WA state workers slam furloughs, other pay cut plans, claiming they are a ‘tax on state employees'
Just after noon Thursday, a handful of staff trickled out of the Attorney General's Office in Olympia, holding signs in the light rain.
'No cuts. No furloughs,' their placards read. 'We serve Washington.'
Jonathan Pitel, an assistant attorney general, said his office spends lots of time and energy safeguarding civil and consumers' rights. But as the state faces a deep budget deficit, Pitel and other attorneys and professional staff at the office staged a walkout to sound the alarm about the impact of possible budget cuts and furloughs.
'Protecting children, removing them from vulnerable settings, protecting vulnerable adults, is not a matter of fiscal obligation,' Pitel said March 20. 'It's a matter of the moral obligation of protecting Washingtonians.'
Similar walkouts cropped up at Attorney General's Offices statewide, including in Seattle, Tacoma, Spokane, Everett and Tumwater. More than 800 attorneys and 840 professional staff would feel the effects of proposed furloughs and budget reductions, according to a news release announcing the events.
The walkouts were responding to Gov. Bob Ferguson's proposal to impose one-day-a-month furloughs over two years for state employees. That hasn't sat well with state workers, some of whom feel betrayed by a man they helped elect.
Kim Triplett-Kolerich, president of the Local 795 union representing professional staff at the Attorney General's Office, told McClatchy that one furlough day per month for two years would equate to nearly an entire month without pay.
Attorney General Nick Brown said in a statement that there's 'a long way to go until the budget is finalized.'
'I am hopeful the legislature can balance the budget without furloughing state workers and cutting funding to vital programs that Washingtonians depend on,' he said.
Washington leaders are scrambling to figure out how to fix the state's budget shortfall.
During a press conference late last month, Ferguson rolled out the controversial furlough idea, prompting blowback from state workers. But in a statement provided to McClatchy, the governor remained adamant that he appreciates the important work such employees provide.
'I value their feedback on our budget situation,' the governor continued, 'and welcome any thoughts they have on how we can close the $16 billion budget shortfall I've inherited as a new governor.'
Mike Yestramski, president of the Washington Federation of State Employees, said if the furloughs are enacted, they'd cancel out the collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) negotiated last year with then-Gov. Jay Inslee's administration. Ferguson has said he would honor the CBAs, but once-a-month furlough days over the next two years would save the state some $300 million.
Certain workers would be excluded from the furloughs, including prison staff and state troopers.
'When they say they're going to fund the CBAs, but they're also going to do furloughs, then that's lip service because the net is unchanged,' Yestramski told McClatchy.
Yestramski said the state already has trouble recruiting and retaining state employees. Most of the state's workforce wages and salaries are 'significantly behind market as is.'
Public employees do their jobs because they care about their communities, Yestramski said. It's why he decided to be a social worker.
On the gubernatorial campaign trail, Ferguson promised labor leaders he would support working people in his decisions, Yestramski said. That Ferguson has seemed unwilling to impose higher taxes on the state's wealthiest residents is disappointing to Yestramski, who pointed out that Washington has the 49th most regressive tax system in the U.S., placing more of a tax burden on low-income residents than their wealthier counterparts.
'I mean, a furlough is a tax on state employees,' Yestramski said. 'That's just very — it's very disheartening.'
Senate Republicans unveiled their own budget proposal earlier this month, one that wouldn't raise taxes.
The minority party's plan also would forego pay raises for state employees, said state Sen. Chris Gildon, the Senate Republican budget leader, but it would include $5,000 bonuses for state workers, which Gildon said would pencil out better for those making $80,000 or less.
Gildon told McClatchy that there isn't a way to balance the budget while giving state employees the $4 billion in pay raises negotiated under Inslee.
'The budget is a matter of priorities, and this is a choice of priority, right?' he said. 'Do you prioritize giving pay raises to state employees who right now make, in 38 of our 39 counties, they make more than your neighbors in the private sector? … Or do you value maintaining affordability for every citizen in Washington state?'
Deputy Senate Majority Leader Manka Dhingra said during a recent media availability that she is disappointed to see Republican lawmakers take aim at state employees — similar to how the new federal administration has treated federal workers.
'These are people who serve our communities, who provide services and support to each and every one of us,' the Redmond Democrat said. 'And to really have them suffer because they can't have their affordability issues met, just because they work in service to our government, I think is blatantly unfair.'
Both Senate and House Democrats are gearing up to unveil their budget plans early next week. Yestramski, for one, will be watching.
Furloughs would be felt by Washingtonians statewide, he said, including via longer lines to renew drivers licenses or stalled-out road repairs.
