Among all Israel's targets in Iran, the strikes at Evin Prison left some people 'in disbelief'
Interrogations. Torture. Mock executions.
Accounts from inside Iran's Evin Prison are as harrowing as they are rare — many of those locked up inside never make it out.
The notorious facility, on the outskirts of the country's capital Tehran, is used to house political prisoners who dare show dissent to the country's Islamist regime.
In the final days of its war with Iran, Israel used fighter jets to bomb the jail, with the country's top politicians spinning the June 23 attack as a symbolic blow against its arch enemy.
Yesterday, Asghar Jahangir, a spokesperson for Iran's judiciary, was quoted in the country's Mizan news outlet as saying 71 people had been killed in the attack.
He said the number included "administrative staff, youth doing their military service, detainees, family members of detainees who were visiting them and neighbours who lived in the prison's vicinity".
Analysts interpreted the strikes as a clear sign Israel had expanded its targets from just military and nuclear facilities.
Anoosheh Ashoori, a British-Iranian engineer, was held in Evin prison from August 2017 to March 2022, after being accused of espionage.
He said he was abducted in the street while back in Iran to visit his mother after she had a knee operation.
He was bundled into a car, and his ordeal had begun.
"They blindfolded me and they ordered me to put my head on the lap of the person sitting next to my left," he said.
"After a while I could hear the traffic, the sound of the traffic fading."
Mr Ahoori was taken to Evin Prison.
Mr Ahoori said he was kept in solitary confinement, given "foul food", and prevented from sleeping, with a floodlight shined on his head.
"It was so frightening," he said.
"My days were in that 2 metre by 3 metre cell, with the sound of a malfunctioning air conditioning unit together with hearing all the sounds of crying, begging, whimpering of the others in the neighbouring cells."
During his time in Evin Prison, Mr Ashoori said he spent 116 days at two interrogation centres, including one run by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
"The pressure was so much and the threats to kill my family members were so real," he said.
"After a while of sleep deprivation, long hours of interrogation, I mean, you just name it and it's happening to you."
A video shared by Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar on social media showed an entrance to the compound blown apart and the accompanying text: "Long live freedom, damn it!"
However, doubt has now been cast over that footage, with experts telling ABC News Verify it could be AI-generated.
That doesn't mean the jail wasn't hit, though.
Last week, Defence Minister Israel Katz said the air force was striking "regime targets and agencies of government repression" across Tehran, including Evin Prison.
Video broadcast on Iranian state television showed widespread destruction outside the facility, and emergency services carrying an injured man from the scene on a stretcher.
The jail was built about 50 years ago and has gained notoriety since Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution.
It now houses thousands of protesters, journalists, people accused of espionage, activists and academics.
Human rights organisations have decried the number of inmates in Evin accused of arbitrary catch-all offences like "enmity against God" and "corruption on earth".
Both are punishable by death and are used by Iran's regime as judicial trump cards to arrest dissidents.
Australian academic Kylie Moore-Gilbert, who was arrested while attending a conference in Iran, spent more than two years in the jail on charges of espionage.
She was eventually released in 2020 as part of a prisoner swap.
The Australian government described the allegations against her as "baseless".
Last week, she took to social media to post a video of Israel's strike on the facility and wrote: "Every single person who has ever passed under these gates, or has been forced to stand outside them to film the regime's propaganda, will be staring in disbelief at these scenes."
The anti-regime group Edaalate Ali hacked Evin Prison's CCTV cameras in 2021 and leaked the footage to expose human rights abuses taking place behind its walls.
In a post on the encrypted messaging service Telegram after Israel's attack, the organisation claimed Iranian authorities were trying to stop friends and relatives of people locked inside the jail from accessing the area.
"Let's break the chains of captivity together and free political prisoners," it wrote in one update, before encouraging people to head to the compound and help the inmates escape.
The footage it leaked made international headlines, and documented inmates being sexually harassed and beaten, as well as overcrowded cells and incidents of self-harm.
The videos were so shocking, even Iran's top prisons official, Mohammad Mehdi Haj Mohammadi, described the behaviour they uncovered as "unacceptable".
Amnesty International has documented multiple types of torture used at Evin Prison, including "floggings, electric shocks, mock executions, waterboarding, sexual violence, suspension, force-feeding of chemical substances, and deliberate deprivation of medical care".
Iranian-Kurdish rapper Saman Yasin was incarcerated at the facility for two years for taking part in Iran's 2022 uprising.
He has since detailed a "mock execution" he was subjected to, in which he was taken to a set of gallows and read his last rights.
"I was under that noose for about 15 minutes, I think," he told CNN earlier this year.
"I could tell that they had brought in a cleric, and he was reciting the Quran over my head … and he kept telling me: 'Repent, so that you go to heaven'."
