Lawyer says Prince Harry was unfairly treated when stripped of UK security detail
LONDON — Prince Harry was treated unfairly when he was stripped of his British security detail, his attorney told appeals court judges Tuesday.
Harry, whose rare appearance in court indicated the case's importance to him, lost his government-funded protection in February 2020 after he stepped down from his role as a working member of the royal family and moved to the U.S.
A High Court judge ruled last year that a government panel's decision to provide 'bespoke' security for the Duke of Sussex on an as-needed basis was not unlawful, irrational or unjustified.
But attorney Shaheed Fatima argued that a group that evaluated Harry's security needs failed to follow its own process and perform a risk management assessment.
'The appellant does not accept that bespoke means better,' Fatima said. 'In fact, in his submission, it means that he has been singled out for different, unjustified and inferior treatment.'
A lawyer for the government said Harry's argument in the lower court was accurately found to have been based on an 'inappropriate, formalist interpretation' of the government's security review that was misconceived.
'The appeal is fairly to be characterized in the same way,' attorney James Eadie said. 'It involves a continued failure to see the wood for the trees, advancing propositions available only by reading small parts of the evidence, and now the judgment, out of context and ignoring the totality of the picture.'
The hearing before three Court of Appeal justices is due to end Wednesday and a written decision is expected later. While the hearing was livestreamed, some was to be conducted behind closed doors to discuss sensitive security details.
Harry arrived at court with a small security detail supplemented with court officers. He waved to cameras before disappearing into a private entrance.
Harry, 40, the younger son of King Charles III, has bucked royal family convention by taking the government and tabloid press to court, where he has a mixed record.
But Harry rarely shows up to court hearings, making only a few appearances in the past two years. That included the trial of one of his phone hacking cases against the British tabloids when he was the first senior member of the royal family to enter the witness box in more than a century.
Harry claimed he and his family are endangered when visiting his homeland because of hostility aimed at him and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, on social media and through relentless hounding by news media.
After being denied government-sponsored protection, Harry faced at least two serious security threats, his lawyer said in court papers. Al-Qaida had published a document that said Harry's assassination would please Muslims, and he and his wife were involved in a dangerous pursuit by paparazzi in New York.
He lost a related court case in which he sought permission to privately pay for a police detail when in the U.K. but a judge denied that offer after a government lawyer argued officers shouldn't be used as 'private bodyguards for the wealthy.'
Harry also dropped a libel case against the publisher of the Daily Mail for an article that said he had tried to hide his efforts to continue receiving government-funded security.
But he won a significant victory at trial in 2023 against the publisher of the Daily Mirror when a judge found that phone hacking at the tabloid was 'widespread and habitual.' He claimed a 'monumental' victory in January when Rupert Murdoch's U.K. tabloids made an unprecedented apology for intruding in his life for years, and agreed to pay substantial damages to settle his privacy invasion lawsuit.
He has a similar case pending against the publisher of the Mail.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Aid leaders urge Houthis to release humanitarian workers detained in Yemen
The heads of 10 major international charities and United Nations agencies have demanded the release of aid workers held captive by Yemen's Houthi rebels. In a statement released to mark the one-year anniversary of the kidnapping of 23 UN staff and five humanitarian workers in northern Yemen, they said nothing could justify the ordeal the hostages had been through. 'They were doing their jobs, helping people in desperate need: people without food, shelter, or adequate health care,' they said in the letter, seen by The Telegraph. The Iran-backed group's action, they added, have had a 'chilling effect across the international community' and 'undermined mediation efforts for lasting peace' in Yemen. Antonio Guterres, the UN Secretary-General, said: 'The UN and its humanitarian partners should never be targeted, arrested or detained while carrying out their mandates for the benefit of the people they serve.' He strongly condemned the death of a World Food Programme (WFP) staff member in detention in February. The worker, who has only been identified by his first name, Ahmed, had delivered food aid with the organisation since 2017. It is unclear how he died. 'The Houthi de facto authorities have yet to provide an explanation for this deplorable tragedy,' he said. Hisham al-Hakimi, 44, Save the Children International's safety and security director in Yemen, also died in Houthi custody in October 2024. The organisation described his death as 'unexplained' and called for an investigation. Ten years of civil war have devastated Yemen and triggered one of the world's worst humanitarian crises. More 150,000 people have died and 24 million people – around 60 per cent of the population – are in need of humanitarian assistance. One in two children under the age of five is suffering from malnutrition. In January, the UN said it would pause all operations in the northern governorate of Saada, a stronghold of the Houthi movement, citing safety concerns. It is also actively engaging with senior Houthi officials to try to secure the release of all its detained employees, it added. Human rights groups have also accused the Houthi movement of routinely kidnapping, torturing and arbitrarily detaining hundreds of civilians. Last June, when it arrested the aid workers, the group claimed to have dismantled an 'American-Israeli spy network' – a claim the UN rejected as baseless. Protect yourself and your family by learning more about Global Health Security Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Driver has narrow escape as metal object smashes through windscreen
