logo
World braces for Iran's response to US strikes

World braces for Iran's response to US strikes

CNA4 hours ago

ISTANBUL/WASHINGTON/JERUSALEM: The world braced on Sunday (Jun 22) for Iran's response after the US attacked key Iranian nuclear sites, joining Israel in the biggest Western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution.
With the damage visible from space after 30,000-pound US bunker-buster bombs crashed into the mountain above Iran's Fordow nuclear site, Tehran vowed to defend itself at all costs.
It fired another volley of missiles at Israel that wounded scores of people and flattened buildings in Tel Aviv. The US State Department ordered employees' family members to leave Lebanon and advised citizens elsewhere in the region to keep a low profile or restrict travel.
An advisory from the US Department of Homeland Security warned of a "heightened threat environment in the United States." Law enforcement in major US cities stepped up patrols and deployed additional resources to religious, cultural and diplomatic sites.
Tehran has so far not followed through on its threats of retaliation against the United States, either by targeting US bases or trying to choke off global oil supplies, but that may not hold.
Speaking in Istanbul, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said his country would consider all possible responses. There would be no return to diplomacy until it had retaliated, he said.
"The US showed they have no respect for international law. They only understand the language of threat and force," he said.
Ali Shamkhani, an adviser to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said on X that the initiative was "now with the side that plays smart, avoids blind strikes. Surprises will continue!"
US President Donald Trump, in a televised address, called the strikes "a spectacular military success" and boasted that Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities had been "completely and totally obliterated."
But his own officials gave more nuanced assessments and, with the exception of satellite photographs appearing to show craters on the mountain above Iran's subterranean plant at Fordow, there has been no public accounting of the damage.
The UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said no increases in off-site radiation levels had been reported after the US strikes.
IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi told CNN that it was not yet possible to assess the damage done underground. A senior Iranian source told Reuters that most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow had been moved elsewhere before the attack. Reuters could not immediately corroborate the claim.
Trump immediately called on Iran to forgo any retaliation, saying the government "must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier," he said.
US Vice President JD Vance said Washington was not at war with Iran but with its nuclear programme, adding this had been pushed back by a very long time due to the US intervention.
In a step towards what is widely seen as Iran's most effective threat to hurt the West, its parliament approved a move to close the Strait of Hormuz. Nearly a quarter of global oil shipments pass through the narrow waters that Iran shares with Oman and the United Arab Emirates.
Iran's Press TV said closing the strait would require approval from the Supreme National Security Council, a body led by an appointee of Khamenei.
Attempting to choke off Gulf oil by closing the strait could send global oil prices skyrocketing, derail the world economy and invite almost certain conflict with the US Navy's massive Fifth Fleet, based in the Gulf and tasked with keeping the strait open.