One man, who was born in the jail, has told the ABC about visiting his parents there as a child.
He said he remembered an "ugly green hallway" and being interrogated by guards before entering.
Iranian officials have this month encouraged the country's judiciary to expedite trials for anyone accused of "collaborating" with Israel — something that would result in execution.
Israel's decision to bomb the jail has been criticised by the sister of one of its inmates.
French woman Neomie Kohler, whose sibling Cecile and her partner Jacques Paris have been incarcerated at Evin Prison since May 2022 on spying charges they deny, said the IDF's attack put innocent people "in mortal danger".
"This strike is completely irresponsible," she told the AFP news agency, adding: "This is really the worst thing that could have happened.
"We have no news, we don't know if they are still alive. We're panicking,"
Amit Segal, the chief political analyst for Israel's Channel 12 news, said in a post on social media that the strike on Evin Prison meant Benjamin Netanyahu's government "appears to be flirting with regime change" in Iran.
"This is an escalation by Israel, as it is now targeting not just Iranian military sites, but also Iranian institutions that oppress their own people — and don't directly affect Israel," he wrote.
Governments in both Israel and the US repeatedly claimed during the 12-day war that they were not trying to affect the downfall of Iran's government and its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Although US President Donald Trump did take to social media during the fighting to ask "if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why couldn't there be a Regime change???"
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Head of nuclear agency concedes he ‘doesn't know' whether Iran's nuclear material remains intact
The head of the international agency responsible for monitoring Iran's nuclear development has made a troubling admission, conceding he 'doesn't know' whether the country managed to move its stockpile of enriched uranium to safety before the American strikes. Rafael Grossi is Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Today he spoke to Face the Nation, a current affairs program on CBS News in the United States. 'People here are looking for clarity, and there's confusion,' host Margaret Brennan said. 'The Defence Intelligence Agency assesses that Iran's program was set back by a few months, but once they dig out they could resume in a number of months. 'The CIA and the Director of National Intelligence (Trump appointee Tusli Gabbard) say the facilities were destroyed and it would take years to rebuild. 'Israel says the military program is set back by many years. 'What's the truth here? What do you make of these assessments?' Ms Brennan could have also cited President Donald Trump himself, who claimed in the immediate aftermath of the strikes that Iran's nuclear sites had been 'obliterated'. Or Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who said 'Iran's nuclear ambitions have been obliterated'. Or White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, who said the strikes 'took away Iran's ability to create a nuclear bomb'. 'You know what? This hourglass approach, with weapons of mass destruction, is not a good idea,' Mr Grossi said. 'All of that depends on your metrics. If you tell me it will take them two months or three months – for what? 'The capacities they have are there. They can have, in a matter of months I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium. Or less than that. 'But frankly, one cannot say that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there. Because first of all, it is clear that there has been severe damage, but it is not total damage. But Iran has the capacities there, industrial and technological capacities. 'If they wish, they will be able to start doing this again.' He did concede that Iran's 'protective measures' ahead of the American strikes could have included the 'movement of materials', as suggested by a series of satellite images from the days beforehand, which showed trucks leaving the Fordow nuclear facility. 'We don't know. We saw the same images that the whole world has seen,' Mr Grossi said, referring to those satellite images. The fear, here, is that Iran managed to move its stores of highly enriched uranium to safety. Ms Brennan noted that Iran possessed 'just under 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium' before Israel and the United States launched their attacks. 'Do you have any idea where that was moved, and if it was moved before the attack?' Ms Brennan asked. 'We presume, and I think it's logical to presume, that when they announced they were going to be taking protective measures, this could be part of it,' said Mr Grossi. 'But we don't know where this material could be, or whether part of it could have been under attack during those 12 days. 'Some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved. 'There has to be, at some point, a verification. If we don't get that verification, this will continue to hang over our heads as a problem.' Ms Brennan said she was probing at the 'open question' of whether Iran 'could sprint towards a bomb'. 'If we don't know where the highly enriched uranium is, and cannot account for all the centrifuges, is that still a risk?' she asked. 'We don't want to be alarmist here, and I don't want to be part of a messaging that would be spreading alarm,' said Mr Grossi. 'But we need to be in a position to confirm what is there, and where is it, and what happened. Iran had a very vast, ambitious program. Part of it may still be there. And if not, there is also the self-evident truth that the knowledge is there. The industrial capacity is there. Iran is a very sophisticated country, in terms of nuclear technology. 'You can't disinvent this.' He stressed that 'we are not going to solve this in a definitive way militarily'. 'You are going to (have to have) an agreement, and an inspection system,' he said. Mr Grossi's point, repeated throughout the interview, was that Iran likely retains the capacity to develop nuclear weapons, despite the damage caused by America's attack. 