Judge rules in favour of Harvard University keeping its international students
Harvard University on Thursday won a brief reprieve in its fight to continue enrolling international students after a federal judge upheld a block on a governmental order.
US district judge Allison Burroughs ruled to uphold the terms of a temporary restraining order (TRO), which froze the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) revocation of the university's student and exchange visitor programme (SEVP) certification programme, the process that enables universities to enrol foreigners, and preserved the status of international students.
The news came as Harvard's Class of 2025 was assembling for commencement exercises. The order grants relief to around 7,000 international students - a quarter of Harvard's student body - whose lives have been thrown into limbo over the last few weeks.
'Harvard will continue to take steps to protect the rights of our international students and scholars, members of our community who are vital to the University's academic mission and community - and whose presence here benefits our country immeasurably,' Harvard said in a public statement about Thursday's court decision.
Burroughs indicated that she will issue a longer-term hold while litigation continues. This would enable international students, staff, and faculty to continue to study and work at the Ivy League school. The TRO will stay in place until a broader injunction is agreed upon. The next hearing has yet to be scheduled.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Last Thursday, DHS told Harvard that its international students must either transfer to other institutions or face deportation, as its continued fight for academic autonomy faced another round of repercussions from the Trump administration.
Harvard sued in response, and last Friday, a judge temporarily blocked the DHS's revocation of the university's SEVP programme.
Trump administration backtracks
Before the order, the Trump administration appeared to waver on its initial decertification, potentially on procedural grounds.
The Department of Homeland Security said on Thursday it would now give Harvard University a 30-day response time to prove it meets the requirements of the SEVP programme.
After 30 days, the DHS could still revoke Harvard's SEVP certification if it still claims that Harvard broke the law, unless a preliminary injunction is granted.
The New York Times reported last week that the administration is poised to cut all remaining federal contracts with Harvard, which are estimated to be worth $100m.
The two sides have been in a legal war for months now.
The US State Department and DHS began cracking down on any pro-Palestinian sentiment expressed by student visa holders in the US after the nationwide campus protests in 2024 in support of Gaza.
At the end of March, the Trump administration announced it was reviewing $9bn in federal funds and grants to Harvard. It said it would review more than $255.6m in current contracts and $8.7bn in grants spread over multiple years.
The administration accused the university of failing to adequately protect Jewish students on campus from antisemitic discrimination and harassment, in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
'Are they troublemakers?': Trump questions why Harvard has so many international students Read More »
On 3 April, the Trump administration sent an initial list of demands to 'right these wrongs', as part of its crackdown on what it calls antisemitism on campuses across the US, referring to the widespread campus protests against Israel's war on Gaza.
Then, on 11 April, the Federal Task Force to Combat Antisemitism sent Harvard an expanded list of demands.
Harvard rejected the government's demands, which included reporting foreign students for code violations, reforming its governance and leadership, discontinuing its diversity, equity, and inclusion programmes, and changing its hiring and admission policies, especially for international students.
In response to the list of demands, the institution took a stand against the Trump administration, saying in a letter, issued by Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and King & Spalding LLP, that 'The university will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights'.
In response, the Trump administration hit Harvard with a $2.3bn federal funding freeze, which represents 35.9 percent of Harvard's $6.4bn operating expenses.
Then, the US Department of Health and Human Services said that it was terminating $60m in federal grants to the university, saying it failed to address antisemitic harassment and ethnic discrimination on campus.
The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based institution has said it 'cannot absorb the entire cost' of the frozen grants, and that it was working with researchers to help them find alternative funding. It is also suing the Trump administration over its decision to cut grants.
The Federal Task Force to Combat Antisemitism is made up of four government agencies, including the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, and the US General Services Administration.
