Major plan in Liverpool for former Merseyside Police headquarters
A landmark former police headquarters is set to be bought by the government's housing and regeneration agency.Canning Place in Liverpool city centre was home to Merseyside Police for more than 40 years, first opening its doors in 1977.The 2.64-acre site is situated near Liverpool ONE shopping centre and the Albert Dock.Homes England has been named as the preferred bidder to buy the site, and it has submitted proposals to transform it into a mixed-use waterfront development, likely to comprise of residential, hotel and retail, leisure and commercial spaces.
Merseyside Police began vacating and relocating to Rose Hill, off St Anne Street, in 2021.Merseyside's Police and Crime Commissioner Emily Spurrell said the move to the new headquarters, which officially opened in March 2022, had saved the force approximately £550,000 each year.She announced last year Canning Place was being put up for sale and said the money recouped would be reinvested into modernising and updating Merseyside Police's stations and buildings.The PCC, working with the Merseyside Police estates team, will now work with Homes England through the final stages of due diligence and site master planning with Historic England and Liverpool City Council, with the aim of exchanging contracts later this year.Once the sale is completed, Homes England will look to select a development partner and secure planning consent from Liverpool City Council for its vision for the site.Eamonn Boylan, chief executive of Homes England, said: "Canning Place is a historic site in a prime location on Liverpool's iconic waterfront. "Once the purchase of the site is completed, we will work with Liverpool City Council and Historic England to agree a masterplan that delivers a high-quality vision for the development that respects its waterfront setting, before selecting a development partner to transform the site into a mixed-use development fit for a new generation."
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
15 minutes ago
- The Sun
Huge fashion retailer with over 250 UK stores ‘drawing up radical rescue plan' with shops and jobs at risk
A HUGE fashion retailer with over 250 UK stores is reportedly drawing up a radical rescue plan which could see shops and jobs axed. The high street giant - which is being forced to restructure due to tough trading standards - employs around 5,500 people and was founded in London in 1948. 2 2 The chain's owners have brought in advisers from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) to come up with money-saving solutions, reports Sky News. The proposals are expected to be finalised in a matter of weeks, though sources have reportedly claimed no decisions have been green lit on the retailer's future. Accounts for River Island Clothing Co for the year ending December 30 2023 showed the firm made a £33.2 million pre-tax loss. Then the turnover during the following 12 months fell by more than 19% to £578.1 million. The firm's latest accounts at Companies House, warned of growing financial and operational risks. "The market for retailing of fashion clothing is fast changing with customer preferences for more diverse, convenient and speedier shopping journeys and with increasing competition especially in the digital space," it said. "The key business risks for the group are the pressures of a highly competitive and changing retail environment combined with increased economic uncertainty. "A number of geopolitical events have resulted in continuing supply chain disruption as well as energy, labour and food price increases, driving inflation and interest rates higher and resulting in weaker disposable income and lower consumer confidence." In January, River Island hired consulting firm, AlixPartners, to undertake work on cost reductions and profit improvement. It's understood PwC has now taken over. Why are so many pubs and bars closing? In recent months, a number of River Island stores have been closing, including in Corby and Chesterfield. Originally named Lewis Separates and then Chelsea Girl, the chain was founded by Bernard Lewis in 1948 and became influential during the 1960s fashion scene, including the iconic mini-dress trend. It was re-branded as River Island in 1988 and throughout the next two decades expanded to become a leading high street force in the UK. It now has a presence in over 125 worldwide markets, in stores and online. Why are retailers closing shops? EMPTY shops have become an eyesore on many British high streets and are often symbolic of a town centre's decline. The Sun's business editor Ashley Armstrong explains why so many retailers are shutting their doors. In many cases, retailers are shutting stores because they are no longer the money-makers they once were because of the rise of online shopping. Falling store sales and rising staff costs have made it even more expensive for shops to stay open. The British Retail Consortium has predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs from April 2025, will cost the retail sector £2.3billion. At the same time, the minimum wage will rise to £12.21 an hour from April, and the minimum wage for people aged 18-20 will rise to £10 an hour, an increase of £1.40. In some cases, retailers are shutting a store and reopening a new shop at the other end of a high street to reflect how a town has changed. The problem is that when a big shop closes, footfall falls across the local high street, which puts more shops at risk of closing. Retail parks are increasingly popular with shoppers, who want to be able to get easy, free parking at a time when local councils have hiked parking charges in towns. Many retailers including Next and Marks & Spencer have been shutting stores on the high street and taking bigger stores in better-performing retail parks instead. In some cases, stores have been shut when a retailer goes bust, as in the case of Carpetright, Debenhams, Dorothy Perkins, Paperchase, Ted Baker, The Body Shop, Topshop and Wilko to name a few. What's increasingly common is when a chain goes bust a rival retailer or private equity firm snaps up the intellectual property rights so they can own the brand and sell it online. They may go on to open a handful of stores if there is customer demand, but there are rarely ever as many stores or in the same places. The Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year.
