
George Osborne is negotiating a 'reciprocal long-term' loan deal that will send the Elgin Marbles back to Greece
George Osborne is negotiating a 'reciprocal loan deal' that would send the Elgin Marbles back to Greece.
The former chancellor, now the chairman of the British Museum, is understood to be discussions with Greek government over a deal that would return the marbles to Athens on a long-term basis.
As part of the deal, Athens would provide the museum with ancient Greek artefacts, many of which have never been shown in the UK.
Importantly, the British Museum would not give up its legal ownership of the sculptures, which would require a change in the law.
The deal is to hoped to come into effect later this decade when the British Museum closes for refurbishment as part of the upcoming redevelopment of the Bloomsbury site in London.
Sources, however, have told the Times that no deal has been finalised and an announcement is not expected in the near future..
The marbles, also known as The Parthenon Sculptures, are a series of Ancient Greek sculptures created between 447BC and 432BC by Greek architect Phidias.
After standing for 2,000 years, the Acropolis was for the most part destroyed as the Ottoman Empire - who at the time ruled Greece - became embroiled in a war with Venice.
The remaining sculptures were removed from the ruins of the Parthenon by Lord Elgin, then British ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, and brought to Britain between 1802 and 1812.
In 1816, the marbles were handed over to the care of the British Museum, where they have remained ever since.
Talks between the British Museum and Greece over the return of the Elgin marbles have been ongoing since 2021.
A spokesman for the Prime Minister said that the 'care and management' of the sculptures was a matter for the British Museum and a long-term loan deal would not need explicit government approval.
It has been claimed that, while Labour won't change a law that stops the British Museum permanently handing back the artefacts, Sir Keir would allow the 'loan' of some of the carvings to Athens.
The fifth-century BC Parthenon sculptures were moved from Athens between 1801 to 1812 by the Earl of Elgin, when it was still part of the Ottoman Empire.
The empire was crumbling at the time, with Greece securing independence in the following decades.
The peer, who was the British ambassador, planned to set up a private museum before transferring them to the British Museum.
Greece insists the artefacts were obtained illegally by Lord Elgin, but the UK is adamant that Lord Elgin had the permission of the Ottoman authorities.
A 1963 law prevents the British Museum from permanently disposing of key items from its collection, although it would not stop a loan deal.
It has been reported by the Critic magazine that Osborne has already agreed to give the Elgin Marbles to Greece as part of a permanent loan deal.
Since the greek government still claims legal ownership of the sculptures, it was 'extremely unlikely that they would ever return to Britain', the report added.
In responde, the museum said that talks has not advances sinc late last year when the PM hosted Greek counterpart Kyriakos Mitsotakis at No10.
A No 10 spokesman said also denied reports of an imminent deal.
'It remains the case that decisions relating to the management of the Parthenon sculptures are a matter for the trustees of the British Museum, which is operationally independent of the government,' the spokesman said.
'We have no plans to change the law that would allow the permanent loan of the Elgin Marbles.'
When asked about the deal, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said she had 'never been someone who thought we should send the Elgin Marbles back'.
A Greek official involved in the talks said the deal would need to see the marbles being transferred for an 'extended period; not 50 or 100 years, nor one or two years'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
20 years on from the febrile aftermath of London's 7/7 bombings, a heart-stopping minute by minute account of the day Scotland Yard's first ever shoot-to-kill operation ended in the... CATASTROPHIC death of an innocent man
Twenty years ago, London was a city under attack, living on its nerves. Out of the blue that summer of 2005, the capital's transport system was hit by a murderous wave of al-Qaeda bombers, with devastating results. Ordinary folk going about their everyday lives died in the onslaught. Hundreds were mutilated. London knew all about terrorist bombs from years of enduring attacks by various Irish factions. But here was something new to these shores and infinitely more terrifying – the suicide bomber hell-bent on martyrdom. To Commissioner of Police Sir Ian Blair it was a door opening into a new kind of terrorism. 'The IRA and the Loyalists never did anything the size of this. This was a step change.'


