Winnipeg residents hope new bylaw offences lead to fewer demolished, derelict buildings
People living in Winnipeg neighbourhoods plagued by burnt-out and partially demolished buildings hope a host of proposed new bylaw offences lead to the cleanup of more problem properties.
A report from the City of Winnipeg's property and development department recommends adding 37 new offences, under the Municipal By-law Enforcement Act — provincial legislation that allows the city to issue tickets for offences like neighbourhood liveability concerns.
The new recommended offences include failing to start or complete demolition projects on time.
Breaking one of the new rules could carry penalties up to $1,000.
That comes as good news to people like Cheryl Martens, who has documented derelict buildings in the Spence neighbourhood for years.
"I think $1,000 is not that much for somebody who owns property in the area, so I suppose if we were being critical, we could say it could be more," Martens said in an interview.
"But the fact that they're doing it feels like they listened, which is worth a lot."
The property and development committee delayed a vote on the proposal at its Wednesday meeting.
The Winnipeg Construction Association and the Manitoba Home Builders' Association made a joint submission asking the city committee to lay it over to its next meeting, to give them time to consult with their members.
That disappointed William Whyte Neighbourhood Association president Darrell Warren.
"I really would like the city to take a stance, and we need to go ahead and hit these guys where it hurts, and that's in their pocketbooks. And we need to be tough," Warren said.
Like Martens, the William Whyte Neighbourhood Association has asked the city to get tougher with derelict property owners, and recorded dozens of burned and demolished buildings, including a row of four vacant and boarded up houses at the corner of Powers Street and Aberdeen Avenue.
"There are property owners here that own their houses and they take care of their properties. It's not fair that we as homeowners have to take care of our properties … and yet this stands for years and years and years," Warren said.
If approved by council, other offences that would be added include failing to comply with a stop work order, and failing to leave a site or maintain it in a safe condition when work is suspended or terminated.
The property committee will debate adding the new fines at its meeting next month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
3 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Social Media Fascists Want DHS and JD Vance to Deport the ‘Menswear Guy'
Derek Guy, a fashion writer more commonly known as 'the Menswear Guy' on X, posted Monday about his experience as an undocumented immigrant brought to the U.S. as a child. Far-right extremists quickly called for Guy to be deported, something that's not entirely unexpected on a social media platform that's turned into an even greater cesspool of hate ever since Elon Musk bought it. What turned out to be somewhat unexpected was the vice president of the United States and the Department of Homeland Security posting gifs to suggest they might really deport him. It all started on Saturday, June 7, when Guy tweeted that while he admired the courage of protesters against ICE, he thought violent protests were counterproductive. Some folks on X and Bluesky thought Guy was lecturing people who were putting their bodies on the line in resistance to ICE round-ups in Los Angeles, stirring some criticism. The following day, Guy seemed compelled to talk about his own experience with immigration, writing on X, 'My family escaped Vietnam after the Tet Offensive and went through an arduous journey that eventually landed them in the Canada. My father worked there for a time as a janitor; my mother, a secretary.' Guy went on to explain that when work fell through in Canada his father went to the U.S. 'as our family needed money' and he ended up 'staying longer than he was supposed to.' Guy writes that he was carried over the U.S.-Canada border by his mother while he was still a baby. 'I'm still unsure whether we technically broke an immigration law,' Guy wrote. 'The border between Canada and the United States was pretty porous (as it is today, for the most part). But either way, since I came here without legal documentation, I eventually fell into the category of being an undocumented immigrant. Yet, I've been in the United States since I was a baby. My identity and roots are very much based in this country, no different from anyone else.' I debated whether to share my story on here, but I guess I will. I think there's an idea out there that millions of violent criminals are pouring across the border, carrying machetes and drugs, looking to harm Americans. Certainly, while some people fall into that category, the… — derek guy (@dieworkwear) June 8, 2025 Guy went on to explain (in a very lengthy post) that most immigrants simply aren't violent criminals and that 'sending us 'back' to our 'home' country would mean sending someone to a foreign land.' But the admission that Guy may be undocumented in the U.S. led to various X accounts calling for him to get kicked out of the country. An account called @growing_daniel wrote, 'JD Vance I know you're reading this and you have the opportunity to do the funniest thing ever,' in a quote-tweet about Guy's immigration status. Vance replied with a GIF of actor Jack