logo
No disease is deadlier in Africa than malaria. Trump's US aid cuts weaken the fight against it

No disease is deadlier in Africa than malaria. Trump's US aid cuts weaken the fight against it

Independent09-03-2025

Malaria season begins this month in a large part of Africa. No disease is deadlier on the continent, especially for children. But the Trump administration's decision to terminate 90% of USAID's foreign aid contracts has local health officials warning of catastrophe in some of the world's poorest communities.
Dr. Jimmy Opigo, who runs Uganda's malaria control program, told The Associated Press that USAID stop-work orders issued in late January left him and others 'focusing on disaster preparedness.' The U.S. is the top bilateral funder of anti-malaria efforts in Africa.
Anti-malarial medicines and insecticide-treated bed nets to help control the mosquito-borne disease are 'like our groceries,' Opigo said. 'There's got to be continuous supply.'
As those dwindle with the U.S.-terminated contracts, he expects a rise in cases later this year of severe malaria, which includes problems like organ failure. There is no cure. Vaccines being rolled out in parts of Africa are imperfect but are expected to largely continue with the support of a global vaccine alliance.
The Washington-based Malaria No More says new modeling shows that just a year of disruption in the malaria-control supply chain would lead to nearly 15 million additional cases and 107,000 additional deaths globally. It has urged the Trump administration to 'restart these life-saving programs before outbreaks get out of hand.'
Africa's 1.5 billion people accounted for 95% of an estimated 597,000 malaria deaths worldwide in 2023, according to the World Health Organization.
Health workers in the three African nations most burdened by malaria — Nigeria, Congo and Uganda — described a cascade of effects with the end of most U.S. government support.
The U.S. has provided hundreds of millions of dollars every year to the three countries alone through the USAID-led President's Malaria Initiative.
The U.S. funding has often been channeled through a web of non-governmental organizations, medical charities and faith-based organizations in projects that made malaria prevention and treatment more accessible, even free, especially for rural communities.
Uganda in 2023 had 12.6 million malaria cases and nearly 16,000 deaths, many of them children under 5 and pregnant women, according to WHO.
Opigo said the U.S. has been giving between $30 million and $35 million annually for malaria control. He didn't say which contracts have been terminated but noted that field research was also affected.
Some of the USAID funding in Uganda paid for mosquito-spraying operations in remote areas. Those operations were supposed to begin in February ahead of the rainy season, when stagnant water becomes breeding ground for the wide-ranging anopheles mosquito. They have been suspended.
'We have to spray the houses before the rains, when the mosquitoes come to multiply,' Opigo said.
Already, long lines of malaria patients can be seen outside clinics in many areas every year. Malaria accounts for 30% to 50% of outpatient visits to health facilities across the country, according to Uganda National Institute of Public Health.
Nigeria and Congo
Nigeria records a quarter of the world's malaria cases. But authorities have reduced malaria-related deaths there by 55% since 2000 with the support of the U.S. and others.
That support is part of the $600 million in health assistance the west African country received from the U.S. in 2023, according to U.S. Embassy figures. It was not immediately clear whether all of that funding has stopped.
The President's Malaria Initiative has supported Nigeria's malaria response with nearly 164 million fast-acting medicines, 83 million insecticide-treated bed nets, over 100 million rapid diagnostic tests, 22 million preventive treatments in pregnancy and insecticide for 121,000 homes since 2011, the embassy says.
In Congo, U.S government funding has contributed about $650 million towards malaria control since 2010.
Now, some of the successes in fighting malaria in Congo are being threatened, which will complicate already difficult efforts to identify and track disease outbreaks across the vast country as supplies and expertise for malaria testing are affected.
Worsening conflict in Congo's east, where some health workers have fled, has raised the risk of infection, with little backup coming.
With the loss of substantial U.S. support, 'a lot of people are going to be affected. Some people are really poor and cannot afford (malaria treatment),' said Dr. Yetunde Ayo-Oyalowo, a Nigerian who runs the Market Doctors nonprofit providing affordable local healthcare services.
Up to 40% of her organization's clients are diagnosed with malaria, Ayo-Oyalowo said.
There is hope among health workers in Africa that, even after the dismantling of USAID, some U.S. funding will continue flowing via other groups including the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. But that group also received U.S. support and has not issued a public statement on the dramatic cuts in U.S. aid.
Opigo in Uganda said the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health might be sources of help.
But he added: 'We need to manage the relationship with the U.S. very carefully."
___
Asadu reported from Abuja, Nigeria. AP journalist Dan Ikpoyi in Lagos, Nigeria contributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr team forced Medicaid officials to reveal the immigration status on millions of enrollees to DHS: report
RFK Jr team forced Medicaid officials to reveal the immigration status on millions of enrollees to DHS: report