'The reality is, if these austerity measures get put into place,' Yestramski said, 'it's not just going to harm state employees, but it is, in fact, going to harm everyone in the state.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Maryland Rep. Andy Harris and D.C. have a long, personal war over marijuana and he's not budging
WASHINGTON – Eleanor Holmes Norton's language was pointed. Rep. Andy Harris is 'trying to overrule the will of my constituents,' said Norton, Washington D.C.'s delegate to the U.S. House. The Maryland Republican, she added, is 'violating his own principles regarding local control of local affairs.' Norton was referring to Harris tucking language into federal budget legislation that prohibited the District of Columbia from spending money to carry out a marijuana legalization law approved by its voters. That was 2014, but it might well have been yesterday. In every congressional session since — including the current one — the 'Harris Rider' has appeared in appropriations bills, and Norton and marijuana legalization advocates have vehemently railed against it. Their longstanding back-and-forth is as predictable as the humidity that returns to Washington each summer. The rider means people can possess or use limited amounts of marijuana at home in Washington, but no one can sell it for recreational use. 'The congresswoman always advocates to remove it,' said Sharon Eliza Nichols, the communications director for Norton, now 89. 'She speaks against it continuously — she references it specifically on the House floor, at press conferences, and at external speaking engagements whenever she speaks about the D.C. appropriations bill.' Harris, 68, whose district includes the Eastern Shore, Harford County and a portion of Baltimore County, is a Johns Hopkins-trained anesthesiologist who has long crusaded against marijuana use. He has an outsized role in District of Columbia governance as a member of the House Appropriations Committee, which has a powerful say over D.C. finances. Harris says marijuana has been linked to a host of physical and social ills. 'The Drug Enforcement Administration and the Food and Drug Administration have held long-standing opinions that marijuana is a psychoactive drug that is both addictive and harmful,' Harris said in a written statement to the Baltimore Sun. 'Despite a lack of much scientific research showing safety and growing evidence of harm, over three dozen states legalized the recreational use of marijuana,' he said. 'I am glad to see that the Trump administration recognized the importance of the Harris Rider by including it in their FY26 Budget Request and look forward to seeing the Harris Rider enacted into law again in this year's appropriations process.' Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser said she opposes 'all congressional interference in the lives and affairs of Washingtonians,' in a statement from her office on Tuesday. Maryland voters approved a ballot referendum in 2022 to legalize marijuana for adults, and sales were permitted beginning in July of the following year. Marijuana remains classified, along with heroin and LSD, as a Schedule I controlled substance, meaning it is illegal at the federal level. States such as Maryland acted independently in legalizing it, and federal law enforcement has generally concentrated its efforts on 'criminal networks involved in the illicit marijuana trade,' according to the Congressional Research Service. President Joe Biden's administration had proposed reclassifying marijuana, which would have removed some restrictions — on medical research, for example — although it still wouldn't have been declared the drug legal federally. But President Donald Trump's administration has not moved to downgrade the drug from Schedule 1, even though Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had pledged to 'decriminalize cannabis at the federal level' while a presidential candidate in 2023. HHS did not return messages seeking comment about its plans. The battle between Harris and marijuana legalization activists seemed to get personal after the congressman's rider was first introduced. In April 2018, former Washington head shop owner Adam Eidinger rented a brick rowhouse in the congressman's district in Salisbury so he could vote against Harris and organize others to do the same. Eidinger, 51, helped push Initiative 71, the ballot measure approved by voters in 2014 to legalize marijuana in Washington for recreational use. He also often showed up at Harris' public events, asking repeatedly why Harris thought he knew more than District voters about what is good for them. Eidinger and his fellow activists tried to imbue their rallies and events with creativity. They displayed inflatable joints outside the White House and distributed cannabis at Trump's first inauguration in 2017. Harris would not relent. 'Andy Harris is totally out of touch. It's frustrating on so many different levels,' Eidinger said this week. 'I've given up on trying to change these guys' minds. We have to vote in guys we can trust,' he said. _____
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Eleanor Holmes Norton running again is a disservice to D.C. residents
Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, the Democrat who represents Washington, D.C, in the House of Representatives, told NBC News on Tuesday that she's running for re-election again next year. Her place as a fixture on the Hill was evident when reporter Sahil Kapur asked if she'd be on the ballot next fall: 'I'm gonna run. I don't know why anybody would even ask me.' Indeed, for many years, the question would have been unnecessary: Norton has served as a nonvoting delegate in Congress since 1991, she has been overwhelmingly re-elected by D.C. voters, and she has shown no interest in stepping aside. But these days, there are plenty of reasons to ask about her plans for next year, starting with the fact that she turns 88 this week. That makes her the oldest member of the House — and when you consider that the 119th Congress is the third oldest in American history, that's really saying something. At the peak of her time in office, Norton worked to safeguard and strengthen the District of Columbia's limited ability to govern itself, helping pull the city out of the hole financially and advocating for D.C. statehood. But an April profile of her in Washingtonian magazine laid bare how much the once-vigorous champion of her hometown has largely receded from public view. Her appearances in committee, the only place where she can vote on bills, have become brief and pro forma. Given the assault President Donald Trump and Norton's Republican colleagues have launched against D.C. home rule and the federal agencies that employ many of its residents, it's a bad time for Washingtonians to not have someone going to the mat for them. The concerns the Washingtonian profile raised have only grown louder since then, with more of her fellow Democrats opting to go on the record to air them. Last week, The Washington Post reported that four of the 13 members of the D.C. Council have expressed concern about her fitness to continue serving, with three of them saying she should step aside. Even the person who ran Norton's first campaign for delegate went public with her doubts: Donna Brazile, a longtime Democratic strategist and one of Norton's closest confidants, said in an interview that the delegate is aware of the concerns and is now mulling whether to run for reelection next year. 