
EPA funding freeze could jeopardize vulnerable communities
COURTESY OF THE HAWAII STATE SENATE 'In Hawaii we understand that you cannot disentangle culture, history and people from a place, and we need to get this administration to understand that.' Jill Tokuda U.S. representative, D-Hawaii
COURTESY OF THE HAWAII STATE SENATE 'In Hawaii we understand that you cannot disentangle culture, history and people from a place, and we need to get this administration to understand that.'
Jill Tokuda U.S. representative, D-Hawaii A federally funded environmental justice project in Waianae has stalled since the Environmental Protection Agency froze a $3 million grant, halting efforts to empower Native Hawaiian communities and investigate long-standing water quality concerns tied to cesspools and landfills.
The Earth Island Institute's Huliau o Waianae initiative, led by local nonprofit Kingdom Pathways, was launched in partnership with Native Hawaiian leaders to train community advisers, collect water quality data and amplify local voices in environmental decision-making.
Though the project officially launched in January after receiving the grant in late December, the EPA froze the funds soon after. Only the project manager remains employed, and plans to fill up to 25 roles are on hold. Advisory positions remain vacant, and momentum has stalled despite a federal court order directing the EPA to release the funds.
'At the end of the day, it's our kuleana to move forward with the project, but we really have to bend over backwards to make things work, ' Kingdom Pathways co-founder Carmen Guzman-Simpliciano said.
The freeze is part of a broader rollback under EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, who has targeted environmental justice programs. In April the agency issued termination notices to nearly 200 staff members in its Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights after months of administrative leave. Earth Island and other partners have sued the EPA, calling the freeze unlawful and warning that it harms front-line communities.
'We are going to do many things : health assessments, learn about policies and train advisers, do water testing and air quality monitoring, ' Guzman-Simpliciano said. 'The funding freeze affected us a lot. We had to end up scrapping our whole plans and starting again on a smaller scale. We talk about health assessments that come with a price tag, then you talk about hiring paid jobs for these advisers. That was a big price ticket itself. So everything has to just get scrapped and start fresh, re-create our whole initial plan to make it fit.'
Don 't miss out on what 's happening !
Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It 's FREE !
Email 28141 Sign Up By clicking to sign up, you agree to Star-Advertiser 's and Google 's and. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA.
The EPA has not provided an official explanation for the freeze. The delay has left subrecipient staff unpaid and blocked the formation of the project's advisory board.
'This was our first year receiving a federal grant, and then the funding froze, ' said Guzman-Simpliciano. 'We don't have much money.
Before all these grants came in, because we are so new, we spent our money out of pocket.'
The project was inspired by Guzman-Simpliciano's personal experience.
Her son contracted a staph infection after swimming in Pokai Bay. She later learned such infections had plagued local swimmers for over 20 years. That incident prompted grassroots water testing that found fecal bacteria levels above state health standards. Her data led to collaboration with the Department of Health and a deeper look at cesspools and landfills in the area.
'None of this happens unless somebody cares enough to get and dig in, to do the research, add the data, present it, then turn it over into the state and find ways on how to go about it and possibly change some regulations or laws, ' she said.
Unlike organizations focused on education, Guzman-Simpliciano said her team aims to collect original data to inform environmental policy. They planned to train Native Hawaiian advisers to monitor water quality in high-risk areas, including near the PVT landfill, which sits on a water table and accepts demolition debris from across Oahu.
'If we're unaware of that water quality and no one's monitoring, we wouldn't know, ' she said. 'Just like Pokai Bay—that's been going on for 20 years until we came in and took action and brought all these things to light.'
Despite legal battles and delays, she said the team remains committed. 'If we don't have that research or that data, then who's going to do it ?'
For many Native Hawaiians, 'climate change ' can feel disconnected from their daily lives. Guzman-Simpliciano, who is Native Hawaiian, explained that they understand environmental shifts by observing nature. Physical events like king tides washing over roads are more immediate than abstract climate science. Seeing these changes, she said, can make the broader concept of climate change harder to grasp.
