Russian-born Harvard researcher charged for secretly bringing frog embryos into the US
A lawyer for a Russian-born scientist and Harvard University researcher charged with trying to smuggle frog embryos asked Thursday that she be brought back to Massachusetts, three months after she was taken to a Louisiana immigration detention center.
(Also read: Harvard slammed as Elon Musk reacts to post accusing university of discriminating against 'white men')
Kseniia Petrova, 30, was already facing deportation. She was charged Wednesday with smuggling goods into the United States, shortly after a federal district court judge had set a hearing on her release. A judge in Louisiana went over the charges during a hearing Thursday.
'She has requested a transfer to Massachusetts, where the complaint was filed,' her lawyer, Gregory Romanovsky, said in a statement. 'We expect federal authorities to transfer her to Massachusetts in the next few weeks.'
If convicted, Petrova faces a sentence of up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000.
Petrova had been vacationing in France, where she stopped at a lab specializing in splicing superfine sections of frog embryos and obtained a package of samples to be used for research.
As she passed through a U.S. Customs and Border Protection checkpoint in Boston Logan International Airport, Petrova was questioned about the samples. Petrova told The Associated Press in an interview last month that she did not realize the items needed to be declared and was not trying to sneak in anything. After an interrogation, Petrova was told her visa was being canceled.
Romanovsky said Customs and Border Protection officials had no legal basis for canceling Kseniia's visa and detaining her. He called her transfer from ICE to criminal custody 'an attempt by the government to justify its outrageous and legally indefensible position that this scientist working for the U.S. on cures for cancer and aging research has somehow become a danger to the community."
The Department of Homeland Security said in a statement on the social platform X that Petrova was detained after 'lying to federal officers about carrying substances into the country.' They allege messages on her phone 'revealed she planned to smuggle the materials through customs without declaring them.'
(Also read: Meet Mona Patel, the Harvard-educated Indian-American CEO who made a splash at Met Gala 2024)
Harvard said in a statement that the university 'continues to monitor the situation.'
Petrova told the AP she left her country to avoid conflict or possible political repression. She fled after Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, marking the start of a bloody three-year war.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Markets with Bertie: The upsides of Liberation Day
Last week, Bertie found himself in Delhi meeting bureaucrats, journalists and politicians of all stripes. In the formal sessions, political correctness reigned, but Bertie has been doing policy trips long enough to know that the real juice starts flowing only during the cocktail hour. Unsurprisingly, President Trump's Liberation Day tariffs and how soon India could do a trade deal were the centrepiece of discussions. Bertie was told in hushed tones that the American trade negotiators were staying in the same hotel as the policy tour participants, as if physical proximity to them would also mean a faster flow of information. This, thought Bertie, was taking the concept of co-location too far, but it did make him peer at every Westerner at the hotel a few seconds longer than he normally would in the hope of guessing who the constituents of the negotiating party were. Also read: Donald Trump warns of 'economic ruination' if courts block his tariff authority In the evening, a small informal group gathered around a former senior bureaucrat, where again the topic of tariffs came up. The general tone was one of ruefulness, with some members of the group lamenting the spectre of lower export growth from India and a possible increase in unemployment. The old bureaucrat took all this in but, in his famous measured tone, countered that it was not all gloom and doom. 'There is a silver lining. Pretty big one at that." The chatter at the table died down, and an air of anticipation hung. The former mandarin did not disappoint. 'Trade barriers in India have been going up for the past few years. There is a reason why the US President calls us tariff king." Everyone agreed that tariffs had indeed been going up. The bureaucrat tilted his head slightly towards a few Americans hanging at the bar and said, 'If the deal means that tariff barriers come down, if not completely, at least in line with the rest of the world, that would be an important reform." There were thoughtful nods around the table. Also read: 'Provide your best offer…': Trump admin pushes countries to seal the trade deal as tariff deadline looms The official went on to highlight the second silver lining. 'Everyone is talking to us, and we are talking to everyone for a trade deal." He explained that these deals had been meandering through a thicket of red tape on both sides for years, but if US actions injected a sense of urgency in these negotiations, it would be a welcome change. 'We could have an agreement with EU (the European Union) within a year. Who would have thought?" he said happily. 'And finally, we might save some foreign exchange," he said with a twinkle in the eye. 'If the US President stops Ivy League colleges from taking in foreign students, we might save some dollars." Bertie, who has no kids, guffawed at this but wasn't joined by the group of his middle-aged peers whose kids' American dreams were now under a cloud. Every silver lining, Bertie thought, has a cloud. Also read: Trump says Xi agreed to restart the flow of rare earth minerals. Why are rare earths important for Chinese economy?
