilia slept in a pushchair. Saturday's win followed a quarter-final victory over former Wimbledon champion Elena Rybakina, and Maria, a semi-finalist at the All England Club in 2022, told the BBC: 'Really, to be honest, I cannot believe it's true. 'It's such a special place. I could not wish a better tournament to be in the final and I'm so, so proud. I had my ups and downs but you always have to keep going. I love to play tennis, I love the sport. We live for these special moments.' Now the world number 86 – the oldest player to make a WTA 500 singles final – will take on eighth seed Anisimova, who prevailed in a topsy-turvy battle against top seed Zheng Qinwen, winning 6-2 4-6 6-4. Anisimova faltered having three times led by a break of serve in the second set, with both players finding the windy conditions difficult. The turning point came after Olympic champion Zheng had recovered from another poor start to a set to lead 3-2 in the decider. The Chinese star had three chances to make it four games in a row but Anisimova withstood the pressure and broke serve in the next game on her way to a first grass-court final. 'I'm so happy to be through this match,' said the 23-year-old. 'I've never gotten a win over her. 'Every time we've played we've had some really tough battles and I was just really relieved at the end there. The conditions were very tricky but we still managed to play some really good tennis.' On facing Maria, Anisimova added: 'I'm super happy to see her in the final. It's incredible what she's doing and her family is so cute. It's really special for her and it's going to be a great final.' Meanwhile, there was a career-best victory in qualifying for the men's event next week for Britain's former Wimbledon junior champion Henry Searle. The 19-year-old claimed a 7-6 (0) 7-6 (6) win over top seed Bu Yunchaokete and will take on American Mackenzie McDonald for a place in the main draw.