Indonesia backs climate deals after envoy's Paris skepticism
Indonesia's environment ministry has backed Jakarta's participation in the landmark Paris climate deal after the country's climate envoy suggested the agreement was irrelevant given Washington's withdrawal.
Indonesia's special envoy for climate change and energy, Hashim Djojohadikusumo, last week questioned why his country should continue participating in the deal to limit warming after President Donald Trump again withdrew from it.
"If the United States does not want to comply with the international agreement, why should a country like Indonesia comply with it?" he said, calling the issue "a matter of justice."
Hashim's office did not respond to requests for comment on the remarks.
But in a statement to AFP, the environment ministry backed the climate deal.
Indonesia "needs to demonstrate its commitment to addressing global environmental impacts", senior environment ministry official Ari Sudijanto said, listing "benefits that Indonesia has gained" as a signatory to climate deals including Paris.
"Indonesia has taken a major role in various efforts to mitigate climate change in the regional and global level," he added.
The ministry declined to directly answer whether Jakarta is considering leaving the deal, or if it endorsed Hashim's statement.
But Ari said "participation in global agreements is beneficial for environmental and climate change control programs, strategies and policies in Indonesia."
Coal-dependent Indonesia is one of the world's top emitters, but the country's new President Prabowo Subianto has pledged to phase out coal power in just 15 years.
The country has also pledged to reach net-zero emissions by 2050, a decade earlier than previously planned.
A spokesperson for the presidential office did not respond to request for comment on Hashim's remarks.
The Paris Agreement aims to limit global warming to below two degrees Celsius higher than pre-industrial levels and is seen as key to coordinating global action on climate change.
Environmentalists fear Trump's withdrawal will undermine global cooperation on reducing fossil fuel use and could embolden major polluters like China and India to weaken their commitments.
Argentina, under libertarian President Javier Milei, has already said it is "re-evaluating" its participation in the agreement.
Hashim's remarks had sparked alarm among environmental groups in Indonesia.
Uli Arta Siagian, a campaigner at climate group WALHI, called Hashim comments "a step backwards in Indonesia's climate commitments."
Uli told AFP that climate and environment skeptics in Indonesia's government had received a "strong push" from Trump's Paris withdrawal.
Norly Mercado, Asia regional director for the 350.org climate network, meanwhile warned Indonesia not to "hide behind the US government's betrayal of global climate goals."
mrc-sah/sn
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
25 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
U.S. strikes crippled Iran's nuclear program, Israeli analysis finds
THE HAGUE — Israel's preliminary analysis of the damage caused by U.S. strikes on Iran's main nuclear facilities — based in part from on-the-ground assessments — shows the attacks inflicted widespread destruction, a senior Israeli official said. The official, granted anonymity to speak candidly, said that Tehran has been 'actively trying to hide the damage' from the attacks, which President Trump said in The Hague on Wednesday had all but eliminated Iran's enrichment program. Trump, who repeatedly defended the effectiveness of the strikes at the NATO Summit, made reference to individuals who had been on the ground to assess the damage, without providing details. 'I can't say it's a final assessment, because we're less than a week after. It's not like we can send officers openly. But that's the indication we have now,' the official said. A spokesperson for Iran's foreign ministry on Wednesday said the bombing raid 'badly damaged' the nuclear sites, but the Iranian government has said it will continue its nuclear efforts, which it insists are for peaceful purposes. A full review of the mission could take weeks, and experts have expressed skepticism of declarative statements by Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that the U.S. operation was a success within mere days of the attack. 'Battlefield damage assessment is an imprecise art, with initial estimates frequently being way off,' said Patrick Clawson, an expert on Iran and director for research at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 'I would be very suspicious of any claims — by Iran, by Trump, by Israel — about what has happened to Iran's enriched uranium stocks or to its centrifuges.' Israel's preliminary findings come after an initial assessment from the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency cast doubt on the effectiveness of the American strikes, stating with low confidence that Iran had retained the core elements of its nuclear program despite the attacks, one U.S. official familiar with the findings told The Times. The DIA assessment was first reported by CNN. The U.S. attack followed nine days of an Israeli military campaign that decimated Iran's air defenses, its military leadership and its ballistic missile stockpiles, while degrading its nuclear facilities. Israeli intelligence has also monitored the reaction to the campaign among Iranian leadership, which has struggled to comprehend the extent of the damage itself, the Israeli official said. 'We don't believe everyone in the leadership knows what really happened, because the whole program was compartmentalized — they weren't sharing a lot of information, and a lot of the officers who were highly involved on the ground level were eliminated,' the official continued. 'So a lot of the top leadership hasn't fully begun to understand what's happened.' The developing intelligence picture comes as Trump defended the U.S. mission, called Operation Midnight Hammer, during multiple appearances at the NATO Summit in The Hague on Wednesday. 'It's been obliterated, totally obliterated,' he said of Iran's nuclear facilities. Addressing the DIA report, he added, 'They did a report, but it was like, if you look at the dates, it's just a few days after.' The U.S. deployment of massive, 'bunker-buster' munitions targeting Iran's main nuclear sites — including six dropped on Fordo, a facility burrowed deep into the side of a mountain — was intended to bury its most advanced equipment and most highly enriched uranium, which can be used to build nuclear warheads. Initial assessments of the damage were unclear, but since then, Trump said, 'we've collected additional intelligence. We've also spoken to people that have seen the site, and the site is obliterated.'
Wall Street Journal
26 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
How ‘Daddy' Trump Learned to Love NATO
THE HAGUE—What a difference one night in a Dutch palace can make. President Trump departed Washington early Tuesday in a bad mood, swearing at Israel and Iran for endangering the cease-fire he had brokered and sweating from a heat wave blanketing the capital.