The task force was set up in February following Trump's executive order, Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism, signed at the end of January.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Oman presents elements of US nuclear deal proposal to Iran
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said his Omani counterpart presented elements of a US proposal for a nuclear deal between Tehran and Washington during a short visit to Tehran on Saturday. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said later on Saturday that US President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff "has sent a detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime, and it's in their best interest to accept it". Araqchi said in a post on X that Iran "will respond to the US proposal in line with the principles, national interests and rights of people of Iran". His statement came ahead of an anticipated sixth round of talks between Washington and Tehran to resolve a decades-long dispute over Iran's nuclear programme. The date and venue of the talks have not been announced yet. "President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb,'" Leavitt said in a statement, confirming that the US proposal had been communicated to Iran. She declined to provide further details. Trump said on Friday that an Iran deal was possible in the "not-too-distant future". Earlier in the week, Trump told reporters he had recently warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to take actions that could disrupt nuclear talks with Iran. Those comments appeared to signal US concern that Israel might strike Iran's nuclear facilities while US diplomatic efforts were under way. Trump himself has repeatedly threatened to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities if diplomacy fails to achieve a deal. One of the main sticking points in the talks between US and Iranian officials has been US insistence that Iran give up its nuclear enrichment facilities, a demand Iran rejects. Trump, who has restored a "maximum pressure" campaign on Tehran since February, ditched a 2015 nuclear pact between Iran and six world powers in 2018 during his first term and reimposed crippling sanctions on Iran. In the intervening years, Tehran has steadily overstepped the 2015 agreement's limits on its nuclear programme, designed to make it harder to develop an atomic bomb. Tehran denies it is seeking a nuclear weapon.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Lebanon warns of dangerous deja vu as Israeli occupation and attacks continue
Moustafa Rizk was detained by the Israeli army for three days when he attempted to return to Houla, his village near the border with Israel, in late January. Under the terms of the November Lebanon-Israel ceasefire agreement, Israeli troops were supposed to withdraw from south Lebanon that day. Instead, Israeli forces remained in position, killing 22 Lebanese civilians attempting to return to their homes and arresting seven others, including Moustafa. The ceasefire, extended until mid-February, has long since expired. Yet Israeli troops still occupy five locations in south Lebanon – including an outpost near Houla that lies more than 100 metres inside Lebanon, beyond the UN-demarcated Blue Line between Israel and Lebanon. 'They're a two-minute drive away from my house,' Mr Rizk told The National bitterly. 'It was a residential area, not unused land. My uncle's house was there. But now they've blocked off the road. We can't access the area.' His anger echoes a broader frustration in Lebanon: the ceasefire required both an Israeli withdrawal and Hezbollah's disarmament. Yet while Hezbollah has largely stood down and allowed the Lebanese army to deploy in its place in southern Lebanon, Israel continues to occupy and bombard Lebanese territory. Hezbollah, once a powerful paramilitary force, is now constrained by a truce it cannot afford to break. The Lebanese army has so far dismantled more than 90 per cent of the group's military infrastructure south of the Litani River. Israel has refused to relinquish its foothold, undermining Lebanon's sovereignty. Defence Minister Yoav Gallant said Israeli forces will stay 'indefinitely'. It also continues to launch near-daily attacks, including on areas well north of the Litani, in what analysts say is a pressure campaign to force Lebanon to fully disarm Hezbollah. The US is also pressing Lebanon for a deadline to completely disarm not only Hezbollah but allied militias across the country – a demand Lebanese leaders say cannot happen under fire. 'We're trying to 'convince' the American administration of our point of view over how to deal with this [disarmament] in the most pragmatic and reasonable way,' a political source close to talks with the US and Hezbollah told The National. 'We are trying to explain that there are limits to pushing in Lebanon.' Hezbollah has shown co-operation with the Lebanese army in handing its weapons and military sites south of the Litani. Military sources told The National that the army is absorbing viable Hezbollah weapons and ammunition. But Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem has refused to consider the group's complete disarmament while Israel continues to launch attacks. "Does anyone expect us to discuss a national defence strategy as warplanes fly over our heads and there is occupation in south Lebanon," Mr Qassem asked in an April speech. "Let Israel withdraw first." Former intelligence chief Abbas Ibrahim, who maintains ties with both the US and Hezbollah, doubts diplomacy alone can shift Israel's stance. 