Nicholson vigorously nodding his head. Guy got a good burn in on the vice president, quote-tweeting Vance with 'i think i can outrun you in these clothes.' Guy frequently critiques the fashion choices of conservative men, something that really seems to irk many of his followers, given the fact that they rely on him for advice on clothes. Guy has previously made fun of Vance's pants for being too short and skinny. i think i can outrun you in these clothes — derek guy (@dieworkwear) June 9, 2025 As if it wasn't bad enough that Vance was suggesting he might try to get Guy deported, the Department of Homeland Security posted a GIF from the movie Spy Kids, quote-tweeting a call for him to be deported. The suggestion being that they had their eyes on him. Far-right influencer Andy Ngo expressed skepticism of Guy's story about his family fleeing Vietnam, claiming he could be lying since he didn't publish his story in 'a publication that goes through some level of independent verification.' The ironic part of that, of course, is that Ngo constantly posts garbage on X without any kind of 'independent verification' as he puts it. Musk and his legion of far-right fans are so fond of saying the traditional media are dead and that you don't hate the mainstream journalists enough. But when someone tells their own story, they're quick to want some kind of verification from the same old-school media they whine about. Guy didn't respond to an email sent Monday afternoon but shared an article from HuffPost on Monday about the attention, writing, 'honestly, didn't expect this is what would happen when i joined a menswear forum 15 years ago.' I shared my story because I think the narrative about undocumented immigrants has become very slanted in order to justify crackdowns. It doesn't help when people think that all undocumented immigrants are criminals who hate the US. The ones I know are good, hardworking people. — derek guy (@dieworkwear) June 9, 2025 The average undocumented immigrant is pretty similar to the average citizen: they dream of getting a better job, they value family, they enjoy social time with friends,' Guy wrote. 'Like most people, they have wishy washy political views and aren't ideologues. They hide from view for obvious reasons. And thus, their part of this story isn't being told.' 'What you see on TV or social media is a slice designed to justify draconian policies,' he concluded.
Fast Company
8 hours ago
- Fast Company
Data breach victims: Here's how your personal information is sold to criminals
Every year, massive data breaches harm the public. The targets are email service providers, retailers and government agencies that store information about people. Each breach includes sensitive personal information such as credit and debit card numbers, home addresses, and account usernames and passwords from hundreds of thousands—and sometimes millions—of people. When National Public Data, a company that does online background checks, was breached in 2024, criminals gained the names, addresses, dates of birth, and national identification numbers such as Social Security numbers of 170 million people in the U.S., U.K., and Canada. The same year, hackers who targeted Ticketmaster stole the financial information and personal data of more than 560 million customers. As a criminologist who researches cybercrime, I study the ways that hackers and cybercriminals steal and use people's personal information. Understanding the people involved helps us to better recognize the ways that hacking and data breaches are intertwined. In so-called stolen data markets, hackers sell personal information they illegally obtain to others, who then use the data to engage in fraud and theft for profit. The quantity problem Every piece of personal data captured in a data breach —a passport number, Social Security number, or login for a shopping service—has inherent value. Offenders can use the information in different ways. They can assume someone else's identity, make a fraudulent purchase, or steal services such as streaming media or music. The sale of data, also known as carding, references the misuse of stolen credit card numbers or identity details. These illicit data markets began in the mid-1990s through the use of credit card number generators used by hackers. They shared programs that randomly generated credit card numbers and details and then checked to see whether the fake account details matched active cards that could then be used for fraudulent transactions. As more financial services were created and banks allowed customers to access their accounts through the internet, it became easier for hackers and cybercriminals to steal personal information through data breaches and phishing. Phishing involves sending convincing emails or SMS text messages to people to trick them into giving up sensitive information such as logins and passwords, often by clicking a false link that seems legitimate. One of the first phishing schemes targeted America Online users to get their account information to use their internet service at no charge. Selling stolen data online The large amount of information criminals were able to steal from such schemes led to more vendors offering stolen data to others through different online platforms. