
A1 Northumberland: Homes 'left to rot' on cancelled road route
In October 2024 the government announced it was cancelling a project to widen part of the A1 in Northumberland, years after National Highways had spent more than £4m on the purchase of houses and land in the way of the scheme. The affected families - including one couple who had to start afresh miles away in Cumbria - said they had "been through hell" as they saw their properties "left to rot" unnecessarily.Melanie Wensby-Scott sat in her car and cried on the day she and her husband left Northgate House, which sits right next to the road not far from Morpeth.The couple had been packing up the last of their belongings and she was still running the vacuum cleaner around when National Highways contractors arrived."They started boarding up the windows and changing the locks," she said. "I honestly felt like we were being evicted."
Melanie and her husband Julian had had "big plans" when they bought the house in 2009. "We put in a new kitchen, new bathrooms, we were planning a new conservatory and we had no intention of ever leaving," she said.But in 2014, the then Prime Minister David Cameron announced plans to dual a 13-mile section of the A1 and it became clear their house was in the path of the chosen route. "When they first came round I said I didn't want to move and they basically said I had no option," said Mrs Wensby-Scott."It was just awful to know you were going to lose your home."
The A1 scheme stalled for a few years, alternating between ready to start and still on hold until, in May 2024, Rishi Sunak's government approved the Development Consent Order which gave the final go-ahead. However, Labour swept back into power two months later and cancelled the project in October 2024, stating it had to make "difficult decisions about road schemes which were unfunded or unaffordable". Mrs Wensby-Scott said: "When I heard the news, I just thought 'oh my God all that for nothing'."Everything we went through, the heartache, the angst, I just couldn't believe it. "You drive past now and it's falling apart, it just looks awful. It's such a shame, it was such a beautiful house."
At the other end of the proposed route, Felicity and James Hester were living in East Cottage near the village of Rock.It was a "perfect place" for them because it had a paddock and stabling for their horses, but they soon realised the bulldozers were heading their way. "It was just horrible," Mrs Hester said. "We went through four or five years of utter hell trying to find somewhere we could actually move to, it was just a nightmare. "The way the property market was at the time in Northumberland, we couldn't find anything which matched what we had so we had to move to Cumbria."Now we're a couple of hours away from all the friends we had."
Next to East Cottage is Charlton Mires, a large 200-year-old farmhouse and steadings that had been the home of the Beal family since 1904, but would also need to be flattened for road building. Martin Beal described its loss as "very painful". "I felt like I'd let my family down somehow because I couldn't save our home," he said. "There are just so many memories in there."They were also taking part of our land, so I couldn't plan ahead. I had sleepless nights, it was very hard."
A freedom of information request by the BBC revealed that more than £68m had already been spent on the A1 scheme by the time it was cancelled, and that figure continues to rise by just under £30,000 a month. That is partly because National Highways is obliged to pay insurance and council tax on the unneeded properties, including an empty house premium.
Land agent Louis Fell, who represented the Hester and Beal families, described the situation as "a mess"He said: "I know National Highways didn't make the decision to cancel the road, but they need to have a strategy for the properties, perhaps consider refurbishing them and renting them to young families."For them just to sit here rotting is such a waste of money and it's not a good look for an area popular with tourists."
National Highways previously said it was "sympathetic" to Mr Beal's situation after delays to payments for his property.In a statement, it said: "We carefully review expenditure on all our projects to ensure that lessons are learned and processes are improved for any future road improvement schemes."Discussions surrounding the future of the homes purchased as part of this scheme remain ongoing and will be communicated in due course. "The properties are being managed by our estates team until a strategy is agreed."During this time, the properties will be secured by our maintenance contractor and inspected on an appropriate basis."