Security experts have long warned a weakened Iran could also find other unconventional ways to strike back, such as bombings or cyberattacks.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in an interview on "Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo," warned Iran against retaliation for the US strikes, saying such action would be "the worst mistake they've ever made."
Rubio separately told CBS's "Face the Nation" talk show that the US has "other targets we can hit, but we achieved our objective."
"There are no planned military operations right now against Iran," he later added, "unless they mess around."
The UN Security Council was due to meet later on Sunday, diplomats said, at the request of Iran, which urged the 15-member body "to address this blatant and unlawful act of (US) aggression, to condemn it in the strongest possible terms."
DIVERGING WAR AIMS
Israeli officials, who began the hostilities with a surprise attack on Iran on Jun 13, have increasingly spoken of their ambition to topple the hardline Shi'ite Muslim clerical establishment that has ruled Iran since 1979.
US officials, many of whom witnessed Republican President George W Bush's popularity collapse following his disastrous intervention in Iraq in 2003, have stressed that they were not working to overthrow Iran's government.
"This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told reporters at the Pentagon. "The president authorised a precision operation to neutralise the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear programme."
Senator Lindsey Graham, a staunch Trump ally, said on NBC's "Meet the Press with Kristen Welker" program that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had told him his country would no longer endure being under missile attack.
"They're not going to live under threat from Iran anymore," Graham said. "Israel's made a decision. This regime is going to change in one of two ways: they're going to change their behavior, which I doubt, the regime itself, or the people are going to replace the regime.'
Iranians contacted by Reuters described their fear at the prospect of an enlarged war involving the United States.
"Our future is dark. We have nowhere to go - it's like living in a horror movie," Bita, 36, a teacher from the central city of Kashan, said before the phone line was cut.
Much of Tehran, a capital city of 10 million people, has emptied out, with residents fleeing to the countryside to escape Israeli bombardment.
Iranian authorities say more than 400 people have been killed since Israel's attacks began, mostly civilians. Israel's bombardment has scythed through much of Iran's military leadership with strikes targeted at bases and residential buildings where senior figures slept.
Iran has been launching missiles back at Israel, killing at least 24 people over the past nine days, the first time its projectiles have penetrated Israel's defences in large numbers. The elite Revolutionary Guards said they had fired 40 missiles at Israel in the latest volley overnight.
Air raid sirens sounded across most of Israel on Sunday, sending millions of people to safe rooms.
In Tel Aviv, Aviad Chernovsky, 40, emerged from a bomb shelter to find his house had been destroyed in a direct hit. "It's not easy to live now in Israel (right now), but we are very strong. We know that we will win,' he said.
Trump had veered between offering to end the war with diplomacy or to join it, at one point musing publicly about killing Iran's supreme leader. His decision ultimately to join the fight is the biggest foreign policy gamble of his career.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Commentary: If Trump's China policy seems off, look at who he's listening to
Commentary: If Trump's China policy seems off, look at who he's listening to

