Government focuses on tenants over landlords in rent crisis moves
It's been almost a decade since
rent pressure zones
(RPZs) were introduced to curb
sharp spikes in rent
and cap increases at 2 per cent or the rate of inflation, whichever is the lower.
Initially they were confined to Dublin and other big cities but have since been extended across the State, to 24 of the 31 councils, and 111 of the 166 local electoral areas.
Castlebar, Co Mayo, and Tullow, Co Carlow, were the latest to be added to the list in May.
After a three-hour-long meeting of leaders last night, it was decided that a proposal be put at Cabinet today that RPZs would be extended to the whole country.
READ MORE
As well as Taoiseach
Micheál Martin
and Tánaiste
Simon Harris
, the meeting was attended by Minister for Housing James Browne, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe and Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers.
Pat Leahy reports it was also confirmed that landlords would not be allowed to reset rent between tenancies, unless tenants have left voluntarily or have breached the tenancy agreement. In other words, a notice to quit will not be sufficient to allow a rent review.
As
the report states
: 'Housing advocates had warned the Government that allowing landlords to reset the rent between tenancies would result in many tenancies being terminated by the landlords in order to increase the rents.'
The import is that the extension of the RPZs plus the new clause on rent review will be seen to favour tenants rather than landlords.
For the first time also, landlords will be classified according the number of properties owned. At present, all landlords are treated the same regardless of how many properties they own. Now, smaller landlords will be categorised as such if they own three properties or less.
Here is Pat Leahy's
analysis of the proposed changes.
'Modest' increases in local property tax from 2026
There is also another big property-related article in The Irish Times this morning
setting out the expected increases in local property tax (LPT)
from next year.
There has been an increase of over 20 per cent in property prices since 2021, the last time changes to LPT were made.
The report has a preview of a memo Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe is expected to bring to Cabinet this morning: 'Fearing substantial hikes in tax bills, the Government is expected to change the way the tax is calculated in advance of the next date for revaluation on November 1st of this year.'
The implications are that houses valued at under €240,000 will see their LPT bill increase by only €5 a year. Properties valued between €420,000 and €525,000 will see increases of €23, still relatively modest.
At the top tier there will be more substantial hikes. Those with properties valued between €1.995 million and €2.1 million will pay an extra €389 a year.
Israel war bonds to be debated again in Dáil
The last week in May in the Dáil was dominated by an intense debate over the role played by the Central Bank in authorising for the European markets bonds that have been issued by the state of Israel. The Government has argued it is a technical process that has fallen on our Central Bank to do for Europe and that Ireland has never bought bonds.
The Opposition has said the bonds are war bonds and the State or its institutions should have no part whatsoever in dealing with the bonds.
A Sinn Féin Private Members' Bill to effectively stop the Central Bank from dealing with them was defeated in the Dáil, but not before two Government TDs, Barry Heneghan and Gillian Toole, voted with the Opposition.
Now, after the week's recess, the same issue is being debated in the Dáil this week, on foot of a Private Members' motion being tabled by the Social Democrats. The four big Opposition parties have combined again to back it and held a press conference on the plinth. Part of the strategy is to put more pressure on Government backbenchers to abstain or vote against an issue where not all are comfortable with the Coalition's position.
There are
more details of the motion here
.
Best Reads
Fintan O'Toole focuses on a statistic that shows that
some students sitting State exams this week went to bed hungry last night
. We should be mortified, he writes.
Eoin Burke-Kennedy writes that the
Irish Fiscal Advisory Council has predicted another surge
in corporation tax.
Joe Humphreys's great Unthinkable column
asks should we be quite so smug
about Trump's tariffs?
Playbook
The Cabinet meets this morning with a big agenda, including Government concern over what retaliatory tariffs the EU will impose on the US; almost 500 new places in higher education to address key shortages of health and social care professionals; a new incentive scheme to retain air traffic controllers in the Air Corps; and a new antiterrorism Bill.
Full details are to be found
in this preview of the meeting
.
