
Quebec study finds 'cocktail of different pesticides' in treated tap water
Social Sharing
A recent Quebec study shows that a multitude of pesticides can be found in tap water, even after being treated at a water treatment plant.
Sébastien Sauvé, an environmental chemistry professor at Université de Montréal, supervised the study that was published in the June issue of the scientific journal Water Research.
For more than two years, from 2021 to 2023, researchers collected water samples twice a week from the Châteauguay River in Quebec's Montérégie region.
The samples were collected from the river as water was being pumped into a water treatment plant and were compared to treated water samples leaving the plant for distribution as drinking water.
The river was chosen because it runs through areas of intensive agriculture activity, where pesticides used by farmers eventually make their way from the fields into waterways.
The objective, Sauvé said, was to look at how pesticide concentrations in the water varied over time, as well as before and after processing at a water treatment plant.
Highest concentrations of pesticides occurred in June and July at the beginning of growing season, and while none of the samples collected exceeded Quebec guidelines for safe drinking water, researchers discovered that the treatment process did not effectively filter out pesticides.
WATCH | What's in the water?
What's in this Montreal suburb's tap water? Study points to a cocktail of pesticides
4 minutes ago
Duration 2:28
Scientists are warning that they have found traces of pesticides in the drinking water of municipalities along the Châteauguay river. While the levels found complied with Quebec regulations, the study's authors recommend authorities make changes.
Traces of at least 50 different kinds of pesticides and metabolites were found in tap water, in some cases in higher concentrations than the source water. Metabolites are molecules that result from the degradation or breakdown of pesticides.
"There is quite a bit," Sauvé said, adding some pesticides were found in almost all the samples, while others weren't detected as often.
"One of the main ones, or the highest concentration, was for glyphosate," Sauvé said, which is the main active ingredient used in many herbicide formulations.
It is used to kill weeds and is commonly sold under the brand name Roundup.
In Quebec, many municipalities, including Montreal, have banned its sale and use for domestic purposes over concerns for the environment and possible impact on human health.
In 2015, the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) concluded that glyphosate was probably carcinogenic to humans.
Health Canada, however, says it does not cause any harmful effects if used properly.
Cocktail effect a concern
More than the impact of any specific pesticide, however, Sauvé said he's worried about their combined effect.
"We're getting a cocktail of different pesticides and all together, they add up," he said.
How the compounds react together can affect toxicity, he said, explaining they can add up, partially neutralize each other or even multiply.
"In a situation like this, with about 50 different pesticides and metabolites that we've measured, we cannot know what the actual combination effect of the toxicity of all these compounds are, so there's a lot of unknown," Sauvé said.
Maryse Bouchard, a professor of environmental health at the Institut national de la recherche scientifique, told Radio-Canada that the study highlights the need to better assess the risks of the "cocktail effect."
"It's disturbing to see the quantity of different pesticide molecules, many with proven toxicity," she said.
Possible solutions
While Sauvé said there was no reason for consumers of tap water to panic, the findings do raise some concerns.
"It's definitely not a case for panic. It's a case for asking questions, asking the local authorities, 'can we improve our system?'" he said.
What he'd like to see are stricter guidelines similar to those used in Europe. Specifically, he'd like to see an upper limit on the total concentration of combined pesticides allowed in tap water.
"And then, the cities that are exposed to those levels would simply have to improve their water treatment," Sauvé said, adding it should be on a case-by-case basis.
Sarah Dorner is a professor in the department of civil, geological and mining engineering at Polytechnique Montréal and industrial co-chair on drinking water at Polytechnique.
She said having stricter standards for drinking water could help, but said it's important to note that 20 per cent of exposure to pesticides is assumed to come from drinking water, and 80 per cent through other sources such as food.
In her view, upgrading water treatment plants can be expensive and would only solve part of the problem.
"It'll solve the problem for drinking water," she said, but not other problems linked to biodiversity and ecosystem health.
A better approach, she said, might be to reduce the application of pesticides at the source and work with agricultural communities who use them to get a better understanding of how they are used and what can be done.
