WA state workers slam furloughs, other pay cut plans, claiming they are a ‘tax on state employees'
Just after noon Thursday, a handful of staff trickled out of the Attorney General's Office in Olympia, holding signs in the light rain.
'No cuts. No furloughs,' their placards read. 'We serve Washington.'
Jonathan Pitel, an assistant attorney general, said his office spends lots of time and energy safeguarding civil and consumers' rights. But as the state faces a deep budget deficit, Pitel and other attorneys and professional staff at the office staged a walkout to sound the alarm about the impact of possible budget cuts and furloughs.
'Protecting children, removing them from vulnerable settings, protecting vulnerable adults, is not a matter of fiscal obligation,' Pitel said March 20. 'It's a matter of the moral obligation of protecting Washingtonians.'
Similar walkouts cropped up at Attorney General's Offices statewide, including in Seattle, Tacoma, Spokane, Everett and Tumwater. More than 800 attorneys and 840 professional staff would feel the effects of proposed furloughs and budget reductions, according to a news release announcing the events.
The walkouts were responding to Gov. Bob Ferguson's proposal to impose one-day-a-month furloughs over two years for state employees. That hasn't sat well with state workers, some of whom feel betrayed by a man they helped elect.
Kim Triplett-Kolerich, president of the Local 795 union representing professional staff at the Attorney General's Office, told McClatchy that one furlough day per month for two years would equate to nearly an entire month without pay.
Attorney General Nick Brown said in a statement that there's 'a long way to go until the budget is finalized.'
'I am hopeful the legislature can balance the budget without furloughing state workers and cutting funding to vital programs that Washingtonians depend on,' he said.
Washington leaders are scrambling to figure out how to fix the state's budget shortfall.
During a press conference late last month, Ferguson rolled out the controversial furlough idea, prompting blowback from state workers. But in a statement provided to McClatchy, the governor remained adamant that he appreciates the important work such employees provide.
'I value their feedback on our budget situation,' the governor continued, 'and welcome any thoughts they have on how we can close the $16 billion budget shortfall I've inherited as a new governor.'
Mike Yestramski, president of the Washington Federation of State Employees, said if the furloughs are enacted, they'd cancel out the collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) negotiated last year with then-Gov. Jay Inslee's administration. Ferguson has said he would honor the CBAs, but once-a-month furlough days over the next two years would save the state some $300 million.
Certain workers would be excluded from the furloughs, including prison staff and state troopers.
'When they say they're going to fund the CBAs, but they're also going to do furloughs, then that's lip service because the net is unchanged,' Yestramski told McClatchy.
Yestramski said the state already has trouble recruiting and retaining state employees. Most of the state's workforce wages and salaries are 'significantly behind market as is.'
Public employees do their jobs because they care about their communities, Yestramski said. It's why he decided to be a social worker.
On the gubernatorial campaign trail, Ferguson promised labor leaders he would support working people in his decisions, Yestramski said. That Ferguson has seemed unwilling to impose higher taxes on the state's wealthiest residents is disappointing to Yestramski, who pointed out that Washington has the 49th most regressive tax system in the U.S., placing more of a tax burden on low-income residents than their wealthier counterparts.
'I mean, a furlough is a tax on state employees,' Yestramski said. 'That's just very — it's very disheartening.'
Senate Republicans unveiled their own budget proposal earlier this month, one that wouldn't raise taxes.
The minority party's plan also would forego pay raises for state employees, said state Sen. Chris Gildon, the Senate Republican budget leader, but it would include $5,000 bonuses for state workers, which Gildon said would pencil out better for those making $80,000 or less.
Gildon told McClatchy that there isn't a way to balance the budget while giving state employees the $4 billion in pay raises negotiated under Inslee.
'The budget is a matter of priorities, and this is a choice of priority, right?' he said. 'Do you prioritize giving pay raises to state employees who right now make, in 38 of our 39 counties, they make more than your neighbors in the private sector? … Or do you value maintaining affordability for every citizen in Washington state?'
