
Singapore GE2025: 2.6mil Singaporeans head to the polls in first election with PM Wong as leader
A voter casts his ballot in the general election at a polling station in Singapore on May 3, 2025. Polling stations opened on May 3 across Singapore as voters began casting their ballots in an election seen as the first real test for Prime Minister Lawrence Wong and his long-ruling People's Action Party. - AFP
SINGAPORE: Some 2.6 million Singaporeans will head to the polls today (May 3) in a general election taking place amid great global uncertainty.
This election marks the first time Prime Minister Lawrence Wong is leading the ruling PAP in an electoral contest, and comes after nine days of intense and, at times, combative campaigning.
Candidates from various political parties fanned out across the island, delivering speeches at rallies, debating policies on podcasts, and engaging voters through social media posts, livestreams and memes.
There are 92 out of 97 parliamentary seats that await the verdict of voters, with Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC uncontested at this election.
The electoral contest takes place amid a backdrop of global uncertainty, persistent inflation, and concerns over issues such as cost of living, housing and social mobility.
In all, 11 political parties and two independents are contesting in 32 constituencies, including several new ones following electoral boundary changes in March. The five-member PAP team in Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC was elected unopposed on Nomination Day on April 23.
The People's Action Party (PAP) is fielding candidates in all constituencies, while the Workers' Party (WP) is contesting 26 seats in eight constituencies – five GRCs and three SMCs. The Progress Singapore Party (PSP) is fielding 13 candidates in six constituencies, including four SMCs.
Other parties in the race include the People's Alliance for Reform, National Solidarity Party (NSP), Red Dot United, Singapore Democratic Party and People's Power Party (PPP).
Multi-cornered fights will take place in five-member Ang Mo Kio, Sembawang and Tampines GRCs, as well as the single seats of Potong Pasir and Radin Mas.
Tampines has the most number of contenders, with the PAP up against three opposition parties – the WP, NSP and PPP.
Other closely watched battlegrounds that have emerged during the hustings include the new Punggol GRC and Jalan Kayu SMC.
Polling will take place on May 3 from 8am to 8pm, with 1,240 stations set up islandwide, up from the 1,100 during GE2020.
Voters are encouraged to consider voting in the afternoon to avoid morning crowds, the Elections Department (ELD) said in a May 1 advisory.
They can check their polling station's queue status by scanning the QR code on their poll card before heading to their voting centre.
They must have with them their original NRIC or passport and poll card. Alternatively, they can present their digital NRIC and ePoll card on the Singpass app.
Voters are also reminded not to wear or carry any item that may be interpreted as political messaging. These include, but are not limited to, bags, water bottles, fans or clothing bearing party symbols or slogans. Those who do so may be turned away by election officials.
Voters are encouraged to use the self-inking 'X' stamp provided at polling booths, although they may also use their own pen to mark the ballot.
The police have advised voters to walk or take public transport to their polling stations, and not to loiter in the area after voting.
Priority queues, wheelchairs and designated drop-off points will be available for voters who are sick or frail, or have disabilities.
After polls close at 8pm on May 3, counting will begin immediately at designated centres.
Preliminary results from sample counts, which are based on a random tally of ballot papers from each polling station, are expected to be released earlier in the night to give an indication of the likely outcome. - The Straits Times/ANN
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
Singapore embassy in Washington seeking US clarification on Harvard's visa ban
International students make up more than a quarter of Harvard's student body. - Photo: AFP SINGAPORE: Singapore's embassy in Washington has been seeking clarification from the US State Department and Department of Homeland Security on President Donald Trump's directive prohibiting foreigners from entering the country to study at Harvard University. The embassy is hoping for clarity from the US authorities in the next few days, including on whether there will be any delay in the processing of visas for Singaporeans hoping to study in the United States, Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan said on Saturday (June 7). In a Zoom call with the Singapore media to wrap up his five-day visit to Washington, he noted that many current and prospective students looking to study in the United States had expressed their concern to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs over potential visa delays. Asked to elaborate on contingencies being planned should Singaporean students find themselves unable to proceed with their plans to study in the United States, he said the Government is trying to find solutions to deal with the worst-case scenario where students are not able to physically study in Boston. 'We've got some ideas for how we can help them to, in a sense, deal with that eventuality without impairing their academic and professional progress,' said Dr Balakrishnan. 