'There is an agreement in describing this as a very serious level of damage. It can be described in different ways, but at facilities where Iran used to have capabilities in treatment and enrichment of uranium, (that has) been destroyed to an important degree. Some is still standing,' he said. 'So there is, of course, an important setback in terms of those capabilities. This is clear. Now the important issue is, what are the next steps? 'I think we have a snapshot of a program that has been very seriously damaged, and now what we need to focus on is the next steps.' He said he 'wholeheartedly' supports Trump envoy Steve Witkoff's attempts to reach a negotiated deal with Iran, but 'it's not going to be easy' in the aftermath of the strikes. Ms Brennan pointed out that Iran's parliament just passed a law saying it would not be co-operating with the IAEA, and the country's Foreign Minister had specifically said Mr Grossi would be barred from entering the country. 'This is why it's so important that we sit down around the table,' said Mr Grossi. 'Iran is party to the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. That implies that they need to work with the agency. 'So we have been going through this law they approved, and we see that they are talking about co-operation on the basis of the security and the safety of their sites. I think that is not incompatible with the inspection work that needs to take place. 'At the end of the day, this whole thing, will have to have a long-term solution.' Pressed on whether Iran was kicking out IAEA inspectors, Mr Grossi hinted the answer was no, though he did not say as much directly. 'An international treaty takes precedence. You cannot invoke an internal law to not abide with an international law,' he said. 'I think we have to go down into the details, because the work will have to continue. Otherwise nobody will have an idea of what is happening in Iran. Iran will continue with a nuclear program, the contours of which are yet to be seen.'
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Trump vows to find intelligence leaker
Donald Trump has signalled a possible showdown with the press over a leaked intelligence report into the impact of the US strikes on Iran. The President says authorities could attempt to force reporters to give up their sources.
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Iran could resume enriching uranium within months, UN nuclear watchdog boss says
Iran could resume producing enriched uranium in months, according to comments made by the head of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog that have raised more doubts about the efficacy of US strikes on Tehran's nuclear program. Officials in the United States have repeatedly stated that the strikes on Iran's Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities "obliterated" them, although President Donald Trump said on Friday that he would consider bombing the Middle Eastern nation again if it was enriching uranium to worrisome levels. Rafael Grossi, the director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told CBS News in an interview on Sunday that Iran's capabilities to resolve any damage to its nuclear program do not appear to have been wiped out. "The capacities they have are there. They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that," he said. US officials also obtained an intercepted phone call between Iranian officials appearing to suggest the government in Tehran believes the US strikes were less devastating than expected, according to a report from The Washington Post. In an interview on Sunday local time, Mr Trump also suggested that his government would look to investigate and potentially prosecute individuals found responsible for leaking an internal, preliminary classified report that cast doubt on how successful the US strikes in Iran were. "They should be prosecuted. The people who leaked it," the president said on the Fox News US. "We can find out. If they wanted, they could find out easily. "You go up and tell the reporter: 'National security, who gave it?' You have to do that, and I'll suspect we'll be doing things like that." Mr Trump's interview with Fox aired as his "Big Beautiful Bill" cleared a procedural hurdle in the US Senate, before it entered a 10-hour debate process. The US strikes came after Israel said this month it wanted to remove any chance of Iran developing nuclear weapons, launching its own attacks on Tehran that ignited a 12-day war between the two countries. Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only. Mr Grossi said the US strikes on the three Iranian sites had significantly set back Iran's ability to convert and enrich uranium. Western powers, however, have stressed that Iran's nuclear advances provide it with an irreversible knowledge gain, suggesting that while losing experts or facilities may slow progress, the advances were permanent. "Iran is a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology," Mr Grossi said. "So, you cannot disinvent this. You cannot undo the knowledge that you have or the capacities that you have." Mr Grossi was also asked about reports of Iran moving its stock of highly enriched uranium in the run-up to the US strikes and said it was not clear where that material was. "Some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved," he said. On Friday, Mr Trump scoffed at Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's heated warning to the US not to launch future strikes on Iran, as well as the Iranian supreme leader's assertion that Tehran 'won the war" with Israel. Mr Trump said the ayatollah's comments defied reality after 12 days of Israeli strikes and the US bombardment, and the US president suggested the comments were unbecoming of Iran's most powerful political and religious figure. "Look, you're a man of great faith. A man who's highly respected in his country. You have to tell the truth," Mr Trump said. "You got beat to hell." Mr Trump also told reporters at the White House that he expected Iran to open itself to international inspection to verify that it does not restart its nuclear program. Asked if he would demand during expected talks with Iran that the IAEA or some other organisation be authorised to conduct inspections, Mr Trump said Iran would have to cooperate with the group "or somebody that we respect, including ourselves". Wires