WATCH | Glyphosate banned for domestic use in Montreal:
In a written statement to CBC, Mélina Jalbert, a spokesperson for Quebec's Environment Ministry, said it collaborates with several government partners, including Health Canada and the Institut national de santé publique du Québec, to ensure the quality of drinking water in Quebec.
Furthermore, Jalbert said the ministry checks pesticide levels in the water around agricultural lands every year.
"It should be noted that the latest pesticide assessment shows a decrease in the agricultural sector and that we are continuing our efforts to reduce their use," she wrote.
Sauvé acknowledged the government does annual checks, but said they might not be taking measurements when levels of pesticides peak.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
7 hours ago
- CBC
Inside an all-Canadian voyage to Antarctica
This weekend, CBC News will present a special all about Antarctica. Watch Amy Smith's interview with CBC's international climate correspondent, Susan Ormiston, who led a news team on a month-long assignment to the region.


National Post
9 hours ago
- National Post
Why is the air quality so bad? What to know about the health dangers of wildfire smoke
In addition to hearts and lungs, wildfire smoke may mess with the human brain, emerging research suggests. Article content Fine particulate matter carried in wildfire smoke can enter the brain via the bloodstream, causing inflammation and oxidative stress, a condition resulting from too many cell-damaging molecules called free radicals and not enough antioxidants to mop them up, one theory holds. Article content Article content Article content Recently, scientists have linked exposure to wildfire smoke to increased risks for impaired cognitive function, memory loss, greater odds of being diagnosed with dementia and an increase in emergency department visits for anxiety, depression, psychotic episodes and other mental-health problems. Article content Article content Plumes of smoke from Prairie wildfires that have forced the evacuation of thousands of people from their homes led to air quality advisories issued for large swaths of the country Friday, with Environment Canada messages covering British Columbia, the Prairies and most of Ontario and Quebec, the Montreal Gazette reported. Article content More toxic than other sources of pollution, wildfire smoke can cause a range of health effects, from mild coughs, itchy eyes and headaches to dizziness, wheezing, chest pains, asthma attacks, shortness of breath and heart palpitations. Article content And when heat and poor air quality combine, the health impacts are reached that much sooner, said Dr. Anna Gunz, a pediatric intensive care doctor at Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre and associate professor at Western University's Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry. Article content Article content While those at the doorstep of fires are most vulnerable, the fine particulates in wildfire smoke can travel 1,000 kilometres or more. Article content Article content The National Post spoke to Gunz to help unpack how wildfire smoke can impact physical and mental health. This conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity and length. Article content We have over 40 years of air pollution health data and so some of this is grounded in the same principles. Article content We love the smell of campfires. But even the smoke that we breathe by a campfire contains lots of particulates that are actually really bad for us. It's not stuff that we're supposed to be breathing. Article content When we think about wildfires, it's not just wood that's been cut from trees that you maybe know. It's everything else that's burning — pesticides, herbicides, metals. Even allergens and fungus. Article content Because it moves so far, you don't need to be right next to a wildfire to be affected. It's high concentrations for shorter periods of time, but it is ubiquitous. Part of the problem with being away from the wildfire is that people don't necessarily realize the air might be bad. It can be really deceiving.