San Francisco Chronicle
26 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump voters cheer his move against Iran. MAGA leaders had warned the bombing could backfire
FRONT ROYAL, Va. (AP) — As President Donald Trump prepared to order the bombing of Iran's nuclear sites, many prominent leaders of his 'Make America Great Again' movement warned he was making a grave mistake. Tucker Carlson accused Trump of abandoning his pledge to keep the United States out of new wars. Charlie Kirk said an escalation would be too divisive. Steve Bannon, Trump's former chief strategist, said intervention would thwart the Republican's most important priority, mass deportations. But interviews with Trump voters across the country this week and early polling suggest Trump's decision has been welcomed by his political base. While some said they were weary of the U.S. becoming embroiled in a protracted war, most cheered the move and said they did not see it as running counter to Trump's 'America First' approach. Ken Slabaugh, a retired Air Force veteran from Warrensburg, Missouri, said he was '100% supportive' of the strikes. Speaking Sunday near Whiteman Air Force Base, home of the B-2 bombers used in the attack, Slabaugh said it was clear to him that negotiations and attempts to strike deals with Iran were futile, and Trump had to act. The Iranians, he said, 'can't be trusted and they certainly can't have a nuke.' The response was exactly what he expected from the president. 'What he said was he's not gonna start new wars. He doesn't start wars. He finishes them,' Slabaugh said. 'It's pretty obvious that when the situation requires it, he don't monkey around with it. He gets in it and gets it done." MAGA's enthusiastic response More than 1,000 miles away, at an American Legion post in Brunswick, Maryland, Denny Bayer said the attacks were 'awesome.' 'He wants global peace," the Army National Guard veteran said Tuesday. 'He gave them 60 days' to make a nuclear deal. Bayer, 72, is not concerned about possible retribution because he said Trump had made clear what would follow: 'If you hurt one hair on an American's head I'll rain hellfire down on you." In Front Royal, Virginia, about 70 miles (112 kilometers) from the nation's capital, retired drywaller Stacey Roles said Trump's decision was 'the right one." Roles, 77, described himself as part of Trump's 'MAGA" movement. 'Trump's got my support,' Roles said Tuesday. Targeting 'a bully' Pam Pollard, 65, a longtime GOP leader in Oklahoma, said her first thought upon hearing the U.S. had dropped bombs was that the action would be supported by 'the entire world, save a very small few.' Presidents going back multiple administrations have talked about Iran's nuclear buildup, Pollard said, calling Iran a bully in the region. 'President Trump isn't someone to be bullied,' she said. Pollard was not worried about a military escalation. She does worry about the possible activation of 'terrorist cells.' 'I am very fearful of that all over the world, not just in America,' she said. In La Grange, Kentucky, on the outskirts of Louisville, Donna Williamson, a Republican from nearby Carrollton, said she worries about the U.S. being drawn into a protracted war in the Mideast. 'I hope and I pray that Trump is doing the right thing, but I will reserve judgment,' she said Monday. What early polling shows Early polls suggest Republicans are far more supportive of the military action than are Democrats. A Quinnipiac University poll Wednesday found that about 80% of registered voters who are Republicans back the U.S. joining Israel in striking Iran's nuclear sites. Overall, however, about half of those polled say they disapprove of the strikes, and 75% of Democratic voters were opposed. The poll found that 80% of Republicans believe the strikes will make Americans safer, while nearly as many Democrats believe the strikes will make Americans less safe. Meanwhile, nearly 8 in 10 voters are either very concerned or somewhat concerned about the possibility the U.S. will get drawn into war with Iran. A Fox News poll conducted immediately after Israel attacked Iran, but before the U.S. became involved, found that about 8 in 10 registered voters were 'extremely' or 'very' concerned about Iran getting a nuclear bomb. Trump has a history of foreign intervention Trump won the presidency in 2016 in part due to anger over the 'forever wars' in Afghanistan and Iraq, but he has never been opposed to foreign intervention. In 2019, U.S. special forces killed Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the shadowy leader of the Islamic State group, during a raid in Syria, as part of a campaign that involved U.S. troops on the ground. A year later, Trump ordered the assassination of Gen. Qassem Soleimani, a top Iranian general, and some worried that strike would lead to full-blown war. In March, Trump ordered airstrikes against the Houthis in Yemen. He promised to use 'overwhelming lethal force' until the Iran-backed rebels ceased their attacks on shipping along a vital maritime corridor. Trump has brushed has off the suggestion that his base would be put off by the attacks on Iran, telling reporters, 'My supporters are more in love with me today.' 'He should finish the job' Bill Cantle, a Republican from Clearwater, Florida, said he thinks Trump is 'doing the right thing" on Iran. 'I just think he should finish the job. Not leave it half-done," Cantle said while he and his wife explored downtown La Grange, Kentucky, during a visit. Republican Peter Espinosa, a retired Army sergeant who was born in Cuba and lives in the Miami suburb of Doral, said he sees Iranian officials as 'the bad guys" and views Trump as 'disciplined.' 'I truly believe he's a peacekeeper," he said. "We just need to fight the hostility that's going on in the Middle East right now and take care of it, because if we don't, our country is going to be jeopardized.' At a GOP fundraiser Tuesday in Lima, Ohio, headlined by Vice President JD Vance, Clark Spieles said he has faith in the administration's actions. 'Nobody likes war, everybody wants peace,' said Spieles, a Shawnee Township, Ohio, trustee, adding "I have confidence that they're doing the right thing.' Gomez Licon reported from Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Schreiner from La Grange, Kentucky and Colvin from New York. Associated Press polling editor Amelia Thomson DeVeaux in Washington, and AP Writers Nicholas Ingram in Knob Noster, Missouri and Julie Smyth in Lima, Ohio, contributed to this report.