Deputy Senate Majority Leader Manka Dhingra said during a recent media availability that she is disappointed to see Republican lawmakers take aim at state employees — similar to how the new federal administration has treated federal workers.
'These are people who serve our communities, who provide services and support to each and every one of us,' the Redmond Democrat said. 'And to really have them suffer because they can't have their affordability issues met, just because they work in service to our government, I think is blatantly unfair.'
Both Senate and House Democrats are gearing up to unveil their budget plans early next week. Yestramski, for one, will be watching.
Furloughs would be felt by Washingtonians statewide, he said, including via longer lines to renew drivers licenses or stalled-out road repairs.
'The reality is, if these austerity measures get put into place,' Yestramski said, 'it's not just going to harm state employees, but it is, in fact, going to harm everyone in the state.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
9 hours ago
- New York Post
UES pol pushes crackdown on NYC ‘broken' emergency contracting system
An Upper East Side councilwoman wants to crack down on the mayor's ability to dole out controversial no-bid contracts after a series of high-profile boondoggles during the migrant and COVID crises. Councilmember Julie Menin is proposing two new bills in the aim to curb financial fiascos tied to such contracts — like the controversial $432 million sweetheart deal with DocGo that had taxpayers footing the bill for uneaten meals and empty migrant shelters. 'It's time for drastic change by reforming the city's excessive emergency procurement practices that lack vital checks and balances,' Menin said. The measures would cap the mayor's emergency contracting powers at 30 days and force quicker audits of the deals. 3 Julie Menin wants to fix the city's 'broken' emergency contract procurement process. Leonardo Munoz Current law allows the mayor to dole out non-competitive contracts lasting up to one year during a declared emergency. Menin said the frantic procurement process squanders billions in taxpayer dollars due to waste and malfeasance. She pointed to the COVID-19 pandemic, when then-Mayor Bill de Blasio extended emergency declarations over 100 times, spending an eye-popping $7 billion on emergency supplies with little oversight. It led to New York City loading up on mountains of the supplies, which became unnecessary when the crisis ended. 3 The de Blasio administration spent billions on non-competitive emergency contracts during the COVID pandemic. RICHARD HARBUS Under one COVID-era contract, the city spent as much as $7.50 per cloth mask, Menin said. When city officials auctioned off $225 million leftover PPE supplies, they only recouped $500,000. 'These are reforms to a broken contracting system which has price gouged our government,' Menin said. Mayor Eric Adams has also faced intense scrutiny over the emergency contracts handed out during the emergency he declared over the influx of migrants arriving to the city. The Adams administration awarded DocGo contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars — without a bidding process to hear from other firms — to operate migrant shelters, despite the company having little experience on the matter. 3 The Adams administration doled out more than $5 billion in emergency contract during the migrant crisis. Michael Nigro Reports showed the contractor used unlicensed security guards, tossed thousands of uneaten meals and underutilized shelter space — eventually leading to an investigation by the state Attorney General's Office and the termination of the deal. 'The failures surrounding DocGo for a critical service only reinforced the need for reforming our broken emergency procurement process,' Menin said. One of Menin's bills would also mandate public disclosure of subcontractors, with penalties of up to $100,000 for failing to report financial relationships. 'Recent mayoral administrations have shown no appetite for good government contracting practices and it's time for the City Council to advance vital legislation to save taxpayer dollars, be fiscally responsible and root out corruption,' she said.