CBC
10 hours ago
- CBC
Coal mines on Alberta's eastern slopes could push fishery 'beyond recovery': study
Old coal mines on the eastern slopes of the Alberta Rockies are leaching chemicals that are poisoning the fish downstream, says a new study by Alberta government scientists. It also suggests any new coal developments could result in "population collapse" of fish species in a nearby lake. The findings were made in a provincial government study posted online May 27. The paper is awaiting peer review. The scientists who authored it were not made available to speak to reporters. The other authors not employed by the province did not respond to requests for comment. Alberta has responded to the study with an advisory saying people should consider "limiting consumption" of three fish species drawn from Crowsnest Lake, a fishing spot downstream from the coal mines. Those species were found to have dangerously high levels of selenium, a mineral found in coal-rich deposits, in their body tissue. The authors write the study shows that "biological impacts of (mountaintop removal) coal mining can persist long after mining operations end." They suggest that "any further coal mine development may well push the Crowsnest fishery beyond sustainability." The study comes after the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) granted an Australia-based coal company permission to start a controversial coal exploration on the eastern slopes. The project was initially rejected in 2021 when a panel ruled the likely environmental effects on fish and water quality outweighed potential economic benefits. But the regulator said last month it's possible there will be runoff from the nearby pit lake that Northback Holding Corp. is using. It ultimately concluded the project won't have any effect on the water quality downstream. The AER said that "out of an abundance of caution," Northback will have to comply with a directive for managing drilling waste in response to concerns over selenium. Every fish sample exceeds selenium guideline: study The new study measured selenium levels in fish from Crowsnest Lake, which is fed by creeks connected to Tent Mountain and Grassy Mountain — both former coal mine sites. Alberta has a fish tissue selenium guideline of four micrograms per gram. The authors write that every single fish sample analyzed exceeded this value. Average selenium concentrations were highest in brown trout, coming in at 18 micrograms per gram. The authors write that the selenium levels could lead to "behavioural changes, physical symptoms ... respiratory issues, reproductive issues and ultimately population collapse." Accumulating fluid in body tissue or fin and tail damage are among the other side effects. Most people are exposed to healthy levels of selenium through grains and flours, but Health Canada says elevated consumption can lead to hair loss, decreased cognitive function and gastrointestinal disorders. The high selenium concentrations can only be explained by "the incorporation of legacy coal mine pollution," the authors write. The study goes on to say selenium levels in fish in Crowsnest Lake are similar to those found in water bodies near Fernie, B.C., that resulted in Teck Mining Company, which owned and operated a nearby mine, being forced in 2021 by B.C. provincial court to pay a $60 million fine — the largest fine ever imposed under the Fisheries Act. Fish populations in those mining-impacted streams were found in 2011 to have an average selenium concentration of 7.6 micrograms per gram. Nine years later, the adult westslope cutthroat trout population had suffered a 93 per cent decline, the study says. An 'especially vulnerable system' The authors conclude that factors including the emergence of Whirling Disease, drought conditions, high fishing activity — and now high selenium levels in fish — make the Crowsnest Lake and River "an especially vulnerable system." "Any new development of coal mining along the eastern slopes may well push the Crowsnest fishery beyond recovery," they write. Colin Cooke, one of the authors, published a 2024 study that found a former coal mine in the Crowsnest River watershed was releasing selenium to fish at rates more than dozens of times higher than federal and provincial guidelines. Cooke is a senior aquatic scientist with the Alberta government, according to his LinkedIn profile. Peter Doyle, CEO of Evolve Power Ltd., formerly Montem Resources Ltd., which previously sought to restart an old mine on Tent Mountain, said in an email that the company is complying with terms set out by the AER. "As reflected in other work by the author, there are numerous contributors to water quality in the Crowsnest River valley, not related to Tent Mountain, including changes in upstream conditions, changes in weathering rates and other anthropogenic changes in the watershed," Doyle wrote, referring to Cooke's 2024 study. That report notes those factors, among others, could be contributing to contaminant levels and concluded that coal mining activities in the Crowsnest River watershed "have been impacting ecosystems downstream for decades." Northback, in an email, wrote that Crowsnest Lake is unrelated to its Grassy Mountain project. "However, with our own project, Northback is committed to adhering to the highest environmental standards and ensuring a safe water supply." Report authors 'not trained spokespeople' Ryan Fournier, press secretary for Alberta's environment ministry, deferred questions about monitoring and enforcement to the AER. He said the province is funding a series of studies and submitting them to peer-reviewed academic journals as the province revises its coal policy. He also said the authors were not available to speak to media because they "are not trained spokespeople." The AER told The Canadian Press that it has directed Evolve Power, the Tent Mountain owner, to submit a "selenium management plan proposal" that targets reductions in selenium in mine-affected water. Evolve was to submit that plan by July 31 of last year, but the AER said it granted the company an extension to March 31, 2026. The energy regulator also said that while selenium levels are elevated, "there is no evidence of non-compliance on monitoring or selenium management requirements at this time." The province announced in December it would allow coal mining to take place in Alberta under certain conditions. However, it exempted Northback and Evolve Power's projects from those rules because they were considered "advanced."