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, offenders used Internet Relay Chat, or IRC channels, to sell data. IRC was effectively like modern instant messaging systems, letting people communicate in real time through specialized software. Criminals used these channels to sell data and hacking services in an efficient place. In the early 2000s, vendors transitioned to web forums where individuals advertised their services to other users. Forums quickly gained popularity and became successful businesses with vendors selling stolen credit cards, malware, and related goods and services to misuse personal information and enable fraud. One of the more prominent forums from this time was ShadowCrew, which formed in 2002 and operated until being taken down by a joint law enforcement operation in 2004. Their members trafficked more than 1.7 million credit cards in less than three years. Forums continue to be popular, though vendors transitioned to running their own web-based shops on the open internet and dark web, which is an encrypted portion of the web that can be accessed only through specialized browsers like TOR, starting in the early 2010s. These shops have their own web addresses and distinct branding to attract customers, and they work in the same way as other e-commerce stores. More recently, vendors of stolen data have also begun to operate on messaging platforms such as Telegram and Signal to quickly connect with customers. Cybercriminals and customers Many of the people who supply and operate the markets appear to be cybercriminals from Eastern Europe and Russia who steal data and then sell it to others. Markets have also been observed in Vietnam and other parts of the world, though they do not get the same visibility in the global cybersecurity landscape. The customers of stolen data markets may reside anywhere in the world, and their demands for specific data or services may drive data breaches and cybercrime to provide the supply. The goods Stolen data is usually available in individual lots, such as a person's credit or debit card and all the information associated with the account. These pieces are individually priced, with costs differing depending on the type of card, the victim's location and the amount of data available related to the affected account. Vendors frequently offer discounts and promotions to buyers to attract customers and keep them loyal. This is often done with credit or debit cards that are about to expire. Some vendors also offer distinct products such as credit reports, Social Security numbers and login details for different paid services. The price for pieces of information varies. A recent analysis found credit card data sold for $50 on average, while Walmart logins sold for $9. However, the pricing can vary widely across vendors and markets. Illicit payments Vendors typically accept payment through cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin that are difficult for law enforcement to trace. Once payment is received, the vendor releases the data to the customer. Customers take on a great deal of the risk in this market because they cannot go to the police or a market regulator to complain about a fraudulent sale. Vendors may send customers dead accounts that are unable to be used or give no data at all. Such scams are common in a market where buyers can depend only on signals of vendor trust to increase the odds that the data they purchase will be delivered, and if it is, that it pays off. If the data they buy is functional, they can use it to make fraudulent purchases or financial transactions for profit. The rate of return can be exceptional. An offender who buys 100 cards for $500 can recoup costs if only 20 of those cards are active and can be used to make an average purchase of $30. The result is that data breaches are likely to continue as long as there is demand for illicit, profitable data.
New York Times
a day ago
- New York Times
Defense cites ‘reliability concerns' of E.M. in first of closing arguments at Hockey Canada trial
LONDON, Ont. – Defense attorneys began delivering their closing arguments in the Hockey Canada sexual assault trial on Monday, attacking the complainant's testimony as containing a 'cornucopia of credibility and reliability concerns' and suggesting that she has re-tooled her narrative to present herself as a victim to evoke sympathy from friends and family and in pursuit of the civil lawsuit she settled in 2022. Advertisement Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dubé and Cal Foote are all charged with sexual assault after an alleged incident in June 2018. The complainant — a woman known as E.M., whose identity is protected by a publication ban — has said she was sexually assaulted over the span of several hours in a London, Ont., hotel room. The players were in town for a Hockey Canada event celebrating their gold medal at the 2018 World Junior Championship. McLeod is also facing a second charge for 'being a party to the offense' for what the Crown has asserted was his role 'assisting and encouraging his teammates to engage sexually' with E.M. All five players have pleaded not guilty. David Humphrey, attorney for McLeod, was the first defense attorney to make oral submissions in front of Justice Maria Carroccia in the eighth and final week of the trial. He pre-empted his argument by telling Carroccia that usually defense teams are 'happy to have a few hits' on the complainant, but this case has an abundance. 'This is a case where the defense has an embarrassment of riches,' Humphrey said. 