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Jack Grealish is at a crossroads – and the next step is far from obvious
Sometimes a career can be measured by what happens over summers. In 2021, Jack Grealish became the most expensive Englishman in history, the Premier League 's record signing, the £100m man. In 2023, he was the treble winner whose celebrations in Ibiza felt the stuff of legend. In 2024, he was, to his surprise, omitted from England's European Championships squad. In 2025, it would be rather less of a shock if he is excluded from Manchester City 's Club World Cup squad. It could be seen as the rise and fall of Grealish. He may be deemed to be at a crossroads, though one interpretation is that he has reached a dead end, at least as far as City is concerned. Grealish, 29, has started one Premier League match in 2025, appeared for a grand total of four minutes in City's last seven top-flight fixtures and did not make the bench for their final-day win at Fulham. Pep Guardiola has said he dislikes having to leave players out of the matchday squad, that the players and the club have to find the 'best way' forward. He both wants a smaller squad and is busy making signings. Something has to give. Someone has to go. Leaving Grealish at home when City go to the United States would be an unsubtle hint that he will be the most high-profile casualty. Bidding farewell to him altogether could be a rather lengthier process. Grealish has two years left on his contract, wages that would be prohibitive to most other clubs and which would probably require City to substantially subsidise even a loan deal. The easy answer is to suggest Grealish returns to his beloved Aston Villa. Yet they are shorn of Champions League revenues next season and, in any case, possess more compelling choices in the attacking midfield spots: the Grealish of the last two years is an inferior player to Morgan Rogers, Jacob Ramsey and John McGinn. Grealish has the high profile and high fee, but has had a low output. The feeling is that he is aware of the criticism. In a social media post this week, Grealish argued he had scored in his last three appearances that lasted at least 45 minutes. It isn't entirely true – he omitted the FA Cup ties against Leyton Orient, Plymouth and Nottingham Forest – but it was an attempt to alter the perception. Except that the perception is true. He has one league goal since 2023. He did not score for City in any competition in 2024. The last two seasons have brought just five assists in total. The City Grealish can win free-kicks and retain possession – his pass completion rate in last season's Premier League was 91 per cent – but that may reflect the way the risk and excitement have been stripped from his game. And even Guardiola, who doesn't tend to judge players on goals, may have belatedly realised Grealish provides too few. He only really flourished as a City player with others delivering the goals and assists he didn't: of four seasons, only one has been a personal success. And in 2022-23, Kevin De Bruyne contributed an extraordinary 29 assists, Ilkay Gundogan got vital goals and, though none even started the Champions League final, Julian Alvarez, Phil Foden and Riyad Mahrez all scored at least 15 times. It remains to be seen how the post-De Bruyne era shapes up and who comprises the supporting cast and supply line to Erling Haaland. Yet, after City recorded their lowest tally of Premier League goals in a season under Guardiola, there seems a recognition that they require players who can make them prolific. The January addition Omar Marmoush scored 28 times last year, 20 of them for Eintracht Frankfurt. Of two proposed midfield additions, Tijjani Reijnders scored 15 goals for AC Milan last season and Rayan Cherki got 20 assists for Lyon, including the most (eight) of anyone in the Europa League. Then there is Grealish, the increasingly conservative dribbler. Jeremy Doku and Savinho have displaced him as the wide men who run at defenders. Meanwhile, central-midfield additions are likely to end Guardiola's brief experiments – against Forest and Juventus – of Grealish in a deeper role. It leaves him looking the odd man out. Which, again, should be no shock. Grealish has only started 17 of 76 league games for City since winning the Champions League. He ranked 19th in Premier League minutes for City last season, behind the January buys Nico Gonzalez and Marmoush. For Guardiola to have the compact squad he wants, he needs players who stay fit but Grealish has had two stop-start campaigns with injuries. For now, and perhaps permanently, there is the impression that the Guardiola and Grealish bromance is over. They were always the odd couple, the nerd and the Jack the lad. At City, there are plenty of examples of Grealish's common touch, his genuine concern for fans, but his fondness for a night out may have started to count against him. Or maybe it would have been forgiven if he were delivering on the pitch. He hasn't in the last two years, a reality which is compounded by his price tag. It made him a luxury in one respect; many of City's signings – and most of their finest ones – in the last decade came for between £35m and £65m. It also means City face a bigger loss. And any prospective buyer or borrower would have to factor in an adjustment period, to answer the question, can Grealish return to the player City bought? Because who, really, needs an attacking midfielder who has too little involvement in goals? Grealish would need a process of de-Guardiola-isation, to restore him to the free spirit from the player who was reprogrammed at City. The Kalvin Phillips precedent is scarcely encouraging. Another likeable Englishman has not recaptured the qualities that made him excel before he joined City. Grealish at least had the heights of the treble. But it came at the cost of making him a duller footballer. And, two years on, as he faces a personal summer of discontent, it is hard to see where he would fit in now.
