
Online gambling and betting advertising is non-compliant with Gambling Act — minister
South Africans have noticed that gambling and betting advertising is getting very intrusive, but there are plans for better regulation.
Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Parks Tau, has confirmed in parliament that the advertising for online gambling and betting does not comply with the National Gambling Act, but emphasised that a crack-down is coming.
He was responding to a question from Makashule Gana, an MP for Rise Mzansi, whether the recent advertising and marketing campaigns of gambling and betting companies comply with the National Gambling Act and related regulations and policies.
Tau said in his reply that the National Gambling Board reviewed recent gambling and betting advertising campaigns to see if they comply with the National Gambling Act and National Gambling Regulations.
'The findings indicate that a number of gambling operators' current advertising and marketing practices do not fully comply with the legislative and regulatory framework, particularly regarding responsible gambling messaging and protection of minors.
ALSO READ: Did you know online gambling is illegal in SA? Here are plans to stop it
Online gambling and betting skipping statutory warnings
Tau said online gambling operators are contravening regulation 3(2) of the National Gambling Regulations about the inadequate display of responsible gambling warnings, which requires that any advertisement must include a clear and prominent statement warning against the dangers of addictive and compulsive gambling.
In a video or television advertisement, this message must incorporate at a minimum the name, toll-free number and slogan of the National Responsible Gambling Programme, and it must be published in visual format so that each slogan appears in a legible and noticeable format for at least three seconds.
'The responsible gambling message was barely visible and appeared only briefly, which undermines the intent of the regulation.'
ALSO READ: R1.1 trillion worth of online bets in a year: Does SA need to rein in digital gambling?
Children exposed to online gambling and betting advertising
He said online gambling operators also contravened regulation 3(1)(i)(i) of the National Gambling Regulations in these ways:
Exposure to minors: prohibits placing gambling advertisements in media primarily directed at children under the age of eighteen, but the Board noticed that advertisements are frequently aired during family viewing times, including during popular shows, such as MasterChef and Junior MasterChef, as well as during sports matches where the audience is likely to include minors. Tau says this is contrary to the Act, which prohibits gambling for individuals under 18. Advertising during these time slots also increases the risk of normalising gambling behaviour among young viewers.
Targeted online and streaming advertising: Tau said gambling advertisements were observed on radio streaming websites and platforms such as YouTube, often without responsible gambling disclaimers. These platforms do not adequately verify the age of users, allowing easy access to gambling content by minors. 'This raises serious concerns regarding the enticement of underage children to participate in gambling activities,' he said.
Sponsorship and product placement: the sponsorship of family-friendly programmes by major bookmakers results in increased visibility and frequency of gambling advertisements during television content widely consumed by minors and families. Tau said this form of marketing bypasses regulatory intentions to protect vulnerable groups from gambling influence.
Tau said the board engaged the provincial gambling boards about the contraventions and intends to advise the National Gambling Policy Council Meeting of the matter for resolution. 'Therefore, the department and the board will focus on implementing corrective measures in the next cycle.'
ALSO READ: 'Let's make gambling safer': New bill targets unfair online gambling practices
National Gambling Policy Council stepping up soon
Gana also wanted to know whether Tau found that the lack of National Gambling Policy Council meetings since March 2018 contributed to the gambling crisis and lack of accountability in the gambling and betting sector.
Tau said he will convene the National Gambling Policy Council soon. 'Gambling is a functional area of concurrent competence between national and provincial government in terms of the constitution, and therefore requires intergovernmental cooperation.
'The statutory mandate of the Council in terms of section 62 of the National Gambling Act includes consulting on the determination and establishment of the national gambling policy and laws, including the promotion of uniform national and provincial laws about gambling norms and standards, as well as any matter concerning gambling.'
The Council enables provinces and national government to debate and deliberate on policy and ensure alignment of policy and enforcement interventions across the country.
Tau said that with the gambling environment evolving, there has been a growth in the industry, which also paved the way for illegal activities, such as online gambling, to thrive. 'In addition, the inability to meet affects uniformity and harmonisation of gambling policy and legislation, which leads to fragmentation in the gambling regulation in the country.'