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
The rise and fall of Trump and Musk's partnership
Last week, the Internet witnessed the spectacular implosion of one of the most unconventional alliances in modern American politics. What had once been an uneasy partnership between the billionaire CEO of Tesla and X, Elon Musk, and U.S. President Donald Trump, blew into a full-blown public feud. Mr. Musk accused the 78-year-old President of 'total ingratitude', posting on X: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election. Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51–49 in the Senate.' To this, Mr. Trump shot back on Truth Social, saying, 'I would have won Pennsylvania regardless of Elon. I'm very disappointed with Elon.' But the rift had not appeared overnight. Their relationship had been fraying for months — quietly at first, then more openly, until it finally collapsed. A rocky start Mr. Musk was never a fan of Mr. Trump. In the lead-up to the 2016 election, Mr. Musk openly supported Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. 'I feel a bit stronger that he is not the right guy,' he said of Mr. Trump at the time in an interview with CNBC. 'He doesn't seem to have the sort of character that reflects well on the United States.' Yet, after Mr. Trump won the election, Mr. Musk joined a handful of White House advisory boards, including Mr. Trump's 'manufacturing jobs council'. The alliance did not last long. Mr. Musk left those roles just months later, citing Mr. Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accords. 'Climate change is real. Leaving Paris is not good for America or the world,' he tweeted in June 2017. Over the years, their paths occasionally crossed, but the relationship remained distant. In 2020, Mr. Trump, at the SpaceX launch in Florida, praised Mr. Musk, saying: 'I speak to him all the time. Great guy. He's one of our great brains. We like great brains. And Elon has done a fantastic job.' Mr. Musk, however, did not reciprocate the praise. Later in 2022, Mr. Musk purchased Twitter and later rebranded it as 'X' in July 2023. One of his first moves was to reinstate Mr. Trump's previously banned account (after finding his tweets were 'highly likely to encourage and inspire people to replicate the criminal acts' that took place in the January 6 Capitol attack.) Though Mr. Trump did not immediately return to posting on X, Mr. Musk's move was largely seen as pro-Trump. Around the same time, he also began aligning more openly with Republicans. 'In the past I voted Democrat, because they were (mostly) the kindness party. But they have become the party of division & hate, so I can no longer support them,' Mr. Musk tweeted. Growing camaraderie By 2024, as Mr. Trump prepared for a second term in the White House, their camaraderie deepened, with Mr. Musk playing an increasingly visible role in backing Mr. Trump's campaign and policies. He officially endorsed the Republican candidate, following an assassination attempt on Mr. Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania. 'I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery,' Mr. Musk had tweeted. It was seen as a striking moment of public solidarity. Not only did Mr. Musk use his X social media platform to boost Mr. Trump's efforts to get re-elected, but also offered financial support. Mr. Musk's pro-Trump spending group America PAC also played a major role in helping mobilise and register voters in battleground States that could decide the election. The Guardian reported that Mr. Musk spent almost $300 million in support of Mr. Trump. On the night of the election victory, Mr. Trump had said, 'A star is born', referring to Mr. Musk. And days later, the Tesla CEO emerged as a key ally of the President. He was appointed to lead a newly created government cutting agency, called the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Two weeks into the job, Mr. Musk said he loved Mr. Trump 'as much as a straight man can love another man'. Their closeness was on full display from flying together on Air Force One to dancing together on New Year's Eve to the disco hit YMCA. Democrats jokingly even referred to Mr. Musk as 'President Elon.' In a joint interview with Fox News in February, both heaped praise on each other. Mr. Trump said that Mr. Musk and his '100 geniuses' were ensuring his executive orders got implemented to avoid the experience of past administrations that were frustrated by bureaucracy. 'He has got some very brilliant young people working for him that dress much worse than him actually. They dress in just t-shirts; you would not know they have 180 IQ,' Mr. Trump said, praising Mr. Musk as a 'leader' who 'gets it done'. Mr. Musk, in return, praised the leader. And in March, the White House lawn was turned into a Tesla showroom. Mr. Trump stepped out from a shiny red Model S instead of his usual black Limousine, and later he even purchased the car. However, seven months later, the bromance began to cool. In April, Mr. Musk said he would be spending less time at the DOGE. The Wall Street Journal reported that Mr. Musk's White House visits declined towards the end of his tenure. At first, he was there five to seven days a week. Then three. By the end, only occasionally. Tensions boil In May, tension started to simmer. Mr. Musk criticised the White House-backed tax and budget proposal, known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Act. 