'At the political level, Lebanon has taken a decision to use diplomatic channels. It's not because we're generous – it's because we don't have the [military] capability to deter Israel,' he told The National. For now, Lebanese officials can do little more than accuse Israel of violating Lebanon's sovereignty. But many fear that this fragile moment mirrors a dark chapter of the country's past. The end of the Israel-Hezbollah war was a decisive defeat for Hezbollah that ruptured a years-long power struggle in Lebanon between pro-Iran players and the pro-Western bloc. Hezbollah's waning political and military dominance has exposed Lebanon to unchallenged American and Israeli pressure. Suddenly, after years of state paralysis, the country had a new President, new Prime Minister, and a fully empowered cabinet. President Joseph Aoun, formerly the head of the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF), has committed to disarming non-state actors, but not at the expense of national stability. Yet US policy risks undercutting that goal. Analysts, military officials, and political insiders familiar with continuing talks with Washington told The National that American pressure to disarm Hezbollah fails to consider Lebanon's complicated history. With the LAF chronically underfunded and under-equipped, officials warn that fully disarming Hezbollah and allied militias while Lebanon endures daily Israeli attacks and a military occupation could deepen instability and provoke renewed conflict. 'The [US] needs to understand Lebanon's history, and they have to trust how we can achieve the goal of restoring sovereignty and stability,' the political source close to the talks said. Grim history Lebanon's history is littered with failed foreign-led disarmament efforts. In 1982, following a series of cross-border clashes with the Palestine Liberation Organisation – which was operating in southern Lebanon and Beirut as a state-within-a-state – Israel invaded Lebanon and besieged Beirut. Under a US-brokered deal, the PLO was forced to disarm. Just weeks later, one of the deadliest massacres of Lebanon's 15-year civil war unfolded, when Israeli forces facilitated the Christian Phalangist militia's slaughter of more than 1,200 civilians in the Shatila refugee camp for Palestinians. Israel withdrew from Beirut shortly after, and another US-brokered 1983 agreement promised full Israeli withdrawal pending the Lebanese army's deployment throughout the country. But the Lebanese army was too fractured to enforce it. Instead, Israel maintained its occupation of south Lebanon until the year 2000, when it was forced to withdraw following guerrilla resistance from Hezbollah – itself born from the 1982 Israeli invasion. Today, on the heels of yet another war, Lebanese leaders are warning the US and Israel not to make the same mistake again. Lebanese officials have already reached an agreement with the Palestinian Authority to disarm factions – among them Hezbollah ally Hamas – and allow the Lebanese state to extend its control into Lebanon's Palestinian refugee camps. And with Hezbollah largely dismantled in the south, the Lebanese army is preparing to extend its control north of the Litani River. How that happens will be decisive. The LAF's Limits Since taking office, Mr Aoun has actively campaigned to bolster Lebanon's national army. To do that, the LAF needs funding, equipment and sustained foreign support. But it also needs strength, according to retired general Mounir Shehadeh, who previously led the Lebanese government's co-ordination with Unifil, the UN peacekeeping force between Lebanon and Israel. 'The Lebanese army does not have the kind of weapons necessary to defend itself from or even deter external threats,' he said. 'Even if it had the finances, the army wouldn't be allowed to have weapons that could break the current balance of power.' The LAF was not involved in the conflict between Hezbollah and Israel. Still, 'during the war, Israel deliberately attacked clearly visible Lebanese army positions,' he added. Two soldiers have been killed since the ceasefire, and over 40 others were killed during the war, according to Lebanese security sources. Active military occupation US envoy Morgan Ortagus is expected in Beirut in June to push for an accelerated timeline for disarming Hezbollah and its allies, illustrating the disconnect between US policy and Lebanon's political reality. Avoiding a repetition of history will require convincing the US to pressure Israel into withdrawing and halting its attacks on Lebanon – including three on Beirut since the ceasefire. 'If Israel continues to strike, for example, Beirut, it will be impossible to proceed with reforms,' said the Lebanese political source. 'It would be as if they're trying to topple the new government.' Maj Gen Ibrahim put it more bluntly: 'The Americans are reading the situation badly. First, you have to free the country from [Israeli] occupation. After that, you can oblige Hezbollah to disarm,' he told The National. He warned that Israel's continued presence 'legitimises Hezbollah's claim that resistance is necessary'. 'There is no way to solve any problem in Lebanon by force. Our history proves that. And if we can't learn from history, then nothing will ever teach us.' 'What sovereignty?' When Mr Rizk finally returned to Houla, he found his home – and most of the village – destroyed. He scoffs at the notion that the army's presence guarantees sovereignty when an Israeli military outpost sits less than two kilometres away. 'What sovereignty?' he asked. 'When they put soldiers on the border, but they don't have the power to deter attacks? When Israeli missiles strike wherever they want, where's the sovereignty? A sovereignty of prostration and subservience?' His frustration illustrates what Lebanese leaders are warning their Western counterparts. 'As long as there's occupation, there will be resistance,' he said. 'The resistance isn't about Hezbollah or any political party. It comes from the people. We're the people.'
