&w=3840&q=100)
Trump's USCIS pick sparks fear among Indian students Over OPT changes
If you're an Indian student in the U.S. — or planning to be one — there's new reason to worry. The Optional Practical Training (OPT) programme, which thousands of Indian students rely on for work opportunities after graduation, is now in the crosshairs of President Trump's nominee for the top immigration role in America.
Here is why:
President Trump's nominee for Director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Joseph Edlow, has expressed intentions to significantly alter the Optional Practical Training (OPT) programme, even though US President Donald Trump has said international students should receive green cards after graduating from U.S. universities. Economists, business leaders and educators have said that ending post-graduation OPT and STEM OPT would halt America's best programs for attracting and retaining international talent.
What Is OPT?
Optional Practical Training (OPT) is a programme that allows international students on F-1 visas to work in the U.S. for up to 12 months after completing their academic studies. Students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields are eligible for a 24-month extension, totaling up to 36 months of work authorization. This programme serves as a bridge for students to gain practical experience and potentially transition to longer-term employment opportunities in the U.S
For most Indian students, OPT is a vital bridge between education and employment, helping them gain experience and improving their chances of transitioning to a work visa like the H-1B.
What is happening now?
Joseph Edlow, President Trump's nominee for Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), has indicated he wants to restrict or roll back the OPT program.
At a recent US Senate hearing, Edlow criticized the OPT system, saying it has "exceeded its original intent" and that work permits should only be available while the student is still studying — not after graduation.
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) asked Edlow to describe changes he would make to Optional Practical Training if he were confirmed as USCIS director.
'I think the way in which OPT has been handled over the past four years, with the help of certain decisions coming out of the D.C. Circuit Court, have been a real problem in terms of misapplication of the law,' Edlow said in response. 'What I want to see would be essentially a regulatory and sub-regulatory program that would allow us to remove the ability for employment authorizations for F-1 students beyond the time that they are in school.'
This raised immediate red flags among immigration lawyers, education experts, and especially Indian students, who make up one of the largest international student populations in the U.S.
What the mumbers say
According to the Institute of International Education (IIE):
In the 2023/24 academic year,
163,452 international students participated in post-completion OPT
79,330 students were enrolled in STEM OPT
That's a total of 242,782 students
If Edlow's approach is implemented — limiting work authorization only while enrolled — these figures would plummet. The STEM OPT, which only begins after a student completes their degree, would be eliminated entirely.
This would drastically reduce the pipeline of foreign students entering the U.S. workforce via the H-1B route.
How many Indians could be affected?
Over 270,000 Indian students are currently studying in the U.S.
Roughly 69,000 are on OPT, according to 2023 US immigration data
Many of these students heavily rely on OPT to work, repay student loans, and secure long-term opportunities like H-1B sponsorship.
What would change?
If Edlow's views are implemented as policy:
Students might lose the right to work after graduation
OPT could be limited only to jobs during the degree — not after
Without OPT, students may have to leave the U.S. immediately unless they quickly secure an H-1B visa (which is hard due to strict quotas)
But isn't OPT legal?
Yes. In fact:
The U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the OPT and STEM extension programs in 2022
The Supreme Court also refused to overturn that decision
But Edlow's views reflect a broader policy direction that could still reshape or dismantle OPT through administrative rule changes
Why are experts worried?
Experts say cutting OPT would:
Hurt US universities, which attract top talent from India, China, and other countries
Push international students to consider other countries like Canada, Australia, or the UK
Damage the U.S. tech and innovation sectors, which rely on skilled foreign graduates
Miriam Feldblum, head of the Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration,told Forbes that experiential learning is a 'core component of U.S. education' and warned that restricting OPT would 'undermine the country's ability to compete globally.'
'Any rollback of OPT will severely harm international students and our ability to attract talented students from around the world, our nation's global competitiveness, economic growth, national research capacity and future innovation," Miriam was quoted by Forbes as saying.
What should Indian students do?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
34 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump signs order to double steel, aluminium import tariffs to 50%
New Delhi: A 50% tariff on steel and aluminium imports into the United States went into effect on Wednesday, doubling the previous rate as President Donald Trump cited national security concerns for the dramatic escalation in trade protections. The new tariff rates, increased from an earlier 25% rate, were announced by Trump in a statement on Tuesday. The president claimed legal authority to impose the tariffs through Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows the president to address national security risks arising from imports. 'In my judgement, the increased tariffs will more effectively counter foreign countries that continue to offload low-priced, excess steel and aluminium in the United States market and thereby undercut the competitiveness of the United States steel and aluminium industries,' read Trump's statement released by the White House. Trump said the earlier 25% tariff rates, first announced in February and implemented on March 12, had helped America's steel industry but had not enabled companies to maintain the capacity needed to meet national defence needs. 'I have determined that increasing the previously imposed tariffs will provide greater support to these industries and reduce or eliminate the national security threat posed by imports of steel and aluminium articles and their derivative articles,' Trump said. The tariff increase comes amid broader trade disputes at the World Trade Organisation. Several countries, including India, have formally challenged the US measures, characterising them as 'safeguard measures' that violate WTO rules and threaten retaliatory action. In May, India formally notified the WTO that it viewed America's tariffs on steel and aluminium as safeguard measures and indicated it could suspend 'concessions and other obligations' given to the US and that it retains the right to enforce retaliatory measures. On May 22, America rejected India's characterisation of the tariffs as safeguard measures and refused to engage in talks on the matter. The introduction of tariffs has proven controversial within the US. The America Iron and Steel Institute, an industry group, has welcomed the increased tariffs as a necessary measure to protect domestic producers from cheaper foreign competition. However, manufacturers using steel as input for production have publicly raised concerns that more expensive steel will impact competitiveness across other domestic industries. For India specifically, the consequences are direct and substantial. According to the Global Trade Research Institute (GTRI), a New Delhi-based research group, India exported $4.56 billion worth of iron, steel, and aluminium products to the US in FY2025, with key categories including $587.5 million in iron and steel, $3.1 billion in articles of iron or steel, and $860 million in aluminium and related articles. 'These exports are now exposed to sharply higher US tariffs, threatening the profitability of Indian producers and exporters,' the GTRI said in a brief.