The Independent

time9 hours ago

  • The Independent

RFK Jr team forced Medicaid officials to reveal the immigration status on millions of enrollees to DHS: report

The Trump administration has handed over the personal data of immigrant Medicaid enrollees to deportation officials, the Associated Press reports. Included in the data are the immigration statuses of millions of Medicaid enrollees, which could be used to i dentify individuals for deportation as part of President Donald Trump 's hard-line immigration crackdown. This has caused notable concern among officials in California due to the raids in Los Angeles by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, supported by troops, which have ignited protests and civil unrest. An internal memo and emails obtained by the AP show that Medicaid officials unsuccessfully attempted to block the data transfer, citing legal and ethical concerns. They were overruled by two top advisers to Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr., who ordered that the dataset be handed over to the Department of Homeland Security, the emails reveal. The data consists of the details of people living in California, Illinois, Washington State, and Washington, D.C., all so-called 'sanctuary states' that permit non-U.S. citizens to enroll in Medicaid programs funded solely by state taxpayer dollars. California Governor Gavin Newsom 's office expressed concern that the data would be used for immigration raids supported by the National Guard troops and Marines that President Trump deployed in Los Angeles. 'We deeply value the privacy of all Californians,' a statement said. 'This potential data transfer brought to our attention by the AP is extremely concerning, and if true, potentially unlawful, particularly given numerous headlines highlighting potential improper federal use of personal information and federal actions to target the personal information of Americans.' Department of Health and Human Services spokesman Andrew Nixon said the data was shared legally, 'to ensure that Medicaid benefits are reserved for individuals who are lawfully entitled to receive them.' The data includes addresses, names, Social Security numbers and claims data for enrollees in those states, the AP reported, based on details of the memo and two people familiar with what the states sent to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Officials at CMS were given just 54 minutes on Tuesday to comply with the RFK Jr. team's directive, the outlet reported. The AP states that Nixon wouldn't answer questions about how Homeland Security would use the data, and DHS officials did not respond to requests for comment.

Over 1,000 yogis set to downward dog at Emirates Arena for largest event of its kind
Over 1,000 yogis set to downward dog at Emirates Arena for largest event of its kind

Scotsman

time9 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Over 1,000 yogis set to downward dog at Emirates Arena for largest event of its kind

In just one week over 1,000 yoga enthusiasts will be namaste-ing at the Emirates Arena in Glasgow as part of a World Yoga Day event with renowned PYPT practitioner, Sadhvi Devaditi. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Tickets for the event – believed to be the biggest of its kind - are being snapped up quickly with over 900 already reserved, and organisers are encouraging others to secure their spot now and join the movement. The clincher, tickets are completely free. This year's event promises to be the biggest and most dynamic yet, with a live international broadcast from the Emirates Arena. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The event is a major part of Scotland's contribution to World Yoga Day, recognised globally on 21 June. Sunita Poddar, Chairperson of the Patanjali Yog Peeth (Scotland) Trust In the lead-up to the big day, the city is embracing yoga like never before. Free yoga classes will be offered to offices, schools, and community groups across Glasgow and Edinburgh from 16 to 23 June, helping people of all backgrounds experience the physical and mental health benefits of yoga. This special event is hosted by the Consulate General of India, Edinburgh, and Patanjali Yog Peeth (UK) Trust, with support from Glasgow Indians Association The events are designed to introduce people to yoga, celebrate the community spirit of new and experienced yogis across Glasgow, and supports the bringing together of from across Glasgow to celebrate the benefit of yoga. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Sunita Poddar, Chairperson of the Patanjali Yog Peeth (Scotland) Trust, said: 'Yoga is for everyone - it transcends age, background, and ability. 'At PYPT, we are committed to promoting holistic health and wellbeing by reconnecting communities with the ancient wisdom of yoga. Our aim is to inspire positive change, both physically and mentally, and empower individuals to take control of their own wellbeing. 'This celebration at the Emirates Arena is a chance to come together and experience the transformative power of yoga - we welcome everyone to be part of this special day.' Sunita Poddar is the founder and chief executive of Glasgow-based care home group, Oakminster Healthcare. Part of her mission to root her businesses and approach to person-centred resident care in health and wellbeing will see the team of care home wellbeing enablers trained to deliver low-impact yoga sessions for residents across the five care homes in Govan, Kinning Park, Pollokshields, St George's Cross and Knightswood. The PYPT Yoga Event is free, but registration is essential via Eventbrite.