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Gaza shelters reimagined as memorials and study spaces at Venice Architecture Biennale
Stairwells often take on a new function during war and natural disasters. These in-between spaces – typically designed to merely connect one floor to another – become something else entirely in moments of crisis. Structurally resilient and tucked away from exposed facades, they serve as improvised shelters where people gather in hope, fear and resilience. Their mundane utility is transformed. In the face of destruction, stairwells become spaces where life clings on. Time Reclaiming Structures, a project by Dima Srouji and Piero Tomassoni that is being highlighted at Venice Architecture Biennale, draws inspiration from these spaces to create a series of structures that are as much a dedication to Gaza 's heritage as they are shelters, study spaces and memorials. Stairs are a central component of their design. 'Anyone that has experienced war will have this intimate relationship with the architecture of a staircase,' Srouji says. 'What's interesting about it is that the form of a staircase is not exactly what saves you. It's more the intimacy, the magic that starts to happen in that space during hours of shelter where you're reading under the staircase with your dad, or doing your homework.' Gaza Shelters, the first iteration of Time Reclaiming Structures, reflects these nuances. At first glance, the structures proposed in the project initially seem simple in their design. Rectangular in shape, comprising no more than four walls and a roof, they are adjoined by a moveable staircase. Yet, the central structures as well as their staircases have been designed with more than one purpose. The structures are each dedicated to a branch of knowledge that are threatened by Israel's attack on Gaza. These include spiritual, medical, environmental, artisanal, architectural, culinary studies. The roofs of these rectangular structures are engraved with heritage sites in the Palestinian enclave. The ceilings underneath feature the topographies of the Strip's natural terrains. The walls display artefacts, archeological finds, photographs and objects reflecting the purpose of the structure. The stairs also function as a library and study space. 'Each one focuses on a different branch of knowledge,' Srouji says. She offers the one dedicated to the medical as an example, saying it is 'one of the most urgent spheres to think about.' The proposed structure would contain films about Dr Ghassan Abu-Sittah, the Palestinian surgeon who has repeatedly travelled to his homeland from the UK to help those affected by the cyclical Israeli onslaught. It would also include research by US academic Jasbir Puar, whose work delves into the maiming of Palestinian men and the use of prosthetics. 'You'll also see work on the history of gauze, because it was first invented in Gaza and the word gauze is actually derived from Gaza,' Srouji says. Meanwhile, the heritage sites engraved on the roofs, and which are viewable by climbing the stairs, are informed by Srouji's own work in archeological sites in collaboration with The Palestinian Museum. Highlighted sites include the Great Omari Mosque, Byzantine Church of Jabalia, the Church of Saint Porphyrius, all of which have been damaged or destroyed by Israeli air strikes. 'It also includes some of the tunnel structures as well and which are archaeological features,' Srouji says. 'People don't realise this, but there's the St Helena Tunnel that is 4000 years old. It used to connect downtown central Gaza to historic Gaza to the coast. The tunnels are also archeological heritage sites. They're not just sites of resistance.' Time Reclaiming Structures was inspired both by the biennale's theme of collective knowledge, as well as global geopolitical realities – chief among them the war in Gaza. The structures make a profound argument about memory, attention and empathy in the age of crisis. The spaces that come as part of the project are not meant to only reclaim heritage sites, but also time. 'The title was probably the hardest part of the project for us,' Srouji says. 'Trying to configure, not just what's happening in Gaza in terms of genocide, but also other things the world is dealing with today can be a point of empathy and solidarity for Palestine. That's where Piero's research comes in, in terms of slowing down time, and brings some capacity for empathy.' 'Humans are now in a condition of almost inability to take the necessary time to understand the history that they are living,' Tomassoni adds. 'Because there is no time for the deep thinking that is required to elaborate a philosophical or historical understanding of the past but also of the present. If we lose that then we are not going to be able to resolve any of our problems.' This is how the idea behind Time Reclaiming Structured emerged, aiming to create forms that act as shelters as well as contemplative spaces – places that protect, isolate and allow for reflection amid chaos. 'It can be applied to Gaza right now but also a number of other places,' Tomassoni says. 'The structure is partially monumental when seen from outside. But then when you go inside, it becomes small gallery, museum or chapel.' Srouji and Tomassoni were initially aiming to build three of the structures for the Venice Biennale, however when they found out the Arsenale was the only space that would be showcasing projects unaffiliated with National Pavilions, they knew they wouldn't have the opportunity to build any of them for the event. Instead, they decided to feature all the structures as renders within the Arsenale exhibition space. However, the duo are still keen on developing the project and building them in stone, preferably limestone, given its connotations to Palestine. 'We see this as the first iteration of Time Reclaiming Structures, which could go in many directions' Tomassoni says. 'It could also be the first step to building a Palestinian Pavilion, for example.'
