Truck driver can seek triple damages in lawsuit over THC content in CBD product, Supreme Court says
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Wednesday sided with a truck driver who wants to sue for triple damages over a CBD hemp product he says was falsely advertised as being free from marijuana's active ingredient and resulted in him getting fired.
The 5-4 opinion clears the way for the trucker to seek triple damages under an anti-mob law. It doesn't decide his underlying claims that the product's THC content got him fired.
Douglas Horn said he wanted to treat chronic shoulder and back pain after a serious accident. He chose the product because it was advertised as being free from THC, which gives marijuana its high. CBD is a generally legal hemp compound that is widely sold as a dietary supplement.
But lab tests taken after Horn was fired for failing a routine drug test confirmed the product did have THC, he claimed.
Horn sued the Vista, California-based Medical Marijuana Inc. and sought triple damages under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, often known as RICO.
The company pushed back, disputing Horn's account and saying he can't sue for higher damages because he's claiming a personal injury rather than harm to his business.
Horn says his firing was a business injury and he's been financially ruined, and an appeals court allowed Horn's claim to go forward.
___
Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Stifel Starts Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) at Buy, Cites Strong Growth
Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) is among the 10 Best Growth Stocks Under $100 to Buy Now. Analysts at Stifel initiated the 'Buy' rating for Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER), with a price target of $110, highlighting an upside of nearly 27%. The analysts believe the giant can meet or even exceed its 2024 targets, including mid-to-high-teens growth in gross bookings and a high EBITDA compound annual growth rate. The financials of the company reinforce a somewhat similar picture. Just recently, Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) inked the acquisition of Taiwan fleet dispatcher Crown Taxi in an attempt to enhance its presence in the Taiwanese market. While the deal is pending regulatory approval, if successful, it can offer Crown Taxi professional drivers a smoother working experience and increase passenger, in general. A close up view of a hand holding a smartphone, using a ride sharing app. For a company like Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER), there's a lot to look forward to. The perfect blend of AI, ML, and cloud infrastructure positions the company as more than just a transportation provider. Given its record of losses, the company has managed to build a sustainable business model on the foundations of innovation and smart capital. Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) is a California-based developer and operator of proprietary technology applications. With a global presence, the company has three main segments: Mobility, Delivery, and Freight. Founded in 2009, Uber is committed to creating opportunity through movement. While we acknowledge the potential of UBER as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None.
TechCrunch
an hour ago
- TechCrunch
Week in Review: WWDC 2025 recap
Welcome back to Week in Review! We have lots for you this week, including what came out of WWDC 2025; The Browser Company's AI browser; OpenAI's partnership with Mattel; and updates to your iPad. Have a great weekend! The Apple experience: We kicked the week off with WWDC 2025, Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference, where the company showed off a newly designed iOS 26, new features across its products, and much more. There was considerable pressure on Apple this year to build on its promises and to make amends to developers as it lags behind in AI and faces continued legal challenges over its App Store. Snack hack: U.S. grocery distribution giant United Natural Foods (UNFI) was hit by a cyberattack, the company confirmed Tuesday. Much of UNFI's external-facing systems were offline, including web systems used by suppliers and customers, as well as the company's VPN products. Whole Foods was one of the victims, and it told staff that the cyberattack was affecting UNFI's 'ability to select and ship products from their warehouses' and that this will 'impact our normal delivery schedules and product availability.' Public debut: Chime's much-anticipated public debut finally arrived, with the company raising $864 million in its IPO. Iconiq was one of Chime's many backers taking a victory lap at its graduation to become a public company. This is TechCrunch's Week in Review, where we recap the week's biggest news. Want this delivered as a newsletter to your inbox every Saturday? Sign up here. News Image Credits:Google Not to be outdone: Google rolled out Android 16 to Pixel phones, adding group chat to RCS, AI-powered edit suggestions to Google Photos, and support for corporate badges in Google Wallet. Cabs are here: Elon Musk has spent years claiming that Teslas would be able to drive themselves. Apparently the time has come — maybe? Musk said this week that Tesla will start offering public rides in driverless vehicles in Austin, Texas, on June 22. Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW An AI browser: The Browser Company said last year that it's going to stop supporting and developing its Arc browser, which, although popular, was never able to reach scale. The startup has since been busy developing an AI-first browser called Dia. And another one: OpenAI released o3-pro, which is a version of o3, a reasoning model that the startup launched earlier this year. As opposed to conventional AI models, reasoning models work through problems step by step, allowing them to perform more reliably in domains like physics, math, and coding. In other news, Sam Altman posted on X to say that his company's first open model in years will be delayed until later this summer. Desperately seeking: Now that people can ask a chatbot for answers — sometimes generated from news content taken without a publisher's knowledge — there's no need to click on Google's blue links. And that's hurting publishers. Cool? Mattel and OpenAI are teaming up to create an 'AI-powered product,' whatever that is. As part of the deal, Mattel employees will also get access to OpenAI tools like ChatGPT Enterprise to 'enhance product development and creative ideation.' 'A privacy disaster': Reporter Amanda Silberling tried out the Meta AI app and found that it's publicly sharing people's queries. 