Dáil
14:00: Leaders' Questions
14:34: Order of Business
15:04: Bills for Introduction: Taxes Consolidation (Rights of Performers and Film Workers) (Amendment) Bill 2025 – First Stage
15:10: Taoiseach's Questions
15:55: Government Business: Statements on Housing
19:27: Private Members' Business (Sinn Féin): Motion re Urgent action on vacant Council Housing
21:27: Parliamentary Questions: Oral – Minister for Environment, Climate and Communications Darragh O'Brien
00:03: Dáil adjourns
Seanad
14:30: Commencement Matters
15:30: Order of Business
16:30: Government Business: Statements on Breast Cancer Services
18:45: Private Members' Business: Motion re Insurance Reform
20:45: Seanad adjourns
Committees
11.30: Artificial Intelligence
Research Ireland: Introduction to Artificial Intelligence
12.05: Comhchoiste na Gaeilge
An Plean Náisiúnta um Sheirbhísí Poiblí Gaeilge 2024-2030
15.00: Housing
Discussion on the Report of Housing Commission
15.00: Justice
Engagement on Policing Matters
18.00: Arts, Media, Communications
Prelegislative Scrutiny of revised General Scheme of the Broadcasting (Amendment) Bill
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
32 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Cost of health insurance nears €2,000
If health insurance, along with most things these days, feels like it's getting more expensive , then you're right. The cost of private health insurance has jumped to almost €2,000 per person, according to industry watchdog HIA. As Conor Pope reports, as well as a spike in prices, the figures highlight a significant slowdown in the numbers taking out cover in the first three months of the year. As the Government brings in sweeping changes to the rental market here, John McManus assesses how housing has become an issue that voters expect the State to provide in the same way as health or education, and explores the implications for financing new homes such a change has. These days it seems almost impossible to buy a home if you aren't part of a couple. But it can be done . In Money Matters Joanne Hunt outlines what you need to know about buying your home on your own. US trade tariffs will result in a major slowdown in global growth but not a recession, the World Bank has said. In its latest Global Economic Prospects report, the Washington-based institution said that heightened trade tensions and wider policy uncertainty would drive global growth down this year 'to its slowest pace since 2008 outside of outright global recessions'. Eoin Burke-Kennedy reports. READ MORE The impact of the proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) on Ireland's energy demands is 'not going to be as steep as many people believe', Research Ireland has told an Oireachtas committee. Colin Gleeson watched the hearing. A team of four Trinity College Dublin students placed third at the Global Finals of the Boston University Susilo Business and Ethics Case Competition. The students were the first Irish team to reach the world finals in the competition. Hugh Dooley reports. How to manage your pension in these volatile times Listen | 37:00 In Commercial Property, Fiona Reddan reports that a high-spec manufacturing facility, currently owned and operated by Wyeth Nutritionals Ireland, in Askeaton, Co Limerick, is being brought to the market asking €22 million. Also in Commercial Property, Ronald Quinlan writes that Coonan Property and Savills are guiding a price of €6.55 million for a 10.92-acre site with full planning permission for the development of six industrial units in Rathcoole, Co Dublin. Ronald also reports that the first building in what is being billed as Ireland's first co-located university enterprise quarter has been launched on the site of the former Waterford Crystal factory site on Waterford City's Cork Road. Boots booked a €2.4 million impairment charge against the value of its Irish property portfolio last year as a precaution against rising sales costs and overheads, as profit growth eased significantly from the previous year. Ian Curran has the story. A mystery objector is opposing a planned new gate as part of house revamp plans by Dee and Ian Lawlor for their property at Coolbeg, Shrewsbury Road in Dublin 4. Gordon Deegan has details of the objection against the work planned for the house, which was used in scenes from the 1990s Hollywood blockbuster Far and Away starring Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman. Retailer Marks & Spencer resumed taking some online orders for clothing lines for customers in England, Scotland and Wales on Tuesday after a 46-day hiatus following a cyberattack, but customers in Ireland will have to wait a while longer. If you'd like to read more about the issues that affect your finances try signing up to On the Money , the weekly newsletter from our personal finance team, which will be issued every Friday to Irish Times subscribers.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Government had to choose tenants over investors