'A cornucopia of credibility and reliability concerns in (E.M.'s) testimony.' E.M. testified that she met McLeod at a local bar, engaged in a night of drinking and dancing before the two went back to his hotel to have consensual sex. She said that following that initial sexual encounter, she emerged from the bathroom to find more men in the room. Over the course of several hours, she said she was pressured to perform sexual acts, spit on, slapped and asked to insert golf clubs and golf balls into her vagina. She described feeling scared and vulnerable and said that she went on 'autopilot' – dissociating to get through the night. Multiple players testified about a group text message they received from McLeod, inviting them for a '3 way quick' and supplying his room number, but said she initiated the sexual acts, asking players to have sex with her and goading them when they declined. Advertisement Humphrey said that E.M. is a 'flawed witness' whose testimony is 'unbelievable and unreliable.' She may have not wanted to acknowledge that she had a 'sexually adventurous' night in the hotel room, Humphrey said. He said that she didn't want to take responsibility for her actions and suggested that embarrassment and regret prompted her to tell a 'white lie' to her mother about what happened in the early-morning hours of June 19, 2018. Humphrey said that 'white lie' then snowballed into a criminal investigation. Humphrey seized on E.M.'s initial police interview in the days following the alleged incident and noted that she did not describe the fear she testified about when speaking with Detective Stephen Newton. (E.M. testified that at the time of that June 2018 interview with London Police, she was still processing what happened to her and felt uncomfortable talking about it with a male detective whom she had never met previously). Humphrey said that the element of fear was not sincere and instead invoked to support her $3.55 million lawsuit against Hockey Canada, which was resolved via an out-of-court settlement in 2022. 'Her new terror narrative that was advanced in the claim was scripted to remedy the deficiencies in the first narrative she had provided to Detective Newton,' Humphrey said. Justice Carroccia's first substantive remark of the day was to note the speed with which the Hockey Canada lawsuit was settled: 'Extremely quickly, frankly,' Carroccia said. 'I have never seen a settlement that takes place one month after the statement of claim is served.' In his submission, Humphrey addressed a few elements of his client's actions, including his initial interview with police in November 2018 and the two videos he referred to as 'consent videos.' Humphrey acknowledged that when McLeod was interviewed by police he did not detail the full contents of the text messages he sent to teammates, including the group chat message with an invitation for three-way sex and an invitation to another player offering a 'gummer,' which is slang for oral sex. Humphrey said he wasn't sure if McLeod just didn't remember the content of his texts or had not done a deep dive on the contents of his phone. He expressed disappointment that Newton did not ask further questions after McLeod disclosed he texted teammates that he was ordering food and had a girl in his room that night. Advertisement Humphrey said McLeod only invited a 'limited number' of players. (The 'gummer' text was sent to Taylor Raddysh. The '3 way' text was sent to a group chat of 19 players.) Humphrey argued that because the text describes a 'three-way' it wasn't reasonable to conclude he anticipated more than a few players taking him up on the invitation. 'He was surprised by the number of people who came,' Humphrey said. Humphrey said the two videos recorded in the early morning of June 19, 2018 are critical to McLeod's defense. In one of the videos, she says 'I'm OK' when asked if she's 'OK with this.' In the other, she says, 'It was all consensual.' E.M. has testified that she didn't recall those videos being recorded but said that she believes they were taken at the end of the night because she recalled McLeod hounding her to say the sexual acts were consensual. Humphrey said it was an 'unusual' and 'awkward' situation and that McLeod didn't know if E.M. would wake up the next morning to 'gloat' about what happened or with regret. He praised McLeod's presence of mind in memorializing what he described as evidence of her being 'happy' and fine with everything that was happening. 'He was drunk but he still had his head on straight and he wanted to make sure she was fully consenting,' Humphrey said. In his oral submission, Humphrey argued that the Crown had not met its burden of proof in proving the charges against his client beyond a reasonable doubt. He added that the alcohol consumption and passage of time that degraded the memory quality of many witnesses in the trial should leave the court with reasonable doubt. Humphrey also said that he wanted to explain, for those watching the proceedings less familiar with the law, that it was not the court's job to 'assess the morality of how the accused or others in the room were acting, whether they could have been better behaved or more respectful.' Advertisement 'Those issues may be of interest to the public, but they are not issues for assessment by the court,' Humphrey said. — The Athletic's Dan Robson reported remotely from Toronto and The Athletic's Kamila Hinkson reported remotely from Montreal. (Courtroom sketch of defense attorney David Humphrey from earlier in the trial by Alexandra Newbould / The Canadian Press via AP)