Still, she recognizes climate change is real. 'There is a need to shift our mindset, ' she said, noting that pollution, heat and other factors are having real effects. She stressed the importance of observing local changes and understanding their impact within Hawaii's cultural context, where land, history and traditions shape the community's view of the environment.
Guzman-Simpliciano said it's troubling when federal agencies overlook Hawaii's cultural perspective and delay projects like hers. The freeze, she said, feels like silencing those who had stepped up to protect their land.
Her team also discovered that dry streams in Waianae were due not to climate change, but to illegal water diversions by six people—a revelation that challenges oversimplified explanations for environmental issues.
U.S. Rep. Jill Tokuda, D-Hawaii, said the administration fails to recognize the importance of culture, history and place in environmental decisions.
'The real challenge that we are going to have is that this administration does not recognize, quite frankly, the value of culture, history and even sense of place in decisions about resourcing environmental protection projects or climate projects, ' Tokuda said. 'In Hawaii we understand that you cannot disentangle culture, history and people from a place, and we need to get this administration to understand that.'
She emphasized that community-driven projects like Huliau o Waianae are critical for communities exposed to contamination and neglect.
'It's important to ensure that voices from communities like Waianae are heard and respected in environmental decision-making, especially given their history of being overexposed to landfills and other environmental hazards, ' she said.
Advocates warn the freeze undermines federal environmental justice commitments. Without resolution, one of Hawaii's most environmentally burdened communities remains without support.
Despite the challenges, Tokuda noted bipartisan recognition of climate change's impacts, from wildfires to floods. She said Congress has made calls, sent letters and demanded answers on staffing cuts and funding freezes, as those are factors that could threaten the EPA's ability to respond to environmental crises and disasters.
'While the language may differ, the reality is that climate change is impacting agriculture, natural resources and disaster response efforts nationwide, ' Tokuda said.
She called for sustained investment in climate and environmental protection.
'We're literally talking about the water that people drink. We're talking about the air that people breathe, the most basic of things that we need to ensure are safe. This is the agency that will hold people accountable and responsible and be there to remediate the wrongs that happen, whether it be wildfires or whether it be Red Hill, whether it be to help communities that struggle with cesspool conversions or have struggled with landfills, ' she said.
Tokuda encouraged local groups to seek alternative funding sources on top of reaching out to their congressional delegates.
'Organizations should look at diversifying their funding models, ' she said. 'It's important to reassess business plans and funding strategies so they can bridge the gap while we work to restore significant investments in environmental protection.'
She called for collaboration and adaptability, with the hope that federal support will soon return.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
EPA launches repeal of Obama and Biden-era power plant rules
The Trump administration on Wednesday proposed repealing rules regulating carbon dioxide emissions and rolling back mercury and hazardous air pollutants from power plants. Why it matters: The Environmental Protection Agency's action is the most significant under President Trump to tear down Democratic administrations' climate regulations. The proposals now go to public comment and ultimately will face legal challenges. Driving the news: EPA wants to repeal the 2015 emissions standards for new fossil fuel-fired power plants issued during the Obama administration as well as the Biden administration's 2024 rule for new and existing fossil fuel-fired power plants. The CO2 and mercury rules were designed to regulate coal, natural gas and oil "out of existence," EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said during a news conference. A cycle of speakers at the EPA press event — mostly Republican members of Congress — lamented the closure of coal-fired power and called it a threat to the reliability country's power grid. The Navajo Generating Station — a coal-fired plant in Arizona that closed in 2019 — "was the most efficient power plant in the country, and sadly we had to tear it down," Navajo Nation President Buu Nygren said. Between the lines: Zeldin deflected questions about legal vulnerability of the rule. He emphasized EPA wasn't seeking to repeal the Mercury and Air Toxic Standards (MATS), which govern emissions for mercury and other air pollutants emitted by units with a capacity of more than 25 megawatts. "What a final rule will look like is a decision to be made in the future," Zeldin said. The other side: "The Trump administration's subservience to its fossil fuel megadonors is on full display," Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee's top Democrat, said in a statement.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's EPA accidentally made the case against passing the Big Beautiful Bill