Under what are known as the Crichel Down rules, in situations like this the properties should be offered back to the owners, but all three families say they do not wish to go back to homes which have been empty for several years. Martin Beal said his former home was "full of damp and falling apart". He now has permission to build a new farmhouse nearby but when it is built, because it is a direct replacement for Charlton Mires, planning arrangements mean the original farmhouse has to be demolished at a cost to the taxpayer of an estimated £100,000. "It has been there for 200 years, it's a beautiful house. It is just ridiculous it has to be demolished for nothing," Mr Beal lamented."I'm just so angry about everything my parents and I have been through, and all those millions of pounds wasted for what?"
Follow BBC North East on X and Facebook and BBC Cumbria on X and Facebook and both on Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: The victims of the Liverpool parade horror - after number of fans hurt rose to 109
Four people who were injured after a car was driven into crowds at Liverpool's Premier League victory parade can today be named following the lifting of reporting restrictions. Paul Doyle, 53, of West Derby, Liverpool, has been charged with seven offences in connection with the crash, which took place on Water Street at around 6pm on May 26 when a Ford Galaxy ploughed through hundreds of pedestrians. He is accused of the unlawful wounding with intent of Simon Nash, 52, causing grievous bodily harm (GBH) with intent to Susan Passey, 77, and Christine Seeckts, 66, and the attempted GBH of Ethan Gillard, 18. An order preventing publication of their identities was put in place when Doyle first appeared before Liverpool Magistrates' Court on Friday. Recorder of Liverpool Judge Andrew Menary KC today lifted those restrictions, which had been made under Section 46 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. Doyle is charged with another count of wounding with intent and a second count of attempted GBH, which both relate to children, for whom reporting restrictions remain in place. He is also charged with dangerous driving after being alleged to have driven his car dangerously on roads between his home address in Burghill Road and Water Street. Doyle was not required to attend today's court hearing. On Friday, Doyle appeared before magistrates in the morning, before a crown court appearance in the afternoon. Judge Menary fixed a trial date for November 24 and remanded the defendant in custody ahead of a plea hearing on August 14. Merseyside Police said yesterday that the number of people reported injured after the incident had risen to 109. Four people remained in hospital. Detectives are continuing to appeal for witnesses as they investigate the full circumstances of the Water Street horror. They have received more than 500 submissions to the public information portal set up in the wake of the incident. Detective Superintendent Rachel Wilson said: 'This is a complex and constantly evolving investigation and we are still working through and assessing those reporting being injured and our enquiries remain ongoing. 'I would continue to appeal for anyone who has information and is yet to come forward to please get in touch as a matter of urgency.' The public information portal can be accessed here.


BBC News
11 minutes ago
- BBC News
Kirby announces England retirement before Euros
England attacking midfielder Fran Kirby has announced her retirement from international football with immediate effect before the European an exclusive interview with BBC Sport, Kirby says she is leaving the international scene with her "head held high".The Brighton player, who has 77 caps for the Lionesses, has been a key figure for England for more than a was named in Sarina Weigman's squad for the Uefa Nations League matches against Portugal and Spain but was informed she would not be selected for the Euros starting on 2 her first interview after announcing her retirement, Kirby said: "It is something I have been thinking about for over a year. I knew this was going to be my last major tournament."The plan was to retire after the Euros but after speaking to Sarina I'm not going to make the squad."It was like a dagger to my heart but also a weight off my shoulders all at the same time. It was emotional for both of us but we both respected what each person was saying." The news comes just days after goalkeeper Mary Earps also retired from international football before England attempt to defend their Euros 31, is understood to have informed her England team-mates of the decision after Tuesday's clash against Spain in last England appearance was as a second-half substitute in the 6-0 win over Portugal. She was not named in the matchday squad against former Chelsea player, who is a two-time PFA Women's Footballer of the Year winner, is one of the most recognisable female players in the won seven Women's Super League (WSL) titles and five Women's FA Cup trophies at Chelsea, but she is best remembered for playing a key role in England's historic Euro 2022 