CNA

time27 minutes ago

  • CNA

Commentary: If Trump's China policy seems off, look at who he's listening to

HONG KONG: United States President Donald Trump believes China is on the brink of collapse. He's said as much repeatedly, claiming that Beijing is 'getting killed' by his tariffs, that Chinese factories are closing and that unemployment is soaring. As someone who's written about China's relations with the US for more than 30 years, I find it fascinating to observe how Mr Trump's bluster and bluffing tactics have failed to pressure China into submission in their trade war. More critically, his bullying approach seems to reflect a significant misunderstanding of China and its leadership, which could have negative implications for future bilateral discussions. This raises the question of whether Mr Trump is receiving sound advice regarding his strategy toward China. Some might argue that in his aggressive pursuit of an America First agenda, it is Mr Trump's prerogative to disregard how the rest of the world, including China, perceives his actions. While this may hold some truth, a review of Mr Trump's public speeches and social media posts reveals a profound misapprehension of China and its intentions. WHAT HOLDS UP, AND WHAT DOESN'T For instance, as soon as Beijing began its tit-for-tat retaliation against US tariff increases on Chinese imports in early April, Mr Trump took to his Truth Social platform to declare: 'China played it wrong, they panicked – the one thing they can't afford to do,' emphasising every word in capital letters. As China stood firm and vowed to 'fight till the end', Mr Trump claimed in a May interview that 'China is getting killed right now' and 'They're getting absolutely destroyed.' He asserted that China's economy 'is collapsing'. His claims are greatly exaggerated. Official data indicate that while China's exports did slow down in May, it still grew 4.8 per cent year-on-year, despite a 34.5 per cent drop in shipments to the US. And although industrial output growth eased from 6.1 per cent in April to 5.8 per cent in May, it remains robust, and retail sales - a key gauge of consumer demand - surged by 6.4 per cent in May, exceeding expectations. While China may be facing deflationary pressures, its economy is far from the collapse that Mr Trump imagines. Overall, he has drastically underestimated Beijing's political strategy and its willingness to endure short-term economic challenges. DONALD TRUMP'S CHINA INTEL Last month, Mr Trump reportedly downsized the National Security Council - which advises the president on foreign policy and national security matters - letting go of most of the China team, seemingly as part of a broader effort to reduce the influence of those who might oppose his America First agenda. This raises another important question: Where is he obtaining his information about China? Mr Trump's known affinity for Fox News is well-documented. He's appointed more than a dozen former Fox News hosts, journalists and commentators to senior positions during his second term in office. These include Pete Hegseth as Defense Secretary, former Fox pundit and US Representative Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence, and former Fox Business host Sean Duffy as Transportation Secretary. Meanwhile, figures like Gordon Chang, who infamously predicted in 2001 that China would collapse by 2011 in his book The Coming Collapse of China, has continued to promote his disproven theories in that sphere. In April, Mr Trump posted a quote on Truth Social by Mr Chang - who has claimed in interviews that Beijing had everything to lose in a tariff war with Mr Trump - calling for more aggressive tariffs on China. Such misguided perspectives have undoubtedly complicated bilateral discussions between Washington and Beijing. Following talks in Geneva in May, both sides agreed to pause the tariff war and establish a framework for further negotiations. However, this framework quickly fell apart. From the US perspective, China imposed restrictions on critical mineral exports, including rare earth elements. Meanwhile, China viewed the US as continuing to introduce unfavourable measures, such as threatening to revoke Chinese student visas and suspending sales of technology and products used in assembling China's COMAC C919 aircraft. The standoff was finally resolved after Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed to speak with Mr Trump on Jun 5. Ironically, just a day earlier, Mr Trump had posted on Truth Social that Mr Xi was 'extremely hard to make a deal with'. This comment again suggests a limited understanding of China's political dynamics. While Mr Trump has made it clear that he wants to lead negotiations, China prefers that the outcomes be agreed upon beforehand. A 'DONE' DEAL? The phone call paved the way for discussions in London earlier this month, during which both sides appeared to agree on a new framework to implement the Geneva agreement. Mr Trump claimed in a Truth Social post that a deal had been reached with China, pending final approval from both him and Mr Xi. He seemingly suggested that China had agreed to supply US companies with magnets and rare earth metals, while the US would ease its threats regarding the revocation of Chinese student visas. However, there is more than meets the eye. It is hard to believe that China would agree to resume rare earth supplies solely in exchange for continued visa issuance for Chinese students. After all, control over rare earths - of which China processes 90 per cent globally - has become a significant leverage point against the US. It is more plausible that China will continue to push the US to relax restrictions on more advanced chips, even though US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated there would be no "quid pro quo" regarding easing curbs on AI chip exports to China in exchange for access to rare earths. Meanwhile, it is believed that Chinese companies are finding ways to acquire the latest AI chips, as the US restrictions have inadvertently created a booming black market for these supplies. One industry source likens the US restrictions on AI chips to the futility of the Prohibition era in the US. As one popular meme illustrates, Mr Trump declares, 'I hold the cards,' to which Mr Xi replies, 'The cards are made in China.'

Iran Votes to Close Strait of Hormuz that Could Put One-Fifth of World's Oil Supply at Risk and Trigger Sharp Rise in Global Crude Prices
Iran Votes to Close Strait of Hormuz that Could Put One-Fifth of World's Oil Supply at Risk and Trigger Sharp Rise in Global Crude Prices

International Business Times

timean hour ago

  • International Business Times

Iran Votes to Close Strait of Hormuz that Could Put One-Fifth of World's Oil Supply at Risk and Trigger Sharp Rise in Global Crude Prices

