Jesse Watters: Democrats should ‘beg' Elon Musk to stay in government
All times eastern Special Report with Bret Baier The Evening Edit with Elizabeth Macdonald Maria Bartiromo's Wall Street FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: President Trump celebrates keeping U.S. Steel in Pittsburgh with big rally
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
12 minutes ago
- News24
Why WBHO - SA's lone construction survivor - is a ‘buy'
Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once. Start your FREE trial now
Newsweek
32 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Iran Reviews US Nuclear Deal Offer Amid Rising Tensions
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iran says it is reviewing a formal U.S. proposal for a new nuclear deal between the two countries. The offer, delivered last week, represents the most significant step toward a potential agreement between Washington and Tehran since talks began in April, although both sides remain divided on critical issues such as uranium enrichment and sanctions relief. At the same time, The Wall Street Journal reported that the White House has ordered a freeze on new sanctions against Iran, effectively pausing President Donald Trump's "maximum pressure" campaign as officials reassess their approach amid ongoing diplomatic efforts. Newsweek has reached out the State Department and Iran's foreign ministry for comment. Why It Matters A potential nuclear deal between the U.S. and Iran could reshape the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East and impact global non-proliferation efforts. Tehran's advancing uranium enrichment program raises alarms about nuclear weapon development, making the proposed agreement a pivotal development. The simultaneous freeze on sanctions underscores Washington's strategic shift toward diplomacy, balancing pressure with engagement. A woman in a hijab walks by an anti-U.S. mural in Tehran on May 3, 2025. A woman in a hijab walks by an anti-U.S. mural in Tehran on May 3, 2025. Kyodo/AP Images What To Know The U.S. proposal, crafted by President Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, sets out terms aimed at limiting Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran is carefully reviewing the offer—the first official U.S. deal since indirect talks began earlier this year. Central issues include Iran's right to uranium enrichment and the extent of sanctions easing. Araghchi confirmed on social media that Iran received the proposal via Oman's foreign minister, pledging a response "in line with the principles, national interests, and rights of the Iranian people." My dear brother @badralbusaidi, distinguished Foreign Minister of Oman, paid a short visit to Tehran today to present elements of a US proposal which will be appropriately responded to in line with the principles, national interests and rights of the people of Iran. — Seyed Abbas Araghchi (@araghchi) May 31, 2025 Iran's uranium enrichment activities have intensified, with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reporting that Tehran now possesses over 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent purity—close to weapons-grade levels. The IAEA also noted Iran's refusal to grant inspectors full access, raising questions about the true extent of its nuclear program. Iran denies any intention to develop nuclear weapons and insists its nuclear activities are peaceful. Sanctions Freeze and U.S. Strategy Meanwhile, the White House's decision to halt new sanctions reflects growing concerns that a hardline approach might derail negotiations. According to The Wall Street Journal, the freeze was communicated by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt to officials at the National Security Council, Treasury Department, and State Department. This pause allows Washington to reassess its strategy as it balances "maximum pressure" with diplomatic engagement. Iran's Position Iran has consistently maintained that any agreement must respect its right to uranium enrichment and lift sanctions imposed on its economy. Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baqaei defended Tehran's cooperation with the IAEA and dismissed criticism of Iran's nuclear record as politically motivated. Iran also condemned the recent IAEA report, calling it biased and reiterating its commitment to non-proliferation treaties. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt speaks during the daily press briefing in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House on May 29, 2025 in Washington, DC. Leavitt discussed a federal court... White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt speaks during the daily press briefing in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House on May 29, 2025 in Washington, DC. Leavitt discussed a federal court blocking U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs using an emergency powers law, the "One, Big, Beautiful Bill" Act that was passed by the House of Representatives, and other topics. MoreWhat People Are Saying Abbas Araghchi, Iranian Foreign Minister: "My dear brother @badralbusaidi, distinguished Foreign Minister of Oman, paid a short visit to Tehran today to present elements of a U.S. proposal which will be appropriately responded to in line with the principles, national interests and rights of the people of Iran." Karoline Leavitt, White House Press Secretary: "President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb. It is in Tehran's best interest to accept a detailed and acceptable proposal that has been sent by the U.S." What Happens Next As Iran reviews the U.S. proposal, talks continue with both sides seeking common ground amid deep divisions. The freeze on sanctions could pave the way for further diplomatic engagement, but persistent concerns over uranium enrichment and verification remain key obstacles. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining whether a renewed nuclear agreement can be reached or if tensions will escalate further.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's safety research cuts heighten workplace risks, federal workers warn