After months of deliberation the Government seems to have finally settled on a rent control strategy . It is something of a dog's dinner and can best be seen as an attempt to reconcile two things that are fundamentally irreconcilable. The first is the need to reassure the increasing number of people in rented accommodation that their already sky-high rents are not going to be driven even higher by avaricious landlords capitalising on a severe housing shortage . The second is creating the conditions that will entice international institutional investors into the property market, which requires convincing them that they will be able to set and keep rents at a level where they can earn the sort of market-beating returns that would make investing in Ireland an attractive option relative to the myriad of other global opportunities. READ MORE Much of the emphasis is understandably being put on the measures intended to protect existing tenants, which include the extension of rent controls across the State. Rent increases will be subject to a limit – inflation or 2 per cent – and landlords will be severely restricted in their ability to reset rents to market levels when a tenancy ends. [ Why is the housing crisis Ireland's most enduring failure? Opens in new window ] There will, however, be a distinction drawn between small and large landlords. Those with fewer than three properties will be able to evict tenants and presumably put up rents. There is less emphasis or detail on the measures intended to encourage institutional investment. New builds will not be subject to rental caps and landlords will be able to increase rent to match inflation. The industry is understood to be disappointed. The Government will argue with some justification that it has done its best to balance various competing interests and that a compromise was inevitable. Doing nothing was not an option. The Government is right about that. But how this fudge will work in practice is anyone's guess and the potential for unintended consequences is high. One thing is for sure. Rents will go up. A combination of upward pressure from small landlords at the bottom and a pull from large institutional investors at the top will ensure that rents in the middle also rise. The details of the plan have not been published but the apparent decision to focus more on protecting tenants than encouraging investors may prove the right one. The inherent contradictions in trying to coax private capital seeking high returns into investing in a sector in which policy is to keep rents down is probably insurmountable. The most likely outcome is that the new measures will prove sufficient to swing the investment case for some projects already in the pipeline and a few more top-end developments will be built for rent than might have been otherwise. Every little helps of course The Government would appear to have resisted the entreaties of property developers and their backers as represented by lobby group Irish Institutional Property, which holds that 60 per cent of the funding needed to address the housing shortage must come from international investors. The State and the domestic banks will make up the rest, they believe. The fundamental problem with this argument is that we are approaching the limit in terms of people who can pay the sort of rent that international investors will be seeking without enduring significant financial pain, which in turn will have a detrimental knock-on effect for the economy. Most people are already paying rents in excess of what economists deem sustainable, which is between 20 and 35 per cent of net income. The average Irish person earns about €44,000 a year and the average rent is €1,600 a month or about €20,000 a year. The political pressure that has led to implementation of nationwide rent controls and other pro-tenant measures confirms that we are at the limits of what can be tolerated by society in terms of housing costs. Any international investor looking at investing in housing in Ireland as a long-term bet that will return more than 10 per cent a year would really want to get their head around that before committing. The ones that get in early might do okay, but the risk premium they will want is only going to push up the rent they charge. The reality is that a property market as badly broken as our one does not represent an appetising low-risk investment opportunity. The system – based around widespread home ownership and the accumulation of private wealth – worked reasonably well for a long time but now it doesn't. The reasons are a combination of factors beyond the State's control and the ball being dropped in areas that are its responsibility, such as planning and infrastructure. Housing and rental accommodation in particular are increasingly taking on the characteristics of a public good along the lines of health and education in the minds of voters: something the State regulates, provides and supports on a not-for-profit basis. Nationwide rent controls are just further evidence of this. Health and education are not services that the State looks to fund via hedge funds. They are funded by the exchequer and ultimately in the sovereign debt markets. That is where the Government should be looking for investment. It may now have no choice.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Many Northern nationalists doubt Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael's commitment to Irish unity
Northern nationalists felt betrayed by Dublin 100 years ago, after the collapse of the Boundary Commission in December 1925. It left the border with Northern Ireland unchanged despite their hopes that it would make unification inevitable. Many of their descendants still feel that way. Most Irish nationalists believed the commission, set up as part of the 1921 Anglo-Irish Treaty, would see much of the territory of the six counties of the Northern Ireland state that was established in May 1921 being transferred to the fledging Irish Free State. The shifting of Tyrone, Fermanagh, south Armagh, south Down (including Newry) and Derry City with their Catholic majorities to the Free State, it was hoped, would leave the remainder of Northern Ireland an unviable rump. Irish unity would then be inevitable. Events, however, did not turn out as nationalists hoped, for a catalogue of reasons, including the ambiguous wording of Article 12 in the Treaty that