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
White House warns Downing Street against letting China build 'super embassy' near sensitive financial sites
The Oval Office has urged Downing Street against giving a Chinese embassy the green light to be built near London financial centres. Previously, proposals for the 'super-embassy' were rejected by the Conservative government amid concerns from British intelligence. However, the plans have been reintroduced following lobbying from China 's very own President Xi Jinping. But fresh warning have since emerged, as due to the Royal Mint Court's locality to a sensitive hub of essential communication cables, it poses a great risk for an attack. The suggested site is also situated between several major financial hubs in Canary Wharf and the City as well as three crucial data centres. It is understood US President Donald Trump has warned Sir Keir Starmer against giving the embassy the go-ahead. The matter is believed to have been discussed during trade talks, as Britain and its Atlantic allies discuss how they will implement a trade deal to avoid UK steel producers being lumbered with 50 percent import tariffs by July 9. According to the Times, US diplomats would be trepidatious about sharing intelligence with Britain if the embassy went ahead. A senior US official told the publication: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' It comes after a claims 'dark cabling' running beneath the proposed site 'feeds the City of London' were given in a memo to the United States' National Security Council by members of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (Ipac). John Moolenaar, the Republican head of the House of Representatives' China committee said if these reports were 'accurate' that the site would 'pose an unacceptable risk' to both the UK and US. 'The Chinese Communist Party has a clear track record of targeting critical infrastructure.' he said. 'This development would raise serious concerns in the United States and could be viewed as an act of strategic overreach by Beijing and a curious error in judgment by London.' The executive director of IPAC, Luke de Pulford dubbed the matter as a 'flashpoint' in US-UK trade talks, adding that it was 'staggering' the White House had to corroborate the cabling risk to 'defend its own financial system. 'It's time to send Xi Jinping a clear message: no matter the pressure or coercion, the UK and US won't trade away national security, and this embassy isn't happening,' he said. China has been attempting to revise plans for the Royal Mint building, which neighbour the Tower of London, since they were purchased in 2018. It is believed the Chines foreign minister, Wang Yi, brought up the matter with foreign secretary, David Lammy, while visiting London last year. According to The Times, President Xi had also discussed the same issue with the Prime Minister in a phone conversation. The proposal for the embassy, which would be China's largest in Europe, was previously rejected by Tower Hamlets council in 2022. But two weeks after Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves came back from a visit to China earlier this year, both the council's and Scotland Yard's objections were dropped. Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, described China as a 'dangerous threat to the national and economic security of our country'. She said the Conservative party continued to stand 'firmly' against the embassy proposals, stating her party would never put the UK's 'financial centre or country at risk.' Next Monday, three of Trump's aides are scheduled to meet with their Chinese peers in London for discussions in a bid to solve the current trade war between the two economic powerhouses. The Treasury secretary Scott Bessent, the commerce secretary Howard Lutnick and the trade representative Jamieson Greer will act as representatives for the US, Trump has declared on Truth Social. Yesterday, China 's foreign ministry confirmed vice-premier He Lifeng will be on British shores from June 8 until June 13, adding that talks would with the US would take place. Previously, a Chinese embassy spokesperson has quashed spy allegations, stating: 'Anti-China elements are always keen on slandering and attacking China.' A government spokesman said: 'Applications for a new Chinese embassy in Tower Hamlets have been called in for ministers to decide. A final decision will be made in due course.'


Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
MARK LITTLEWOOD: A full-blooded agenda can help revive the Tory Party's fortunes - but we must act fast
These are tough times for the Tory party. The Conservatives are struggling to get 'cut-through' in the national media and in the public debate. Because of the party's lowly poll ratings, such coverage as there is tends to focus on whether the Tories are minded to embark upon yet another leadership election. Some ask whether the party can survive at all. Good news for Kemi Badenoch has been thin on the ground. But she can draw some real comfort this weekend from a survey conducted by my grassroots organisation, Popular Conservatism. We asked hundreds of rank-and-file Tories how the party should seek to get back on its feet and how it should rebuild. Tory supporters are not overwhelmed with unalloyed hope and optimism – they would be delusional if they were. A vast majority thought last month's local election results were as bad as to be expected, or even worse. A good chunk of those surveyed are tempted by Reform and think Nigel Farage will be the next prime minister. On Kemi herself, 60 per cent think she is doing something from a reasonable to an excellent job in what have obviously been difficult circumstances. On policy and strategy, the messages they sent back are pretty clear. They expect a full overhaul of Tory party headquarters and more powers given over to the membership – rather than central office parachuting favoured sons and daughters into desirable seats. But it's on policy where Kemi should take the most heart. She has already pivoted away from the 2050 carbon Net Zero commitment and 93 per cent agree with her. She has now opened an internal commission into whether the UK should withdraw from the ECHR – 91 per cent think we should. There is also overwhelming support for slashing back quangos (95 per cent) and dramatically reducing the size of the Civil Service (93 per cent). Scrapping the Supreme Court (78 per cent), abolishing the Equality Act (76 per cent) and curtailing the independence of the Bank of England (79 per cent) also curry significant favour. Taken together, these measures could add up to the sort of full-blooded agenda that Tory members think could revive the party's fortunes. And they want it rolled out fast, with 86 per cent demanding that policy positions be adopted more rapidly than has been the case thus far. Tory members don't seem to think that Kemi is facing the wrong way, they just want her to run, rather than walk, in the direction she has set.