Drastic cuts at a federal workplace safety research agency increase the risk of illness and injury for workers across the US and undermine preparations for public health emergencies, fired employees warn. The Trump administration ordered widespread layoffs at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, inside the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, when it issued a 'reduction in force' notice to some 85% of the agency's 1,100 workers employees on 1 April. While some of those terminations were later reversed following pushback from labor unions and the public, only 328 employees were reinstated. Related: 'So many are devastated': Trump's federal firings and their ripple effect 'An immediate impact is that we're not as prepared for some type of public health emergency,' said Dr Micah Niemeier-Walsh, an industrial hygienist at Niosh in Ohio, who was fired, and then reinstated. 'Long term, the Trump administration talks about wanting to bring back or expand certain sectors of the economy like mining or manufacturing. Those are jobs that really rely on Niosh work.' Jennica Bellanca, for example, worked to train emergency responders in mining in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Her role was terminated. 'It's such a hard thing. Everyone here works so hard to help support the health and safety of mine workers and other workers,' she said, noting that small companies do not have the resources to invest in alternative safety programs. 'I'm just concerned that nobody else is going to fill this gap. There's a reason that the government provides this safety net. 'In our case, the safety net is to help workers go home to their families every day and make sure that nothing bad happens.' Bellanca questioned a central argument for the cuts – efficiency in federal government spending – by noting that long-term research projects may now go unreleased. When we're gone, there's going to be nobody to get this information out Jennica Bellanca, former trainer for emergency responders 'When we're gone, there's going to be nobody to get this information out,' she said. 'And because we were so abruptly, sort of cut off in the middle of projects, all of this work that we've done, we're not able to get this out, released, as a full public product. In my mind, that's a waste of government money.' Niemeier-Walsh, the vice-president of American Federal of Government Employees Local 3840, said the reduction in force was the 'final, massive blow to our work' after earlier limitations on travel, communications and remote work imposed since Donald Trump took office in January. 'Our ability to be as successful as we have been as an institute relies on the rest of the Niosh employees coming back because our work is so interconnected,' said Niemeier-Walsh. 'I'm very, very concerned what this means for every single American worker if we're not able to fully restore Niosh. These cuts are not based in science. They're not based on the public health need. They're based on politics, and that's bad for the health of the American people.' Related: Mass resignations at labor department threaten workers in US and overseas, warn staff – as more cuts loom She cited as an example the employees in the health hazard evaluation program, which was established to reduce workplace risks and recommend ways to mitigate dangers, who were reinstated after earlier cuts. But they rely on chemists to develop analytical methods to measure chemicals in the workplace, and engineers to design solutions; these chemists and engineers have not been reinstated, she said. Since the agency was founded in 1970, recordable workplace illnesses and injuries and fatalities have been drastically reduced in the US. The rate of non-fatal workplace injuries and illnesses declined from 10.9 cases per 100 full-time workers in 1972 to 2.4 in 2023. The AFL-CIO, the largest federation of labor unions in the US, and several other labor unions filed a lawsuit this month to restore the cut programs at Niosh, arguing the cuts 'directly threaten the lives of workers whose safety and health depend on Niosh' services that are congressionally mandated. Even though some of the initial cuts have been reversed,'we have deep concerns that the whole reason Niosh was started to begin with is still eliminated,' said Rebecca Reindel, the director of occupational safety and health at the AFL-CIO, who noted that the agency's founding mandate was to assure every man and woman in the US has safe and healthful working conditions. Reindel expressed particular concern about disruption to long-term research projects. Related: US workers feel effects of Trump cuts: 'I am seeing my work dry up' 'All of this research work that they do, where they have these big cohorts, they've been following people for 40 years,' she said. 'And now they're just cut off for these occupational prospective cohorts, where they follow them over years to see what kind of diseases are developing. 'If we're just staffing those cohorts now, we're really losing 40 years worth of work. Even if they restart them, we're going to have lost so many people to follow up.' A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services did not comment on the record. Its secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr, was working to ensure Niosh critical services remain intact and continue as the agency streamlines its operations, they claimed.