'For others who are not yet here, who have not yet secured visas, you may also need to have backup plans, but my main point is we will stay in touch, and we will continue to keep you informed.' Dr Balakrishnan noted that Singapore's Ambassador to the United States Lui Tuck Yew has also held a virtual town hall meeting with students who are now at Harvard. In the virtual meeting on May 30, Lui told Singaporean students at Harvard that the Republic's autonomous universities can offer them placements if they wish to discontinue their studies in the United States and return home. A Ministry of Education spokesperson said this message was given to affected students so they could consider returning to Singapore as a possible option to continue their studies. There are six autonomous universities here: the National University of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, the Singapore Management University, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore University of Technology and Design and Singapore Institute of Technology. University statistics show that there are now 151 Singaporean students at Harvard. Among them are 12 Public Service Commission scholarship holders. Foreign students at Harvard were thrown into limbo after Trump's administration announced on May 22 that it had revoked Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Programme certification with immediate effect. The nearly 6,800 international students in the Ivy League college were given an ultimatum to either transfer to another institution or face deportation. A federal judge later blocked the move, with the Trump administration rolling back its stance on May 29 and giving Harvard 30 days to submit evidence contesting the administration's plan to revoke the school's right to enrol international students. International students make up more than a quarter of Harvard's student body, but Trump said the university should cap its international intake at 15 per cent. Dr Balakrishnan said the situation confronting international students stems from domestic political issues within the United States. But students, including from Singapore, can become affected as collateral damage, and there will be a period of uncertainty of at least a few days or weeks. 'Nevertheless, we will continue to pursue this with the American authorities, and I hope we'll be able to find suitable solutions for our students who want to pursue educational opportunities in the United States.' At a macro level, it remains in both Singapore and the United States' interests to keep opportunities open for Singaporeans who want to study and work in the United States to expand their domain experience and their networks, Dr Balakrishnan added. 'So this is an issue that we will continue to pursue with the State Department.' - The Straits Times/ANN


Focus Malaysia
a day ago
- Focus Malaysia
Siti Kasim dares Madani gov't to imitate PAP's 'MPs are slaves of the people, not their masters' benchmark
THE high standards demanded by the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) which has recently achieved a landslide victory in Singapore's 14th General Election of its MPs with the key emphasis being 'always uphold our reputation and integrity' should be emulated by the Madani government. Such is the opinion of Siti Kasim who is impressed with the tall order which is encapsulated in a 2,617-word letter entitled 'Rules of Prudence' penned by Singapore's fourth Prime Minister Lawrence Wong and addressed to all PAP MPs. For the record. PAP won 87 out of 97 seats in the just concluded national polls (it has won all general elections since Singapore's independence) which is Wong's first as PM and in his capacity as PAP's secretary-general. Overall, the PAP won 65.6% of the votes. 'That MPs have to be humble in victory by always remembering that as MPs they are servants of the people, not their masters really struck the chord insofar as Malaysian politics are concerned,' gestured the human rights activist and lawyer in her latest YouTube rant. 'Another secret formula which Wong let out of the bag that it's still not too late for the Madani government to look into is that PAP's reputation for clean, incorruptible government is one of its most precious assets that enables it to retain the trust of Singaporeans all these years (PAP has never lost an election).' Siti Kasim is further impressed by the exemplary behaviour demanded of PAP's MPs in that they should never abuse their political position to seek favours. 'He (Wong) warned MPs against lobbying any ministry or statutory board to make changes to decisions or policies that are not grounded on public interest … This very much brings to mind the 'Yes YB. Yes YB' attitude among our civil servants,' the Orang Asli advocate pointed out. 'Also worth heeding is the call to separate an MP's public political position from his/her private, professional or business interests.' In reminding PAP's MPs against exploiting their public position as government MPs, Wong has stressed that their conduct must always be above board by keeping at bay their close contacts with the ministers, access to government departments and civil servants when it comes to serving their personal interest or for the benefit of their employers. Against the backdrop of poor MP attendance which has occasionally prompted postponement of the Dewan Rakyat proceedings, Siti Kasim also agreed with Wong that 'all MPs are expected to attend all sittings of Parliament'. 'Please inform the whip if you have to leave the Parliament premises while a sitting is on. If you have to be absent from any sitting, seek permission from the government whip and apply for leave of absence from the speaker with copies to the leader of the house and the government whip,' Wong had penned in his letter. 'If you travel abroad, you should also inform the whip where you can be reached while abroad.' To sum up, Siti Kasim described Wong's letter as 'a vivid example of good governance'. He demanded that PAP MPs should speak their mind frankly whether for or against government policies but must be backed by adequate facts and reasons. It's a rarity for Malaysian MPs from the government bloc to go against a tabled government policy in line with the toe-the-line spirit or likewise brushed aside views from the position even if they are truly constructive. Also worth mentioning is the notion of accepting gifts whereby MPs must declare all gifts, (other than personal gifts from close friends or relatives) to the Parliament clerk who will have the gifts valued. If they wish to keep the gifts, they must pay the Singaporean government for them at the valuation price. – June 1, 2025


