Navy sailor returns home from deployment to find out family gave his dog away — before he tracks down pooch: ‘Isn't just a pet'
A US Navy sailor returned home from an eight-month deployment to the Middle East only to find out that his beloved dog had been given away by a family member who had agreed to care for the pooch.
Paulo Silva's homecoming celebration was short-lived when he learned that his 5-year-old golden retriever, Archie, was gone.
'While I was away, something happened that I was completely unaware of and never would have agreed to—my dog was given away without my knowledge or consent,' Silva wrote in a now-revised Facebook post.
5 Navy sailor Paulo Silva says his dog Archie was given up by the family he tasked on watching him while he was deployed to the Middle East.
Paulo Silva Facebook
Silva, a Freehold, NJ native who lives in Virginia, described Archie as his companion. The two had experienced everything together until the dog was brought to Toms River, NJ, just before the sailor's deployment last October.
'This dog isn't just a pet to me. He is my heart, my companion, and a piece of my soul that helped carry me through some of the hardest times in my life,' he said.
Silva described his bond with Archie as 'irreplaceable,' having been through everything together.
'I love this dog more than words can express—more than life itself.
Silva had been aboard the USS Harry S. Truman during the aircraft carrier's 251-day mission to the Middle East, where it was attacked by the Iranian-backed terror group Houthis and fired over 1.1. million pounds of ordnance, the Navy Times reported.
5 Archie a 5-year-old golden retriever was last known to be in Toms River, NJ.
Paulo Silva Facebook
5 Silva described his bond with Archie as 'irreplaceable,' having been through everything together.
Paulo Silva Facebook
Silva says he routinely checked in with family during his deployment, but was never told Archie was having trouble settling into the new environment.
'They said my dog wasn't settling in too well – that he was having problems staying at the house. But I've had numerous people look after my dog before, with no issue,' Silva told the Asbury Park Press.
The relative allegedly told Silva they 'had no choice' but to give the dog away.
Silva, who returned home on June 1, set out to look for Achie and pleaded for social media to help locate the man who took in the dog.
'I'm reaching out publicly not out of anger, but out of heartbreak. I am respectfully asking you to please consider returning my dog to me,' he wrote. 'I am pleading with you, not just as a veteran, but as someone who lost something deeply precious to them without any choice or voice in the matter.'
5 Silva was deployed on the USS Harry S. Truman during the aircraft carrier's 251-day mission to the Middle East.
Paulo Silva Facebook
Silva – with the help of Toms River and Monmouth County police, a veterans group and Facebook –located his dog on Wednesday afternoon.
'I'm very happy to share that Archie has safely returned to me. I want to sincerely thank the family who has been caring for him during this time,' Silva wrote in an update.
The grateful sailor helped connect the family with a golden retriever breeder who offered to donate a puppy for helping Silva reunite with Archie.
5 Archie was reunited with Silva after the dog search campaign.
Paulo Silva Facebook
'I'm completely overwhelmed (in the best way) by the love and support you've all shown about my Archie Barchie being returned,' Silva wrote.
He shared a picture of a happy Archie with his tongue out at their reunification.
In an update Wednesday afternoon, Silva called for civility from his supporters who had allegedly targeted the family that gave Archie away.
'I want to respectfully ask that everyone stop any further harassment, threats, or negative actions directed at the family,' Silva wrote. 'This situation has been difficult for all involved, and it's important that we move forward with kindness, understanding, and respect.'