On the campaign trail last year, Donald Trump frequently criticized the Biden administration for new regulations targeting what he called 'clean, beautiful coal.' In April, he signed executive orders directing federal agencies to undo any regulations that 'discriminate' against coal. Coal-fired power plants produce a significant but shrinking share of U.S. electricity — about 16 percent in 2023 — and are by far the most polluting and planet-warming component of the power sector on a per-kilowatt basis. So it was no surprise when, on Wednesday, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin gathered more than a half dozen Republican lawmakers at the agency's Washington, D.C., headquarters to announce the planned repeal of two rules, finalized under the Biden administration, that established limits on carbon and mercury emissions from U.S. power plants. Once finalized, the Trump administration's proposals will eliminate all caps on greenhouse gases from the plants and revert the mercury limit to a less strict standard from 2012, respectively. The Biden-era rules, Zeldin said Wednesday, were 'expensive, unreasonable, and burdensome' attempts 'to make all sorts of industries, including coal and more, disappear.' With demand for electricity poised to surge in the coming years, especially as tech companies make massive investments in artificial intelligence infrastructure, Zeldin said that the EPA's new proposals will boost electricity generation and 'make America the AI capital of the world.' His argument was echoed by the slate of Republican lawmakers who followed him at the podium. The old rules 'would have forced our most efficient and reliable power generation into early retirement, just as Ohio and the rest of the nation are seeing a historic rise in demand due to the AI revolution, new data centers, and a manufacturing resurgence,' said Representative Troy Balderson. 'Between data centers, AI, and the growing domestic manufacturing base, the simple fact is we need more electrons on the grid to power all of this,' added Representative Robert Bresnahan of Pennsylvania. But despite their vigorous agreement that as many energy sources as possible are needed to power America's future and keep utility bills affordable, every single representative who spoke on Wednesday had, just weeks earlier, cast a vote for a major bill in Congress that will almost certainly have the opposite effect. Analysts say that the pending legislation, which has the Trump-inspired title 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' will slow the country's buildout of new electricity sources and eventually lead the average U.S. household to incur hundreds of dollars in additional annual energy costs. That's because the new GOP legislation essentially repeals the Inflation Reduction Act, a landmark 2022 law that has resulted in roughly $800 billion in investments in clean energy technologies. By rolling back regulations on coal-fired power, the GOP's hope seems to be that some of those lost energy investments can be compensated by fossil fuels. However, analysts agree that this is highly unlikely, due largely to the sheer cost of new coal-fired power, as well as supply bottlenecks that have sharply limited the feasibility of new natural gas plants. Instead, the result will likely just be more expensive electricity. 'The economics of coal plants are the worst they've ever been,' said Robbie Orvis, a senior director for modeling and analysis at Energy Innovation, a nonpartisan think tank. 'Even just keeping existing coal plants online compared to building new renewables is more expensive.' To justify its repeal of the greenhouse gas emissions rule for power plants, the EPA is arguing that the U.S. power sector is responsible for just 3 percent of global emissions, and as a result is not a 'significant' contributor to air pollution, which is the threshold the Clean Air Act sets for when the government can regulate a stationary source of emissions. While the 3 percent figure is factually accurate, experts say the argument is misleading, especially given that the power sector is responsible for about a quarter of all greenhouse gas emissions within the country. 'You're dealing with something that has lots and lots and lots of sources, and you can't just throw up your hands and say, 'Well, this won't achieve anything,'' said David Bookbinder, director of law and policy at the Environmental Integrity Project, a nonprofit founded by former EPA enforcement attorneys. If the U.S. power industry relies more on coal and natural gas relative to renewables, as Republicans appear to hope, those emissions could remain stubbornly high, especially as demand for power grows. What's even more certain is that costs will continue to go up. The latest government inflation data shows that consumer electricity prices are already rising much more dramatically than overall consumer prices. In this environment, the technology companies building massive data centers to power cloud computing and AI have struggled to find adequate, cheap electricity. In fact, so many power-guzzling facilities are being built that lawmakers in Virginia, which