Iran's parliament has voted to close down the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial maritime route that handles around 20 percent of the world's daily oil supply, which could halt around $1 billion worth of oil exports each day and could trigger a sharp rise in global oil prices. The decision will be implemented once it receives final approval from Iran's Supreme Council. The Supreme Council must take a final decision by the end of tonight, Iran's state-run Press TV reported. Email Kosari, a commander in Iran's Revolutionary Guards, said on Sunday that Iran's major escalation in response to the U.S. strikes on its nuclear sites "will be done whenever necessary." Iran to Stop Oil Supply The Strait of Hormuz, which connects the Gulf of Oman to the Persian Gulf, is one of the most strategically important maritime passages in the world — measuring only 20 miles across at its narrowest point. The actual navigable shipping lanes within the strait are even more restricted, with less than two miles of clearance in each direction, making them especially susceptible to attacks or blockades. The strait's shallow depth makes it especially susceptible to underwater mines, while its limited width leaves ships exposed to potential attacks from land-based missiles, patrol boats, or helicopters. Although Iran lacks the legal authority to restrict maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, any attempt by its navy to do so would likely provoke a forceful reaction. The U.S. Fifth Fleet, along with other Western naval forces, maintains a constant presence in the region. The strait is flanked by Iran on the north and bordered by Oman and the United Arab Emirates to the south. A major portion of the oil exported by key producers in the region — including Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE — passes through this narrow and vital passage. Asia to Suffer the Most Asia is likely to suffer the most from any shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz, as countries like China, India, Japan, and South Korea rely heavily on it for the majority of their oil imports. China — the largest buyer of Iranian oil and a key ally that has often used its veto at the UN Security Council to shield Tehran from sanctions or resolutions — would be especially impacted by any closure. At the same time, closing the strait would also deal a serious blow to Iran's own economy. Iran previously disrupted shipping in the Persian Gulf in April last year when it detained a Israel-linked container ship near the Strait of Hormuz, accusing the MSC Aries of breaching maritime laws. Earlier in April 2023, Iran also seized a tanker that was going to the U.S., alleging that it had struck another vessel. In May 2022, two Greek tankers were seized and held for six months — widely interpreted as a retaliatory move following the confiscation of Iranian oil by Greek and U.S. authorities from a separate ship. In earlier incidents, Yemen's Houthi rebels interfered with maritime traffic through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which connects to the Red Sea on the opposite side of the Arabian Peninsula. Using missiles and drones, the Houthis managed to cut down shipping activity through the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden by about 70 percent in June compared to the average traffic seen in 2022 and 2023, according to Clarkson Research Services Ltd, a division of the world's largest shipbroking firm.

World awaits Iranian response after US hits nuclear sites
World awaits Iranian response after US hits nuclear sites