'Meta does not indicate to users what their privacy settings are as they post, or where they are even posting to. So, if you log into Meta AI with Instagram, and your Instagram account is public, then so too are your searches about how to meet 'big booty women,'' she writes. iPad for work: iPadOS 26 will bring new features to the 15-year-old device that might actually make it usable for a full day of work. Analysis A wave of recent headlines and posts has raised questions about Bluesky, from concerns about slowing growth to claims that the platform is turning into a left-leaning echo chamber and that its users are too serious. While those critiques capture part of the conversation, they don't reflect the full picture of what Bluesky is working toward. But if left unchecked, those perceptions could pose a real challenge to the platform's future growth.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Were Boise homeowners illegally taxed? Idaho Supreme Court to weigh in
The curtains are closing on a long-running legal battle over Boise's Harris Ranch neighborhood. Since 2021, residents have gathered and fought the area's Boise-based developer and the city of Boise over a special taxing district they say is unlawful and unfair. Both sides presented oral arguments June 9 to the Idaho Supreme Court and now await a decision that could come in weeks. Or, more likely, months. The homeowners say the special taxing district, called a community infrastructure district, forced them to unfairly foot the bill for $22 million in payments to the developer of Harris Ranch in October 2021. Barber Valley Development, which is building the Boise neighborhood on behalf of the Harris Family Limited Partnership, rejected the claims that the payments were illegal and argued that they have followed the rules outlined by the Idaho Legislature. The Legislature permitted community infrastructure districts in 2008 with the hope that they could help make growth pay for itself. In such a district, homeowners pay extra taxes for local public improvements like roads and roundabouts. In theory, this means that a resident of the Boise Bench or North End wouldn't be forced to pay higher taxes for things they wouldn't need or use such as sewer lines. Led by residents Larry Crowley and Bill Doyle, the homeowners with the Harris Ranch CID Taxpayers Association say the district made them pay up to 40% higher taxes than those outside the district — including homes across their street that were intentionally cut out of the district boundaries. An Ada County judge threw out all 16 of the homeowners' arguments in April 2023. The homeowners appealed to the state's highest court almost five months later. 'It's been a lengthy effort,' Crowley said by phone after Monday's oral arguments. 'We've done our part, now it's in their court.' Crowley said that they were hopeful that there could be some relief coming for homeowners, but that he was proud of the work the community had done. 'It's been in many ways a very humbling experience,' Crowley said. 'We're just really thankful for the opportunity to get to this point.' Doug Fowler, the president of Barber Valley Development, said that he was looking forward to putting the legal issues behind him and continuing to build out the neighborhood, some of which has been paused amid the court battle. After chiding both sides for using confidential information from an accidental email in their arguments, the Supreme Court justices grilled lawyers representing the homeowners, the city and Barber Valley Development. They poked holes in arguments, seemed to cast doubt on both sides and tested the boundaries of an issue that has never been litigated before. Though the lawyers and justices touched on several topics on the sprawling lawsuit's one-hour oral argument, possibly the most poignant was whether the district was formed correctly in 2010 and whether that issue could be used in arguments. Nicholas Warden, the attorney for the neighbors, argued that the district was created by the vote of a single resident on land outside the district who would never need to pay the extra taxes. No one who would eventually pay the taxes took part in the vote. This, Warden said, should invalidate the $22 million payment in 2021 because the creation of the bonds required approval by a supermajority of residents. 'Our position is that an assent of a supermajority requires at least one person, in other words more than none, of the people who are going to pay the tax to vote on it,' Warden said. 'That could easily have occurred in this place.' Justice Greg Moeller said there are plenty of cases where people may buy a house, move in and need to pay into something like a school bond or mosquito abatement district even if they hadn't voted for it. The homeowners, he said, bought their homes knowing of the district. 'I understand why they're unhappy with this,' Moeller said. 'But it's not unusual for people to buy land in a district with restrictions that they're helpless to change by the time they move in.' Melodie McQuade, an attorney with Boise's Givens Pursley law firm representing the infrastructure district, said there was no evidence that the vote was illegal, and the creation of the district wasn't up for debate in the case. 'The plaintiffs want to challenge the formation of the district and then multiple decisions that have been made over the past several years,' McQuade said. 'You can't reach back that far.' A key moment came when Moeller asked McQuade if the infrastructure district could be considered a legal form of taxation without representation — an argument that Crowley and Doyle have made since they first sued. 'I don't believe so,' McQuade said. 'I believe this is a mechanism for infrastructure to be paid for in perhaps a slightly different way than if the developer baked it into the lot costs.' Moeller said that it seemed as if it could be a way to hide who voted for tax increases and would prevent them from being able to hold anybody accountable. 'My best answer to that, conceptually, is that it shouldn't be disqualifying that a small group of people would vote to create the district,' McQuade said. 'It's not surprising that these big pieces of land would have very few voters, because they're all owned by maybe even one family.' A new law was supposed to help emergency services handle growth. It isn't working As Boise builds up, Eagle tees up density restrictions with little public input Boise to welcome 'crown jewel' of hotels on Grove Street. What's coming? A Christian college wants to build apartments in Garden City. Neighbors are mad