India.com
35 minutes ago
- India.com
India Eyes Deadliest Missile Yet: Meet R-37M That Can Obliterate Pakistan's AWACS, F-16s Before They Even Fire
New Delhi: In the escalating arms race post-Operation Sindoor, India may be acquiring a game-changing weapon that could rewrite South Asia's air warfare equation. It is Russian R-37M missile, a long-range air-to-air beast so fast and deadly that even the United States and China are known to shudder at its capabilities. Russia is said to have offered India to supply the R-37M and license its production on Indian soil. If the deal goes through, the Indian Air Force (IAF) will gain a powerful edge over adversaries such as China and Pakistan in high-stakes aerial confrontations. The R-37M is considered to be a nightmare for Pakistan's F-16s and AWACS. It is not only a missile but also a jet killer. Built to destroy enemy aircraft from beyond visual range (BVR), it can take down Pakistan's prized F-16s and AWACS surveillance aircraft before they even detect an Indian fighter jet. With speeds of up to Mach 6, six times the speed of sound, the R-37M can strike targets more than 300 kilometers away. Its mid-flight target switch capability and active radar guidance system make it almost impossible to dodge, even for highly maneuverable jets. 'It's not a missile but an airborne predator. It allows India to destroy enemy aircraft without ever entering their strike zone. That flips the entire doctrine of air combat,' said a senior defense analyst. At present, the IAF deploys R-77 missiles on its Su-30MKI jets. But the R-37M could replace the R-77 entirely, offering a dramatic leap in range, speed and precision. Designed originally to target U.S. AWACS and refueling aircraft, the R-37M's induction into India's arsenal would render Pakistan's air surveillance systems deeply vulnerable. Russia is reportedly willing to share production technology, allowing India to manufacture the missile domestically – a huge win for India's 'Make in India' defense ambitions. Built for the kill, let's know the R-37M by the numbers: speed – Up to Mach 6 (7,400 km/h); range – estimated 300-400 km; weight – 510 kg, length – over four metres; warhead – 60 kg high-explosive; designation – NATO calls it the AA-13 Axehead; and targets – fighter jets, AWACS, drones and tanker aircraft. Unlike older systems, the R-37M does not need visual confirmation. It can lock onto targets far outside the enemy's radar or weapon range, hitting them from the safety of stand-off distances. For Indian pilots, this means striking first from far and never being seen. R-37M Can Strike Across LoC The Pakistan Air Force (PAF) is heavily reliant on U.S.-made F-16s, which are considered its crown jewel. But defense experts warn that with the R-37M in play, India could shoot them down from across the Line of Control (LoC) before they even know what hit them. 'The R-37M neutralises Pakistan's aerial advantage. If deployed, this missile makes any cross-border intrusion suicidal for enemy jets,' said a retired Air Marshal. As India's defense modernisation accelerates in the wake geopolitical tensions simmer, the R-37M could soon be a centerpiece of the country's air dominance strategy – one that might keep adversaries awake at night.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pak a global threat, terrorism must be exposed: Owaisi
Hyderabad: AIMIM president and Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi , who was part of a multi-party delegation sent by the Centre to Gulf countries, said Pakistan has become a global threat by financing and sponsoring terrorism. "Pakistan is the epicentre of Takfirism and terrorism. They have no right to speak on Muslims or Islam," he told reporters, adding that officials in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Algeria shared concerns over terrorism. "Some favoured India-Pakistan dialogue, others stressed the need to eliminate terror. We've done our job—it's now up to the Indian government," he said. Owaisi highlighted that the four nations visited are influential members of groups like the OIC, GCC, and Middle East and North Africa Financial Action Task Force (MENAFATF). He recalled their past support in 2018 when Pakistan was placed on the FATF grey list. "We hope for similar cooperation again," he added. The delegation, led by BJP MP Baijayant Panda, urged the Gulf countries to support actions against Pakistan's terror financing networks, many of which are linked to ISI and illegal financial flows. Owaisi stressed unity among Indian political parties on national issues. "There is no politics when it comes to national security. But our political opposition to BJP and RSS ideology will continue. That's the essence of democracy," he said. He demanded a special Parliament session to discuss the Pahalgam terror attack , which killed 26 people. "Was it a security lapse? Who is accountable? The PM must address the nation. If needed, an in-camera Parliament session can be held, as done in the 1960s," he said. On the Pakistan delegation led by Bilawal Bhutto, Owaisi remarked, "Bilawal should tell the world who killed his mother. The UN inquiry report said Pakistan did a shoddy job in investigating her death."