The Star
4 days ago
- The Star
Anti-Trump tide turns tables
THE Trump factor is shaping global politics, one election at a time – just not necessarily to the president's liking. In recent votes in Canada and Australia, centrists revived their fortunes while parties that borrowed from the Maga playbook faltered. Although Donald Trump has been back in power only four months, his policies – from tariffs to upending alliances – have rippled into domestic political battles worldwide. Voters seem to have Trump somewhere on their minds as they head to the polls. Canada and Australia share much in common: a political system, a major mining industry and a sovereign in King Charles III. Now they also share a remarkable political story. Before Trump's inauguration, the centre-left ruling parties in both countries seemed poised to lose power. The front-runners were conservative parties whose leaders flirted with Trumpian politics in style and substance. Yet, within weeks of Trump's return, both political landscapes flipped. The centre-left incumbents surged ahead and went on to win. In both cases, the conservative leaders lost not just the elections but even their own parliamentary seats. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney campaigned on an explicitly anti-Trump message, placing the US president's threats to Canada at the heart of his campaign. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese did not do so explicitly, but both men benefitted from an anti-Trump bump. Pierre Poilievre, head of Canada's Conservatives, and Peter Dutton, leader of Australia's opposition, struggled to shake off damaging associations with Trump. Dutton backtracked on unpopular Trump-style proposals, such as radically cutting public sector jobs. Poilievre never pivoted away, even after Trump threatened Canada's sovereignty. Charles Edel, Australia chair at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, called Australia's election a 'blowout' partly driven by Trump's implicit intrusion. 'There were enough similarities to the Canadian election to suggest the conservatives' fortunes fell as Trump's tariffs and attacks on America's allies ramped up,' he said. In Canada, some viewed the Australian result as trans-Pacific solidarity. 'Albo Up!' an online meme proclaimed, swapping Albanese's nickname into Carney's anti-Trump slogan: 'Elbows Up!' Carney capitalised on a perception that he would be a steady hand to manage Trump's unpredictable impact on Canada's economy, already hurting from tariffs and uncertainty. His background as an economic policymaker bolstered his image. Across the globe in Singapore, a similar argument for stability also helped the ruling People's Action Party. Last month, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong told his parliament that Singapore would suffer a heavier blow from US tariffs due to its reliance on global trade. Much like Carney, who declared the old Canada-US relationship 'over', Wong issued a stark warning. 'The global conditions that enabled Singapore's success over the past decades may no longer hold,' he said. On May 3, voters returned Wong's party to power – an expected outcome but one seen as strengthened by the party's 'flight to safety' strategy. 'This is another case of the Trump effect,' said Cherian George, an academic who has written on Singaporean politics. 'Deep concern about Trump's trade wars is driving many voters to strongly back the incumbent.' In Germany, the first Western ally to hold a national election after Trump's return, the effect has been less direct but still present. Friedrich Merz, sworn in as Germany's new chancellor on May 6, did not politically benefit from Trump's election the way leaders in Canada and Australia did. However, Trump's confrontations with European allies on defence and trade have helped him since. Merz successfully pushed for suspending spending limits in fiscally conservative Germany, arguing that old certainties about US commitment to mutual defence were gone. 'Do you seriously believe that an American government will agree to continue Nato as before?' he asked lawmakers in March. Meanwhile, the far-right AfD party, embraced by Maga figures and endorsed by Elon Musk, failed to capitalise. Polls suggest its ties to Trump did it no favours. An unpredictable US president can yield unpredictable outcomes abroad, as British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is learning. Starmer, a centre-left leader who won office before Trump's return, initially won praise for his businesslike dealings with Washington. Unlike Carney, Starmer avoided direct criticism of Trump, seeking common ground and preventing rupture. After a seemingly successful White House visit, even Starmer's political opponents acknowledged his deft handling. At the same time, Nigel Farage – leader of the anti-immigration Reform UK party and a close Trump ally – struggled with accusations of sympathising with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Yet Starmer soon ran out of steam. He failed to parlay his pleasant US visit into exemptions from tariffs on British goods. Early last month, his Labour Party suffered a significant setback in local and regional elections. It lost 187 council seats and a parliamentary by-election in one of its strongholds. By contrast, Farage's party surged. Reform UK won that by-election, took two mayoralties and made sweeping gains across England. For the first time, it seized control of the lowest tiers of government in several areas. — ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times