Axios
19 hours ago
- Axios
Divorcing in Trump's Washington? Good luck
When Washington couples split up today, they're facing a super volatile party in the courtroom. No, not their ex — it's President Trump's policies. The big picture: Divorce is already stressful. But add federal layoffs, a saturated job market, an uncertain real estate landscape and a possible recession? Buckle up, divorce lawyers tell Axios. Zoom in: Trump's fast-paced decision making is particularly impacting Washingtonians' finances — and money is a big sticking point for couples who are splitting. "When the income takes a dip, how do you calculate alimony? How do you calculate child support? How long is the decrease in income going to last? Nobody knows," says lawyer Jessica Markham, whose client list includes many former and current federal employees. "When the economy is not doing well, you have less options on how to problem-solve untangling two people's financial lives." What they're saying: Some of Markham's clients who've been fired from the federal government, forced to retire early, or are scared of layoffs are now requesting short- or long-term alimony from their exes — something she says wouldn't have happened a year ago. "It's such a new dynamic to their relationship," she says. "They were previously in a very secure position, and in those cases, it's harder to settle, because it's so shocking." Other wannabe-divorcés are delaying the process because they want more security about their employment status before they put themselves on the hook for something they can't afford. Housing is another issue. Some divorcing feds are worried about buying a new single-person pad because they're unsure of their future. One of Markham's federal clients initially had trouble getting a mortgage because the lender was worried they wouldn't be a safe borrower — their agency employer was doing layoffs, Markham says. Others are holding onto homes to see if Washington's real estate market dips, making it cheaper to buy their former spouse out, says lawyer Maria Simon. Also a problem: Child care. Now that feds are back in the office full time, some are asking the ex for help with day care or a nanny and getting pushback, says Simon. "[The partner is saying,] 'Well you never needed it before. Why do I have to pay for it now?'" Zoom out: There's no tax bracket that isn't affected. Lawyer Cheryl New says her Washington power-player clients are worried about how Trump's policies are affecting the valuation of their assets, businesses and investments, and how that will affect their divorce settlements. "[They're thinking,] 'Am I going to be able to pay my employees? Am I going to be able to afford the four homes that I bought and the three kids in the private school?'" New says. The intrigue: New's client list includes some divorcing politicos in Trump's orbit, she tells Axios — who are equally freaked by the effects of his policies on their own breakups. "What you see in the press and what you see on television is not precisely what I'm seeing behind closed doors," she says. "[They're] just as worried, if not more, because there's some insider information there." New says she also represents lawyers who left their jobs at some of the white-collar law firms working pro bono with Trump — and who are now worried about how their lack of income will affect their divorce proceedings. What we're watching: Simon anticipates that custody battles will begin to feature former feds who have to leave the DMV to find work in a less saturated market — and want to take the kids with them, she says.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Teen accused of shooting Colombian presidential candidate Miguel Uribe
June 8 (UPI) -- Colombian police have arrested a teenage boy in connection with Saturday's shooting of far-right presidential candidate Miguel Uribe. Uribe, a 39-year-old senator, was shot while he addressed his supporters during a campaign event in a park in Bogotá, the Colombian Attorney General's Office said in a statement Sunday. He was hit twice and remains in intensive care. Two other people were also injured, and police arrested a 15-year-old who was carrying a 9mm Glock pistol. Footage shared on social media appears to show when Uribe was shot, causing his followers to flee in panic. Fundación Santa Fe Bogotá, the hospital where Uribe was airlifted Saturday, said in a statement Sunday that he was admitted to the emergency room in critical condition. "After all the evaluations by various specialties, he was immediately taken to surgery to perform the initial damage control," the hospital said. "Once the neurosurgical and left thigh procedures were completed, he was transferred to intensive care for postoperative stabilization. His condition is of the utmost seriousness and the prognosis is reserved." The government of left-wing President Gustavo Petro, who is term-limited and cannot run for reelection, condemned the attack in a statement and expressed solidarity with Uribe. "The National Government categorically and forcefully rejects the attack that Senator Miguel Uribe Turbay was the victim of in the last few hours," the statement said. "This act of violence is an attack not only against the personal integrity of the senator, but also against democracy, freedom of thought and the legitimate exercise of politics in Colombia." Petro's government called peace, coexistence and respect for differences the "fundamental pillars" of a democratic society. Prosecutors said they were considering the shooting an attack on the "democratic participation" in the country, and Attorney General Luz Adriana Camargo Garzón expressed her alarm at the seriousness of the attack and urged for political unity in the country "to shield the electoral process." She said her office would investigate the shooting with the National Police.