'It's time to turn things over. You've done it all,' Brazile said of her friend. If Brazile was being on the level with the Post, it seems Norton's 'mulling' was brief. Either way, it only highlights the Democratic Party's ongoing struggles with gerontocracy in its ranks. Nobody wants to be the one seen shoving old-timers out the door or be accused of ageism — but three members of the House Democratic Caucus have died since the term began in January. The issue is compounded when it comes to older Black elected officials, many of whom owed their rise through the ranks to their caucus' seniority-based system. The very fact that Norton may well run and win again speaks to how little value is placed in the seat she holds. It is one of the nation's darker ironies that the residents of its capital are unrepresented in Congress. When the District first gained a delegate in 1970, The New York Times said the role 'will, in effect, be a full‐time paid lobbyist for the voteless people in the city of Washington.' The first such lobbyist, Walter Fauntroy, served for 10 terms, stepping down in 1990 to run for mayor. The second is Eleanor Holmes Norton. For the vast majority of my lifetime, she has been the only federal elected representative that Washingtonians have had. It's only because I, a D.C. native by birth, left Washington that I have voting members of the House and the Senate to speak on my behalf. As many recent major votes have spotlighted, the margin separating majority from minority in the House has been exceedingly slim for the last several Congresses. If D.C. had a full voting representative, control over that seat would likely be considered a major Democratic priority, and her ineffectiveness might get the spotlight treatment that other even more embarrassing — and consequential — examples of gerontocracy deserved. Instead, Norton is the owner of a second-class seat, and her diminishment is treated as an irrelevancy. But vote or no vote in Congress, Norton's determination to stay in office in effect leaves her hundreds of thousands of constituents even more vulnerable to Congress' further stripping them of the right to govern themselves. It would be a sad end to an otherwise sterling legacy. Better that Norton listens to those around her asking her to step down, giving a chance for the people she's loyally served to appoint a new guardian. This article was originally published on


New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
UES pol pushes crackdown on NYC ‘broken' emergency contracting system
An Upper East Side councilwoman wants to crack down on the mayor's ability to dole out controversial no-bid contracts after a series of high-profile boondoggles during the migrant and COVID crises. Councilmember Julie Menin is proposing two new bills in the aim to curb financial fiascos tied to such contracts — like the controversial $432 million sweetheart deal with DocGo that had taxpayers footing the bill for uneaten meals and empty migrant shelters. 'It's time for drastic change by reforming the city's excessive emergency procurement practices that lack vital checks and balances,' Menin said. The measures would cap the mayor's emergency contracting powers at 30 days and force quicker audits of the deals. 3 Julie Menin wants to fix the city's 'broken' emergency contract procurement process. Leonardo Munoz Current law allows the mayor to dole out non-competitive contracts lasting up to one year during a declared emergency. Menin said the frantic procurement process squanders billions in taxpayer dollars due to waste and malfeasance. She pointed to the COVID-19 pandemic, when then-Mayor Bill de Blasio extended emergency declarations over 100 times, spending an eye-popping $7 billion on emergency supplies with little oversight. It led to New York City loading up on mountains of the supplies, which became unnecessary when the crisis ended. 3 The de Blasio administration spent billions on non-competitive emergency contracts during the COVID pandemic. RICHARD HARBUS Under one COVID-era contract, the city spent as much as $7.50 per cloth mask, Menin said. When city officials auctioned off $225 million leftover PPE supplies, they only recouped $500,000. 'These are reforms to a broken contracting system which has price gouged our government,' Menin said. Mayor Eric Adams has also faced intense scrutiny over the emergency contracts handed out during the emergency he declared over the influx of migrants arriving to the city. The Adams administration awarded DocGo contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars — without a bidding process to hear from other firms — to operate migrant shelters, despite the company having little experience on the matter. 3 The Adams administration doled out more than $5 billion in emergency contract during the migrant crisis. Michael Nigro Reports showed the contractor used unlicensed security guards, tossed thousands of uneaten meals and underutilized shelter space — eventually leading to an investigation by the state Attorney General's Office and the termination of the deal. 'The failures surrounding DocGo for a critical service only reinforced the need for reforming our broken emergency procurement process,' Menin said. One of Menin's bills would also mandate public disclosure of subcontractors, with penalties of up to $100,000 for failing to report financial relationships. 'Recent mayoral administrations have shown no appetite for good government contracting practices and it's time for the City Council to advance vital legislation to save taxpayer dollars, be fiscally responsible and root out corruption,' she said.