A driver had a narrow escape when a metal object smashed through his windscreen and sliced his head open as he drove along a motorway. Jake Gray, a 31-year-old welder, was travelling to work in his VW Golf when the piece of metal flew through his front windscreen and out of the rear window. The father of two was left with a severe head wound pouring with blood, but managed to safely pull on to the hard shoulder of the M56 in Cheshire. The mystery object had missed his face by a matter of inches. He called police after the incident on May 29 and was taken to hospital in Warrington, where he was treated for a hairline fracture of the skull. Mr Gray, of Stockton, County Durham, said: 'I was on my way to work listening to Smooth Radio, and then suddenly I blinked and noticed my window was completely smashed. 'It was completely obliterated by this object that had come through, glass shattered in my face and I looked down and I was covered in blood. It has sliced straight through the windscreen and it's gone out the rear window too, which was also smashed, so it went right through the car. 'I somehow managed to pull over safely and called 999. It all happened in the blink of an eye and I was screaming in panic because of the blood. But it could have been a lot worse. I could easily have been decapitated.' Police and highways officers were unable to find the object at the scene of the incident, between junctions 10 for Stretton and 11 for Daresbury. A Cheshire Constabulary spokesman said: 'At around 6.15am on May 29, police received reports of a road traffic incident on the M56 between junctions 10 and 11. 'The caller reported an unknown object had hit his vehicle, smashing the windscreen and causing an injury to his head. He was taken to hospital and later discharged. Inquiries are currently ongoing.' A National Highways spokesman said: 'Our thoughts are with Mr Gray after this incident. While it would be inappropriate to comment on the details of this specific incident due the police investigation, National Highways has rigorous motorways inspection, reactive and routine maintenance regimes to tackle defects and remove debris. 'In urgent cases, we can and do close lanes or a carriageway to remove debris including after collisions or in cases where items have fallen from vehicles. The next planned 'sweep' of this section of the M56 is at the end of the month. 'Anyone spotting hazardous debris can report it to us, when they can do so safely, by calling our 24-7 customer contact centre on 0300 123 5000.' Anyone with information is asked call Cheshire Constabulary on 101, quoting crime reference number 25000440305. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mental health sick days are an oxymoron
Donald Trump has changed his mind so often on tariffs that my head is spinning. Writing about the crushing weight of the budget deficit has been getting me down. And to be honest, if I have to listen to Rachel Reeves do her impression of a Dalek with a bad head cold one more time I might ask to be left alone in a dark room with a revolver and a glass of whisky. There are plenty of reasons why I could tell the Telegraph editor that I was too stressed, anxious or depressed to deliver a column today. But hold on. In fact, knuckling down to some work will be good for me, and will almost certainly make me feel better. In reality, as the latest shocking numbers on the days lost to mental health made clear this week, British employers need to start insisting that putting in a proper shift at the office, factory or warehouse is better for everyone – and bring the epidemic of psychological sickness under control before it crushes the economy. Output has stagnated, the stock market is disappearing, and job vacancies are starting to fall. Still, it is good to see the UK is still leading the world at something. According to the Office for National Statistics – where fortunately the staff managed to pull themselves together long enough to crunch the numbers on our behalf – the time taken off work for mental health has just hit a record high. Over the course of 2024, British employees took a record 20.5m days off for mental health conditions such as stress, anxiety and depression, up from 14.8m as recently as 2023. With grim inevitably, the public sector has been leading the way on that, with mental health accounting for an absence rate of 2.9pc, or 16.4pc of all absences, compared to a rate of 1.8pc at private businesses, or 6.7pc of total absences. Overall, that is a rise of 38pc over just two years. If anything else in the economy was increasing at that kind of a rate, we wouldn't be worrying about growth. We would be richer than Dubai, Switzerland and Singapore put together. We may have only seen the start of the really big increases. The figures are 'only the tip of the iceberg', according to Jamie O'Halloran, of the Institute for Public Policy Research, who argues that many employees carry on working even when they are unwell. Heck, surely we can push that 20m figure even higher. Thirty million, perhaps? Or 50m? Or 100m? The sky is the limit. The trouble is, the numbers are rising so fast that it is hard to accept that we should take them at face value. Sure, we all agree that better diagnosis and a more tolerant culture has meant that staff who might have suffered in silence in the past are now more honest about their problems, and more likely to seek help, and take time off where necessary for treatment. No one thinks that people should avoid treating any form of illness, and it is right to recognise that a mental health condition is just as serious as any more obvious physical affliction. And yet, to put this politely, it is surely also obvious that something fishy is going on. Why is mental health, for example, so much worse in the public sector than the private? Are government jobs really more stressful, or demanding, than private sector ones? With working from home, gold-plated pensions, strong unions, and little chance of redundancy, you might think there was less to make you feel anxious. And how can the total go up by 38pc over just two years, a rate which would imply that days off for mental health will rise by 423pc over the next decade, taking the total number of absences up to 107m days lost, or the equivalent of taking 475,000 people out of the UK's total workforce? The blunt truth is this. If the mental health epidemic keeps on growing at its current rate it is going to crush the economy. And yet the science tells us that, actually, work is good for our mental health. It gives us purpose, and a sense of belonging. For example, according to a study by the University of Cambridge, looking at over 70,000 UK residents between 2009 and 2018, 'paid employment brings other benefits – often psychological – such as self-esteem and social inclusion', while according to a study published in the National Library of Medicine in the United States 'unemployment worsens mental health and gaining employment can improve mental health, even for people with the most serious mental illnesses'. I could easily quote dozens of similar findings. But I am sure everyone gets the point by now. While there are limits to how much people should work, in general it is better for their mental health, improving their sense of well-being, giving them a purpose, enabling them to mix with more people, and sometimes just filling up days that would otherwise feel very empty. Led by human resources departments that have grown too powerful, many employers, and especially in the public sector, are being far too indulgent. Sure, they need to be sympathetic, and they need to allow people who have a genuine issue to take time off for a well-planned course of treatment. But the British economy already has woeful productivity, and is trapped in a doom loop of stagnant growth, rising taxes, and falling living standards. We simply can't afford this level of mental health absences – because on current trends the economy is going to be completely destroyed. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