NOW READ: WATCH: Women and pensioners among 'vulnerable' groups, says Gauteng Gambling Board
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
'Cradock Four' inquest: Son of Calata drops bombshell that his dad died for his activism
JOHANNESBURG - The son of slain apartheid activist Fort Calata has testified before an inquest that he was told by a senior government official that his father's case was part of the price that had to be paid during negotiations for South Africa's freedom. The Cradock inquest is on its fifth day in the Gqeberha High Court, and Lukhanyo Calata is on the witness stand. The inquiry is to establish whether the apartheid security branch police or any other people can be held liable for the deaths of the anti-apartheid activists. Fort Calata, Matthew Goniwe, Sicelo Mhlauli and Sparrow Mkhonto were abducted and assassinated by police in 1985. IN PICS: Gqeberha High Court Judge visits key locations linked to lives of 'Cradock Four' It's a widespread rumour that the negotiators of South Africa's freedom in the run-up to democracy may have agreed to certain conditions that have led to most black South Africans remaining disadvantaged, and the perpetrators of apartheid crimes being let off the hook. But on Friday, in the 'Cradock Four' inquest, the son of Calata, Lukhanyo, told the Gqeberha High Court of a conversation he had with the Deputy Minister of Justice, John Jeffrey, in 2017. 'The deputy minister said you know the issues of the TRC [Truth and Reconciliation Commission], including the 'Cradock Four' matter, was part of the price that had to be paid for the negotiation settlement. When he said that my blood was boiling, because what did he mean that this was part of the price that had to be paid?' Calata said his family was not willing to accept that his father was used by politicians as a pawn in some kind of negotiation game. ALSO READ: Judge visits locations related to killings of Cradock Four


eNCA
2 hours ago
- eNCA
NSPCA investigating viral video of emaciated dog
JOHANNESBURG - The National Council of SPCAs (NSPCA) has confirmed that it is investigating a viral video showing a woman dancing in front of a severely emaciated dog -- a clip that has sparked widespread outrage. The NSPCA told eNCA that its Special Projects Unit has launched a formal investigation and is working to verify key details. 'At this stage, we are confident that we've identified the individual and can now focus on the location of the animal,' the organisation said. The dog's condition has raised serious welfare concerns. 'As the video is very short, it is difficult to assess the animal's overall welfare, but there are concerns about, at least, the animal being emaciated,' the NSPCA said. — Random Pictures (@Random_Picx) June 3, 2025 If it finds sufficient evidence of contraventions under the Animals Protection Act 71 of 1962, charges will be laid. 'Should there be evidence, beyond reasonable doubt, that contraventions… have been committed, charges will be laid,' the NSPCA confirmed. Because the video was originally shared by a third party, investigators have had to trace its source -- a task made more difficult by the nature of social media virality. 'Investigations of this nature are extremely challenging as we first need to determine the source (person) of the video, then their location and/or identity,' the NSPCA explained. It says it prioritises education in most cases, but will seek a warrant to remove an animal if it is clear that neglect is intentional or that an animal is suffering without intervention. 'When it is apparent that there was wilful neglect … or being aware that the animal is suffering and not taking any reasonable steps to remedy the situation, we may apply for a warrant to seize the animal,' the organisation stated. The NSPCA has urged South Africans to report suspected animal cruelty directly to authorities, rather than simply resharing disturbing content online. 'It is always difficult if people reshare content, because the virality often benefits the initial poster, instead of ensuring that the animal cruelty issue is addressed,' the organisation said. They also encouraged members of the public to act quickly when they see signs of abuse or neglect. 'We've always said that the public are our eyes and ears… We urge the public to report anything they suspect — rather safe than sorry.'


Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Shamila Batohi and the NPA's week from hell — Failed extradition and calls for her resignation
There have been calls for NPA boss Shamila Batohi to resign following the entity's ongoing failure to prosecute State Capture cases. Batohi claims there are no fundamental problems in the NPA. On Friday, 6 June 2025, ActionSA called for advocate Shamila Batohi to be removed as the head of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) following the latest defeat in a State Capture prosecution. Meanwhile, the DA has revealed a set of reforms it believes can improve the justice system. These announcements follow this week's ruling by the Free State Division of the High Court in Bloemfontein, where Judge Philip Loubser found the extradition of Moroadi Cholota, the former personal assistant of corruption-accused former Free State premier Ace Magashule, was unlawful and unconstitutional on the basis that the extradition was requested by the NPA rather than the justice minister. This is related to the ongoing trial of 17 accused, including Magashule, over the tainted R225-million asbestos audit project in the Free State. The 17 accused, which include companies, are faced with 70 counts of corruption. On Friday morning, ActionSA parliamentary leader Athol Trollip said the party called not only for Batohi's removal as the National Director of Public Prosecutions, but a 'full parliamentary inquiry' into what they claim is the NPA's 'ongoing prosecutorial failures and the extent to which political interference has infected its operations'. Trollip said the NPA had 'once again exposed its deep dysfunction, either through incompetence or wilful neglect' in the ongoing asbestos trial and the handling of Cholota's extradition from the US. 'This is not an isolated blunder, but part of a disturbing and entrenched pattern. The NPA has become a refuge for the politically connected, a place where accountability is avoided, justice is delayed, and prosecutions collapse with shocking regularity. 'Under Shamila Batohi's leadership, the NPA reels from one scandal to the next. South Africans are left wondering if these failures are merely a result of incompetence, or is there a deliberate agenda to protect the corrupt?' said Trollip. The NPA has come under fire on multiple fronts. Accountability Now director Paul Hoffman told Daily Maverick: 'The bottom line of the judgment is that they used the wrong procedure in the extradition — they got the wrong person to ask for the extradition.' This, he said, 'upsets the entire apple cart and makes the extradition invalid, and once the extradition is invalid, then the court has got no business sitting in judgment over the person who has been extradited'. Hoffman explained: 'At the time that they did the extradition, the Supreme Court of Appeal had not made the ruling which says that it's not for the prosecutors to ask for the extradition… It's for the ministry of justice to ask for the extradition.' He continued: 'It's really not a typical bungle, but it's just another bungle.' Batohi and the NPA respond On Thursday night and Friday morning, Batohi has been on a media blitz responding to questions around the NPA. During an interview with Newzroom Afrika, Batohi confirmed her team had met with Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi to reflect on this week's ruling. She revealed this centred around how pending and future extraditions would work. 'There's no fundamental problems in the NPA,' she told the broadcaster in an interview that spanned more than 2o minutes. She said that in the case of the acquittal of Nigerian televangelist Timothy Omotoso on charges of rape and human trafficking, among others, 'that broke my heart' because of her fight for justice for victims of gender-based violence. Batohi said: 'It's easy to put Shamila Batohi as the face of failure, but we really need to look at the challenges we're facing (systemically).' In addition, she said that while she was 'disappointed by the setbacks' within prosecutions, she was 'proud of the progress so far' by NPA staff, the majority of whom she said were 'dedicated and committed' to the rule of law. DA calls for reforms Following the Cholota ruling, the DA said it would write to Parliament's justice committee so the NPA could 'account for yet another unacceptable failure in prosecuting State Capture cases'. On Friday, the party's spokesperson on justice, Glynnis Breytenbach, said the DA would bring the issue to next Tuesday's justice committee meeting. During a media briefing on Friday morning, Breytenbach, a former state prosecutor, said: 'In the high-profile State Capture matter involving Ace Magashule's former PA, Moroadi Cholota, the NPA bungled the extradition request by using the wrong authority — a mistake that now risks derailing accountability in yet another major case.' The party is proposing a set of reforms, including passing the DA's 'Scorpions 2.0' Bill to create an independent Anti-Corruption Commission with the power to investigate and prosecute high-level corruption, free from political interference; amending the Constitution to ensure the NPA head is appointed by Parliament, and not by the president; the introduction of a dedicated parliamentary oversight subcommittee to keep the NPA accountable; and fighting for better funding, smarter recruitment, and stronger retention of experienced prosecutors. Breytenbach dismissed calls for Batohi's removal. She said the party would not table such a motion, and 'we would certainly not support it'. 'The national director is not the problem at the NPA. It's not a one-man job or a one-woman job. While I think that she could possibly have done things differently, she is not doing a bad job, and the failures of the NPA are not, you know, attributable to her and her alone.' Breytenbach said the process of appointing Batohi's replacement was 'something that concerns us deeply, and we've raised that more than a year ago already'. Batohi will turn 65 in January 2026 and retire at that point. Breytenbach said the process should include public participation, following the process President Cyril Ramaphosa used to appoint Batohi. This, she said, was laudable: 'So we're hoping that he will do that again.' She said the longer the process was postponed, the more dangerous it could become. 'It's a process that I would like to see start yesterday,' she said. DM