'The family is not at fault, and I believe we can all agree that it's time to put this chapter behind us for the sake of everyone involved, especially Archie,' he concluded.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Prince Harry Apparently Wants Archie and Lilibet to Have the Option of Becoming Working Royals
Prince Harry apparently wants to leave the door open for his kids, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, to possibly be working royals someday, should they choose to do so. A new report explores Harry and Meghan Markle's decision to use Archie and Lilibet's prince and princess titles and HRH statuses. It also explains that their U.K. passports may have been delayed amid a reluctance to put their HRH titles and Sussex surname on years after stepping back as working members of the royal family, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle still retain their HRH titles (shorthand for His or Her Royal Highness), and, while they don't use them publicly, have used them privately, as came out earlier this year. Harry and Meghan's kids, 6-year-old Prince Archie and 4-year-old Princess Lilibet, also have HRH titles, and, according to Town & Country, the Duke of Sussex wants to leave the option open for his kids to become working royals themselves someday, should they choose to do so. A new report in The Guardian details Harry's efforts to get U.K. passports for Archie and Lilibet, with the surname Sussex (as Meghan has expressed the desire to use for herself, as well) and the HRH titles as well. Archie's passport, for example, was originally issued as Archie Mountbatten-Windsor (the surname the larger royal family uses) upon his birth in 2019, but after Archie's grandfather King Charles took the throne in 2022, he and Lilibet became entitled to use prince and princess titles. Harry and Meghan first expressed their intent to use said titles in March 2023, six months after Charles became King, on the occasion of Lilibet's christening. 'The children's titles have been a birthright since their grandfather became monarch,' a spokesperson for Harry and Meghan said at the time. There was a delay in issuing U.K. passports for Archie and Lilibet and 'There was clear reluctance to issue passports for the kids,' a source 'close to the Sussexes' told The Guardian, with the insider adding that 'the King hadn't wanted Archie and Lili to carry the titles, most of all the HRH, and the British passports, once created, would be the first and perhaps the only legal proof of their names.' The Guardian reported that Harry 'wants to keep the HRH titles for his children so that when they grow older they can decide for themselves whether they want to become working royals or stay out of public life.' As far back as the volatile Sandringham Summit in early 2020, Buckingham Palace said that 'The Sussexes will not use their HRH titles as they are no longer working members of the royal family.' That said, at least Meghan still uses her HRH title in a private capacity. The Guardian also reported that Harry and Meghan considered changing their surname to Spencer before landing on Sussex, which the outlet said stemmed from 'sheer exasperation' on Harry's part. After speaking about the matter with his uncle Earl Charles Spencer—Princess Diana's younger brother—though he was 'enthusiastic and supportive of the name change,' he advised against doing so because of legal reasons, and Harry and Meghan chose Sussex instead, reflective of their Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles given to them by Queen Elizabeth on the occasion of their 2018 wedding. 'Harry was at a point where British passports for his children with their updated Sussex surnames were being blocked with a string of excuses over the course of five months,' a source speaking to The Guardian said. Per People, the passports for Archie and Lilibet eventually arrived nearly six months after the initial application; for context, standard processing time is typically around three weeks. The passports arrived 'shortly after the Sussexes' lawyers wrote to the U.K. Home Office, threatening to file a data subject access request—a legal move that could have revealed internal discussions or decisions behind the delay,' People reported. Read the original article on InStyle
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Disruption after boat hits bridge
Railway services have been disrupted after a boat hit a bridge. Network Rail said it was notified at about 8:15 BST that a "commercial boat" had collided with the Kingsferry Bridge, connecting the Isle of Sheppey and mainland Kent. Southeastern said it suspended the Sheerness-on-Sea line due to the strike, although it added shortly after 10:00 that normal services would resume shortly. Delays of up to 25 minutes on Southeastern trains between Sittingbourne and Sheerness were reported by INRIX after the strike. Network Rail said the bridge was held in a raised position while its teams examined the structure, which they deemed "safe to reopen". It thanked passengers for their patience. Kent Fire and Rescue Service said it was not called to the incident. The police have been contacted. Follow BBC Kent on Facebook, X, and Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@ or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250. Network Rail Southeastern
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
'We had a job' to do: Humble veteran, 100, recalls D-Day 81 years later