'I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending Bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not decreases it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,' Mr. Musk told the TV programme CBS Sunday Morning. Mr. Trump, however, was reportedly less angry than some of his advisers about Mr. Musk's criticism, according to The Wall Street Journal. On May 31, the two men made a public appearance together in the Oval Office to mark the end of the tech billionaire's tenure as a special government employee, after 138 days in the office. Even then, Mr. Trump insisted that Mr. Musk was 'not really leaving' his team. Breaking point But once out, the billionaire resumed his criticism against the 'Big Beautiful Bill', saying it would drive up the federal budget deficit and undo the cost-cutting work of DOGE. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Mr. Musk wrote on X on June 1. Mr. Trump responded sharply days later, expressing dismay. ' I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this Bill better than almost anybody sitting here,' he said. ' He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem.' The spat intensified to a level that Mr. Musk even floated the idea of launching a new political party in America in a poll on X, that would represent 'the 80% in the middle'. He also levelled major allegations against Mr. Trump, saying the President was named in the unreleased Epstein files, a reference to documents linked to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. He later deleted this tweet. To this, Mr. Trump went on his Truth Social platform on Friday and posted a statement attributed to the Epstein criminal defence attorney David Schoen that vehemently denied Mr. Musk's accusation. Mr. Trump, meanwhile, also threatened to cancel Mr. Musk's U.S. government contracts, and the President's ally Steve Bannon suggested that the South African-born American citizen 'should be deported from the country immediately'. The financial fallout was swift and severe. Tesla's shares tumbled 14.2%, wiping approximately $152 billion off its market value. Mr. Musk's personal net worth plunged by $33 billion on June 6 alone. By the end of the week, the usually outspoken billionaire had gone quiet — sidelined, isolated, and, some say, stunned. The Trump campaign, meanwhile, has reportedly begun exploring alternative tech partnerships, with names like Peter Thiel and Palantir-linked firms. Whether this is a temporary rift or the final chapter in their alliance remains to be seen. But for now, the bromance is over.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
'They spit, we hit': Trump says LA 'invaded and occupied' by illegal migrants, orders 'to set it free'
Violent protests over immigration enforcement shook Los Angeles over the weekend, prompting a strong federal response. President Trump vowed to 'liberate' the city from a 'migrant invasion' and restore order. read more 'They spit, we hit': Trump says LA 'invaded and occupied' by illegal migrants, orders 'to set it free'. Image: AFP US President Donald Trump has pledged to 'liberate Los Angeles from the migrant invasion' following violent clashes between the state National Guard and anti-immigration enforcement protesters. Posting on Truth Social, the president said 'the illegals will be expelled' and the city would be 'set free,' as troops used tear gas and less-lethal weapons to break up crowds in downtown LA. 'A once great American City, Los Angeles, has been invaded and occupied by Illegal Aliens and Criminals,' the president wrote. 'Now violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents to try and stop our deportation operations, But these lawless riots only strengthen our resolve." STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump said that he is directing Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and Attorney General Pam Bondi, in coordination with all other relevant Departments and Agencies, to take all such action necessary to liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion, and put an end to these Migrant riots. 'Order will be restored, the Illegals will be expelled, and Los Angeles will be set free. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Tensions rose throughout Sunday, continuing from the unrest the night before. Images showed vehicles burning and protesters throwing fireworks at armed, helmeted officers. Police and protesters faced off outside the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown LA, where buildings were spray-painted with slogans like 'f****** ICE' and 'f****** LAPD.' By Sunday afternoon, the LAPD put the city on 'tactical alert.' Later, police declared an unlawful assembly in part of the city, issued a dispersal order, and began making arrests.