Trump Medicaid cuts could devastate rural health services, hospitals warn
Trump Medicaid cuts could devastate rural health services, hospitals warn

Reuters

time11 hours ago

  • Reuters

Trump Medicaid cuts could devastate rural health services, hospitals warn

WASHINGTON, June 13 (Reuters) - Rural hospitals are sounding the alarm over proposed healthcare cuts in President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending package, warning the changes could force them to scale back services or close their doors. The bill would reduce federal spending on Medicaid, the health program for low-income Americans, by tightening enrollment standards and limiting federal aid to states. That worries rural providers, who rely heavily on the program to serve a population that tends to be poorer and sicker than the nation as a whole. "We can't sustain serving our community the way we are with additional cuts," said Carrie Lutz, CEO of Holton Community Hospital in Holton, Kansas. The independent nonprofit hospital, which serves a farming community of 13,000, is asking voters for a quarter-cent sales-tax increase to help cover its costs, which outpace annual revenues in many years. Lutz's concerns highlight the delicate balancing act lawmakers face as they try to enact Trump's priorities. Republicans who control both chambers of the U.S. Congress aim to cut Medicaid spending by $785 billion over a decade, to partly offset the cost of extending and adding to the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's signature first-term legislative achievement. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill will add $3 trillion to the $36.2 trillion national debt over the next decade, when interest payments are taken into account. Independent analysts have said the bill will effectively boost incomes for wealthier Americans and reduce incomes for the less affluent, due to cuts to Medicaid and other safety-net programs. Republicans have set a July 4 deadline to pass the bill out of Congress, giving the Senate three weeks to make changes, pass it and send it back to the House of Representatives. No Democrats voted for the bill in the House, and no Democratic supporters for it have emerged in the Senate. So Republicans who hold a slim 53-47 Senate majority must reconcile demands of budget hawks who want deeper spending cuts against concerns of others worried about the toll on rural and working-class voters who helped elect Trump. An internal Republican poll in May found voters in the most competitive congressional districts would be less likely to vote for a Republican who supported cutting Medicaid to pay for tax cuts. The upper chamber's slower pace has given interest groups time to seek changes to the 1,100-page bill. Multinational companies seek to neutralize a retaliatory tax they say could discourage investment in the U.S. Some states are fighting a provision that would prevent them from regulating artificial intelligence. Solar-energy companies warn the bill could devastate their industry by revoking subsidies for green energy. Much opposition has focused on changes to Medicaid, which covers 71 million low-income Americans. The bill would cut spending on Medicaid, which represented about 9% of the $6.8 trillion federal budget last year, by requiring adult recipients to work, excluding non-citizens and limiting an accounting mechanism states use to boost the federal government's contribution. Overall, the bill would leave 10.9 million more people without insurance, CBO estimates. Any cuts to Medicaid would hit hard in rural areas and small towns, where roughly 18% of adults are enrolled in Medicaid compared with 16% for the country as a whole, according to Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. Rural residents tend to be sicker, with higher rates of addiction, mental illness, and mortality from heart disease, cancer and stroke, the center found. The National Rural Health Association said the bill could force providers to cut services or close. Nearly half of rural hospitals currently lose money, and 120 have closed or stopped offering inpatient services over the past decade, the trade group says. The cuts could be especially acute in Kansas. The state recently increased its tax on Medicaid providers from 3% to 6%, an accounting maneuver that would effectively boost the federal government's contribution. The provider tax has been widely criticized as a gimmick or loophole that does not accurately reflect how much money is actually being spent on medical care. The bill would block that increase, freezing the state's provider tax at a lower level than in many other states. Lutz said that would reduce Holton Hospital's $22 million annual revenue by roughly $1 million - a significant hit for an organization that typically spends more money than it takes in each year. Tighter Medicaid enrollment standards, meanwhile, would increase red tape for hospital staff, while the citizenship provisions could exclude the town's Guatemalan immigrants, she said. With those changes, she said, the hospital would have to treat more uninsured patients. At least 41 of the Senate's 53 Republicans represent rural states, and several said they will work to remove the bill's limits on the provider tax. "Leave the provider tax alone. Put the work requirements in and all that kind of stuff. But for God's sakes don't cut into the bone," said Senator Jim Justice of West Virginia. The Senate Finance Committee could unveil changes to the House-passed bill in coming days. Failure to tackle that issue, they say, could leave many of their residents without reliable access to care. "If we don't get it right, doctors do not have to serve Medicaid patients and so in rural areas we could have doctors exit and I don't think our members from rural states would want that," said Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store