The numbers are staggering: 160,000 Allied troops. Five thousand ships and 13,000 aircraft. All to take a heavily fortified 50-mile stretch of French shoreline, a herculean effort to reclaim a critical part of Europe from the Nazis and turn the tide of the most horrific war the world had ever seen. On June 6, 1944 − D-Day − World War II's invasion of Normandy, codenamed Operation Overlord, got underway. Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, supreme commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force, told the men as they mobilized for battle: "The eyes of the world are upon you. ... The hopes and prayers of liberty-loving people everywhere march with you." Tolley Fletcher, at the time a 19-year-old Navy gunner's mate, remembered the rough seas and the treacherous landing troops at Utah Beach had to make in 3- to 4-foot waves, each carrying about 60 pounds of gear on their backs and descending on rope ladders from larger ships onto smaller landing crafts. "I felt for those soldiers," Fletcher, now 100 years old, told USA TODAY. "In my mind, that was the worst part, other than people getting hurt." Fletcher, who joined the Navy at 17 in late December 1941, said he and his shipmates were fortunate to be mostly out of the line of fire. "There was some shelling, not really a lot, and luckily we didn't get hit. "Maybe halfway in, we started seeing lots of bodies in the water," said Fletcher, who now lives in the Baton Rouge, Louisiana, area. "I was asked (later) what we did about it. We didn't do anything about it − we had a job: to escort those troops to the beach." On D-Day, "that's what these guys faced," said Peter Donovan Crean Sr., vice president for education and access at the National World War II Museum in New Orleans. "They knew they were in the presence of history. Soldiers, sailors, Marines − they knew what they were doing was going to go down in history, which also meant they knew the danger involved. "Guys who were 18, 19, 20 years old were faced with the possibility of their death, but they did it anyway." As we mark the 81st anniversary of D-Day, here is a look at what happened on the beaches of Normandy, the men who fought knowing they might not survive to see victory and the way it affected the Allies' fight to defeat fascism, genocide and tyranny. In order to defeat the Nazis in Europe, the Allies knew they'd have to take France, under German occupation since 1940. Operation Overlord saw a mobilization of 2,876,000 Allied troops in Southern England, as well as hundreds of ships and airplanes, in preparation for a ground invasion, the largest the world had seen. Weighing conditions including the weather, disagreements among other military leaders and strategic uncertainty, Eisenhower gave the go-ahead for the operation to begin before dawn on June 5, 1944. If things didn't go well for the Allies, Eisenhower wrote a note accepting responsibility. The following day, nearly 160,000 Allied troops landed along the 50-mile stretch of French shoreline. More than 9,000 Allied troops were killed or wounded, and 100,000 troops would continue the slow, bloody journey to Berlin, the center of German power. According to the U.S. Army, D-Day was "simply an alliteration, as in H-Hour." Some believe the first "D" also stands for "day," a code designation, while the French say the "D" stands for "disembarkation." The Army's website says that "the more poetic insist D-Day is short for 'day of decision.'" Asked in 1964, Eisenhower instructed his assistant Brig. Gen. Robert Schultz, to answer. Schultz wrote that "any amphibious operation has a 'departed date'; therefore the shortened term 'D-Day' is used.' D-Day was not the only decisive battle of the European theater, Crean said. "It was a crucial battle but there were more ahead," he said. "They had 700 miles of tough road ahead to get to Berlin." The Battle of the Bulge, waged over 41 days in December 1944 and January 1945, required 700,000 Allied troops. "It was a tough slog for another 11 months," Crean said. Victory in Europe − V-E Day − would come on May 8, 1945, nearly a year after D-Day. The war wouldn't end until the Japanese surrendered on Sept. 2, 1945. There are about 66,000 surviving World War II veterans in the United States, Crean said, and while that may sound like a lot, it's a tiny fraction of the 16.4 million who served their country in the conflict. "So to be able to talk to and thank one veteran now is a gift for any of us," Crean said. The National World War II Museum's mission "is more critical than ever ... so more people will understand what they did and continue to be inspired by their sacrifices," added Crean, a retired colonel with 30 years' service in the Army. The museum has had oral historians travel the country to record more than 12,000 personal stories from World War II veterans. They've conducted extensive interviews with veterans, Holocaust survivors and homefront workers and, using artificial intelligence, created a way for visitors to have "conversations" with them and ask questions to learn about the war effort. And they offer virtual programming, teacher training and a student leadership award. Fletcher, the Navy gunner's mate, said he's uncomfortable with the idea of being considered a hero. Asked about his role in history, he said, "I really didn't think about it then, and I don't think about it now, though it's been impressed upon me quite a bit. "When I think about what I went through, and what all the Army and the other men who were mixed up in really tough situations, it makes me feel a little bit guilty." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Remembering D-Day: Veteran, 100, offers first-hand account of D-Day