is at the heart of the data center belt, have enacted legislation to prevent them from overwhelming the grid. Since utilities have been unable to meet the power needs of tech players like Microsoft, Google, and Amazon Web Services, some of these companies have begun directly contracting with renewables developers and striking deals with nuclear power plant operators. A trade group representing these companies recently asked the Senate to revise the pending legislation so it restores some of the clean energy provisions from the Inflation Reduction Act, saying the U.S. needs 'affordable and reliable power' in order to 'maintain its leadership in AI.' Analysts say such leadership is threatened if the Trump administration continues to try to tip the scales toward fossil fuel sources that are not competitive with newer sources of energy. 'The current administration is picking technology winners and losers and making trade-offs,' said Orvis. 'And the trade-off they want to make is: get rid of the clean energy tax incentives that are driving all of this new clean electricity onto the grid, which puts downward pressure on prices and will lower people's rates.' Orvis added that higher electricity costs raise the cost of doing business for manufacturers, including those at the leading edge of AI, making it more difficult to compete with China. 'We're at a pivotal crossroads,' said Orvis. 'We can either lean in and support the domestic growth of these industries by creating a policy environment with certainty, incentives, and support. Or we can do what the current administration is trying to do, and pull back on all of those things and allow China to step in.' This story was originally published by Grist with the headline Trump's EPA accidentally made the case against passing the Big Beautiful Bill on Jun 13, 2025.

Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
With Baumgartner in audience, Trump signs bill blocking Washington's electric vehicle mandate; state sues in response
Jun. 12—WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Thursday signed legislation into law that blocks Washington and other states from following California's lead in phasing out gas-powered vehicles. Rep. Michael Baumgartner of Spokane was among dozens of Republican lawmakers invited to the White House for the occasion, which the president used to riff on a variety of topics in addition to the bill. Between calling Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell "a numbskull" and highlighting his own popularity on TikTok, Trump celebrated the revocation of Biden-era waivers from the Environmental Protection Agency that let California impose stricter vehicle emissions standards than the federal government. After the Biden administration allowed California to ban the sale of gas-powered cars starting in 2035, Washington followed suit in 2022, requiring that all new cars sold in the state be either fully electric or plug-in hybrids. A total of 17 states has adopted similar rules that the newly signed law revokes. "The automakers didn't know what to do, because they're really building cars for two countries," Trump said. "When you have 17 states, you're building cars for two countries." In an interview before the bill-signing ceremony, Baumgartner said the California regulation and its progeny would have been devastating to the U.S. economy. "There does not exist the ability to magically create electric semi-trucks that move nearly 70% of the goods that Americans consume, so it would have been crippling to our economy if this rule was left in place," he said. "You can't run semi-trucks across America on unicorn laughter and aspirational dreams of environmental extremists." To revoke the waivers, the EPA issued under a previous administration, lawmakers invoked the Congressional Review Act, which allowed them to skirt the 60-vote supermajority required to pass most bills in the Senate. They did so despite the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office and the Senate parliamentarian, the chamber's neutral adviser on rules, both informing senators that the EPA waivers didn't count as the executive-branch rules for which the act applies. Despite near-unanimous opposition from Democratic senators, the bill revoking California's waivers received significant bipartisan support in the House, plus a single Democratic senator, Michigan's Elissa Slotkin. Trump was surprised on Thursday when a GOP lawmaker in the room told him 35 House Democrats had voted in favor. One of them was Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of southwest Washington, who runs an auto repair shop with her husband and has been a frequent critic of her party's push to speed a transition to electric vehicles. Shortly after Thursday's ceremony concluded, Washington state Attorney General Nick Brown and California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a joint lawsuit with nine other states challenging the elimination of California's waiver. The suit alleges that the resolution violates the separation of powers, the Take Care Clause and multiple federal statutes, including the Congressional Review Act and Administrative Procedure Act. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff states allege that the Congressional Review Act has "never before been used in any context that resembles this one. It has certainly never been used, as it was here, to negate particular state laws." The lawsuit seeks to have the resolution declared unlawful and to require the federal government to implement the Clean Air Act consistent with the granted waivers. "Transportation is the single greatest contributor to greenhouse gas pollution in Washington, and our residents understand the transition to zero-emission vehicles is critical in the fight against climate change," Brown said in a statement Thursday. "This is the Trump administration's latest unlawful attempt to derail Washington's and the nation's transition to a clean future." At the White House, Trump railed against Democrats' efforts to use state and federal laws to phase out gas-powered vehicles — the country's biggest single source of greenhouse gas emissions — and speed the adoption of wind, solar and other low-carbon energy sources. "They're making you buy stuff that doesn't work," the president said. "You should be given the option to buy the electric car, by a gasoline-powered car, buy a hybrid. Probably not hydrogen, because hydrogen has the tendency that when it blows up, you're gonzo. It's over." After the room broke out in laughter at that line, Trump turned to Rep. Steve Scalise and said, "It'll make your accident look like peanuts," apparently referring to the 2017 shooting that left the Louisiana Republican in critical condition. Washington state officials have taken steps in recent days to prepare for the new federal law. In a June 6 memo, the Washington State Department of Ecology notified vehicle manufacturers that it would temporarily pause compliance requirements for some vehicle categories. "This recent federal action introduces new uncertainty for states, manufacturers, and consumers at a time when both businesses and consumers are making real progress in reducing the transportation sector's greenhouse gas emissions," Ecology Director Casey Sixkiller said in a statement June 6. "It undermines states' rights, negatively impacts public health, and puts U.S. automakers at a competitive disadvantage in a global market that is rapidly transitioning to zero-emission vehicle technology." Sixkiller added that the agency would work with legislators, industry partners, local governments and other states to "stay on track and ensure continued progress toward our climate and public health goals." After the federal bill cleared the Senate in late May, Gov. Bob Ferguson said in a statement that the action was "brazenly out of step with the law, science, and public will." "For more than 50 years, states have possessed the ability to adopt stronger vehicle emissions standards to protect public health. Washington has exercised that right, along with 17 other states, resulting in cleaner air and healthier communities," Ferguson said. "Despite this retreat from public health by the federal government, I'm committed to ensuring Washington moves forward on building a healthier, cleaner future." Thursday's bill signing drew praise of the Washington Trucking Association, which said it remains committed to working with Washington lawmakers and the Department of Ecology on a "workable path to electrification." "California's EV trucking mandates have been a disaster for states like Washington, and have caused real harm to the trucking industry, a key link in our trade-dependent state's supply chain network," the association's president and CEO, Sheri Call, said in a statement. "Washington state does not have the infrastructure in place to properly institute such a sweeping mandate like this, and the technology has not advanced enough yet to support the trucking industry's rapid transition to clean energy. Our neighbors in Oregon recently opted out of these mandates for these same reasons." Vicki Giles Fabré, vice president of the Washington State Auto Dealers Association, said that Washington's franchised new car and truck dealers have "made substantial investments in electrification and remain committed to selling electric and hybrid vehicles." "The Washington State Auto Dealers Association intends to work with state policymakers to find solutions that incentivize increased adoption of these vehicles, while also supporting the needs of franchised dealers, their employees, and the customers they serve," Fabré said in a statement Wednesday. According to Sixkiller, one in five new vehicles sold today runs on zero-emission technology. "We're not going to slow down that progress. Washingtonians already experience the impacts of climate change every year, from drought and wildfire to flooding and sea-level rise," Sixkiller said in a statement following the Attorney General's lawsuit. "As our Attorney General's Office fights to protect our state's rights, we'll continue working with the Legislature, industry partners, local governments, and other states to continue our progress on clean transportation. At a time of great uncertainty, that's a promise we can keep." Orion Donovan Smith's work is funded in part by members of the Spokane community via the Community Journalism and Civic Engagement Fund. This story can be republished by other organizations for free under a Creative Commons license. For more information on this, please contact our newspaper's managing editor.