started all six of England's games in the tournament, scoring twice, as Wiegman's side lifted the trophy with victory over Germany at Wembley."When I woke up in the morning after telling Sarina, I didn't feel any regret," added Kirby. "That's when I knew I'd made the right decision."I've been on this team for a long time, it's not going to be a shock that it was coming to an end."You get to a certain age and there are some really good youngsters that are coming through." Kirby, who started her career at Reading, scored seven goals in 17 WSL appearances this season as Brighton finished fifth."I've put everything into this and feel like I have had a good domestic year," she said."I've fought hard to be in the Euros squad but unfortunately that's not enough."Kirby has battled with injury issues and illness throughout her career, struggling with fatigue in the build-up to Euro 2022 and missing the 2023 World Cup with a knee injury that required surgery."Everyone knows the injuries that I've had and I've been protecting my body," she said."This is part of that. But I feel like I've got so much to give in football. I'm already looking forward to the domestic season." Kirby's full retirement statement After being in the England team since I was 21, it's time to close that chapter of my life. I didn't ever want this day to come, but I cannot tell you how proud I am it been the biggest honour to represent my country, one that I had only dreamt about as a young girl.I've played with some incredible players, worked with some incredible managers, played in some amazing tournaments and have irreplaceable journey has been full of ups and downs, setbacks and achievements. Enough has been said and written about those, but regardless of whatever was thrown at me, I want you all to know that every time I put on that England badge I gave it 100%.Every single call-up, I accepted my role and did whatever was needed for the team. I wanted England to win. I've always been there to help England mum had a dream of me representing my country and I'm so proud I was able to do that and play in front of you all.I will never, ever forget the noise when my name is read out at a stadium. I was first selected when I was playing in WSL 2, I played a part in the game-changing World Cup, wininng bronze in 2015, creating memories of a in every game and winning the Euros in 2022 was a dream come true, to be part of change in women's football was one of the best experiences I could ever have you to all of you for embracing me as a young girl from Reading who had a dream. I hope you all know that wearing that badge was the greatest every young girl that suffers setbacks, just remember you can. You can. Forever a Lioness, Fran.


Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Abusive mother of double amputee Tony Hudgell to be released from prison
A mother who abused her six-week-old son so severely he lost his legs is to be freed from prison. The Parole Board has ruled that Jody Simpson, who caused Tony Hudgell near-fatal injuries, can be released. The board said her imprisonment was 'no longer necessary for the protection of the public' after she had engaged with rehabilitation schemes in jail. Simpson and her partner Tony Smith, birth parents to Tony, were sentenced to 10 years in prison in February 2018 after inflicting multiple fractures, dislocations and blunt trauma to Tony's face. The boy was left untreated and in agony for 10 days. In recent years, Tony, who was adopted by Mark and Paula Hudgell, has raised £1.8 million for charity, most of which came during the Covid pandemic, when he walked 10km (6.2 miles) on his prosthetic legs. Simpson was initially let out in February this year at an automatic release point but was sent back to jail in May, after breaking her licence conditions by having 'a relationship with a convicted sex offender'. The Parole Board said she had 'engaged with art psychotherapy…and victim awareness work.' It said her behaviour in prison had been 'without issue'. In its judgment, it said: The panel noted Ms Simpson had done well for many months on licence prior to her developing an unwise relationship. However, it accepted that she now fully understands the risky situation she created for herself and the need for her to be open about her life with her probation officer. 'After considering the circumstances of her offending and time on licence, the progress made while in custody and the evidence presented at the hearing, the panel was satisfied that imprisonment was no longer necessary for the protection of the public.' Under the terms of her release licence, she will have to stay at a designated address and 'to be of good behaviour, to disclose developing relationships, and to report as required for supervision or other appointments.' She will also be subject to enhanced supervision or monitoring including drug testing, GPS tagging, signing-in times and a specified curfew. She will also only be allowed to meet designated contacts, be subject to an exclusion zone to avoid contact with victims and face restriction on her use of computers and the internet.