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Why banks may no longer refund fraud victims
Lenders are lobbying for new fraud reimbursement rules to be watered down over fears scam victims are being told to lie to their banks. Since last October, companies which handle payments have been required to give victims of 'Authorised Push Payment' (APP) fraud their money back, up to a limit of £85,000. In the first three months, 86pc of money lost to the scams – approximately £27m – was reimbursed to consumers by 60 firms. The current rules mean that, other than a £100 'excess' which firms can remove from payments, the only reasons that customers can be denied a payout are if they've ignored warnings, failed to quickly notify their bank of the fraud, refused to share information about the scam or do not consent to a police report being made. But in meetings in May, banks demanded that requirements for victims to act reasonably – and not to lie to their bank – were made stronger. This would mean that customers could be denied refunds in more cases. The Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) will hold an independent review of the mandatory scheme in October, and will then recommend changes. Problems raised include the high reimbursement limit, compliance monitoring by which administers the scheme, and the limited number of exemptions for refusing payouts. Lenders also said they should be able to give clear warnings about lying to them, as victims are often guided to do by fraudsters. One bank told industry magazine The Banker that: 'The [consumer negligence] bar is set so high that in almost all these cases a customer can be incredibly reckless, can lie to their bank, can ignore warnings and still get their money back.' Riccardo Tordera, director of policy and government relations at The Payments Association (TPA), said: 'The PSR says just 2pc of claims are rejected on this basis yet acknowledges no clear shift in consumer behaviour. 'Meanwhile, the Financial Ombudsman Service and the PSR both apply a stricter definition of gross negligence than common law, which could make enforcement of reimbursement policies challenging in a British court.' Under the previous voluntary code – called the Contingent Reimbursement Model (CRM) – customers could be refused for ignoring warnings or failing to verify the payee. Now the test is much stricter. Reimbursement numbers never jumped above 75pc under the old scheme – compared to 86pc for the mandatory payouts. APP scams see victims convinced to move their money themselves, eventually into a 'safe' account controlled by the fraudsters, at which point it is lost. Ticket sale scams, such as those experienced by Oasis and Taylor Swift fans, are also considered APP frauds. At first glance, the implementation has gone well. The amount lost in APP frauds dropped by 2pc between 2023 and 2024, according to UK Finance, and the number of cases fell by a fifth. But £450.7m was still lost to fraudsters last year. But the scheme has not been without its critics. Before the scheme was implemented, some parts of the industry warned of the potential problems of moral hazard – which is when consumers are incentivised to lie – and that fraudsters would pose as victims. This, it was claimed, would drive a significant spike in claims. But these fears have not materialised. Originally, the reimbursement limit was set to £415,000 – with firms expected to pay out just days after claims were made. But lobbying saw the limit dropped to £85,000, the same as the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), which protects money deposited with banks. Smaller and medium-sized payment companies had said that one large claim could wipe them out. David Geale, managing director of the Payment Services Regulator (PSR), which is responsible for the scheme, said in May that: 'While it is too early to draw firm conclusions based on the period covered by this data, we have not seen evidence of spikes in claim volumes that some had feared would occur under the policy.' Before the scheme was introduced, there was a voluntary code which most of the major banks were signed up to, run by the Lending Standards Board. Sources at the LSB said last year, before reimbursement was mandatory, that they had not seen fraudulent claims. Rocio Concha, director of policy and advocacy at Which?, said: 'Based on the available data from the PSR, the new mandatory scheme appears to be performing well, with more fraud victims getting their money back. 'Sections of the industry had tried – without producing any evidence – to claim that mandatory reimbursement would lead to consumers acting irresponsibly or even teaming up with criminals to con banks out of cash. This seemed ludicrous at the time and initial insights have borne that out.' Ms Concha added that while the number of cases were down, there was another worrying trend. She said: 'Latest industry figures suggest more victims are being tricked into sending money to bank accounts overseas controlled by fraudsters. That is concerning as these transfers aren't covered by the new mandatory reimbursement rules.' A spokesman for the PSR said: 'We have always been clear that we would have an independent review following the implementation of the policy. 'If we think there are key learnings or adjustments to make to our policy, we will consider those carefully before making any changes.'