CNA

timean hour ago

  • CNA

World awaits Iranian response after US hits nuclear sites

ISTANBUL/WASHINGTON/JERUSALEM: The world braced on Sunday (Jun 22) for Iran's response after the US attacked key Iranian nuclear sites, joining Israel in the biggest Western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution. With the damage visible from space after 30,000-pound US bunker-buster bombs crashed into the mountain above Iran's Fordow nuclear site, Tehran vowed to defend itself at all costs. It fired another volley of missiles at Israel that wounded scores of people and flattened buildings in Tel Aviv. The US State Department ordered employees' family members to leave Lebanon and advised citizens elsewhere in the region to keep a low profile or restrict travel. An advisory from the US Department of Homeland Security warned of a "heightened threat environment in the United States." Law enforcement in major US cities stepped up patrols and deployed additional resources to religious, cultural and diplomatic sites. Tehran has so far not followed through on its threats of retaliation against the United States, either by targeting US bases or trying to choke off global oil supplies, but that may not hold. Speaking in Istanbul, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said his country would consider all possible responses. There would be no return to diplomacy until it had retaliated, he said. "The US showed they have no respect for international law. They only understand the language of threat and force," he said. Ali Shamkhani, an adviser to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said on X that the initiative was "now with the side that plays smart, avoids blind strikes. Surprises will continue!" US President Donald Trump, in a televised address, called the strikes "a spectacular military success" and boasted that Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities had been "completely and totally obliterated." But his own officials gave more nuanced assessments and, with the exception of satellite photographs appearing to show craters on the mountain above Iran's subterranean plant at Fordow, there has been no public accounting of the damage. The UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said no increases in off-site radiation levels had been reported after the US strikes. IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi told CNN that it was not yet possible to assess the damage done underground. A senior Iranian source told Reuters that most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow had been moved elsewhere before the attack. Reuters could not immediately corroborate the claim. Trump immediately called on Iran to forgo any retaliation, saying the government "must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier," he said. US Vice President JD Vance said Washington was not at war with Iran but with its nuclear programme, adding this had been pushed back by a very long time due to the US intervention. In a step towards what is widely seen as Iran's most effective threat to hurt the West, its parliament approved a move to close the Strait of Hormuz. Nearly a quarter of global oil shipments pass through the narrow waters that Iran shares with Oman and the United Arab Emirates. Iran's Press TV said closing the strait would require approval from the Supreme National Security Council, a body led by an appointee of Khamenei. Attempting to choke off Gulf oil by closing the strait could send global oil prices skyrocketing, derail the world economy and invite almost certain conflict with the US Navy's massive Fifth Fleet, based in the Gulf and tasked with keeping the strait open. Security experts have long warned a weakened Iran could also find other unconventional ways to strike back, such as bombings or cyberattacks. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in an interview on "Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo," warned Iran against retaliation for the US strikes, saying such action would be "the worst mistake they've ever made." Rubio separately told CBS's "Face the Nation" talk show that the US has "other targets we can hit, but we achieved our objective." "There are no planned military operations right now against Iran," he later added, "unless they mess around." The UN Security Council was due to meet later on Sunday, diplomats said, at the request of Iran, which urged the 15-member body "to address this blatant and unlawful act of (US) aggression, to condemn it in the strongest possible terms." DIVERGING WAR AIMS Israeli officials, who began the hostilities with a surprise attack on Iran on Jun 13, have increasingly spoken of their ambition to topple the hardline Shi'ite Muslim clerical establishment that has ruled Iran since 1979. US officials, many of whom witnessed Republican President George W Bush's popularity collapse following his disastrous intervention in Iraq in 2003, have stressed that they were not working to overthrow Iran's government. "This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told reporters at the Pentagon. "The president authorised a precision operation to neutralise the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear programme." Senator Lindsey Graham, a staunch Trump ally, said on NBC's "Meet the Press with Kristen Welker" program that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had told him his country would no longer endure being under missile attack. "They're not going to live under threat from Iran anymore," Graham said. "Israel's made a decision. This regime is going to change in one of two ways: they're going to change their behavior, which I doubt, the regime itself, or the people are going to replace the regime.' Iranians contacted by Reuters described their fear at the prospect of an enlarged war involving the United States. "Our future is dark. We have nowhere to go - it's like living in a horror movie," Bita, 36, a teacher from the central city of Kashan, said before the phone line was cut. Much of Tehran, a capital city of 10 million people, has emptied out, with residents fleeing to the countryside to escape Israeli bombardment. Iranian authorities say more than 400 people have been killed since Israel's attacks began, mostly civilians. Israel's bombardment has scythed through much of Iran's military leadership with strikes targeted at bases and residential buildings where senior figures slept. Iran has been launching missiles back at Israel, killing at least 24 people over the past nine days, the first time its projectiles have penetrated Israel's defences in large numbers. The elite Revolutionary Guards said they had fired 40 missiles at Israel in the latest volley overnight. Air raid sirens sounded across most of Israel on Sunday, sending millions of people to safe rooms. In Tel Aviv, Aviad Chernovsky, 40, emerged from a bomb shelter to find his house had been destroyed in a direct hit. "It's not easy to live now in Israel (right now), but we are very strong. We know that we will win,' he said. Trump had veered between offering to end the war with diplomacy or to join it, at one point musing publicly about killing Iran's supreme leader. His decision ultimately to join the fight is the biggest foreign policy gamble of his career.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store