set up the commission and allowed for multiple interpretations. READ MORE From the off, the newly-created, inexperienced Free State government was politically and diplomatically outmanoeuvring by both London and the new authorities in Stormont. And, throughout, Northern nationalists were naive. In the end, the commission ended in rancour when it proposed that only slight rectifications should be made to the original boundary lines drawn up in the Anglo-Irish Treaty, leaving the Border as it was then and remains today. Even the simple things were not handled properly by the Irish side. The commission was chaired by a British-appointed head, not by an independent chairperson, while there were lengthy delays in setting the body up. Following a largely accurate forecast of the expected final boundary recommendations published by the diehard unionist Morning Post newspaper on November 7th, 1925, WT Cosgrave 's Free State government insisted the report as a whole should be shelved. The newspaper's report had rightly claimed that the commission would propose only minimal transfers from Northern Ireland to the Free State. Crucially, the Free State would lose parts of east Donegal and north Monaghan. The furore led the commission's Free State representative Eoin MacNeill to resign from the role. Once it was revealed, however, that he had appeared to consent to the changes, or had not substantially objected, he was forced to resign as the Free State's minister for education. In a panic, Cosgrave rushed over to London to have the Boundary Commission report buried, and after a week of intense negotiations involving the Free State, British and Northern Irish governments, a tripartite agreement was signed on December 3rd, 1925. Under the agreement, Article 12 of the Treaty, which set up the commission, was revoked and Northern Ireland's boundary remained as it had been defined under the Government of Ireland Act, 1920. Meanwhile, Article 5, which had created a £150,000,000 bill that the fledgling State was to pay to London, was waived, with the Free State becoming liable for malicious damage incurred during the War of Independence. Under the treaty, 40 parliamentarians, 20 each from Stormont and Dublin, were to have looked after subjects of common concern, including railways, fisheries and contagious diseases of animals. Extra powers could have been added, as required. However, these were scrapped too. While the Council of Ireland was considered an 'irritant' to the Northern Ireland government, it was the Free State government that readily abandoned it. In lieu of it, the Northern Ireland prime minister James Craig 'suggested joint meetings of the two governments in Ireland 'at an early date' so that both governments could deal with charges brought by one against the other'. Cosgrave agreed but they never met again. In fact, the next meeting between the heads of both Irish governments was 40 years later, when Seán Lemass met Terence O'Neill in 1965. Instead of engaging with Ulster unionists with a view to ending or limiting partition, Irish governments of different hues preferred to preach about its evils without offering anything like practical or tangible policies that could deal with the issue. It was only from the 1960s that Irish governments promoted the merits of North-South bodies, such as the Council of Ireland, as well as bodies that exist today such as the Shared Island initiative. The fallout from the Boundary Commission has left a bitter taste in the mouths of Northern nationalists ever since 1925. Their trust in British governments (always threadbare) evaporated completely, but, perhaps more importantly, their trust in the South suffered an irrevocable blow, due to the Free State government's abandonment of the North for financial benefits. That mistrust still resonates today. Many Northern nationalists believe there is a partitionist mindset in the South and that the 'establishment' political parties of Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael are not interested in Irish unity, despite rhetoric to the contrary. There is contempt for the geo-blocking of programmes in the North by RTÉ (particularly sporting ones), the provision of weather information from Met Éireann for just the 26 counties, the naming of the 26 county state as Ireland under the Constitution, and the prohibition of citizens in the North from voting in Irish presidential elections. [ Geography and destiny – Ronan McGreevy on the Boundary Commission Opens in new window ] As prospects of a Border poll have entered public discourse since the acceptance of the Belfast Agreement of 1998, focus has shifted to an ambiguous clause in that agreement: Schedule 1 (2), which states that the British secretary of state for Northern Ireland 'shall exercise the power' to call a Border poll 'if at any time it appears likely to him that a majority of those voting would express a wish that Northern Ireland should cease to be part of the United Kingdom and form part of a united Ireland'. As with the Boundary Commission, many Northern nationalists believe this clause leaves the power in the hands of the British government. Some fear that this could prevent a Border poll from occurring at all. While there appears to be a clear avenue to Irish unity now through the Belfast Agreement, people are still very wary that the way the commission imploded in 1925 could happen again through what they would see as underhand and devious methods over calling a Border poll. Cormac Moore is a historian, currently serving as historian-in-residence with Dublin City Council. His latest book, The Root of All Evil, about the Boundary Commission, is published by Irish Academic Press
